Degradation of refractory organics in concentrated leachate by the Fenton process: Central composite design for process optimization

doi:10.1007/s11783-020-1294-1

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

2021, Vol. 15

Issue (1): 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1294-1

本期目录

Degradation of refractory organics in concentrated leachate by the Fenton process: Central composite design for process optimization

Senem Yazici Guvenc(

), Gamze Varank

Department of Environmental Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, Davutpaşa Campus, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey

全文: PDF(2190 KB) HTML

Abstract：

• 90% total COD, 95.3% inert COD and 97.2% UV₂₅₄ were removed.

• High R² values (over 95%) for all responses were obtained with CCD.

• Operational cost was calculated to be 0.238 €/g COD_removed for total COD removal.

• Fenton oxidation was highly-efficient method for inert COD removal.

• BOD₅/COD ratio of leachate concentrate raised from 0.04 to 0.4.

The primary aim of this study is inert COD removal from leachate nanofiltration concentrate because of its high concentration of resistant organic pollutants. Within this framework, this study focuses on the treatability of leachate nanofiltration concentrate through Fenton oxidation and optimization of process parameters to reach the maximum pollutant removal by using response surface methodology (RSM). Initial pH, Fe²⁺ concentration, H₂O₂/Fe²⁺ molar ratio and oxidation time are selected as the independent variables, whereas total COD, color, inert COD and UV₂₅₄ removal are selected as the responses. According to the ANOVA results, the R² values of all responses are found to be over 95%. Under the optimum conditions determined by the model (pH: 3.99, Fe²⁺: 150 mmol/L, H₂O₂/Fe²⁺: 3.27 and oxidation time: 84.8 min), the maximum COD removal efficiency is determined as 91.4% by the model. The color, inert COD and UV₂₅₄ removal efficiencies are determined to be 99.9%, 97.2% and 99.5%, respectively, by the model, whereas the total COD, color, inert COD and UV₂₅₄ removal efficiencies are found respectively to be 90%, 96.5%, 95.3% and 97.2%, experimentally under the optimum operating conditions. The Fenton process improves the biodegradability of the leachate NF concentrate, increasing the BOD₅/COD ratio from the value of 0.04 to the value of 0.4. The operational cost of the process is calculated to be 0.238 €/g COD_removed. The results indicate that the Fenton oxidation process is an efficient and economical technology in improvement of the biological degradability of leachate nanofiltration concentrate and in removal of resistant organic pollutants.

Key words： Concentrated leachate Fenton oxidation Central composite design Biodegradability Inert COD

收稿日期: 2020-02-02 出版日期: 2020-07-24

Corresponding Author(s): Senem Yazici Guvenc

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2021, 15(1): 2.
Senem Yazici Guvenc, Gamze Varank. Degradation of refractory organics in concentrated leachate by the Fenton process: Central composite design for process optimization. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 2.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/10.1007/s11783-020-1294-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/Y2021/V15/I1/2

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Wastewater type	Process type	Characterization of WW	Independent variables	Optimum conditions	Max. Removal Efficiency (%)	Operation Cost	Reference
Leachate Nanofiltration Concentrate	Only Fenton	UV₂₅₄: 3860 mg/L COD: 7000 mg/L Inert COD: 6120 mg/L Color: 11400 Pt/Co	pH: 2–4, Fe²⁺: 30–150 mmol/L, H₂O₂/Fe²⁺: 0.5–3.5 and oxidation time: 30?110 min	pH: 3.99, Fe²⁺: 150 mmol/L, H₂O₂/Fe²⁺: 3.27 oxidation time: 84.8 min	COD: 90	0.238 €/g COD_removed	This study
Leachate Nanofiltration concentrate	Only Fenton	COD: 4500 mg/L TOC: 1600 mg/L Chromaticity: 250	Initial pH: 2?5 H₂O₂ (mol/L): 0.10–1.00 Fe²⁺ concentration (mmol/L): 10–25	Initial pH: 2 H₂O₂: 1 mol/L Fe⁺²:17.5 mmol/L	COD: 69.6 TOC: 68.9 Chromaticity: 100	NA	^{Xu et al. (2017)}
Leachate Nanofiltration concentrate	Fenton and UV-Fenton	COD:2172 mg/L Color: 5600 PtCo	pH: 2–3 H₂O₂: 4%(v/v) FeSO₄·7H₂O: 2 g/L Time: 120 min	NA	COD: 89.68	NA	Wang et al. (2016b)
Leachate Nanofiltration concentrate (A), Leachate Nanofiltration concentrate (B)	Fenton-Photo Fenton	COD(A): 1330 mg/L COD(B): 3450 mg/L TOC(A): 715 mg/L TOC(B): 1426 mg/L Color (Dilution)(A): 400 Color (Diluation)(B): 500 Total PAHs (A): 18.57 µg/L Total PAHs (B): 5.40 µg/L	pH: 2–7 H₂O₂: 0–60 mmol/L Fe⁺²: 3–10 mmol/L Time: 2 h	pH:5 H₂O₂:10 mmol/L Fe⁺²: 4 mmol/L Time: 2 h	COD: 70 PAHs-2 ring (A):58 PAHs-2 ring (B): 45 PAHs-3 ring (A): 30 PAHs-3 ring (B): 44	NA	^{Li et al. (2016)}
Leachate Nanofiltration concentrate	Fenton-UV Fenton	COD: 724 mg/L BOD5: 43 mg/L NH₄-N: 11.3 mg/L Conductivity: 11.3 mS/cm Cl: 2925.7 mg/L Suspended solids: 128 mg/L	pH: 2–3 H₂O₂: (4%? v/v) FeSO₄·7H₂O: (2 g/L) Time: 0–120 min	NA	COD: 80.1	NA	^{Wang et al. (2016a)}
Leachate UF and NF concentrate	Fenton	COD: 3060 mg/L BOD₅: 288 mg/L	pH range of 2–6.5 H₂O₂/Fe²⁺: 1–15 Fe²⁺: 100–1000 mg/L Time: 20?200 min	Temperature: ~20°C Fe²⁺ :400 mg/L pH:3 Time:2 h H₂O₂/Fe²⁺: 9	COD:>60	NA	^{He et al. (2015)}
Leachate RO concentrate	Microwave (MW)-Fenton	COD: 2494 mg/L BOD₅/COD: 0.13	pH: 5.0 Fe²⁺: 0.04 mol/L H₂O₂/Fe²⁺ ratio:8 Time: 3 h	pH:5.0 Fe²⁺: 0.04 mol/L H₂O₂/Fe²⁺: 8 Time: 3 h MW power: 390 W-8 min	COD: 75 BOD₅/COD: 0.62	NA	^{Zhang et al. (2018)}
Leachate NF concentrate	Fenton UV-Fenton UV-H₂O₂	COD: 1280 mg/L BOD₅: 121 mg/L	pH: 2.0–7.5 FeSO₄.7H₂O:1.8–14.4 mmol/L, H₂O₂:100–400 mmol/L Time:0–180 min. Temperature:15°C–45°C	pH:3.0, FeSO₄.7H₂O: 7.2 mmol/L, H₂O₂ dosage: 400 mmol/L Temperature: 25°C	COD: 92.7 BOD₅/COD: 0.44	NA	^{Zhao et al. (2020)}
Concentrated Leachate	MW-Fe⁰ /H₂O₂	COD: 1501 mg/L BOD₅: 23.4 mg/L BOD/COD: 0.02	initial pH: 2–8 Fe⁰: 0.10 to 0.50 g/L H₂O₂: 1 to 25 mL/L MW: 200 to 700 W	Temperature: 85°C, initial pH of 2.0, Fe⁰: 0.5 g/L, H₂O₂: 20 mL/L MW: 400 W Time: 14 min	COD:58.70 UV₂₅₄:85.69 CN:88.30 BOD₅/COD:0.41	0.56 CNY/t	^{Chen et al. (2018)}
Memebrane Concentrate Landfill Leachate	Fenton	COD: 3300 mg/L TOC: 1080 mg/L BOD₅: 48.4 mg/L	H₂O₂: 1–18 mL Time: 0–120 min pH: 2?6 H₂O₂/Fe(II) molar ratio 1?5	H₂O₂ = 9.0 mL/200 mL H₂O₂/Fe(II) molar ratio: 3.0 pH= 3.0 time= 40 min	COD: 78.9±1.3 TOC: 70.2±1.4 UV₂₅₄: 90.64±1.6	NA	^{Teng et al. (2020)}

Tab.4

1	N Abedinzadeh, M Shariat, S M Monavari, A Pendashteh (2018). Evaluation of color and COD removal by Fenton from biologically (SBR) pre-treated pulp and paper wastewater. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 116: 82–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.01.015
2	M C S Amaral, W G Moravia, L C Lange, M R Zico, N C Magalhães, B C Ricci, B G Reis (2016). Pilot aerobic membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration for municipal landfill leachate treatment. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, 51: 640–649 https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1159874
3	S S A Amr, H A Aziz, M N Adlan, S Q Aziz (2013). Effect of Ozone and Ozone/Fenton in the advanced oxidation process on biodegradable characteristics of semi-aerobic stabilized leachate. Clean- Soil, Air. Water (Basel), 41(2): 148–152
4	APHA (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,21st ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association
5	S Bajpai, S K Gupta, A Dey, M K Jha, V Bajpai, S Joshi, A Gupta (2012). Application of central composite design approach for removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution using weakly anionic resin: modelling, optimization, and study of interactive variables. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 227–228: 436–444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.016
6	N Biglarijoo, S A Mirbagheri, M Ehteshami, S M Ghaznavi (2016). Optimization of Fenton process using response surface methodology and analytic hierarchy process for landfill leachate treatment. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 104: 150–160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.019
7	N Borràs, R Oliver, C Arias, E Brillas (2010). Degradation of atrazine by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes using a boron-doped diamond anode. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 114(24): 6613–6621 https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1035647
8	F Boumechhour, K Rabah, C Lamine, B M Said (2013). Treatment of landfill leachate using Fenton process and coagulation/flocculation. Water and Environment Journal : the Journal / the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management, 27(1): 114–119 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00332.x
9	P S Calabrò, S Sbaffoni, S Orsi, E Gentili, C Meoni (2010). The landfill reinjection of concentrated leachate: Findings from a monitoring study at an Italian site. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181(1-3): 962–968 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.107
10	W Chen, A Zhang, Z Gu, Q Li (2018). Enhanced degradation of refractory organics in concentrated landfill leachate by Fe0/H2O2 coupled with microwave irradiation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 354: 680–691 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.012
11	S Cortez, P Teixeira, R Oliveira, M Mota (2011). Evaluation of Fenton and ozone-based advanced oxidation processes as mature landfill leachate pre-treatments. Journal of Environmental Management, 92: 749–755 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.035
12	Y H Cui, W J Xue, S Q Yang, J L Tu, X L Guo, Z Q Liu (2018). Electrochemical/peroxydisulfate/Fe3+ treatment of landfill leachate nanofiltration concentrate after ultrafiltration. Chemical Engineering Journal, 353: 208–217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.101
13	A Fernandes, L Labiadh, L Ciríaco, M J Pacheco, A Gadri, S Ammar, A Lopes (2017). Electro-Fenton oxidation of reverse osmosis concentrate from sanitary landfill leachate: Evaluation of operational parameters. Chemosphere, 184: 1223–1229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.088
14	O García-Rodríguez, J A Bañuelos, A El-Ghenymy, L A Godínez, E Brillas, F J Rodríguez-Valadez (2016). Use of a carbon felt-iron oxide air-diffusion cathode for the mineralization of Malachite Green dye by heterogeneous electro-Fenton and UVA photo electro-Fenton processes. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 767: 40–48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.01.035
15	I Gulkaya, G A Surucu, F B Dilek (2006). Importance of H2O2/Fe2+ ratio in Fenton’s treatment of a carpet dyeing wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(3): 763–769 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.006
16	R He, B H Tian, Q Q Zhang, H T Zhang (2015). Effect of Fenton oxidation on biodegradability, biotoxicity and dissolved organic matter distribution of concentrated landfill leachate derived from a membrane process. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 38: 232–239 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.006
17	G Hodaifa, J M Ochando-Pulido, S Rodriguez-Vives, A Martinez-Ferez (2013). Optimization of continuous reactor at pilot scale for olive-oil mill wastewater treatment by Fenton-like process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 220: 117–124 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.065
18	C L Hsueh, Y H Huang, C C Wang, C Y Chen (2005). Degradation of azo dyes using low iron concentration of Fenton and Fenton-like system. Chemosphere, 58(10): 1409–1414 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.091
19	C J Hu, D L Huang, G M Zeng, M Cheng, X M Gong, R Z Wang, W J Xue, Z X Hu, Y N Liu (2018a). The combination of Fenton process and phanerochaete chrysosporium for the removal of bisphenol A in river sediments: mechanism related to extracellular enzyme, organic acid and iron. Chemical Engineering Journal, 338: 432–439 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.068
20	X Hu, X Wang, Y Ban, B Ren (2011). A comparative study of UV-Fenton, UV–H2O2 and Fenton reaction treatment of landfill leachate. Environmental Technology, 32(9): 945–951 https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2010.521953
21	Y Hu, Y Lu, G Liu, H Luo, R Zhang, X Cai (2018b). Effect of the structure of stacked electro-Fenton reactor on treating nanofiltration concentrate of landfill leachate. Chemosphere, 202: 191–197 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.103
22	S M Iskander, J T Novak, Z He (2019). Reduction of reagent requirements and sludge generation in Fenton’s oxidation of landfill leachate by synergistically incorporating forward osmosis and humic acid recovery. Water Research, 151: 310–317 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.089
23	X Jing, Y Cao, X Zhang, D Wang, X Wu, H Xu (2011). Biosorption of Cr(VI) from simulated wastewater using a cationic surfactant modified spent mushroom. Desalination, 269(1-3): 120–127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.050
24	K H Kang, H S Shin, H Park (2002). Characterization of humic substances present in landfill leachates with different landfill ages and its implications. Water Research, 36(16): 4023–4032 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00114-8
25	P Kjeldsen, M A Barlaz, A P Rooker, A Baun, A Ledin, T H Christensen (2002). Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 32(4): 297–336 https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380290813462
26	S Kliś, M Thomas, K Barbusiński, K Gołombek, Ł Krzemiński, M Chyc (2019). Removal of Azo Dye Acid Red 27 from aqueous solutions using classical and modified Fenton reagent with zero-valent iron. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 137: 100–106
27	J Li, L Zhao, L Qin, X Tian, A Wang, Y Zhou, L Meng, Y Chen (2016). Removal of refractory organics in nanofiltration concentrates of municipal solid waste leachate treatment plants by combined Fenton oxidative-coagulation with photo-Fenton processes. Chemosphere, 146: 442–449 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.069
28	X H Li, S Chen, I Angelidaki, Y F Zhang (2018). Bio-electro-Fenton processes for wastewater treatment: Advances and prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal, 354: 492–506 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.052
29	Y Long, J Xu, D Shen, Y Du, H Feng (2017). Effective removal of contaminants in landfill leachate membrane concentrates by coagulation. Chemosphere, 167: 512–519 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.016
30	A Mojiri, L Ziyang, W Hui, Z Ahmad, R M Tajuddin, Abu S S Amr, T Kindaichi, H A Aziz, H Farraji (2017). Concentrated landfill leachate treatment with a combined system including electro-ozonation and composite adsorbent augmented sequencing batch reactor process. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 111: 253–262 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.07.013
31	P H Nakhate, H G Patil, K V Marathe (2018). Intensification of landfill leachate treatment by advanced Fenton process using classical and statistical approach. Chemical Engineering & Processing: Process Intensification, 133: 148–159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.10.004
32	L M Nieto, G Hodaifa, S Rodríguez, J A Giménez, J Ochando (2011). Degradation of organic matter in olive-oil mill wastewater through homogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Chemical Engineering Journal, 173(2): 503–510 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.022
33	T Ölmez (2009). The optimization of Cr(VI) reduction and removal by electrocoagulation using response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 162(2–3): 1371–1378 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.017
34	P Oulego, S Collado, A Laca, M Díaz (2016). Impact of leachate composition on the advanced oxidation treatment. Water Research, 88: 389–402 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.048
35	N Panda, H Sahoo, S Mohapatra (2011). Decolourization of methyl orange using Fenton-like mesoporous Fe2O3-SiO2 composite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 185(1): 359–365 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.042
36	M Panizza, G Cerisola (2009). Electro-Fenton degradation of synthetic dyes. Water Research, 43(2): 339–344 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.028
37	Y Peng (2017). Perspectives on technology for landfill leachate treatment. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 10: S2567-S2574 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.09.031
38	S G Poulopoulos, M Nikolaki, D Karampetsos, C J Philippopoulos (2008). Photochemical treatment of 2-chlorophenol aqueous solutions using ultraviolet radiation, hydrogen peroxide and photo-Fenton reaction. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 153(1-2): 582–587 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.002
39	S Ramaswami, J Behrendt, R Otterpohl (2018). Comparison of NF-RO and RO-NF for the treatment of mature landfill leachates: A guide for landfill operators. Membranes, 8(2): 17 https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8020017
40	S Renou, J G Givaudan, S Poulain, F Dirassouyan, P Moulin (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150(3): 468–493 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.077
41	F J Rivas, F J Beltran, J Frades, P Buxeda (2001). Oxidation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid by Fenton’s reagent. Water Research, 35(2): 387–396 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00285-2
42	M R Sabour, A Amiri (2017). Comparative study of ANN and RSM for simultaneous optimization of multiple targets in Fenton treatment of landfill leachate. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 65: 54–62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.048
43	R Saini, P Kumar (2016). Optimization of chlorpyrifos degradation by Fenton oxidation using CCD and ANFIS computing technique. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(3): 2952–2963 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.06.003
44	M F Sevimli (2005). Post-treatment of pulp and paper industry wastewater by advanced oxidation processes. Ozone Science and Engineering, 27(1): 37–43 https://doi.org/10.1080/01919510590908968
45	S K Singh, W Z Tang, G Tachiev (2013). Fenton treatment of landfill leachate under different COD loading factors. Waste Management, 33: 2116–2122 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.06.019
46	Y Smaoui, S Mseddi, N Ayadi, S Sayadi, J Bouzid (2019). Evaluation of influence of coagulation/flocculation and Fenton oxidation with iron on landfill leachate treatment. Environment Protection Engineering, 45(1): 139–153 https://doi.org/10.37190/epe190111
47	T Sruthi, R Gandhimathi, S T Ramesh, P V Nidheesh (2018). Stabilized landfill leachate treatment using heterogeneous Fenton and electro-Fenton processes. Chemosphere, 210: 38–43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.172
48	R Subramaniam, D D Gang, J Nie, R Bajpai, R Dufreche, J Baudier, R Sharp, M E Zappi (2017). Application of response surface methodology for optimization of treatment for an aged landfill leachate using Fenton’s oxidation reagent. Environmental Engineering Science, 34: 731–739 https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0613
49	C Teng, K Zhou, Z Zhang, C Peng, W Chen (2020). Elucidating the structural variation of membrane concentrated landfill leachate during Fenton oxidation process using spectroscopic analyses. Environmental Pollution, 256: 113467 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113467
50	M Thomas, B Białecka, D Zdebik (2017). Removal of organic compounds from wastewater originating from the production of printed circuit boards by UV-Fenton method. Archives of Environmental Protection, 43(4): 39–49 https://doi.org/10.1515/aep-2017-0044
51	M Thomas, D Zdebik (2019). Treatment of real textile wastewater by using potassium Ferrate(VI) and Fe(III)/H2O2: Application of Aliivibrio fischeri and Brachionus plicatilis tests for toxicity assessment. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 27: 78–84 https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0746
52	M Thomas, D Zdebik, E Niewiara (2018). Removing phenols from post-processing wastewater originating from underground coal gasification using coagulation-flocculation and the H2O2/UV process. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(6): 2757–2763 https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/81270
53	G Wang, G Lu, J Zhao, P Yin, L Zhao (2016a). Evaluation of toxicity and estrogenicity of the landfill-concentrated leachate during advanced oxidation treatment: Chemical analyses and bioanalytical tools. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23: 16015–16024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6669-2
54	G Wang, G Lu, P Yin, L Zhao, Q Jimmy Yu (2016b). Genotoxicity assessment of membrane concentrates of landfill leachate treated with Fenton reagent and UV-Fenton reagent using human hepatoma cell line. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 307: 154–162 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.069
55	H Wang, Y Wang, X Li, Y Sun, H Wu, D Chen (2016c). Removal of humic substances from reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) concentrated leachate using continuously ozone generation-reaction treatment equipment. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 56: 271–279 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.040
56	Q Wang, S L Tian, P Ning (2014). Degradation mechanism of methylene blue in a heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction catalyzed by ferrocene. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 53(2): 643–649 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403402q
57	Y Wu, S Zhou, F Qin, H Peng, Y Lai, Y Lin (2010). Removal of humic substances from landfill leachate by Fenton oxidation and coagulation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 88(4): 276–284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2010.03.002
58	J Xu, Y Long, D Shen, H Feng, T Chen (2017). Optimization of Fenton treatment process for degradation of refractory organics in pre-coagulated leachate membrane concentrates. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 323: 674–680 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.10.031
59	W J Xue, Y H Cui, Z Q Liu, S Q Yang, J Y Li, X L Guo (2020). Treatment of landfill leachate nanofiltration concentrate after ultrafiltration by electrochemically assisted heat activation of peroxydisulfate. Separation and Purification Technology, 231: 115928 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115928
60	T Yılmaz, A Aygun, A Berktay, B Nas (2010). Removal of COD and colour from young municipal landfill leachate by Fenton process. Environmental Technology, 31: 1635–1640
61	A Zhang, Z Gu, W Chen, Q Li, G Jiang (2018). Removal of refractory organic pollutants in reverse-osmosis concentrated leachate by Microwave–Fenton process. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(29): 28907–28916 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2900-7
62	L Zhang, A M Li, Y F Lu, L Yan, S Zhong, C L Deng (2009). Characterization and removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from landfill leachate rejected by nanofiltration. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 29(3): 1035–1040 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.020
63	M Zhang, H Dong, L Zhao, D Wang, D Meng (2019). A review on Fenton process for organic wastewater treatment based on optimization perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 670: 110–121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.180
64	Q Q Zhang, B H Tian, X Zhang, A Ghulam, C R Fang, R He (2013). Investigation on characteristics of leachate and concentrated leachate in three landfill leachate treatment plants. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 33(11): 2277–2286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.021
65	X Zhang, J Fu, Y Zhang, L Lei (2008). A nitrogen functionalized carbon nanotube cathode for highly efficient electrocatalytic generation of H2O2 in Electro-Fenton system. Separation and Purification Technology, 64(1): 116–123 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.07.020
66	J Zhao, F Ouyang, Y Yang, W Tang (2020). Degradation of recalcitrant organics in nanofiltration concentrate from biologically pretreated landfill leachate by ultraviolet-Fenton method. Separation and Purification Technology, 235: 116076 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116076
67	B Zhou, Z Yu, Q Wei, H Y Long, Y Xie, Y Wang (2016). Electrochemical oxidation of biological pretreated and membrane separated landfill leachate concentrates on boron doped diamond anode. Applied Surface Science, 377: 406–415 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.045

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed