Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2017, Vol. 11 Issue (3): 318-325   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0488-0
  本期目录
Failure mode investigation of fuel cell for vehicle application
Zhongjun HOU(), Renfang WANG, Keyong WANG, Weiyu SHI, Danming XING, Hongchun JIANG
Sunrise Power Co., Ltd. & National Engineering Research Centre of Fuel cell and H2 Technology, Dalian 116085, China
 全文: PDF(623 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The durability of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) has been posing a key technical challenge to commercial spread of fuel cell vehicles (FCVs). To improve the durability, it is necessary to optimize the fuel cell system (FCS) design against failure modes. The fuel cell durability research method at FCS scale was exhibited, and the failure modes of fuel cell were experimentally investigated in this paper. It is found that the fuel cell dry operation, start/stop cycle and gas diffusion layer (GDL) flooding are typical failure modes of fuel cells. After the modifications against the failure modes, the durability of FCSs is improved to over 3000 h step by step.

Key wordsproton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC)    fuel cell system (FCS)    durability    failure mode    fuel cell vehicle (FCV)    carbon corrosion    water management
收稿日期: 2017-04-03      出版日期: 2017-09-07
Corresponding Author(s): Zhongjun HOU   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2017, 11(3): 318-325.
Zhongjun HOU, Renfang WANG, Keyong WANG, Weiyu SHI, Danming XING, Hongchun JIANG. Failure mode investigation of fuel cell for vehicle application. Front. Energy, 2017, 11(3): 318-325.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-017-0488-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2017/V11/I3/318
Fig.1  
FCS layout 2008FCS 2013FCS 2014FCS
Time of test /year 2009−2010 2013−2014 2014−2015
Power/kW 44 kW 60 kW 36 kW
Stack Stack generation XY100 XY200a XY200a
Number of unit cells 520 400 220
Power density/(W?cm2) 0.34 0.58 0.58
Temperature/°C 0−60 -10−70 -10−80
Pt loading /(g?kW1) 2.8 0.9 0.9
BOP Operating pressure/kPa 30 50 50
Hydrogen emission Purge Purge Recirculation
Air relative humidity/% 30−90 60−70 70−80
Start/stop tolerant No Yes Yes
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
2008FCS 2013FCS 2014FCS
Durability evaluation Road running for 14785 km (coarsely 400 h) FCS durability test on test bench over 1600 h FCS durability test on test bench over 3000 h
Failure mode investigation Characterization of low cell with CV, TEM, XRD and SEM with partition investigation method Measuring contact angle of GDL -
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Samples Performance CV/(m2·g−1) TEM /nm XRD /nm
Aging MEA 0.144V @ 200mA/cm2 Anode 12.2
Cathode 6.3
Anode 4.9
Cathode 5.4
Anode 11.5
Cathode 10.8
Fresh MEA 0.680V @ 500mA/cm2 Anode 21.3
Cathode 19.4
Anode 4.5
Cathode 6.1
Anode 10.8
Cathode 10.8
Tab.3  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fresh MEA 1# 2# 3#
CV/(m2·g-1) Anode 16 18 13 14
Cathode 38 28 16 13
TEM/nm Anode - 5.5 6.0 6.6
Cathode - 6.5 7.6 7.8
Tab.4  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
1 The department of energy hydrogen and fuel cells program plan. 2011–09
2 Strategic Advisory Committee on Technology Roadmap for Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicles, Chinese Society of Automotive Engineering. Technology Roadmap for Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicles. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016
3 R Borup, J Meyers, B Pivovar, Y S Kim, R Mukundan, N Garland, D Myers, M Wilson, F Garzon, D Wood, P Zelenay, K More, K Stroh, T Zawodzinski, J Boncella, J E McGrath, M Inaba, K Miyatake, M Hori, K Ota, Z Ogumi, S Miyata, A Nishikata, Z Siroma, Y Uchimoto, K Yasuda, K I Kimijima, N Iwashita. Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(10): 3904–3951
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050182l
4 J F Wu, X Z Yuan, J J Martin, H Wang, J Zhang, J Shen, S Wu, W Merida. A review of PEM fuel cell durability: degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 184(1): 104–119
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.006
5 S D Knights, K M Colbow, J St-Pierre, D P Wilkinson. Aging mechanisms and lifetime of PEFC and DMFC. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 127(1–2): 127–134
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.033
6 J Y Wang. System integration, durability and reliability of fuel cells: challenges and solutions. Applied Energy, 2017, 189: 460–479
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.083
7 Z J Hou, Q Gan, Y Q Ma, Y Lin, K Wang, X Yan, B Lin, P Ming. Study on durability of the fuel cell power system for the bus application. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(6): 39–43
https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2010.06.039
8 Z J Hou, H C Jiang, R F Wang, J Hu, Y Q Ma, K Y Wang, X Q Yan, P Qi, P W Ming. Performance stability of fuel cell engine applied in the fuel cell car demonstration. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2011, 41(S2): 131–136
9 H T Yun, Z M Zhong, Z C Sun. Modeling and simulation of fuel cell car powertrain. Shanghai Auto, 2006, 3: 4–6
10 P Chen, P Gan, C D Huang. Fuel cell system development for plug-in FCV. Shanghai Auto, 2011, 1: 3–8
11 C A Reiser, L Bregoli, T W Patterson, J S Yi, J D Yang, M L Perry, T D Jarvi. A reverse-current decay mechanism for fuel cells. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2005, 8(6): A273–A276
https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1896466
12 A Taniguchi, T Akita, K Yasuda, Y Miyazaki. Analysis of electrocatalyst degradation in PEMFC caused by cell reversal during fuel starvation. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 130(1–2): 42–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.035
13 J St-Pierre, D P Wilkinson, S Knights, M L Bos. Relationships between water management, contamination and lifetime degradation in PEFC. Journal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems, 2000, 3(2): 99–106
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed