Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

邮发代号 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering  2020, Vol. 14 Issue (2): 26   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1205-5
  本期目录
Dibutyl phthalate adsorption characteristics using three common substrates in aqueous solutions
Tiancui Li1,2, Yaocheng Fan1,2, Deshou Cun1,2, Yanran Dai1, Wei Liang1()
1. State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
 全文: PDF(888 KB)   HTML
Abstract

• DBP adsorption was tested using three kinds of substrates in constructed wetlands.

• The DBP adsorption capacity followed the order: steel slag>gravel>shell sand.

• High temperatures increased the DBP adsorption capacity in the substrates.

• DOM consistently inhibited the DBP adsorption onto steel slag and gravel.

In recent years, the presence and adverse impacts of phthalic acid esters in aquatic environments have gained increasing attention. This work investigated the adsorption behavior of a typical phthalic acid ester, dibutyl phthalate (DBP), onto steel slag, gravel, and shell sand (substrates commonly used in constructed wetlands). The influence of dissolved organic matter (DOM) on DBP adsorption was investigated using humic acid as a proxy for DOM. The results demonstrated that the adsorption of DBP to three substrates reached equilibrium within 96 h, and the adsorption kinetics were well fitted by a pseudo-second-order model. The DBP adsorption isotherms were best fitted by the Langmuir adsorption model. The DBP adsorption capacity decreased in the order of steel slag>gravel>shell sand, with values of 656 mg/kg, 598 mg/kg, and 6.62 mg/kg at 25°C, respectively. DBP adsorbed to the surface of all substrates in a monolayer via an endothermic process. The DBP adsorption capacities of steel slag and gravel decreased as the DOM content increased. The DBP adsorption mechanisms to steel slag and gravel mainly involved the surface coordination of DBP with –OH or –COOH groups and electrostatic interactions. The results of this work suggest that steel slag and gravel may be ideal substrates for use in constructed wetlands to treat wastewater polluted with DBP.

Key wordsAdsorption    Dibutyl phthalate (DBP)    Dissolved organic matter    Substrates
收稿日期: 2019-08-15      出版日期: 2019-12-27
Corresponding Author(s): Wei Liang   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2020, 14(2): 26.
Tiancui Li, Yaocheng Fan, Deshou Cun, Yanran Dai, Wei Liang. Dibutyl phthalate adsorption characteristics using three common substrates in aqueous solutions. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 26.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/10.1007/s11783-019-1205-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/Y2020/V14/I2/26
Fig.1  
Substrates Steel slag Gravel Shell sand
BET surface area (m2/g) 3.697 1.099 1.531
Total pore volume (cm3/g) 0.009855 0.004290 0.007041
Adsorption average pore diameter (nm) 106.6 156.1 183.9
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Adsorbents Pseudo-first-order kinetic model Pseudo-second-order kinetic model Elovich kinetic model
qe
(mg/kg)
k1
(h-1)
R2 qe
(mg/kg)
k2
(g/mg/h)
R2 a b R2
Steel slag 104 0.0309 0.997 136 2.08 × 10-4 0.991 10.2 0.0371 0.972
Gravel 91.5 0.0599 0.923 106 6.89 × 10-4 0.964 22.3 0.0499 0.970
Shell sand 3.59 0.0439 0.880 4.18 0.0135 0.931 0.748 1.29 0.953
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Temperature (°C) Adsorbents Langmuir isotherm Freundlich isotherm
qm
(mg/kg)
KL
(mg/L)
R2 KF
(mg/kg)
n R2
10 Steel slag 131 8.42 0.890 108 -0.160 0.743
Gravel 132 5.08 0.833 99.6 -0.212 0.658
Shell sand 4.89 5.64 0.827 3.83 -0.221 0.913
25 Steel slag 656 1.79 0.947 354 -0.229 0.939
Gravel 598 0.838 0.940 276 -0.246 0.855
Shell sand 6.61 10.9 0.928 5.60 -0.202 0.954
40 Steel slag 1871 2.75 0.891 1220 -0.193 0.821
Gravel 1416 3.87 0.945 1015 -0.151 0.870
Shell sand 8.14 8.82 0.962 6.39 -0.229 0.932
Tab.3  
Adsorbents PAEs Temperature (°C) pH qm (mg/g) Source
Coal-chitosan DEP 25 5.8 31.7 Shaida et al. (2018)
Mollisol DBP 25 7.0 0.757 Lin et al. (2018)
Rhizosphere soil DBP 25 2.04
Montmorillonite DBP 30 7.0 13.8 Lu et al. (2016)
Goethite 12.6
Kaolinite 5.09
Vermiculite DEHP 25 7.0 0.714 Wen et al. (2013)
Natural zeolites DMP 30 6.36 3.30 Xu et al. (2016)
DEHP 3.4
Mg–Al layered double hydroxide DMP 25 7.0 4.21 Wang et al. (2012)
DEHP 4.80
DOP 5.20
Steel slag DBP 25 7.2 0.656 This work
Gravel 0.598
Shell sand 0.006
Tab.4  
Fig.5  
1 M M Abdel daiem, J Rivera-Utrilla, R Ocampo-Pérez, J D Méndez-Díaz, M Sánchez-Polo (2012). Environmental impact of phthalic acid esters and their removal from water and sediments by different technologies: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 109: 164–178
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.014 pmid: 22796723
2 K Ádám, T Krogstad, L Vråle, A K Sovik, P D Jenssen (2007). Phosphorus retention in the filter materials shell sand and Filtralite P (R) - Batch and column experiment with synthetic P solution and secondary wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 29(2): 200–208
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.021
3 F Ayari, E Srasra, M Trabelsi-Ayadi (2008). Low-cost adsorbents for a dye uptake from contaminated water modeling of adsorption isotherms: The Langmuir, Freundlich and Elovich models. Surface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry, 44(6): 489–498
https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375508060112
4 X C Chen, Y P Wang, Q Lin, J Y Shi, W X Wu, Y X Chen (2005). Biosorption of copper(II) and zinc(II) from aqueous solution by Pseudomonas putida CZ1. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 46(2): 101–107
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.10.003 pmid: 16289732
5 S S Ding, W Huang, S G Yang, D J Mao, J L Yuan,, Y X Dai, J J Kong, L Sun, H He, S Y Li, L M Zhang (2018). Degradation of Azo dye direct black BN based on adsorption and microwave-induced catalytic reaction. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(1): 5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-1003-x
6 X Dong, L Q Ma, J Gress, W Harris, Y Li (2014). Enhanced Cr(VI) reduction and As(III) oxidation in ice phase: Important role of dissolved organic matter from biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 267: 62–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.027 pmid: 24418493
7 M Engel, B Chefetz (2016). Removal of triazine-based pollutants from water by carbon nanotubes: Impact of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and solution chemistry. Water Research, 106: 146–154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.051 pmid: 27710798
8 D W Gao, Z Li, H Wang, H Liang (2018). An overview of phthalate acid ester pollution in China over the last decade: Environmental occurrence and human exposure. Science of the Total Environment, 645: 1400–1409
9 Y Guo, L Wang, K Kannan (2014). Phthalates and parabens in personal care products from China: concentrations and human exposure. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 66(1): 113–119
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9937-x pmid: 23880707
10 M Ha, X Guan, L Wei, P Li, M Yang, C Liu (2016). Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate inhibits testosterone level through disturbed hypothalamic-pituitary-testis axis and ERK-mediated 5a-Reductase 2. Science of the Total Environment, 563–564: 566–575
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.145 pmid: 27155079
11 A Imai, T Fukushima, K Matsushige, Y H Kim, K Choi (2002). Characterization of dissolved organic matter in effluents from wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 36(4): 859–870
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00283-4
12 M Z Jeddi, N Rastkari, R Ahmadkhaniha, M Yunesian (2016). Endocrine disruptor phthalates in bottled water: Daily exposure and health risk assessment in pregnant and lactating women. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(9): 534
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5502-1 pmid: 27557841
13 M Julinová, R Slavík (2012). Removal of phthalates from aqueous solution by different adsorbents: A short review. Journal of Environmental Management, 94(1): 13–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.006 pmid: 22098784
14 D Kashyap, T Agarwal (2018). Concentration and factors affecting the distribution of phthalates in the air and dust: A global scenario. Science of the Total Environment, 635: 817–827
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.158 pmid: 29710605
15 I Katsikantami, S Sifakis, M N Tzatzarakis, E Vakonaki, O I Kalantzi, A M Tsatsakis, A K Rizos (2016). A global assessment of phthalates burden and related links to health effects. Environment International, 97: 212–236
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.013 pmid: 27669632
16 H Li, W Wu, X Hao, S Wang, M You, X Han, Q Zhao, B Xing (2018). Removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions by ionic surfactant-modified carbon nanotubes. Environmental Pollution, 243(Pt A): 206–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.059 pmid: 30172990
17 Q Li, X Xu, Y Y Fang, R Y Xiao, D H Wang, W J Zhong (2018). The temporal changes of the concentration level of typical toxic organics in the river sediments around Beijing. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(6): 8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1054-7
18 Y Lin, L Wang, R Li, S Hu, Y Wang, Y Xue, H Yu, Y Jiao, Y Wang, Y Zhang (2018). How do root exudates of bok choy promote dibutyl phthalate adsorption on mollisol? Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 161: 129–136
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.072 pmid: 29879573
19 T T Lu, C Xue, J H Shao, J D Gu, Q R Zeng, S Luo (2016). Adsorption of dibutyl phthalate on Burkholderia cepacia, minerals, and their mixtures: Behaviors and mechanisms. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 114: 1–7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.05.015
20 J H Melián, A M Rodríguez, J Araña, O G Díaz, J G Henríquez (2010). Hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in the Canary Islands. Ecological Engineering, 36(7): 891–899
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.009
21 X Z Meng, Y Wang, N Xiang, L Chen, Z Liu, B Wu, X Dai, Y H Zhang, Z Xie, R Ebinghaus (2014). Flow of sewage sludge-borne phthalate esters (PAEs) from human release to human intake: Implication for risk assessment of sludge applied to soil. Science of the Total Environment, 476–477: 242–249
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.007 pmid: 24468498
22 G Minling, M Xiaojun, S Wenhua, Q Yun, W Lin (2015). Adsorption mechanism of di-n-butyl phthalate easter on brown soil and red soil. International Journal of Environmental of Research, 9(2): 605–612
23 S Net, R Sempéré, A Delmont, A Paluselli, B Ouddane (2015). Occurrence, fate, behavior and ecotoxicological state of phthalates in different environmental matrices. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(7): 4019–4035
https://doi.org/10.1021/es505233b pmid: 25730609
24 S Y Pan, R Adhikari, Y H Chen, P Li, P C Chiang (2016). Integrated and innovative steel slag utilization for iron reclamation, green material production and CO2 fixation via accelerated carbonation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 617–631
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.112
25 R Planelló, O Herrero, J L Martínez-Guitarte, G Morcillo (2011). Comparative effects of butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on the aquatic larvae of Chironomus riparius based on gene expression assays related to the endocrine system, the stress response and ribosomes. Aquatic Toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 105(1–2): 62–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.05.011 pmid: 21684242
26 C Ramprasad, L Philip (2018). Contributions of various processes to the removal of surfactants and personal care products in constructed wetland. Chemical Engineering Journal, 334: 322–333
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.106
27 C J Salim, H Liu, J F Kennedy (2010). Comparative study of the adsorption on chitosan beads of phthalate esters and their degradation products. Carbohydrate Polymers, 81(3): 640–644
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.024
28 M A Shaida, R K Dutta, A K Sen (2018). Removal of diethyl phthalate via adsorption on mineral rich waste coal modified with chitosan. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 261: 271–282
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.031
29 Z Sun, L Mao, Q Xian, Y Yu, H Li, H Yu (2008). Effects of dissolved organic matter from sewage sludge on sorption of tetrabromobisphenol A by soils. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 20(9): 1075–1081
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62152-X pmid: 19143314
30 X Y Tang, S Y Wang, Y Yang, R Tao, Y V Dai, A Dan, L Li (2015). Removal of six phthalic acid esters (PAEs) from domestic sewage by constructed wetlands. Chemical Engineering Journal, 275: 198–205
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.029
31 S Venkata Mohan, S Shailaja, M Rama Krishna, P N Sarma (2007). Adsorptive removal of phthalate ester (Di-ethyl phthalate) from aqueous phase by activated carbon: A kinetic study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 146(1–2): 278–282
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.020 pmid: 17275183
32 C Vohla, M Koiv, H J Bavor, F Chazarenc, U Mander (2011). Filter materials for phosphorus removal from wastewater in treatment wetlands: A review. Ecological Engineering, 37(1): 70–89
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.08.003
33 L Wang, X Gao, J S Guo, W Zhang, Y Xu (2012). Adsorption of phthalate esters from aqueous solution by Mg-Al layered double hydroxide. Future Material Research and Industry Application, Pts 1 and 2, 455–456: 939
34 X H Wang, K Y Zhao, B X Yang, T Chen, D Y Li, H Wu, J F Wei, X Q Wu (2016). Adsorption of dibutyl phthalate in aqueous solution by mesoporous calcium silicate grafted non-woven polypropylene. Chemical Engineering Journal, 306: 452–459
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.076
35 Z D Wen, D W Gao, Z Li, N Q Ren (2013). Effects of humic acid on phthalate adsorption to vermiculite. Chemical Engineering Journal, 223: 298–303
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.012
36 M Wormuth, M Scheringer, M Vollenweider, K Hungerbühler (2006). What are the sources of exposure to eight frequently used phthalic acid esters in Europeans? Risk Analysis, 26(3): 803–824
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00770.x
37 C Wu, K Zhang, X Huang, J Liu (2016). Sorption of pharmaceuticals and personal care products to polyethylene debris. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(9): 8819–8826
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6121-7 pmid: 26810664
38 D Wu, Y Yun, L Jiang, C Wu (2018). Influence of dissolved organic matter on sorption and desorption of MCPA in ferralsol. Science of the Total Environment, 616: 1449–1456
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.169 pmid: 29070453
39 Y Wu, Y Si, D Zhou, J Gao (2015). Adsorption of diethyl phthalate ester to clay minerals. Chemosphere, 119: 690–696
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.063 pmid: 25150972
40 Y F Xu, L Wang, S M Li, W Zhang, Q Jing, J H Cao (2016). Adsorption of PAEs from aqueous solution by modified zeolites. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(39): 18300–18313
https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1091987
41 H Zhang, D L Fang, Z Y Kong, J F Wei, X Q Wu, S Y Shen, W Y Cui, Y W Zhu (2018). Enhanced adsorption of phthalic acid esters (PAEs) from aqueous solution by alkylbenzene-functionalized polypropylene nonwoven and its adsorption mechanism insight. Chemical Engineering Journal, 331: 406–415
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.144
42 J Zhang, L Liu, X Wang, Q Huang, M Tian, H Shen (2016). Low-level environmental phthalate exposure associates with urine metabolome alteration in a Chinese male cohort. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(11): 5953–5960
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00034 pmid: 27138838
43 L Zhang, J Liu, H Liu, G Wan, S Zhang (2015). The occurrence and ecological risk assessment of phthalate esters (PAEs) in urban aquatic environments of China. Ecotoxicology (London, England), 24(5): 967–984
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1446-4 pmid: 25847103
44 X Zheng, B T Zhang, Y Teng (2014). Distribution of phthalate acid esters in lakes of Beijing and its relationship with anthropogenic activities. Science of the Total Environment, 476:107–113
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.111 pmid: 24463031
[1] FSE-19111-OF-LTC_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed