Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2020, Vol. 14 Issue (2): 298-317   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0648-5
  本期目录
用于配电网络风险评估的电动汽车充电行为随机估计的框架
HABIB Salman1(), KHAN Muhammad Mansoor2, ABBAS Farukh2, NUMAN Muhammad2, ALI Yaqoob2, TANG Houjun2, YAN Xuhui3
1. 上海交通大学电子信息与电气工程学院,输变电控制教育部重点实验室; 巴基斯坦工程技术大学电气工程系
2. 上海交通大学电子信息与电气工程学院,输变电控制教育部重点实验室
3. 国家电网溧阳供电公司
A framework for stochastic estimation of electric vehicle charging behavior for risk assessment of distribution networks
Salman HABIB1(), Muhammad Mansoor KHAN2, Farukh ABBAS2, Muhammad NUMAN2, Yaqoob ALI2, Houjun TANG2, Xuhui YAN3
1. Key Laboratory of Control of Power Transmission and Transformation of the Ministry of Education, School of Electronic, Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan
2. Key Laboratory of Control of Power Transmission and Transformation of the Ministry of Education, School of Electronic, Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3. State Grid Liyang Power Supply Company, Liyang 213300, China
 全文: PDF(4567 KB)   HTML
摘要:

电力系统正在转型,以增强可持续性。本文通过开发一种现实且随机的电动汽车(EV)充电模型,为有关未来电力网络运行过程的知识做出了贡献。将电动汽车大规模集成到住宅配电网(RDN)中,对于公用事业运营商来说,这是一个至关重要的不断发展的问题。电压不平衡会阻碍RDN的有效和可靠运行,多样化的EV负载也需要采用随机方法来预测EV的充电需求,因此,本文开发了一个概率模型以说明几个实际方面,包括充电时间,电池容量,行驶里程,充电状态,行驶频率,充电功率以及高峰和非高峰充电策略下的使用时间机制,并 试图通过应用电动汽车充电模式的随机模型来检查与RDN相关的风险。从蒙特卡洛模拟获得的EV随机模型的输出用于评估RDN的电能质量参数。本文研究发现必须评估RDN的设备能力,以确定潜在的过载。RDN的性能规格包括电压不平衡因数,电压行为,家用变压器极限和馈线损耗,是根据具有不同穿透水平的各种充电功率水平的EV充电场景进行评估的。 此外,发现电动汽车对RDN的影响评估主要取决于电网的类型和位置。

Abstract

Power systems are being transformed to enhance the sustainability. This paper contributes to the knowledge regarding the operational process of future power networks by developing a realistic and stochastic charging model of electric vehicles (EVs). Large-scale integration of EVs into residential distribution networks (RDNs) is an evolving issue of paramount significance for utility operators. Unbalanced voltages prevent effective and reliable operation of RDNs. Diversified EV loads require a stochastic approach to predict EVs charging demand, consequently, a probabilistic model is developed to account several realistic aspects comprising charging time, battery capacity, driving mileage, state-of-charge, traveling frequency, charging power, and time-of-use mechanism under peak and off-peak charging strategies. An attempt is made to examine risks associated with RDNs by applying a stochastic model of EVs charging pattern. The output of EV stochastic model obtained from Monte-Carlo simulations is utilized to evaluate the power quality parameters of RDNs. The equipment capability of RDNs must be evaluated to determine the potential overloads. Performance specifications of RDNs including voltage unbalance factor, voltage behavior, domestic transformer limits and feeder losses are assessed in context to EV charging scenarios with various charging power levels at different penetration levels. Moreover, the impact assessment of EVs on RDNs is found to majorly rely on the type and location of a power network.

Key wordselectric vehicles (EVs)    residential distribution networks (RDNs)    voltage unbalance factor (VUF)    state-of charge (SOC)    time-of-use (TOU)
收稿日期: 2019-05-12      出版日期: 2020-06-22
通讯作者: HABIB Salman     E-mail: sams560@sjtu.edu.cn
Corresponding Author(s): Salman HABIB   
 引用本文:   
HABIB Salman, KHAN Muhammad Mansoor, ABBAS Farukh, NUMAN Muhammad, ALI Yaqoob, TANG Houjun, YAN Xuhui. 用于配电网络风险评估的电动汽车充电行为随机估计的框架[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(2): 298-317.
Salman HABIB, Muhammad Mansoor KHAN, Farukh ABBAS, Muhammad NUMAN, Yaqoob ALI, Houjun TANG, Xuhui YAN. A framework for stochastic estimation of electric vehicle charging behavior for risk assessment of distribution networks. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(2): 298-317.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-019-0648-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2020/V14/I2/298
Fig.1  
EV charging levels Voltage requirements Current requirements/A Power requirements/kW
Level 1 Single-phase 120VAC (US), 230VAC (EU) 12
20
1.4
1.9
Level 2 Single-phase 240VAC (US) 17
30
80
4
7.2
19.2
Tab.1  
EV Model EV Percentage/% (Li-Ion), Battery/kWh Range/km Residential charging Level 1
(120 VAC)
Residential charging Level 2 (240 VAC)
Power consumption/kW Approx.
Charging time/h
Power consumption/kW Approx. charging time/h
Nissan leaf 35 24 135 1.8 12–16 6.6 4–5
Chevrolet volt 25 18 85 1.4 10–13 3.8 Up to 5
Mitsubishii-MiEV 15 16 100 1.4 >12 7.2 Up to 6
BMW i3 15 22 160 1.8 7–10 7.2 2.5–3.5
Tesla roadster 10 54 340 1.8 >20 9.7–11.7 1.5–2
Tab.2  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
1 M Tabari, A Yazdani. An energy management strategy for a DC distribution system for power system integration of plug-in electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 7(2): 659–668
2 S Habib, M M Khan, F Abbas, L Sang, M U Shahid, H Tang. A comprehensive study of implemented international standards, technical challenges, impacts and prospects for electric vehicles. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2018, 6: 13866–13890
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2812303
3 S K Habib, M M Khan, F Abbas, H Tang. Assessment of electric vehicles concerning impacts, charging infrastructure with unidirectional and bidirectional chargers, and power flow comparisons. International Journal of Energy Research, 2018, 42(11): 3416–3441
https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4033
4 R Irle. EV-volumes—the electric vehicle world sales database. 2018–11–22, available at ev-volumes.com website
5 D Wu, D C Aliprantis, K Gkritza. Electric energy and power consumption by light-duty plug-in electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2011, 26(2): 738–746
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2052375
6 J A P Lopes, F J Soares, P M R Almeida. Integration of electric vehicles in the electric power system. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2011, 99(1): 168–183
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2066250
7 K Clement-Nyns, E Haesen, J Driesen. The impact of charging plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on a residential distribution grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2010, 25(1): 371–380
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036481
8 D Steen, L A Tuan, O Carlson, L Bertling. Assessment of electric vehicle charging scenarios based on demographical data. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012, 3(3): 1457–1468
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2012.2195687
9 S Deilami, A S Masoum, P S Moses, M A S Masoum. Paper presentation—real-time coordination of plug-in electric vehicle charging in smart grids to minimize power losses and improve voltage profile. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2011, 2(3): 456–467
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2011.2159816
10 P Richardson, D Flynn, A Keane. Optimal charging of electric vehicles in low-voltage distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2012, 27(1): 268–279
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2158247
11 X Wang, R Karki. Exploiting PHEV to augment power system reliability. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 8(5): 2100–2108
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2515989
12 A Almutairi, A Bin Humayd, M M A Salama. Quantifying the impact of PEV charging loads on the reliability performance of generation systems. In: IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 2016
13 K Hou, X Xu, H Jia, X Yu, T Jiang, K Zhang, B Shu. A reliability assessment approach for integrated transportation and electrical power systems incorporating electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9(1): 88–100
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2545113
14 M C Falvo, G Graditi, P Siano. Electric vehicles integration in demand response programs. In: International Symposium on Power Electronics Electrical Drives Automation & Motion, 2014, 548–553
15 M L Di Silvestre, E Riva Sanseverino, G Zizzo, G Graditi. An optimization approach for efficient management of EV parking lots with batteries recharging facilities. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2013, 4(6): 641–649
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-013-0174-y
16 Y Zhou, Z Li, Z Song, et al. The charging and discharging power prediction for electric vehicles. In: IECON 2016–42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Florence, Italy, 2016, 4014–4019
17 M Di Somma, G Graditi, E Heydarian-Forushani, M Shafie-khah, P Siano. Stochastic optimal scheduling of distributed energy resources with renewables considering economic and environmental aspects. Renewable Energy, 2018, 116: 272–287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.074
18 Z Liu, D Wang, H Jia, N Djilali, W Zhang. Aggregation and bidirectional charging power control of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: generation system adequacy analysis. IEEE Transaction on Renewable Energy, 2015, 6(2): 325–335
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2014.2372044
19 G Li, X P Zhang. Modeling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging demand in probabilistic power flow calculations. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012, 3(1): 492–499
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2011.2172643
20 Z Yang, K Li, A Foley. Computational scheduling methods for integrating plug-in electric vehicles with power systems: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 51: 396–416
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.007
21 J Hu, S You, M Lind, J Ostergaard. Coordinated charging of electric vehicles for congestion prevention in the distribution grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2014, 5(2): 703–711
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2013.2279007
22 L Hua, J Wang, C Zhou. Adaptive electric vehicle charging coordination on distribution network. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2014, 5(6): 2666–2675
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2336623
23 J de Hoog, T Alpcan, M Brazil, D A Thomas, I Mareels. Optimal charging of electric vehicles taking distribution network constraints into account. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 30(1): 365–375
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2318293
24 J Quirós-Tortós, L F Ochoa, S W Alnaser, T Butler. Control of EV charging points for thermal and voltage management of LV networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(4): 3028–3039
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2468062
25 A Navarro-Espinosa, L F Ochoa. Probabilistic impact assessment of low carbon technologies in LV distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(3): 2192–2203
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2448663
26 A S B Humayd, K Bhattacharya. A novel framework for evaluating maximum PEV penetration into distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9(4): 2741–2751
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2618219
27 S Sachan, N Adnan. Stochastic charging of electric vehicles in smart power distribution grids. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 40: 91–100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.031
28 R Misra, S Paudyal, O Ceylan, P Mandal. Harmonic distortion minimization in power grids with wind and electric vehicles. Energies, 2017, 10(7): 932
https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070932
29 Y A Alhazmi, M M A Salama. Economical staging plan for implementing electric vehicle charging stations. Sustainable Energy, Grids Networks, 2017, 10: 12–25
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2017.02.001
30 F Sehar, M Pipattanasomporn, S Rahman. RahmanS. Demand management to mitigate impacts of plug-in electric vehicle fast charge in buildings with renewables. Energy, 2017, 120: 642–651
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.118
31 J García-Villalobos, I Zamora, K Knezović, M Marinelli. Multi-objective optimization control of plug-in electric vehicles in low voltage distribution networks. Applied Energy, 2016, 180: 155–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.110
32 M Muratori. Impact of uncoordinated plug-in electric vehicle charging on residential power demand. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(3): 193–201
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0074-z
33 National Household Travel Survey, US. NHTS datasets. 2018–06–06, available at
34 R Godina, E M G Rodrigues, J C O Matias, J P S Catalão. Smart electric vehicle charging scheduler for overloading prevention of an industry client power distribution transformer. Applied Energy, 2016, 178: 29–42
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.019
35 National Transmission and Despatch Company Limited (NTDC), Pakistan. PMS Load Forecast. 2018–04–23, available at ntdc.com website
36 DIgSILENT GmbH Germany. DIgSILENT Power System Software and Engineering. 2014, available at
37 IEEE Power and Energy Society. IEEE PES AMPS DSAS Test Feeder Working Group. 2018–04–17, available at
38 D R R Penido, L R de Araujo, S Carneiro, J L R Pereira, P A N Garcia. Three-phase power flow based on four-conductor current injection method for unbalanced distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(2): 494–503
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.919423
[1] FEP-19028-OF-HS_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed