Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  0, Vol. Issue (): 413-428   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-013-0274-6
  RESEARCH ARTICLE 本期目录
Optimal redundant placement of PMUs in Indian power grid — northern, eastern and north-eastern regions
Optimal redundant placement of PMUs in Indian power grid — northern, eastern and north-eastern regions
Pathirikkat GOPAKUMAR1(), G. Surya CHANDRA1, M. Jaya Bharata REDDY1, Dusmata Kumar MOHANTA2()
1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620015, India; 2. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi 835215, India
 全文: PDF(1151 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Effective utilization of renewable energy sources and efficient management of electric energy are essential for any developing countries like India. This can be envisioned through the implementation of concepts of smart grid (SG). One of the key requisites for SG implementation is that the grid should be completely observable. Renovation of conventional Indian power grid to a SG necessitates incorporation of the phasor measurement units (PMUs) in the present power grid measurement and monitoring system. Since the cost of PMU is high and any bus containing a PMU makes the neighboring connected buses observable, optimal placement of PMUs is very important for complete observability of the grid. This paper proposes optimal redundant geographical locations in the northern, eastern and north-eastern regions of Indian power grid for PMU placement. The PMUs installed in these geographical locations will make the grid completely observable and maintain the observability under the conditions of failure of some PMUs or branch outages. Integer linear programming has been used for finding the optimal PMU locations. The results proposed in this paper can be a stepping stone for revamping the Indian power grid to a SG ensuring complete observability during different contingency conditions.

Key wordsphasor measurement unit (PMU)    smart grid (SG)    Indian power grid    northern region Indian power grid (NRIPG)    eastern region Indian power grid (ERIPG)    north-eastern region Indian power grid (NERIPG)    redundancy    integer linear programing (ILP)
收稿日期: 2013-02-14      出版日期: 2013-12-05
Corresponding Author(s): GOPAKUMAR Pathirikkat,Email:gopuvattekkat@gmail.com; MOHANTA Dusmata Kumar,Email:dkmohanta@bitmesra.ac.in   
 引用本文:   
. Optimal redundant placement of PMUs in Indian power grid — northern, eastern and north-eastern regions[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 0, (): 413-428.
Pathirikkat GOPAKUMAR, G. Surya CHANDRA, M. Jaya Bharata REDDY, Dusmata Kumar MOHANTA. Optimal redundant placement of PMUs in Indian power grid — northern, eastern and north-eastern regions. Front Energ, 0, (): 413-428.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-013-0274-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y0/V/I/413
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
No.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus name
209Uri244Malerk’L279Udaipur
210Wagoora245K.Wangtoo280Bhiwadi
211Amargarh246Bhiwani281Kotputli
212Kishenganga247Dehradun282Agra
213Alistong248Saharanpur283Auraiya
214Wampoh249Baghpat284Tehri
215Salal250Merrut285Koteshwar
216Kishenpur251Muzaffar Ngr286Bareilly
217Dulhasti252Rishikesh287Pithorgarh
218Jammu253Kashipur288Bhauliganga
219Samba254Muradabad289Tanakpur
220Udhampur255Murad Nagar290Kitchcha
221Hiranagar256Dadri291Unnao
222Sarna257Jhatikra292Mainpuri
223Dasuya258Bawana293Lucknow
224Jalandhar259Ballabgarh294Shahjahanpur
225Chamera260Bamnauli295Panki
226Hamirpur261Gurgaon296Kanpur
227Amritsar262Manesar297Unchahap
228Pooling Point263Neemrana298Fatehpur
229Parbati264Sikar299Allahabad
230Koldam265Ratangarh300Rihand
231Nallagarh266Suratgarh301Bulandshahr
232Ludhiana267Merta302Hapur
233Patiala268Jaipur RSEB303Orai
234N.Jhakri269Jaipur304Gorakhpur
235Panchkulan270Jodhpur305Balia
236Abdullapur271Kankroli306Sohawal
237Kurukshethra272Bhinmal307Sultanpur
238New Hissar273RAPP-C308Azamgarh
239Sonepat274Kota309Anpara
240Kaithal275Anta310Obra
241Hissar276Dausa311Varanasi
242Fatehbad277RAPP-B312Mau
243Moga278Chittorg’h
Tab.1  
Fig.5  
No.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus name
313Muzaffarpur344Tarkeera375Jeerat
314Purnea345Brajrajnagr376Subhasgram
315BHRSHRF346IB Valley377LKPUR
316Hazipur347Mera Mundli378KASBA
317Fatwa348Rengali379Bisnupur
318Begusarai349Joda380Santaldih
319Barh350Talcher TPS381Purulia
320Patna351BHNJNGR382Bidhannagar
321Sasaram352Chandaka383Bakreswar
322Arrah353Bhubaneswar384Gokarna
323Khagaul354Duburi385Sagardighi
324DLTNGNJ355Nayagarh386Durgapur
325Karamnasa356Aska387Maithon
326Dehri357Chhatrapur388Bokaro
327Nabi NGR358Theruvelli389Majia
328Garwa359Indravati390Kahalgaon
329Gaya360Jeypore391Farraka
330Jharkhand PL361U.Kolab392Lalmatia
331Ranchi362Balimela393Malda
332NKSTPP363Hirakud394Dalkhola
333Koderma364Bolangir395Siliguri
334Tilaiyya365Tarkera396Melli
335Bogaya366SNDRGRH397Rangit
336Patratu367Baripada398Gangtok
337Tenughat368Balasore399Rangpo
338Ranchi369Bhadrak400Kishanganj
339Rourkela370Paradeep401Birpara
340Chaibasa371Keonjhar402Alipurduar
341Jamshedpur372Kolaghat
342Chandil373Howrah
343Talcher STPS374Arambag
Tab.2  
No.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus name
403Bongaigaon408Ranganadi413Silchar
404BTPS409Subansiri414Imphal
405Balipara410Misa415Melriat
406Khupi411Kathalguri416Pallatana
407B. Chariali412Mariani
Tab.3  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
SlCasesPMU locations
1Complete observability210, 212, 216, 221, 224, 228, 231, 236, 238, 243, 244, 249,250, 252, 259, 263, 265, 269, 271, 277,280, 286, 293, 296,301, 309, 312
2Complete Observability with depth of one redundancy209, 210, 211, 212, 214, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 223,224, 225, 226, 228, 229, 231, 233, 235, 236, 239, 241, 243,244, 245, 248, 249, 250, 252, 253, 259, 260, 262, 263, 265,266, 267, 269, 271, 272, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282,284, 285, 286, 288, 290, 293, 296, 297, 299, 301, 302, 303,306, 308, 309, 310, 312
Tab.4  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
SlCasesPMU locations
1Complete observability314, 317, 319, 321, 326, 328, 329, 332, 337, 340, 341, 343, 345,351, 352, 354, 360, 367, 374, 375, 378, 385, 388, 391,396, 401
2Complete observability with redundancy313, 314, 317, 319, 320, 321, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329,330, 332, 333, 334, 336, 337, 339, 341, 343, 344, 345, 347, 348,351, 352, 353, 354, 357, 360, 361, 362, 364, 367, 369, 370, 373,374,375, 376, 377, 378, 380, 382, 384, 385, 388, 389, 391, 392,395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 401, 402, 405,406, 407
Tab.5  
SlCasesPMU Locations
1Complete observability403, 405, 407, 410, 413
2Complete observability with redundancy403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413,414, 415, 416, 416
Tab.6  
Fig.12  
SlTest systemTotal number of busesComplete observabilityComplete observability with redundancy
1NRERIPG19442119
2ERNERIPG1042874
3NRNERIPG1283279
4NRERNERIPG20856135
Tab.7  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
SlCasesPMU locations
1Complete observability210, 212, 216, 221, 224, 229, 231, 236, 243, 244,249,250, 252,259, 263, 265, 269, 271, 277, 280,286, 296, 301, 302, 304, 305,309, 314, 317, 321, 326, 329, 332, 337, 340, 341, 343, 345, 351,352, 354, 360, 367, 374, 375, 378, 385, 388, 391, 396, 401, 403,405, 407, 410, 413
2Complete observability with redundancy209, 210, 211, 212, 214, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 223, 224,225, 226, 228, 229, 231, 233, 235, 236, 239, 241, 243, 244, 245,248, 249, 250, 252, 253, 259, 260, 262, 263, 265, 266, 267, 269,271, 272, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 284, 285, 286, 288,290, 293, 295, 296, 297, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 309, 312, 313,315, 317, 321, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 332, 334,336, 337,339, 340, 341, 343, 345, 347, 348, 351, 352, 353, 354,357, 360, 361, 362, 364, 367, 369, 370, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377,378, 380, 382, 384, 385, 388, 389, 391, 392, 394, 395, 396, 397,398, 399, 400,401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411,412, 413, 414, 415, 416
Tab.8  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
SlTest SystemNormal PMU placementOptimal placementOptimal placement with depth of one-redundancy
1NRIPG3.120.811.95
2ERIPG2.70.781.86
3NERIPG0.420.150.42
4NRERIPG5.821.263.57
5ERNERIPG3.120.842.22
6NRNERIPG3.540.962.37
7NRERNERIPG6.241.684.05
Tab.9  
1 Power Finance Corporation Ltd. Restructured Accelerated Power Development and Reforms Programme (R-APDRP) of Govt. of India . 2012-12-29, http://www.cseb.gov.in/cspdcl/rapdrp/SCADA-DMS/RFP%20for%20SIA_05-12-2012.pdf
2 Taylor T, Ohrn M. Network Management for smart grids. 2013-03, http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot271.nsf/veritydisplay/461c2ae39130ceafc125762d0047f01f/$file/45-49%203M901_ENG72dpi.pdf
3 PSGuard. Improved Power System Performance through Wide Area Monitoring, Protection and Control . 2013-03, http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot221.nsf/veritydisplay/d271149a1ebc45f9c1256db900564198/$file/741_psg_e_04_v.5.pdf
4 Sinha A, Neogi S, Lahiri R N, Chowdhury S, Chowdhury S P, Chakraborty N. Smart grid initiative for power distribution utility in India. In: IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. San Diego, USA , 2011, 1–8
5 Anderson P M, LeReverend B K. Industry experience with special protection schemes. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1996, 11(3): 1166–1179
6 Phadke A G, Thorp J S, Adamiak M G. A new measurement technique for tracking voltage phasors, local system frequency, and rate of change of frequency. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , 1983, PAS-102(5): 1025-1038
7 Nuqui R F, Phadke A G. Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery , 2005, 20(4): 2381-2388
8 Gou B. Generalized integer linear programming formulation for optimal PMU placement. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 2008, 23(3): 1099-1104
9 Abur A, Magnago F H. Optimal meter placement for maintaining observability during single branch outages. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1999, 14(4): 1273-1278
10 Phadke A G, Thorp J S, Karimi K J. Real time voltage phasor measurements for static state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , 1985, 104(11): 3098-3106
11 Garrity T F. Getting smart: innovations and trends for the future electric power systems. Power Systems Conference 2009 (PSC '09) . Clemson, USA, 2008, 1-8
12 Flynn B. What is the real potential of the smart grid? The AMRA International Symposium . Reno, USA, 2007
13 Abbasy N H, Ismail H M. A unified approach for the optimal PMU location for power system state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 2009, 24(2): 806-813
14 Phadke A G, Thorp J S, Nuqui R F, Zhou M. Recent developments in state estimation with phasor measurements. Power Systems Conference and Exposition 2009 (PSCE '09) . Seattle, USA, 2009, 1-7
15 Xu B, Abur A.Optimal placement of phasor measurement units for state estimation. Final Project Report, PSERC Publication 05-58 , 2005
16 Mohammadi-Ivatloo B. Optimal placement of PMUs for power system observability using topology based formulated algorithms. Journal of Applied Sciences , 2009, 9(13): 2463-2468
17 Ghosh D, Ghose T, Mohanta D K. Communication feasibility analysis for smart grid with phasor measurement units. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , 2013, 99: 1-10
18 Gopakumar P, Chandra G S, Reddy M J B. Optimal placement of phasor measurement units for Tamil Nadu state of Indian power grid. In: Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC) . Venice, Italy, 2012, 80-83
19 Gopakumar P, Chandra G S, Reddy M J B, Mohanta D K. Optimal placement of PMUs for the smart grid implementation in Indian power grid - A case study. Frontiers in Energy ,
doi: 10.1007/s11708-013-0257-7
20 Schulze M A. Linear Programming for Optimization . 1998, http://www.markschulze.net/LinearProgramming.pdf
21 Power Grid Corporation Ltd. Govt. of India. Company Overview . 2013-03, www.powergridindia.com
22 Pradeep Y, Khaparde S A. Complex event processing of high level events in multi-area power grid: An Indian perspective. In: IEEE Power and Energy Society Energy Meeting 2010 . Minneapolis, MN, 2010, 1-6
23 Roy A, Khaparde S A, Pentayya P, Usha S, Abhayankar A R. Operating experience of regional interconnections in India. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting , 2005, 2528-2535
24 Zhu F, Zheng Y, Guo X, Wang S. Environmental impacts and benefits of regional power grid inter connections for China. Energy Policy , 2005, 33(14): 1797-1805
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed