NAZEMZADEGAN Mohammad Reza1, KASAEIAN Alibakhsh1, TOGHYANI Somayeh1, AHMADI Mohammad Hossein2(), SAIDUR R.3, MING Tingzhen4
1. Department of Renewable Energies, Faculty of New Science and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, 1417466191, Iran 2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronic, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood 3619995161, Iran 3. Faculty of Science and Technology, Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, 47500 Petaling Jaya, Malaysia; Department of Engineering, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK 4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Multi-objective optimization in a finite time thermodynamic method for dish-Stirling by branch and bound method and MOPSO algorithm
Mohammad Reza NAZEMZADEGAN1, Alibakhsh KASAEIAN1, Somayeh TOGHYANI1, Mohammad Hossein AHMADI2(), R. SAIDUR3, Tingzhen MING4
1. Department of Renewable Energies, Faculty of New Science and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, 1417466191, Iran 2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronic, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood 3619995161, Iran 3. Faculty of Science and Technology, Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, 47500 Petaling Jaya, Malaysia; Department of Engineering, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK 4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
There are various analyses for a solar system with the dish-Stirling technology. One of those analyses is the finite time thermodynamic analysis by which the total power of the system can be obtained by calculating the process time. In this study, the convection and radiation heat transfer losses from collector surface, the conduction heat transfer between hot and cold cylinders, and cold side heat exchanger have been considered. During this investigation, four objective functions have been optimized simultaneously, including power, efficiency, entropy, and economic factors. In addition to the four-objective optimization, three-objective, two-objective, and single-objective optimizations have been done on the dish-Stirling model. The algorithm of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) with post-expression of preferences is used for multi-objective optimizations while the branch and bound algorithm with pre-expression of preferences is used for single-objective and multi-objective optimizations. In the case of multi-objective optimizations with post-expression of preferences, Pareto optimal front are obtained, afterward by implementing the fuzzy, LINMAP, and TOPSIS decision making algorithms, the single optimum results can be achieved. The comparison of the results shows the benefits of MOPSO in optimizing dish Stirling finite time thermodynamic equations.
通讯作者:
AHMADI Mohammad Hossein
E-mail: mohammadhosein.ahmadi@gmail.com
Corresponding Author(s):
Mohammad Hossein AHMADI
引用本文:
NAZEMZADEGAN Mohammad Reza, KASAEIAN Alibakhsh, TOGHYANI Somayeh, AHMADI Mohammad Hossein, SAIDUR R., MING Tingzhen. 通过分支定界法和MOPSO算法进行碟式斯特林有限时间热力学方法中的多目标优化[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(3): 649-665.
Mohammad Reza NAZEMZADEGAN, Alibakhsh KASAEIAN, Somayeh TOGHYANI, Mohammad Hossein AHMADI, R. SAIDUR, Tingzhen MING. Multi-objective optimization in a finite time thermodynamic method for dish-Stirling by branch and bound method and MOPSO algorithm. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(3): 649-665.
Heat transfer coefficient/(W•K–4 or W•m–2•K–1)
I
Direct solar flux intensity/(W•m–2)
i
ith objective
j
jth solution
n
Mole number of the working fluid/mol
P
Dimensionless output power
Q
Heat transfer/J
R
Universal gas constant/(J•mol–1•K–1)
S
Dimensionless entropy
T
Temperature/K
W
Work/J
V
Volume
t
Cyclic period/s
x
Temperature ratio of the Stirling engine
Greek letter
l
Ratio of volume during the regenerative processes
h
Thermal efficiency
є
Emissivity factor
s
Entropy
d
Stefan–Boltzmann coefficient
Subscripts
H
Absorber (heater)
h
High temperature side heat exchanger
L
Heat sink
c
Low temperature side heat exchanger
m
Entire solar dish Stirling system
t
Stirling engine
0
Ambient condition, optics
1–4
Process states
1
EIA. International Energy outlook.2011–09,
2
F L Curzon, B Ahlborn. Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output. American Journal of Physics, 1975, 43(1): 22–24 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.10023
I Tlili, Y Timoumi, S B Nasrallah. Thermodynamic analysis of the Stirling heat engine with regenerative losses and internal irreversibilities. International Journal of Engine Research, 2008, 9(1): 45–56 https://doi.org/10.1243/14680874JER01707
6
S C Kaushik, S Kumar. Finite time thermodynamic evaluation of irreversible Ericsson and Stirling heat engines. Energy Conversion and Management, 2001, 42(3): 295–312 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00063-7
7
S C Kaushik, S Kumar. Finite time thermodynamic analysis of endoreversible Stirling heat engine with regenerative losses. Energy, 2000, 25(10): 989–1003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00023-2
8
S C Kaushik, S K Tyagi, S K Bose, M K Singhal. Performance evaluation of irreversible Stirling and Ericsson heat pump cycles. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2002, 41(2): 193–200 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1290-0729(01)01297-2
9
M Costea, S Petrescu, C Harman. The effect of irreversibilities on solar Stirling engine cycle performance. Energy Conversion and Management, 1999, 40(15–16): 1723–1731 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00065-5
10
I Urieli, M Kushnir. The ideal adiabatic cycle-a rational basis for Stirling engine analysis. In: Proceeding of 17th IECEC, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1982
11
F Wu, L Chen, C Wu, F Sun. Optimum performance of irreversible Stirling engine with imperfect regeneration. Energy Conversion and Management, 1998, 39(8): 727–732 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(97)10036-X
12
S Petrescu, M Costea, C Harman, T Florea. Application of the direct method to irreversible Stirling cycles with finite speed. International Journal of Energy Research, 2002, 26(7): 589–609 https://doi.org/10.1002/er.806
C H Cheng, Y J Yu. Numerical model for predicting thermodynamic cycle and thermal efficiency of a beta-type Stirling engine with rhombic-drive mechanism. Renewable Energy, 2010, 35(11): 2590–2601 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.04.002
15
O E Ataer. Numerical analysis of regenerators of piston type Stirling engines using Lagrangian formulation. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2002, 25(5): 640–652 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(01)00051-2
16
I Tlili. Finite time thermodynamic evaluation of endoreversible Stirling heat engine at maximum power conditions. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(4): 2234–2241 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.022
F Formosa. Coupled thermodynamic-dynamic semi-analytical model of free piston Stirling engines. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(5): 2098–2109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.12.014
19
I Iwamoto, K Toda, K Hirata, M Takeuchi, T Yamamoto. Comparison of low and high temperature differential Stirling engines. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Stirling engine conference, Anacona, Italy, 1997
20
M H Ahmadi, H Hosseinzade. Investigation of solar collector design parameters effect onto solar Stirling engine efficiency. Journal of Applied Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 1(01): 1–4 https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9873.1000102
Y Li , Y L He, W W Wang . Optimization of solar-powered Stirling heat engine with finite-time thermodynamics. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(1): 421–427 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.037
23
A Sharma, S K Shukla, A K Rai. Finite time thermodynamic analysis and optimization of Solar-Dish Stirling heat engine with regenerative losses. Thermal Science, 2011, 15(4): 995–1009 https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI110418101S
24
H Sayyaadi. Multi-objective approach in thermoenvironomic optimization of a benchmark cogeneration system. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(6): 867–879 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.08.017
25
M H Ahmadi, H Sayyaadi, S Dehghani, H Hosseinzade. Designing a solar powered Stirling heat engine based on multiple criteria: maximized thermal efficiency and power. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 75: 282–291 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.06.025
26
C Chen, C Ho, H Yau. Performance analysis and optimization of a solar powered Stirling engine with heat transfer considerations. Energies, 2012, 5(12): 3573–3585 https://doi.org/10.3390/en5093573
M H Ahmadi, A H Mohammadi, S Dehghani, M Barranco-Jiménez. Multi-objective thermodynamic-based optimization of output power of solar dish-Stirling engine by implementing an evolutionary algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 75: 438–445 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.06.030
29
M H Ahmadi, H Hosseinzade, H Sayyaadi, A H Mohammadi, F Kimiaghalam. Application of the multi-objective optimization method for designing a powered Stirling g heat engine: design with maximized power, thermal efficiency and minimized pressure loss. Renewable Energy, 2013, 60: 313–322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.05.005
30
M H Ahmadi, H Sayyaadi, A H Mohammadi, M Barranco-Jiménez. Thermo-economic multi-objective optimization of solar dish-Stirling engine by implementing evolutionary algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 73: 370–380 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.031
31
A, Lazzaretto A Toffolo. Energy, economy and environment as objectives in multi-criterion optimization of thermal systems design. Energy, 2004, 29(8): 1139–1157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.02.022
32
M H Ahmadi, M A Ahmadi, A H Mohammadi, M Feidt, S M Pourkiaei. Multi-objective optimization of an irreversible Stirling cryogenic refrigerator cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 82: 351–360 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.033
33
H Chaitou, P Nika. Exergetic optimization of a thermoacoustic engine using the particle swarm optimization method. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 55: 71–80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.10.024
34
C Duan, X Wang, S Shu, C Jing, H Chang. Thermodynamic design of Stirling engine using multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 84: 88–96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.003
35
S Toghyani, A Kasaeian, M H Ahmadi. Multi-objective optimization of Stirling engine using non-ideal adiabatic method. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 80: 54–62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.022
36
M H Ahmadi, M Mehrpooya, F Pourfayaz. Exergoeconomic analysis and multi objective optimization of performance of a carbon dioxide power cycle driven by geothermal energy with liquefied natural gas as its heat sink. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 119: 422–434 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.062
37
M H Ahmadi, M A Ahmadi, A Mellit, F Pourfayaz, M Feidt. Thermodynamic analysis and multi objective optimization of performance of solar dish Stirling engine by the centrality of entransy and entropy generation. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2016, 78: 88–95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.042
38
M H Ahmadi, M A Ahmadi, M Feidt. Thermodynamic analysis and evolutionary algorithm based on multi-objective optimization of performance for irreversible four-temperature-level refrigeration. Mechanics & Industry, 2015, 16(2): 207 https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2014080
39
J Kennedy, R Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth, Australia, 1995