Performance analysis of combined cycle power plant

doi:10.1007/s11708-015-0371-9

Frontiers in Energy

2015, Vol. 9

Issue (4): 371-386 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-015-0371-9

本期目录

Performance analysis of combined cycle power plant

Nikhil DEV(

),Rajesh ATTRI

Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad 121006, India

全文: PDF(2626 KB) HTML

Abstract：

Combined cycle power plants (CCPPs) are in operation with diverse thermodynamic cycle configurations. Assortment of thermodynamic cycle for scrupulous locality is dependent on the type of fuel available and different utilities obtained from the plant. In the present paper, seven of the practically applicable configurations of CCPP are taken into consideration. Exergetic and energetic analysis of each component of the seven configurations is conducted with the help of computer programming tool, i.e., engineering equation solver (EES) at different pressure ratios. For Case 7, the effects of pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature and ambient relative humidity on the first and second law is studied. The thermodynamics analysis indicates that the exergy destruction in various components of the combined cycle is significantly affected by the overall pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature and pressure loss in air filter and less affected by the ambient relative humidity.

Key words： first-law second-law exergy destruction components

收稿日期: 2014-12-11 出版日期: 2015-11-04

Corresponding Author(s): Nikhil DEV

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2015, 9(4): 371-386.
Nikhil DEV,Rajesh ATTRI. Performance analysis of combined cycle power plant. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(4): 371-386.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-015-0371-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2015/V9/I4/371

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.1

Fig.8

Tab.2

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig.21

Fig.22

Fig.23

Fig.24

Fig.25

Fig.26

Fig.27

Fig.28

Fig.29

Fig.30

Fig.31

Fig.32

Fig.33

Fig.34

Fig.35

Fig.36

Fig.37

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

1	Klara J M, Izsak M S, Wherley M R. Advanced power generation: the potential of indirectly-fired combined cycles. ASME Paper, 1995, Paper No. 95-GT-261
2	Solomon P R, Serio M A, Cosgrove J E, Pines D S, Zhao Y, Buggeln R C, Shamroth S J. A coal-fired heat exchanger for an externally fired gas turbine. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1996, 118(1): 22–31 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2816545
3	McDonald C F, Wilson D G. The utilization of recuperated and regenerated engine cycles for high-efficiency gas turbines in the 21st century. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1996, 16(8–9): 635–653 https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-4311(95)00078-X
4	Jonsson M, Yan J. Humidified gas turbines—a review of proposed and implemented cycles. Energy, 2005, 30(7): 1013–1078 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.08.005
5	McCarthy S J, Scott I. The WR-21 intercooled recuperated gas turbine engine—operation and integration into the royal navy type 45 destroyer system. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2002: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2002, 977–984
6	Vandervort C L, Bary M R, Stoddard L E, Higgins S T. Externally-fired combined cycle: repowering of existing steam plants. ASME Paper, 1993, Paper No. 93-GT-359
7	Gaggioli R A. The concept of available energy. Chemical Engineering Science, 1961, 16(1–2): 87–96 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(61)87010-3
8	Dev N, Samsher, Kachhwaha S S, Attri R. Exergy analysis and simulation of a 30 MW cogeneration cycle. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 8(2): 169–180 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0263-9
9	Dev N, Samsher, Kachhwaha S S, Attri R. Development of reliability index for combined cycle power plant using graph theoretic approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2014, 5(1): 193–203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2013.09.010
10	Dev N, Goyal G K, Attri R, Kumar N. Graph theoretic analysis of advance combined cycle power plants alternatives with latest gas turbines. In: Proceedings of ASME 2013 Gas Turbine India Conference (GTINDIA2013). Bangalore, India, 2013
11	Dev N, Samsher, Kachhwaha S S, Attri R. GTA-based framework for evaluating the role of design parameters in cogeneration cycle power plant efficiency. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2013, 4(2): 273–284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2012.08.002
12	Dev N, Samsher, Kachhwaha S S, Attri R. GTA modeling of combined cycle power plant efficiency analysis. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2015, 6(1): 217–237

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed