Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2015, Vol. 9 Issue (3): 247-258   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-015-0364-8
  本期目录
Effectiveness of state incentives for promoting wind energy: A panel data examination
Deepak SANGROYA(), Jogendra NAYAK
Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India
 全文: PDF(217 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Over the last decade, India has started to concentrate earnestly on renewable energy. The Indian government, as well as different state governments, are adopting policy instruments such as feed in tariff, captive consumption, renewable purchase obligation and generation based incentive etc. aimed at renewable energy development. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of state level incentives for the development of wind energy in India. Fixed effect panel data modelling technique of econometric analysis is used to analyse the data of 26 Indian states in 11 years. The results show that feed in tariff and captive consumption are the significant predictors of wind energy development. However, renewable purchase obligation does not affect wind energy significantly.

Key wordsIndia    wind energy development    state incentives    econometric analysis    panel data
收稿日期: 2014-09-03      出版日期: 2015-09-11
Corresponding Author(s): Deepak SANGROYA   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2015, 9(3): 247-258.
Deepak SANGROYA, Jogendra NAYAK. Effectiveness of state incentives for promoting wind energy: A panel data examination. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(3): 247-258.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-015-0364-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2015/V9/I3/247
Fig.1  
VariableDefinitionVariable typeMeanStd DevMinMax
INSTALAnnual installation of wind energyCont55.51157.5001083.50
SGDPPer capita GDP of statesCont35836.5321229.526200.00124721.00
POPUAnnual population of states (in Million)Cont4.1094.2960.03619.963
RPOState has RPO incentiveBin0.340.4701
FITState has FIT incentiveBin0.300.4601
WRPOState has special RPO for wind energyBin0.140.3501
CCState allow captive consumptionBin0.240.4301
POTENGross potential of wind energy in every stateCont3952.627674.0116.0035071.00
Tab.1  
Andhra PradeshGujaratKarnatakaKeralaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraRajasthanTamil NaduWest BengalOthers
Up to March200293.2181.469.3223.2400.316.18771.13.2
2002–200306.255.600244.6133.600
2003–20046.228.984.9006.2117.8371.200
2004–200521.851.5201.506.348.8106.3675.500
2005–20060.4584.6143.8011.4545.173.27857.5500
2006–20070.8283.95265.95016.4485.3111.9577.900
2007–20080616.36190.38.5130.39268.1568.95380.6700
2008–20090313.631616.525.1183199.6431.100
2009–201013.6297.1145.40.816.6138.9350602.200
2010–201155.4312.8254.17.446.5239.1436.7997.400
2011–201254.1789.9206.70100.5416.5545.71083.500
2012–2013202.1208.3201.709.6288.5614174.600
2013–May 2014305.4239.4273.819.853.01076.2135.1113.800
Total75334142409554394098282072761.13.2
Tab.2  
StateFederal incentive*Feed in tariff/INRPPA tenureCaptive usageThird party sale
Andhra PradeshYes3.5025AllowedPermitted
Andaman and NicobarYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Arunachal PradeshYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
AssamYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
BiharYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
ChattisgarhYesNot availableNot AvailableNot availableNot available
GujaratYes4.2325AllowedPermitted
HaryanaYes6.1425AllowedPermitted
Himachal PradeshYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
JharkhandYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Jammu & KashmirYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
KarnatakaYes3.7010AllowedPermitted
KeralaYes3.6420AllowedPermitted
Madhya PradeshYes4.3525AllowedPermitted
MaharashtraYesWind zone I – 5.67 (w/o AD), 4.86 (with AD)13AllowedPermitted
Wind zone II – 4.93 (w/o AD), 4.23 (with AD)
Wind zone III – 4.20 (w/o AD), 3.60 (with AD)
Wind zone IV – 3.78 (w/o AD), 3.24 (with AD)
ManipurYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
MeghalayaYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
NagalandYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
OdishaYes5.31 (w/o AD) 4.48 (with AD)13AllowedPermitted
PuducherryYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
RajasthanYes5.18 (w/o AD) 4.90 (with AD)-for projects in Jaisalmer, Jodhpur and Barmer districts. 5.44 (w/o AD) 5.14 (AD)-for other districts25AllowedPermitted
SikkimYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Tamil NaduYes3.5120AllowedPermitted
UttarakhandYesWind zone I – 5.15 (w/o AD), 4.75 (with AD)25AllowedPermitted
Wind zone II – 4.35 (w/o AD), 4.00 (with AD)
Wind zone III – 3.65 (w/o AD), 3.35 (with AD)
Wind zone IV – 3.20 (w/o AD), 2.90 (with AD)
Uttar PradeshYesNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
West BengalYes5.7010AllowedPermitted
Tab.3  
Model 1Model 2
ParametersFIT/YFIT0.435***0.613***
CC/YCC2.804***0.098***
RPO/YRPO−0.262−0.231***
WRPO/YWRPO0.427*−0.362***
POTEN0.230***0.149***
POPU0.0400.151***
SGDP0.297**0.620***
Constant1.6791.832
State dummy variablesYesYes
Time dummy variableYesYes
R2 (with state and time effects)0.790.80
R2 (without state and time effects)0.510.54
Number of observation286286
Specification testsHausman testχ2 =274.16***χ2 =139.71***
Wooldridge testF (1, 24) = 28.81***F (1, 24) = 17.03***
Modified Wald testχ2 =57.19***χ2 =95.68***
Frees’ test1.732***2.019***
Tab.4  
1 A K Singh, S K Parida. National electricity planner and use of distributed energy sources in India. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2013, 2: 42–54
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2013.03.001
2 A K Singh, S K Parida. Evaluation of current status and future directions of wind energy in India. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2013, 15(4): 643–655
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0554-6
3 S Mallah, N K Bansal. Allocation of energy resources for power generation in India: business as usual and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(2): 1059–1066
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.058
4 S Mani, T Dhingra. Policies to accelerate the growth of offshore wind energy sector in India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 24: 473–482
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.065
5 M R Islam, S Mekhilef, R Saidur. Progress and recent trends of wind energy technology. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21: 456–468
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.007
6 G Schmid. The development of renewable energy power in India: which policies have been effective? Energy Policy, 2012, 45: 317–326
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.039
7 M Alam Hossain Mondal, L M Kamp, N I Pachova. Drivers, barriers, and strategies for implementation of renewable energy technologies in rural areas in Bangladesh—an innovation system analysis. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(8): 4626–4634
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.018
8 A H Al-Badi, A Malik, A Gastli. Assessment of renewable energy resources potential in Oman and identification of barrier to their significant utilization. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(9): 2734–2739
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.010
9 A H Al-Badi, A Malik, A Gastli. Sustainable energy usage in Oman—opportunities and barriers. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(8): 3780–3788
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.06.007
10 A A Dehghan. Status and potentials of renewable energies in Yazd Province, Iran. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(3): 1491–1496
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.002
11 B Ghobadian, G Najafi, H Rahimi, T F Yusaf. Future of renewable energies in Iran. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(3): 689–695
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.11.010
12 J Han, A P J Mol, Y Lu, L Zhang. Onshore wind power development in China: challenges behind a successful story. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(8): 2941–2951
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.021
13 X Li, K Hubacek, Y L Siu. Wind power in China—dream or reality? Energy, 2012, 37(1): 51–60
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.030
14 W Liu, H Lund, B V Mathiesen. Large-scale integration of wind power into the existing Chinese energy system. Energy, 2011, 36(8): 4753–4760
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.007
15 J McLaren Loring. Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: factors influencing project success. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(4): 2648–2660
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.008
16 K Q Nguyen. Wind energy in Vietnam: resource assessment, development status and future implications. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(2): 1405–1413
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.011
17 E K Oikonomou, V Kilias, A Goumas, A Rigopoulos, E Karakatsani, M Damasiotis, D Papastefanakis, N Marini. Renewable energy sources (RES) projects and their barriers on a regional scale: the case study of wind parks in the Dodecanese islands, Greece. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(11): 4874–4883
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.050
18 F Menz, S Vachon. The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: experiences from the states. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(14): 1786–1796
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.018
19 J Chandler. Trendy solutions: why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards? Energy Policy, 2009, 37(8): 3274–3281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.032
20 A Tang, J E Taylor, A Mahalingam. Strategic structure matrix: a framework for explaining the impact of superstructure organizations on the diffusion of wind energy infrastructure. Energy Policy, 2013, 63: 69–80
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.029
21 B K Sovacool. The intermittency of wind, solar, and renewable electricity generators: technical barrier or rhetorical excuse? Utilities Policy, 2009, 17(3−4): 288–296
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2008.07.001
22 S Carley. State renewable energy electricity policies: an empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(8): 3071–3081
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.062
23 H Yin, N Powers. Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation? Energy Policy, 2010, 38(2): 1140–1149
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.067
24 H A Feiveson, A Rabl. Subsidy strategies for energy technologies. Energy Policy, 1982, 10(4): 322–336
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(82)90047-7
25 V Khare, S Nema, P Baredar. Status of solar wind renewable energy in India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 27: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.018
26 A Sharma, J Srivastava, S Kar, A Kumar. Wind energy status in India: a short review. Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(2): 1157–1164
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.018
27 The World Institute of Sustainable Energy, the Indian Wind Turbine Manufacturers’Association and Global Wind Energy Council. Indian Wind Energy Outlook 2011. 2011-04
28 P C Maithani. Renewable Energy in the Global Context. Delhi: Narosa Publication, 2008, 41–54
29 K Usha Rao, V V N Kishore. Wind power technology diffusion analysis in selected states of India. Renewable Energy, 2009, 34(4): 983–988
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.08.013
30 A Jagadeesh. Wind energy development in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, India Institutional dynamics and barriers—a case study. Energy Policy, 2000, 28(3): 157–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00007-0
31 D Ghosh, P R Shukla, A Garg, P V Ramana. Renewable energy technologies for the Indian power sector: mitigation potential and operational strategies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2002, 6(6): 481–512
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00015-1
32 G Shrimali, S Tirumalachetty. Renewable energy certificate markets in India—a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 26: 702–716
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.034
33 S K Gupta, P Purohit. Renewable energy certificate mechanism in India: a preliminary assessment. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 22: 380–392
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.044
34 S K Ramasesha. Challenges in the quest for clean energies. Resonance, 2013, 18(5): 440–457
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-013-0062-y
35 J Evans, D Olson. Statistics, Data Analysis, and Decision Modeling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003
36 G Shrimali, J Kniefel. Are government policies effective in promoting deployment of renewable electricity resources? Energy Policy, 2011, 39(9): 4726–4741
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.055
37 E J Ringquist. Policy influence and policy responsiveness in state pollution control. Policy Studies Journal: the Journal of the Policy Studies Organization, 1994, 22(1): 25–43
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb02178.x
38 A Sapat. Devolution and innovation: the adoption of state environmental policy innovations by administrative agencies. Public Administration Review, 2004, 64(2): 141–151
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00356.x
39 S Gouchoe, V Everette, R Haynes. Case studies on the effectiveness of state financial incentives for renewable energy. NREL Technical Report. NREL/SR-620-32819. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, USA, 2002
40 M Howell-Moroney. Studying the effects of the intensity of us state growth management approaches on land development outcomes. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2007, 44(11): 2163–2178
https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701518958
41 A Sarzynski, J Larrieu, G Shrimali. The impact of state financial incentives on market deployment of solar technology. Energy Policy, 2012, 46: 550–557
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.032
42 N Beck, J N Katz. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 1995, 89(3): 634–647
https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
43 R A Salim, S Rafiq. Why do some emerging economies proactively accelerate the adoption of renewable energy? Energy Economics, 2012, 34(4): 1051–1057
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.015
44 R Wiser, C Namovicz, M Gielecki, R Smith. Renewables portfolio standards: a factual introduction to experience from the United States. Ernest Orland Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-62569, 2007
45 P del Río, A Calvo Silvosa, G Iglesias Gómez. Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: a qualitative analysis of different options. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(4): 1897–1908
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.035
46 G Shrimali, D Nelson, S Goel, C Konda, R Kumar. Renewable deployment in India: financing costs and implications for policy. Energy Policy, 2013, 62: 28–43
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.071
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed