Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality

doi:10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

2023, Vol. 17

Issue (2): 23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2

本期目录

Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality

Xianlai Zeng(

)

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

全文: PDF(7083 KB) HTML

Abstract：

● Anthropogenic circularity science is an emerging interdisciplinary field.

● Anthropogenic circularity was one effective strategy against metal criticality.

● Carbon neutrality is becoming the new industry paradigm around the world.

● Growing circularity could potentially minimize the CO₂ emission.

Resource depletion and environmental degradation have fueled a burgeoning discipline of anthropogenic circularity since the 2010s. It generally consists of waste reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, and recovery. Circular economy and “zero-waste” cities are sweeping the globe in their current practices to address the world’s grand concerns linked to resources, the environment, and industry. Meanwhile, metal criticality and carbon neutrality, which have become increasingly popular in recent years, denote the material's feature and state, respectively. The goal of this article is to determine how circularity, criticality, and neutrality are related. Upscale anthropogenic circularity has the potential to expand the metal supply and, as a result, reduce metal criticality. China barely accomplished 15 % of its potential emission reduction by recycling iron, copper, and aluminum. Anthropogenic circularity has a lot of room to achieve a win-win objective, which is to reduce metal criticality while also achieving carbon neutrality in a near closed-loop cycle. Major barriers or challenges for conducting anthropogenic circularity are deriving from the inadequacy of life-cycle insight governance and the emergence of anthropogenic circularity discipline. Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment are the central methodologies to identify the hidden problems. Mineral processing and smelting, as well as end-of-life management, are indicated as critical priority areas for enhancing anthropogenic circularity.

Key words： Anthropogenic circularity Material flow analysis Criticality Carbon neutrality Solid waste Circular economy

收稿日期: 2022-05-02 出版日期: 2022-09-08

Corresponding Author(s): Xianlai Zeng

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2023, 17(2): 23.
Xianlai Zeng. Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 23.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/Y2023/V17/I2/23

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.1

1	M Al-Obaidy, M C Santos, M Baskar, S Attia. (2021). Assessment of the circularity and carbon neutrality of an office building: The case of Centrum in Westerlo, Belgium. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 855( 1): 012025 https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/855/1/012025
2	S H Ali, D Giurco, N Arndt, E Nickless, G Brown, A Demetriades, R Durrheim, M A Enriquez, J Kinnaird, A Littleboy. et al.. (2017). Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature, 543( 7645): 367– 372 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21359 pmid: 28300094
3	A Anctil, V Fthenakis. (2013). Critical metals in strategic photovoltaic technologies: abundance versus recyclability. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 21( 6): 1253– 1259 https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2308
4	M F Ashby, K Johnson. (2014). Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design. Waltham, USA : Butterworth– Heinemann
5	A K Awasthi, V R S Cheela, I D’adamo, E Iacovidou, M R Islam, M Johnson, T R Miller, K Parajuly, A Parchomenko, L Radhakrishan, M Zhao, C Zhang, J Li. (2021). Zero waste approach towards a sustainable waste management. Resources. Environment and Sustainability, 3 : 100014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100014
6	M Azadi, S A Northey, S H Ali, M Edraki. (2020). Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience, 13( 2): 100– 104 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0531-3
7	C W Babbitt, S Althaf, F Cruz Rios, M M Bilec, T E Graedel. (2021). The role of design in circular economy solutions for critical materials. One Earth, 4( 3): 353– 362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.014
8	P Baccini, P H Brunner ( 2012). Metabolism of the Anthroposphere: Analysis, Evaluation, Design. Cambridge: MIT Press
9	F Biermann, K Abbott, S Andresen, K Bäckstrand, S Bernstein, M M Betsill, H Bulkeley, B Cashore, J Clapp, C Folke. et al.. (2012). Navigating the anthropocene: improving Earth system governance. Science, 335( 6074): 1306– 1307 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217255 pmid: 22422966
10	A Bloodworth. (2014). Resources: Track flows to manage technology-metal supply. Nature, 505( 7481): 19– 20 https://doi.org/10.1038/505019a pmid: 24380940
11	P H Brunner, H Rechberger ( 2016). Handbook of Material Flow Analysis: For Environmental, Resource, and Waste Engineers. Boca Raton: CRC Press
12	A Charpentier Poncelet, C Helbig, P Loubet, A Beylot, S Muller, J Villeneuve, B Laratte, A Thorenz, A Tuma, G Sonnemann ( 2022). Losses and lifetimes of metals in the economy. Nature Sustainability,
13	J M Chen. (2021). Carbon neutrality: toward a sustainable future. Innovation, 2( 3): 100127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100127
14	M Chen, O A Ogunseitan. (2021). Zero E-waste: regulatory impediments and blockchain imperatives. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15( 6): 114 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1402-x
15	W Chen, M Wang, X Li ( 2016). Analysis of copper flows in the United States: 1975–2012. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111: 67– 76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.014
16	L Ciacci, I Vassura, F Passarini. (2017). Urban mines of copper: size and potential for recycling in the EU. Resources, 6( 1): 6 https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6010006
17	C Colon, S Hallegatte, J Rozenberg. (2021). Criticality analysis of a country’s transport network via an agent-based supply chain model. Nature Sustainability, 4( 3): 209– 215 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00649-4
18	I Daigo, S Hashimoto, Y Matsuno, Y Adachi ( 2009). Material stocks and flows accounting for copper and copper-based alloys in Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53( 4): 208– 217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.010
19	S Das. (2012). Achieving carbon neutrality in the global aluminum industry. Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society, 64( 2): 285– 290 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-012-0237-0
20	M Dieterle, T Viere. (2022). Life cycle gap analysis for product circularity and sustainability: a case study with three different products. Materials Circular Economy, 4( 1): 12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42824-022-00055-5
21	D Eheliyagoda, J Li, Y Geng, X Zeng. (2022). The role of China’s aluminum recycling on sustainable resource and emission pathways. Resources Policy, 76 : 102552 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102552
22	D Eheliyagoda, X Zeng, J Li. (2020). A method to assess national metal criticality: the environment as a foremost measurement. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7( 1): 43 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00537-4
23	L Erdmann, T E Graedel. (2011). Criticality of non-fuel minerals: a review of major approaches and analyses. Environmental Science & Technology, 45( 18): 7620– 7630 https://doi.org/10.1021/es200563g pmid: 21834560
24	Y Geng, J Sarkis, R Bleischwitz. (2019). How to globalize the circular economy. Nature, 565( 7738): 153– 155 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00017-z pmid: 30626948
25	A L Bîrgovan, E S Lakatos, A Szilagyi, L I Cioca, R L Pacurariu, G Ciobanu, E C Rada. (2022). How should we measure? A review of circular cities indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19( 9): 5177 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095177 pmid: 35564570
26	S Glöser, M Soulier, L A Tercero Espinoza ( 2013). Dynamic analysis of global copper flows. Global stocks, postconsumer material flows, recycling indicators, and uncertainty evaluation. Environmental Science & Technology, 47( 12): 6564– 6572 https://doi.org/10.1021/es400069b pmid: 23725041
27	S Glöser-Chahoud, Espinoza L Tercero, R Walz, M Faulstich. (2016). Taking the step towards a more dynamic view on raw material criticality: an indicator based analysis for Germany and Japan. Resources, 5( 4): 45 https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5040045
28	T E Graedel, R Barr, C Chandler, T Chase, J Choi, L Christoffersen, E Friedlander, C Henly, C Jun, N T Nassar, D Schechner, S Warren, M Y Yang, C Zhu. (2012). Methodology of metal criticality determination. Environmental Science & Technology, 46( 2): 1063– 1070 https://doi.org/10.1021/es203534z pmid: 22191617
29	T E Graedel, E M Harper, N T Nassar, P Nuss, B K Reck. (2015). Criticality of metals and metalloids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112( 14): 4257– 4262 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500415112 pmid: 25831527
30	T E Graedel, P Nuss. (2014). Employing considerations of criticality in product design. Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society, 66( 11): 2360– 2366 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-1188-4
31	T E Graedel, Beers D van, M Bertram, K Fuse, R B Gordon, A Gritsinin, A Kapur, R J Klee, R J Lifset, L Memon. et al.. (2004). Multilevel cycle of anthropogenic copper. Environmental Science & Technology, 38( 4): 1242– 1252 https://doi.org/10.1021/es030433c pmid: 14998044
32	N Gruber, J N Galloway. (2008). An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature, 451( 7176): 293– 296 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06592 pmid: 18202647
33	E M Harper, Z Diao, S Panousi, P Nuss, M J Eckelman, T E Graedel ( 2015a). The criticality of four nuclear energy metals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95( 0): 193– 201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.009
34	E M Harper, G Kavlak, L Burmeister, M J Eckelman, S Erbis, V Sebastian Espinoza, P Nuss, T E Graedel. (2015b). Criticality of the Geological Zinc, Tin, and Lead Family. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19( 4): 628– 644 https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12213
35	C A Hodges. (1995). Mineral resources, environmental issues, and land use. Science, 268( 5215): 1305– 1312 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.268.5215.1305 pmid: 17778975
36	A Hool, D Schrijvers, S Van Nielen, A Clifton, S Ganzeboom, C Hagelueken, Y Harada, H Y Kim, A Ku, J Meese-Marktscheffel, T Nemoto. (2022). How companies improve critical raw material circularity: five use cases. Mineral Economics, 35( 2): 325– 335 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-022-00315-5
37	D Hoornweg, P Bhada-Tata, C Kennedy. (2013). Waste production must peak this century. Nature, 502( 7473): 615– 617 https://doi.org/10.1038/502615a
38	Z Hou, J Chen, M Zhai. (2020). Current status and frontiers of research on critical mineral resources. Chinese Science Bulletin, 65( 33): 3561– 3652
39	R Iranpour, M Stenstrom, G Tchobanoglous, D Miller, J Wright, M Vossoughi. (1999). Environmental engineering: energy value of replacing waste disposal with resource recovery. Science, 285( 5428): 706– 711 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5428.706 pmid: 10426987
40	IRP ( 2019). Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future We Want. Nairobi, Kenya: A Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme
41	M Jin. (2014). Advance of cyclical chemistry. Chemical World, 55( 3): 187– 192 https://doi.org/10.19500/j.cnki.0367-6358.2014.03.015
42	Q Kanwal, J Li, X Zeng. (2021). Mapping recyclability of industrial waste for anthropogenic circularity: a circular economy approach. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9( 35): 11927– 11936 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04139
43	A Kapur, M Bertram, S Spatari, K Fuse, T E Graedel. (2003). The contemporary copper cycle of Asia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 5( 2): 143– 156 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-003-0096-4
44	R A Kerr. (2014). The coming copper peak. Science, 343( 6172): 722– 724 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.343.6172.722 pmid: 24531951
45	M Klotz, M Haupt, S Hellweg ( 2022). Limited utilization options for secondary plastics may restrict their circularity. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 141: 251– 270 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.01.002 pmid: 35158311
46	V Knobloch, T Zimmermann, S Gößling-Reisemann ( 2018). From criticality to vulnerability of resource supply: The case of the automobile industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138: 272– 282 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.027
47	F Krausmann, C Lauk, W Haas, D Wiedenhofer. (2018). From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: the socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Global Environmental Change, 52 : 131– 140 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.003 pmid: 30679887
48	W F Lamb, T Wiedmann, J Pongratz, R Andrew, M Crippa, J G J Olivier, D Wiedenhofer, G Mattioli, A A Khourdajie, J House. et al.. (2021). A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environmental Research Letters, 16( 7): 073005 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e
49	Y Liang, Q Song, N Wu, J Li, Y Zhong, W Zeng. (2021). Repercussions of COVID-19 pandemic on solid waste generation and management strategies. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15( 6): 115 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1407-5 pmid: 33686359
50	M Linder, S Sarasini, P Van Loon. (2017). A metric for quantifying product-level circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21( 3): 545– 558 https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12552
51	S Liu ( 2014). Analysis of Electronic Waste Recycling in the United States and Potential Application in China. New York: Columbia University
52	X Liu, H Sheng, S Jiang, Z Yuan, C Zhang, J J Elser. (2016a). Intensification of phosphorus cycling in China since the 1600s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113( 10): 2609– 2614 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519554113 pmid: 26903638
53	Z Liu, Y Geng, S Ulgiati, H S Park, F Tsuyoshi, H Wang. (2016b). Uncovering key factors influencing one industrial park’s sustainability: a combined evaluation method of emergy analysis and index decomposition analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114 : 141– 149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.149
54	X Lu, Z Zhang, T Hiraki, O Takeda, H Zhu, K Matsubae, T Nagasaka. (2022). A solid-state electrolysis process for upcycling aluminium scrap. Nature, 606( 7914): 511– 515 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04748-4 pmid: 35417651
55	H Mangold, B Von Vacano. (2022). The Frontier of Plastics Recycling: Rethinking Waste as a Resource for High-Value Applications. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 223( 13): 2100488 https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.202100488
56	N T Nassar, R Barr, M Browning, Z Diao, E Friedlander, E M Harper, C Henly, G Kavlak, S Kwatra, C Jun, S Warren, M Y Yang, T E Graedel. (2012). Criticality of the geological copper family. Environmental Science & Technology, 46( 2): 1071– 1078 https://doi.org/10.1021/es203535w pmid: 22192049
57	N T Nassar, X Y Du, T E Graedel. (2015). Criticality of the rare Earth elements. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19( 6): 1044– 1054 https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12237
58	T Norgate, N Haque. (2010). Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18( 3): 266– 274 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.020
59	P Nuss, M J Eckelman. (2014a). Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. PLoS One, 9( 7): e101298 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101298 pmid: 24999810
60	P Nuss, E M Harper, N T Nassar, B K Reck, T E Graedel. (2014b). Criticality of iron and its principal alloying elements. Environmental Science & Technology, 48( 7): 4171– 4177 https://doi.org/10.1021/es405044w pmid: 24597917
61	M P O’Connor, J B Zimmerman, P T Anastas, D L Plata. (2016). A strategy for material supply chain sustainability: enabling a circular economy in the electronics industry through green engineering. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 4( 11): 5879– 5888 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01954
62	E A Olivetti, J M Cullen. (2018). Toward a sustainable materials system. Science, 360( 6396): 1396– 1398 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat6821 pmid: 29954965
63	S Panousi, E M Harper, P Nuss, M J Eckelman, A Hakimian, T E Graedel. (2016). Criticality of seven specialty metals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20( 4): 837– 853 https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12295
64	A Parchomenko, D Nelen, J Gillabel, H Rechberger. (2019). Measuring the circular economy: a multiple correspondence analysis of 63 metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210 : 200– 216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.357
65	D Raabe, C C Tasan, E A Olivetti. (2019). Strategies for improving the sustainability of structural metals. Nature, 575( 7781): 64– 74 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1702-5 pmid: 31695209
66	J H Rademaker, R Kleijn, Y Yang. (2013). Recycling as a strategy against rare earth element criticality: a systemic evaluation of the potential yield of NdFeB magnet recycling. Environmental Science & Technology, 47( 18): 10129– 10136 https://doi.org/10.1021/es305007w pmid: 23909476
67	J N Rauch, T E Graedel. (2007). Earth’s anthrobiogeochemical copper cycle. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 21( 2): GB2010 https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002850
68	H Rechberger, T E Graedel. (2002). The contemporary European copper cycle: statistical entropy analysis. Ecological Economics, 42( 1–2): 59– 72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00102-7
69	B K Reck, T E Graedel. (2012). Challenges in metal recycling. Science, 337( 6095): 690– 695 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217501 pmid: 22879508
70	L Rostek, L A Tercero Espinoza, D Goldmann, A Loibl ( 2022). A dynamic material flow analysis of the global anthropogenic zinc cycle: p roviding a quantitative basis for circularity discussions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 180: 106154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106154
71	L Ruiz-Pastor, V Chulvi, E Mulet, M Royo. (2022). A metric for evaluating novelty and circularity as a whole in conceptual design proposals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337 : 130495 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130495
72	T Sonderegger, S Pfister, S Hellweg. (2015). Criticality of water: aligning water and mineral resources assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 49( 20): 12315– 12323 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02982 pmid: 26392153
73	Q Song, Z Wang, J Li. (2013). Sustainability evaluation of e-waste treatment based on emergy analysis and the LCA method: a case study of a trial project in Macau. Ecological Indicators, 30 : 138– 147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.016
74	M Soulier, S Glöser-Chahoud, D Goldmann, L A Tercero Espinoza ( 2018). Dynamic analysis of European copper flows. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129: 143– 152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.013
75	S Spatari, M Bertram, K Fuse, T E Graedel, H Rechberger ( 2002). The contemporary European copper cycle: 1 year stocks and flows. Ecological Economics, 42( 1– 2): 27– 42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00103-9
76	S Spatari, M Bertram, R B Gordon, K Henderson, T E Graedel. (2005). Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: a dynamic analysis. Ecological Economics, 54( 1): 37– 51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.018
77	W Steffen, W Broadgate, L Deutsch, O Gaffney, C Ludwig. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Review, 2( 1): 81– 98 https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785
78	W Tan, D Cui, B Xi. (2021). Moving policy and regulation forward for single-use plastic alternatives. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15( 3): 50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1423-5
79	L Tercero Espinoza, D Schrijvers, W Q Chen, J Dewulf, R Eggert, J Goddin, K Habib, C Hagelüken, A J Hurd, R Kleijn, et al.. (2020). Greater circularity leads to lower criticality, and other links between criticality and the circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 159: 104718 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104718
80	L S Teseletso, T Adachi. (2022). Long-term sustainability of copper and iron based on a system dynamics model. Resources, 11( 4): 37 https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11040037
81	UNEP and ISWA ( 2015). Global Waste Management Outlook. UNEP
82	USEPA ( 2012). Electronics Environmental Benefits Calculator. FEC Publications and Resources: Life Cycle Assessment Data for Multi-Function Devices & Printers
83	A P M Velenturf, P Purnell, P D Jensen. (2021). Reducing material criticality through circular business models: Challenges in renewable energy. One Earth, 4( 3): 350– 352 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.016
84	A Wang, G Wang, X Deng, F Zhou, H An, W Zhong, H Li, G Liu, Z Ma, D Hu. et al.. (2019). Security and management of China’s critical mineral resources in the new era. Science Foundation in China, 33( 2): 133– 140 https://doi.org/10.16262/j.cnki.1000-8217.2019.02.006
85	M Wang, W Chen, X Li ( 2015). Substance flow analysis of copper in production stage in the U.S. from 1974 to 2012. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 105: 36– 48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.012
86	P Wang, H Wang, W Q Chen, S Pauliuk. (2022). Carbon neutrality needs a circular metal-energy nexus. Fundamental Research, 2( 3): 392– 395 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.003
87	C N Waters, J Zalasiewicz, C Summerhayes, A D Barnosky, C Poirier, A Gałuszka, A Cearreta, M Edgeworth, E C Ellis, M Ellis. et al.. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351( 6269): aad2622 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2622
88	W Yan, Z Wang, H Cao, Y Zhang, Z Sun. (2021). Criticality assessment of metal resources in China. iScience, 24( 6): 102524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102524 pmid: 34142037
89	X Zeng, J Li. (2021). Emerging anthropogenic circularity science: principles, practices, and challenges. iScience, 24( 3): 102237 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102237 pmid: 33748719
90	X Zeng, T Xiao, G Xu, E Albalghiti, G Shan, J Li. (2022). Comparing the costs and benefits of virgin and urban mining. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 7( 1): 98– 106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.05.002
91	L Zhang, J Yang, Z Cai, Z Yuan. (2014). Analysis of copper flows in China from 1975 to 2010. Science of the Total Environment, 478( 0): 80– 89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.070 pmid: 24530587
92	Y Zhou, J Li, H Rechberger, G Wang, S Chen, W Xing, P Li. (2020). Dynamic criticality of by-products used in thin-film photovoltaic technologies by 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263 : 121599 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121599
93	Y Zhou, X T Lin, Z P Fan, K H Wong. (2022). Remanufacturing strategy choice of a closed-loop supply chain network considering carbon emission trading, green innovation, and green consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19( 11): 6782 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116782 pmid: 35682364

[1]

FSE-22064-OF-ZXL_suppl_1

Download

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed