Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

邮发代号 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering  2021, Vol. 15 Issue (1): 15   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1307-0
  本期目录
Mercury removal from aqueous solution using petal-like MoS2 nanosheets
Ragini Pirarath1, Palani Shivashanmugam2, Asad Syed3, Abdallah M. Elgorban3, Sambandam Anandan1(), Muthupandian Ashokkumar4
1. Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli-620015, India
2. Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli-620015, India
3. Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4. School of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic-3010, Australia
 全文: PDF(1322 KB)   HTML
Abstract

• Synthesized few-layered MoS2 nanosheets via surfactant-assisted hydrothermal method.

• Synthesized MoS2 nanosheets show petal-like morphology.

• Adsorbent showed 93% of mercury removal efficiency.

• The adsorption of mercury is attributed to negative zeta potential (-21.8 mV).

Recently, different nanomaterial-based adsorbents have received greater attention for the removal of environmental pollutants, specifically heavy metals from aqueous media. In this work, we synthesized few-layered MoS2 nanosheets via a surfactant-assisted hydrothermal method and utilized them as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of mercury from aqueous media. The synthesized MoS2 nanosheets showed petal-like morphology as confirmed by scanning electron microscope and high-resolution transmission electron microscopic analysis. The average thickness of the nanosheets is found to be about 57 nm. Possessing high stability and negative zeta potential makes this material suitable for efficient adsorption of mercury from aqueous media. The adsorption efficiency of the adsorbent was investigated as a function of pH, contact time and adsorbent dose. The kinetics of adsorption and reusability potential of the adsorbent were also performed. A pseudo-second-order kinetics for mercury adsorption was observed. As prepared MoS2 nanosheets showed 93% mercury removal efficiency, whereas regenerated adsorbent showed 91% and 79% removal efficiency in the respective 2nd and 3rd cycles. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent was found to be 289 mg/g at room temperature.

Key wordsAnionic surfactant    2D material    MoS2 nanosheets    Mercury removal    Adsorption capacity
收稿日期: 2020-03-30      出版日期: 2020-08-19
Corresponding Author(s): Sambandam Anandan   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2021, 15(1): 15.
Ragini Pirarath, Palani Shivashanmugam, Asad Syed, Abdallah M. Elgorban, Sambandam Anandan, Muthupandian Ashokkumar. Mercury removal from aqueous solution using petal-like MoS2 nanosheets. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 15.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/10.1007/s11783-020-1307-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/Y2021/V15/I1/15
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
1 K Ai, C Ruan, M Shen, L Lu (2016). MoS2 nanosheets with widened interlayer spacing for high-efficiency removal of mercury in aquatic systems. Advanced Functional Materials, 26(30): 5542–5549
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201601338
2 R Anbazhagan, H J Wang, H C Tsai, R J Jeng (2014). Highly concentrated MoS2 nanosheets in water achieved by thioglycolic acid as stabilizer and used as biomarkers. RSC Advances, 4(81): 42936–42941
https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA07512A
3 V Bhardwaj, T Bhardwaj, K Sharma, A Gupta, S Chauhan, S S Cameotra, S Sharma, R Gupta, S Sharma (2014). Drug-surfactant interaction: Thermo-acoustic investigation of sodium dodecyl sulfate and antimicrobial drug (levofloxacin) for potential pharmaceutical application. RSC Advances, 4(47): 24935–24943
https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA02177K
4 B Chen, Q Ma, C Tan, T Lim, L Huang, H Zhang (2015). Carbon-based sorbents with three-dimensional Architectures for Water Remediation. Small, 11(27): 3319–3336
5 A Jawad, Z Liao, Z Zhou, A Khan, T Wang, J Ifthikar, A Shahzad, Z Chen, Z Chen (2017). Fe-MoS4: An effective and stable LDH-based adsorbent for selective removal of heavy metals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(34): 28451–28463
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07208
6 W Choi, N Choudhary, G H Han, J Park, D Akinwande, Y H Lee (2017). Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Materials Today, 20(3): 116–130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.002
7 M Fomina, G M Gadd (2014). Biosorption: Current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresource Technology, 160: 3–14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.102
8 R Ganatra, Q Zhang (2014). Few-layer MoS2: A promising layered semiconductor. ACS Nano, 8(5): 4074–4099
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn405938z
9 V Ganesan, C Louis, S P Damodaran (2018). Graphene oxide-wrapped magnetite nanoclusters: A recyclable functional hybrid for fast and highly efficient removal of organic dyes from wastewater. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(2): 2176–2190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.026
10 E Ghasemi, A Heydari, M Sillanpää (2017). Superparamagnetic Fe3O4@EDTA nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for simultaneous removal of Ag(I), Hg(II), Mn(II), Zn(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II) from water and soil environmental samples. Microchemical Journal, 131: 51–56
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2016.11.011
11 X Guo, B Du, Q Wei, J Yang, L Hu, L Yan, W Xu (2014). Synthesis of amino functionalized magnetic graphenes composite material and its application to remove Cr(VI), Pb(II), Hg(II), Cd(II) and Ni(II) from contaminated water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 278: 211–220
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.075
12 M Hadavifar, N Bahramifar, H Younesi, M Rastakhiz, Q Li, J Yu, E Eftekhari (2016). Removal of mercury(II) and cadmium(II) ions from synthetic wastewater by a newly synthesized amino and thiolated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 67: 397–405
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.08.029
13 P Hadi, M H To, C W Hui, C S K Lin, G McKay (2015). Aqueous mercury adsorption by activated carbons. Water Research, 73: 37–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.018
14 M Hsieh, G Li, W Chang, H Tuan (2017). Germanium nanoparticles/molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) nanocomposite as a high-capacity, high-rate anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 5(8): 4114–4121
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA08455A
15 M Hua, S Zhang, B Pan, W Zhang, L Lv, Q Zhang (2012). Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 212: 317–331
16 L Huang, C Peng, Q Cheng, M He, B Chen, B Hu (2017). Thiol-functionalized magnetic porous organic polymers for highly efficient removal of mercury. ACS I&EC Research Journal, 56(46): 13696–13703
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03093
17 Z Huang, M Zhao, C Wang, S Wang, L Dai, L Zhang, L Xu (2020). Selective removal mechanism of the novel Zr-based metal organic framework adorbents for gold ions from aqueous solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 384: 123343
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123343
18 F Jia, Q Wang, J Wu, Y Li, S Song (2017a). Two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide as a Superb adsorbent for removing Hg2+ from water. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5(8): 7410–7419
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01880
19 F Jia, X Zhang, S Song (2017b). AFM study on the adsorption of Hg2+ on natural molybdenum disulfide in aqueous solutions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 19(5): 3837–3844
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP07302F
20 X J Jia, J Wang, J Wu, Y Du, B Zhao, D Engelsen (2015). Bouquet-like calcium sulfate dihydrate: A highly efficient adsorbent for Congo red dye. RSC Advances, 5(88): 72321–72330
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA11514K
21 X Jin, P Ning, L Tang, J Peng, K Li, S Bao (2016). Highly effective removal of mercury and lead ions from wastewater by mercaptoamine-functionalised silica-coated magnetic nano-adsorbents: Behaviours and mechanisms. Applied Surface Science, 393: 457–466
22 A S Krishna Kumar, S J Jiang, J K Warchoł (2017). Synthesis and characterization of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide magnetic MoS2@Fe3O4 nanoparticles for adsorption of Cr(VI)/Cr(III). ACS Omega, 2(9): 6187–6200
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00757
23 P J Landrigan (1982). Occupational and community exposures to toxic metals: Lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic. Western Journal of Medicine, 137: 531–539
24 C Lee, H Yan, L E Brus, T F Heinz, J Hone, S Ryu (2010). Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few layer MoS2. ACS Nano, 4(5): 2695–2700
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1003937
25 G Lin, T Hu, S Wang, T Xie, L Zhang, S Cheng, L Fu, C Xiong (2019). Selective removal behavior and mechanism of trace Hg(II) using modified corn husk leaves. Chemosphere, 225: 65–72
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.006
26 X Liu, L Li, Y Wei, Y Zheng, Q Xiao, B Feng (2015). Facile synthesis of boron- and nitride-doped MoS2 nanosheets as fluorescent probes for the ultrafast, sensitive, and label-free detection of Hg2+. Analyst (London), 140(13): 4654–4661
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AN00641D
27 R Mas-Ballesté, C Gómez-Navarro, J Gómez-Herrero, F Zamora (2011). 2D materials: To graphene and beyond. Nanoscale, 3(1): 20–30
https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00323A
28 K H Nam, S Gomez-Salazar, L L Tavlarides (2003). Mercury(II) adsorption from wastewaters using a thiol functional adsorbent. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(9): 1955–1964
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020834l
29 D Ramimoghadam, M Zobir, B Hussein, Y Taufiq-yap (2012). The effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) on the properties of ZnO synthesized by hydrothermal method. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(12): 13275–13293
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131013275
30 C Santhosh, V Velmurugan, G Jacob, S K Jeong, A N Grace, A Bhatnagar (2016). Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 306: 1116–1137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.053
31 Y Song, M Lu, B Huang, D Wang, G Wang, L Zhou (2018). Decoration of defective MoS2 nanosheets with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as superior magnetic adsorbent for highly selective and efficient mercury ions Hg2+ removal. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 737: 113–121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.087
32 X Wang, Y Guo, Y Li, M Han, J Zhao, X Cheng (2012). Nanomaterials as sorbents to remove heavy metal ions in wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology, 02(07): 154
https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0525.1000154
33 Z Wang, B Mi (2017). Environmental applications of 2 molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(15): 8229–8244
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01466
34 F S Zhang, J O Nriagu, H Itoh (2005). Mercury removal from water using activated carbons derived from organic sewage sludge. Water Research, 39(2–3): 389–395
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.027
35 S Zhang, B V R Chowdari, Z Wen, J Jin, J Yang (2015a). Constructing highly oriented configuration by few-layer MoS2: Toward high-performance lithium-ion batteries and hydrogen evolution reactions. ACS Nano, 9(12): 12464–12472
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05891
36 Y Zhang, S Zhang, T S Chung (2015b). Nanometric graphene oxide framework membranes with enhanced heavy metal removal via nanofiltration. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(16): 10235–10242
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02086
37 M Zhao, Z Huang, S Wang, L Zhang, Y Zhou (2019). Design of L-cysteine functionalized UiO-66 MOFs for selective adsorption of Hg(II) in aqueous medium. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11(50): 46973–46983
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b17508
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed