Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2021, Vol. 15 Issue (2): 328-344   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0676-1
  本期目录
Numerical simulation of underground seasonal cold energy storage for a 10 MW solar thermal power plant in north-western China using TRNSYS
Zulkarnain ABBAS1, Yong LI2(), Ruzhu WANG1
1. Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
 全文: PDF(2063 KB)   HTML
Abstract

This paper aims to explore an efficient, cost-effective, and water-saving seasonal cold energy storage technique based on borehole heat exchangers to cool the condenser water in a 10 MW solar thermal power plant. The proposed seasonal cooling mechanism is designed for the areas under typical weather conditions to utilize the low ambient temperature during the winter season and to store cold energy. The main objective of this paper is to utilize the storage unit in the peak summer months to cool the condenser water and to replace the dry cooling system. Using the simulation platform transient system simulation program (TRNSYS), the borehole thermal energy storage (BTES) system model has been developed and the dynamic capacity of the system in the charging and discharging mode of cold energy for one-year operation is studied. The typical meteorological year (TMY) data of Dunhuang, Gansu province, in north-western China, is utilized to determine the lowest ambient temperature and operation time of the system to store cold energy. The proposed seasonal cooling system is capable of enhancing the efficiency of a solar thermal power plant up to 1.54% and 2.74% in comparison with the water-cooled condenser system and air-cooled condenser system respectively. The techno-economic assessment of the proposed technique also supports its integration with the condenser unit in the solar thermal power plant. This technique has also a great potential to save the water in desert areas.

Key wordsseasonal cold energy storage    borehole heat exchangers    typical meteorological data    TRNSYS    condenser cooling    techno-economic assessment
收稿日期: 2019-10-22      出版日期: 2021-06-18
Corresponding Author(s): Yong LI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2021, 15(2): 328-344.
Zulkarnain ABBAS, Yong LI, Ruzhu WANG. Numerical simulation of underground seasonal cold energy storage for a 10 MW solar thermal power plant in north-western China using TRNSYS. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 328-344.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-020-0676-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2021/V15/I2/328
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Sr No. Parameter Value
1 Storage volume/m3 467027
2 Borehole depth/m 50
3 Header depth/m 0.5
4 Number of boreholes 354
5 Borehole spacing/m 4
6 Storage thermal conductivity/(W·(m·K)–1) 2
7 Storage heat capacity/(kJ·(m3·K)–1) 4113.21
8 Outer diameter of U tube pipe/m 0.032
9 Inner diameter of U tube pipe/m 0.026
10 Reference borehole flow rate/(kg·h–1) 955
11 Fluid density/(kg·m–3) 1000
12 Initial surface temperature/°C 9.53
13 Maximum storage temperature/°C 14
15 Thermal conductivity of vertical layer/((kg·(h·m·K)–1)) 4.32
16 Flow rate in U pipes/(m·s–1) 0.5
17 Pump power/kW 37
19 Overall pump efficiency 0.6
20 Fluid specific heat/(kJ·(kg·K)–1) 4.19
21 Rated flow rate/(kg·h–1) 900
22 Insulation height fraction/m 0.5
23 Insulation thickness/m 0.0254
24 Insulation thermal conductivity/(W·(m·K)–1) 0.043
25 Average airtemperature/°C 9.57
Tab.1  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Month Inlet fluid temperature/°C Air temperature/°C
Oct 0 –2
Nov –5 –7
Dec –6 –11
Jan –9 –13
Feb –5 –8
Mar –1 –3
Tab.2  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Rated parameters Value
Rated flow/(m3·h–1) 400
Rated head/m 20
Rated efficiency/% 70
Motor power/kW 37
Tab.3  
Fig.18  
Cooling technique Total electrical power for cooling/MW Per megawatt electrical power for cooling
Water-cooled condenser at 137 MW power plant 2.056 0.015
Air-cooled condenser at 137 MW power plant 3.355 0.024
BTES system at 10 MW power plant 0.037 0.0037
Tab.4  
Cooling technique Total water consumption/(g·min−1) Per megawatt water consumption /(g·min−1)
Water-cooled condenser at 137 MW power plant 77930 568.8
Water-cooled condenser with seasonal cooling at 10 MW power plant 1656.84 165.68
Tab.5  
Parameters Cost/$
Equipment cost 1004200
Borehole field cost 1062000
Total capital cost 2066200
Annual operating cost 5000
Annual maintenance cost 20662
Total annual cost 25662
LCOH/($·GJ–1) 10
Payback period 20–25 years
Tab.6  
Fig.19  
TES Thermal energy storage
Qf Total fluid flow rate/(kg·h–1)
STES Seasonal thermal energy storage
β Damping factor
BTES Borehole thermal energy storage
Lp Pipe length/m
CF Specific heat capacity of the fluid
Tf Fluid temperature
GSHP Ground source heat pump
QF Fluid flow rate/(kg·h–1)
V Storage volume/m3
ql Regional heat conduction heat flow
Tg Global heat conduction temperature
qsf Steady-state heat flow
Tl Regional heat conduction temperature
r Radial distance of buried pipes
Vk Volume of grid k
Tgk Average temperature in grid k
βsfk Correction factor
Tg,i, jk Temperature of the grid (i, j)
C Volumetric heat capaci/(J·(m3·K)–1)
Nb Number of boreholes
α Heat transfer coefficient
COP Coefficient of performance
Cp Specific heat capacity//(J·(kg·K)–1)
co Before cooling
ρ Density/(kg·m–3)
Ta Ground temperature
Q(t) Rate of heat injection/extraction
ce End of cooling
Tfin Inlet fluid temperature/K
ATES Aquifer thermal energy storage
Tfout Outlet fluid temperature/K
ΔT Temperature difference/ K
Vf Volumetric flow rate of fluid
A Pipe cross-sectional area/m2
Q Flow rate through the pipe/(m3·s–1)
λ Friction coefficient
ξ Minor loss coefficient
Qc Total cold energy stored
W Pump work required by system
q Flow capacity
h Differential head/head losses,
g Gravitational acceleration
Cc Capital cost/$
Cmt Maintenance cost in a year/$
Cot Operational cost in a year/$
Et Energy delivered in year t/GJ
r Discount rate
Np Payback period/a
Cs Total cost of equipment/$
QL Total heat load/GJ
if Electricity inflammation rate
CF Cost of input electrical energy
d Down payment
F Annual solar fraction/%
Rt Net cash flow
N Total number of periods
t Time of cash flow
  
1 F Berroug, E K Lakhal, M El Omari, M Faraji, H El Qarniac. Thermal performance of a greenhouse with a phase change material north wall. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(11): 3027–3035
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.07.020
2 A Najjar, A Hasan. Modeling of greenhouse with PCM energy storage. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(11): 3338–3342
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.04.015
3 S Bouadila, S Kooli, S Skouri, M Lazaar, A Farhat. Improvement of the greenhouse climate using a solar air heater with latent storage energy. Energy, 2014, 64: 663–672
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.066
4 I Sarbu, C Sebarchievici. Solar Heating and Cooling: Fundamentals, Experiments and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier, 2016
5 D Schmidt, D Mangold, H Mülller-Steinhagen. Central solar heating plants with seasonal storage in Germany. Solar Energy, 2004, 76(1–3): 165–174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.025
6 S Kuravi, J Trahan, D Y Goswami , M M, Rahman E K. Stefanakos. Thermal energy storage technologies and systems for concentrating solar power plants. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2013, 39(4): 285–319
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2013.02.001
7 M Liu, N H, Steven Tay S Bell, M Belusko, R Jacob, G Will, W, Saman F. Bruno Review on concentrating solar power plants and newdevelopments in high-temperature thermal energy storage technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 53: 1411–1432
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.026
8 X Xu, F Luo, W Wang, T Hong, X Fu. Performance-based evaluation of courtyard design in China’s cold-winter hot-summer climate regions. Sustainability, 2018, 10(11): 3950
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113950
9 J Moore, A Grimes R, O’Donovan, E Walsh. Design and testing of a novel air-cooled condenser for concentrated solar power plants. Energy Procedia, 2014, 49: 1439–1449
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.153
10 A de Gracia, L F Cabeza. Phase change materials and thermal energy storage for buildings. Energy and Building, 2015, 103: 414–419
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.007
11 A Kumar, S K Shukla. A review on thermal energy storage unit for solar thermal power plant application. Energy Procedia, 2015, 74: 462–469
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.728
12 I Sarbu, C Sebarchievici. A comprehensive review of thermal energy storage. Sustainability, 2018, 10(2): 191
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010191
13 International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). The Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programmes (ETSAP): Technology Brief E17. Paris, France, 2013
14 C A Cruickshank, C Baldwin. Sensible thermal energy storage: diurnal and seasonal. In: Letcher T M, ed. Storing Energy, 2016: 291–311
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803440-8.00015-4
15 M Lundh, J O Dalenback. Swedish solar heated residential area with seasonal storage in rock: initial evaluation. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33(4): 703–711
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.03.024
16 B Sibbitt, D McClenahan, R Djebbar, J Thornton, B Wong, J, Carriere J Kokko. The performance of a high solar fraction seasonal storage district heating system–five years of operation. Energy Procedia, 2012, 30: 856–865
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.11.097
17 W Wu, T You, B Wang, W Shi, X Li. Evaluation of ground source absorption heat pumps combined with borehole free cooling. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 79: 334–343
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.045
18 U Eicker, C Vorschulze. Potential of geothermal heat exchangers for office building climatisation. Renewable Energy, 2009, 34(4): 1126–1133
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.06.019
19 J Lund, B Sanner, L Rybach, R Curtis, G Hellstrom. Geothermal (ground source) heat pumps, a world overview. Oregon: Oregon Institute of Technology, 2004, available at the website of oit
20 B Sanner, C Karytsas, D Mendrinos, L Rybach. Current status of ground source heat pumps and underground thermal energy storage in Europe. Geothermics, 2003, 32(4–6): 579–588
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00060-9
21 D Pahud, M Belliardi, P Caputo. Geocooling potential of borehole heat exchangers’ systems applied to low energy office buildings. Renewable Energy, 2012, 45: 197–204
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.008
22 REN 21. Renewables 2018 Global Status Report (Paris: REN21 Secretariat). 2018, available at the website of ren21
23 Z S Li, G Q Zhang, D M Li, J Zhou, L J, Li L X Li. Application and development of solar energy in the building industry and its prospects in China. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8): 4121–4127
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.006
24 P Crompton, Y Wu. Energy consumption in China: past trends and future directions. Energy Economics, 2005, 27(1): 195–208
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.10.006
25 L Yang, J C Lam, C L Tsang. Energy performance of building envelopes in different climate zones in China. Applied Energy, 2008, 85(9): 800–817
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2007.11.002
26 Y Geng. Improve China’s sustainability targets. Nature, 2011, 477(7363): 162
https://doi.org/10.1038/477162b
27 X G Li, Z H Chen, J Zhao. Simulation and experiment on the thermal performance of U-vertical ground-coupled heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2006, 26(14–15): 1564–1571
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.12.007
28 S Lanini, F Delaleux, X Py, R Olivès, D Nguyen. Improvement of borehole thermal energy storage design based on experimental and modeling results. Energy and Building, 2014, 77: 393–400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.056
29 D Pahud, G Hellström, L Mazzarella. DUCT GROUND HEAT STORAGE MODEL: Manual for Computer Code. Lund: University of Lund, 1989
30 L R Ingersoll, H J Plass. Theory of the ground pipe heat source for the heat pump. Heating, Piping, and Air Conditioning, 1948, 54(7): 339–348
31 R A Beier, M D Smith, J D Spitler. Reference data sets for vertical borehole ground heat exchanger models and thermal response test analysis. Geothermics, 2011, 40(1): 79–85
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2010.12.007
32 B Kelly. Nexant parabolic trough solar power plant systems analysis, task 2 comparison of wet and dry Rankine cycle heat rejection. Technical Report: National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/SR-550–40163, 2006
33 L Semple, R Carriveau, D S K Ting. A techno-economic analysis of seasonal thermal energy storage for green house applications. Energy and Building, 2017, 154: 175–187
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.065
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed