The size distribution of airborne bacteria and human pathogenic bacteria in a commercial composting plant
Min Gao1, Ziye Yang1,2, Yajie Guo1, Mo Chen1, Tianlei Qiu1, Xingbin Sun2(), Xuming Wang1()
1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Beijing Agro-Biotechnology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China 2. College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
•Bacterial concentrations from eight stages were 104–105copies/m3.
•Diameter influenced clustering of bacterial and HPB lineages.
•Dg of 8 HPB ranged from 2.42 to 5.09 μm in composting areas.
•Dg of 8 HPB ranged from 3.70 to 8.96 μm in packaging areas.
•HPB had high concentrations and small sizes in composting areas.
Composting plants are regarded as one of the important sources of environmental bioaerosols. However, limitations in the size distribution of airborne bacteria have prevented our comprehensive understanding of their risk to human health and their dispersal behavior. In this study, different sizes of airborne bacteria were collected using an eight-stage impactor from a full-scale composting facility. Size-related abundance and communities of airborne bacteria as well as human pathogenic bacteria (HPB) were investigated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing coupled with droplet digital PCR. Our results indicate that the bacterial concentrations from the eight stages were approximately 104–105copies/m3. Although no statistical correlation was detected between the particle size and the Shannon index, the influence of size on bacterial lineages was observed in both composting and packaging areas. For airborne bacteria from different stages, the dominant phyla were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, and the dominant genera was Bacillus. Seven out of eight HPB with a small geometric mean aerodynamic diameter had a high concentration in composting areas. Based on diameters of 2.42 to 5.09 μm, most HPB in the composting areas were expected to be deposited on the bronchus and secondary bronchus. However, in the packaging areas, the deposition of HPB (diameters 3.70 to 8.96 μm) occurred in the upper part of the respiratory tract. Our results on the size distribution, abundance, and diversity of these bacteria offer important information for the systematic evaluation of bacterial pathogenicity and the potential health impacts on workers in composting plants and the surrounding residents.
. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2021, 15(3): 39.
Min Gao, Ziye Yang, Yajie Guo, Mo Chen, Tianlei Qiu, Xingbin Sun, Xuming Wang. The size distribution of airborne bacteria and human pathogenic bacteria in a commercial composting plant. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 39.
Previous pure culture studies Diameters (Holtetal., 1994) dg (μm)
Concentration (Copies/m3)
Aerodynamic diameters
Concentration (Copies/m3)
Aerodynamic diameters
dg (μm)
sg
dg (μm)
sg
Streptococcus
3.53 × 102
2.67
2.37
2.29 × 102
7.10
2.02
0.6–1.0
Acinetobacter
6.15 × 104
2.42
3.04
1.21 × 105
4.25
1.66
(1.0–1.5) × (1.5–2.5)
Enterococcus
1.23 × 104
2.95
2.24
8.87 × 103
8.80
1.66
(0.6–2.0) × (0.6–2.5)
Arcobacter
3.07 × 102
5.09
3.01
7.22 × 101
3.70
1.81
(0.2–0.9) × (0.5–3)
Escherichia
4.34 × 103
2.93
2.61
1.19 × 103
4.73
2.96
(1.1–1.5) × (2.0–6.0)
Staphylococcus
2.84 × 103
3.33
3.17
6.30 × 102
3.98
2.22
0.5–1.5
Fusobacterium
8.38 × 103
2.57
1.92
7.19 × 103
8.96
1.49
(0.6–0.8) × (0.8–1.4)
Mycobacterium
1.43 × 103
3.86
2.89
1.04 × 103
5.33
2.17
(0.2–0.6) × (1.0–10)
Tab.1
1
L Bonifait, G Marchand, M Veillette, H Mbareche, M E Dubuis, C Pépin, Y Cloutier, Y Bernard, C Duchaine (2017). Workers’ exposure to bioaerosols from three different types of composting facilities. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 14(10): 815–822 https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1335054
2
J H Byeon, C W Park, K Y Yoon, J H Park, J Hwang (2008). Size distributions of total airborne particles and bioaerosols in a municipal composting facility. Bioresource Technology, 99(11): 5150–5154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.014
3
Y Cormier, G U Y Tremblay, A Meriaux, G Brochu, J Lavoie (1990). Airborne microbial contents in two types of swine confinement buildings in Quebec. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 51(6): 304–309 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669091369709
4
P Di Filippo, D Pomata, C Riccardi, F Buiarelli, F Castellani, G Calitri, G Simonetti, E Sonego, E Bruni, D Uccelletti (2020). Concentrations of bacteria and bacterial and fungal spores calculated from chemical tracers associated with size-segregated aerosol in a composting plant. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(4): 469–476 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00802-0
5
R P Dickson, G B Huffnagle (2015). The Lung Microbiome: New principles for respiratory bacteriology in health and disease. PLoS Pathogens, 11(7): e1004923 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004923
6
E Pagans, R Barrena, X Font, A Sánchez (2006). Ammonia emissions from the composting of different organic wastes. Dependency on process temperature. Chemosphere, 62(9): 1534–1542 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.044
7
A Galès, V Bru-Adan, J J Godon, K Delabre, P Catala, A Ponthieux, M Chevallier, E Birot, J P Steyer, N Wéry (2015). Predominance of single bacterial cells in composting bioaerosols. Atmospheric Environment, 107: 225–232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.035
8
M Gao, R Jia, T Qiu, M Han, Y Song, X Wang (2015). Seasonal size distribution of airborne culturable bacteria and fungi and preliminary estimation of their deposition in human lungs during non-haze and haze days. Atmospheric Environment, 118: 203–210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.004
9
M Gao, R Jia, T Qiu, M Han, X Wang (2017). Size-related bacterial diversity and tetracycline resistance gene abundance in the air of concentrated poultry feeding operations. Environmental Pollution, 220, Part B: 1342–1348
10
M Gao, T Qiu, Y Sun, X Wang (2018). The abundance and diversity of antibiotic resistance genes in the atmospheric environment of composting plants. Environment International, 116: 229–238 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.028
11
B Gutarowska, J Szulc, A Nowak, A Otlewska, M Okrasa, A Jachowicz, K Majchrzycka (2018). Dust at various workplaces—microbiological and toxicological threats. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5): 877–895 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050877
12
J G Holt, N R Krieg, P H A Sneath, J T Staley, S T Williams (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 385–1161
13
P Y Hong, X Li, X Yang, T Shinkai, Y Zhang, X Wang, R I Mackie (2012). Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings. Environmental Microbiology, 14(6): 1420–1431 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02726.x
14
N Just, S Kirychuk, Y Gilbert, V Létourneau, M Veillette, B Singh, C Duchaine (2011). Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. Environmental Research, 111(4): 492–498 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.009
15
J Lelieveld, J S Evans, M Fnais, D Giannadaki, A Pozzer (2015). The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569): 367–371 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371
16
H Liu, X Zhang, H Zhang, X Yao, M Zhou, J Wang, Z He, H Zhang, L Lou, W Mao, P Zheng, B Hu (2018). Effect of air pollution on the total bacteria and pathogenic bacteria in different sizes of particulate matter. Environmental Pollution, 233: 483–493 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.070
17
Q Q Liu, M Li, R Liu, Q Zhang, D Wu, D Zhu, X H Shen, C P Feng, F W Zhang, X Liu (2019). Removal of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole in artificial composite soil treatment systems and diversity of microbial communities. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(2): 28
18
H Mbareche, E Brisebois, M Veillette, C Duchaine (2017). Bioaerosol sampling and detection methods based on molecular approaches: No pain no gain. Science of the Total Environment, 599–600: 2095–2104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.076
19
H Mbareche, M Veillette, G J Bilodeau, C Duchaine (2019). Fungal aerosols at dairy farms using molecular and culture techniques. Science of the Total Environment, 653: 253–263 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.345
J Peng,K Wang, X B Yin, X Q Yin, M F Du, Y Z Gao, P Antwi, N Q Ren, A J Wang (2019). Trophic Mode and Organics Metabolic Characteristic of Fungal Community in Swine Manure Composting. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(6): 93
22
X Qian, W Sun, J Gu, X J Wang, Y J Zhang, M L Duan, H C Li, R R Zhang (2016). Reducing antibiotic resistance genes, integrons, and pathogens in dairy manure by continuous thermophilic composting. Bioresource Technology, 220: 425–432 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.101
23
T A Reponen, S V Gazenko, S A Grinshpun, K Willeke, E C Cole (1998). Characteristics of airborne Actinomycete spores. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(10): 3807–3812 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.64.10.3807-3812.1998
24
S Robertson, P Douglas, D Jarvis, E Marczylo (2019). Bioaerosol exposure from composting facilities and health outcomes in workers and in the community: A systematic review update. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 222(3): 364–386 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.02.006
25
E Robine, D Dérangère, D Robin (2000). Survival of a Pseudomonas fluorescens and Enterococcus faecalis aerosol on inert surfaces. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 55(1-3): 229–234 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00188-4
26
P Sykes, K Jones, J D Wildsmith (2007). Managing the potential public health risks from bioaerosol liberation at commercial composting sites in the UK: An analysis of the evidence base. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(2): 410–424 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.05.005
27
M P M Taha, S J T Pollard, U Sarkar, P Longhurst (2005). Estimating fugitive bioaerosol releases from static compost windrows: feasibility of a portable wind tunnel approach. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 25(4): 445–450 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.02.013
28
R Tellier (2006). Review of aerosol transmission of influenza A virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 12(11): 1657–1662 https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1211.060426
29
R J Thomas, D Webber, W Sellors, A Collinge, A Frost, A J Stagg, S C Bailey, P N Jayasekera, R R Taylor, S Eley, R W Titball (2008). Characterization and deposition of respirable large- and small-particle bioaerosols. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(20): 6437–6443 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01194-08
30
M Veillette, L Bonifait, H Mbareche, G Marchand, C Duchaine (2018). Preferential aerosolization of Actinobacteria during handling of composting organic matter. Journal of Aerosol Science, 116: 83–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.11.004
31
S M Walser, D G Gerstner, B Brenner, J Bünger, T Eikmann, B Janssen, S Kolb, A Kolk, D Nowak, M Raulf, H Sagunski, N Sedlmaier, R Suchenwirth, G Wiesmüller, K M Wollin, I Tesseraux, C E W Herr (2015). Evaluation of exposure–response relationships for health effects of microbial bioaerosols: A systematic review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 218(7): 577–589 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.07.004
32
N Yamamoto, K Bibby, J Qian, D Hospodsky, H Rismani-Yazdi, W W Nazaroff, J Peccia (2012). Particle-size distributions and seasonal diversity of allergenic and pathogenic fungi in outdoor air. ISME Journal, 6(10): 1801–1811 https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.30
