Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2021, Vol. 15 Issue (2): 374-383   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0710-3
  本期目录
Experimental study on influence of operating parameters on tar components from corn straw gasification in fluidized bed
Shuai GUO, Xiao WEI, Deyong CHE, Hongpeng LIU, Baizhong SUN()
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China
 全文: PDF(1487 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Gasification is a promising approach for converting solid fuel sources, including renewable ones like biomass, for use. The main problem in biomass gasification is the formation of condensable tars, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This paper investigated the conversion of tar components during corn straw gasification. It analyzed collected tar components using a gas chromatograph-mass spectrograph (GC-MS). Experimental results indicate that, with increasing temperature from 700°C to 900°C, the concentrations of benzene, indene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, acenaphthylene, fluorene, and pyrene increased whereas those of toluene, phenol, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene decreased. As the equivalence ratio (ER) increased from 0.21 to 0.34, the concentrations of indene and phenanthrene increased from 0.148% and 0.087% to 0.232% and 0.223%, respectively. Further, the phenol content increased as ER increased from 0.21 to 0.26 and then decreased as the ER increased further to 0.34. Other parameters like the steam/biomass (S/B) ratio and catalyst also played a critical role in tar reduction. This paper demonstrates the conversion of some tar components and elucidates their chemical properties during gasification.

Key wordsgasification    tar components    operating parameters
收稿日期: 2020-04-15      出版日期: 2021-06-18
Corresponding Author(s): Baizhong SUN   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2021, 15(2): 374-383.
Shuai GUO, Xiao WEI, Deyong CHE, Hongpeng LIU, Baizhong SUN. Experimental study on influence of operating parameters on tar components from corn straw gasification in fluidized bed. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 374-383.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-020-0710-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2021/V15/I2/374
Ultimate analysis/(wt%, ar) Proximate analysis/(wt%, ar) Three components analysis
Car 42.04 Moisture Mar 4.89 Cellulose 27.9
Har 5.13 Ash Aar 8.79 Hemicellulose 18.1
Oar 38.23 Volatile Var 70.18 Lignin 23.4
Nar 0.69 Fixed carbon FCar 16.14
Sar 0.23
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Compounds Formula Structure Tar group
Benzene C6H6 Class 3
Phenol C6H6O Class 3
Toluene C7H8 Class 3
Indene C9H8 Class 4
Naphthalene C10H8 Class 4
1-methylnaphthalene C11H10 Class 4
2-methylnaphthalene C11H10 Class 4
Acenaphthylene C12H10 Class 4
Fluorene C13H10 Class 4
Phenanthrene C14H10 Class 4
Pyrene C16H10 Class 5
Tab.2  
Parameter Test No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Temperature/°C 700 740 770 820 700 700 700 700 700 700 800 900
ER 0.21 0.26 0.31 0.34 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
S/B 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0 0 0 0 0
DMP/wt% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 30 50 0 0
CO2/vol% 17.1 17.8 18.8 20.2 17.8 19.2 21.7 17.2 18.1 19.0 16.5 15.7
CO/vol% 14.7 15.5 16.4 15.2 12.9 11.6 10.0 15.7 17.4 18.0 16.4 17.8
CH4/vol% 6.36 7.24 7.89 6.41 4.21 2.02 1.29 5.44 4.04 3.0 6.07 5.6
H2/vol% 7.58 7.93 8.91 8.07 9.71 13.3 15.3 8.31 9.79 10.9 7.97 8.35
Tar content/(g·m–3) 6.2 5.56 4.69 3.97 5.34 4.33 3.41 5.11 3.81 2.85 4.18 2.02
Tab.3  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
1 S Fremaux, S M Beheshti, H Ghassemi, et al.. An experimental study on hydrogen-rich gas production via steam gasification of biomass in a research-scale fluidized bed. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 91: 427–432
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.048
2 M Mayerhofer, S Fendt, H Spliethoff, et al.Fluidized bed gasification of biomass—in bed investigation of gas and tar formation. Fuel, 2014, 117(part B): 1248–1255
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.06.025
3 M Mayerhofer, P Mitsakis, X M Meng, et al.. Influence of pressure, temperature and steam on tar and gas in allothermal fluidized bed gasification. Fuel, 2012, 99: 204–209
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.022
4 A Horvat, D S Pandey, M Kwapinska, et al.. Tar yield and composition from poultry litter gasification in a fluidised bed reactor: effects of equivalence ratio, temperature and limestone addition. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(23): 13283–13296
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA02548K
5 J M De Andrés, A Narros, M E Rodríguez. Behaviour of dolomite, olivine and alumina as primary catalysts in air-steam gasification of sewage sludge. Fuel, 2011, 90(2): 521–527
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.09.043
6 S Guo, X Wei, J Li, et al.. Experimental study on product gas and tar removal in air-steam gasification of corn straw in a bench-scale internally circulating fluidized bed. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(2): 1908–1917
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b04008
7 Y H Qin, A Campen, T Wiltowski, et al.. The influence of different chemical compositions in biomass on gasification tar formation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 83: 77–84
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.09.001
8 Z Y Zhang, S S Pang. Experimental investigation of biomass devolatilization in steam gasification in a dual fluidised bed gasifier. Fuel, 2017, 188: 628–635
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.074
9 B L Zhou, A Dichiara, Y M Zhang, et al.. Tar formation and evolution during biomass gasification: an experimental and theoretical study. Fuel, 2018, 234: 944–953
https://doi.org/doi 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.105
10 F Kirnbauer, V Wilk, H Hofbauer. Performance improvement of dual fluidized bed gasifiers by temperature reduction: the behavior of tar species in the product gas. Fuel, 2013, 108: 534–542
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.065
11 D D Feng, Y J Zhao, Y Zhang, et al.. In-situ steam reforming of biomass tar over sawdust biochar in mild catalytic temperature. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2017, 107: 261–270
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.007
12 M L Valderrama Rios, A M González, E E S Lora, et al.. Reduction of tar generated during biomass gasification: a review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2018, 108: 345–370
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.002
13 Q Z Yu, C Brage, T Nordgreen, et al.. Effects of Chinese dolomites on tar cracking in gasification of birch. Fuel, 2009, 88(10): 1922–1926
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.04.020
14 Y Tian, X Zhou, S H Lin, et al.. Syngas production from air-steam gasification of biomass with natural catalysts. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 645: 518–523
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.071
15 M Cortazar, G Lopez, J Alvarez, et al.. Behaviour of primary catalysts in the biomass steam gasification in a fountain confined spouted bed. Fuel, 2019, 253: 1446–1456
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.094
16 F Miccio, B Piriou, G Ruoppolo, et al.. Biomass gasification in a catalytic fluidized reactor with beds of different materials. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 154(1–3): 369–374
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.002
17 Z H Min, M Asadullah, P Yimsiri, et al.. Catalytic reforming of tar during gasification. Part I. Steam reforming of biomass tar using ilmenite as a catalyst. Fuel, 2011, 90(5): 1847–1854
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.12.039
18 B J Vreugdenhil, R W R Zwart. Tar formation in pyrolysis and gasification. Petten: Energy and Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN: Report ECN-E-08–087, 2009
19 M Cortazar, J Alvarez, G Lopez, et al.. Role of temperature on gasification performance and tar composition in a fountain enhanced conical spouted bed reactor. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 1589–1597
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.071
20 Z Q Wu, W C Yang, H Y Meng, et al.. Physicochemical structure and gasification reactivity of co-pyrolysis char from two kinds of coal blended with lignocellulosic biomass: effects of the carboxymethylcellulose sodium. Applied Energy, 2017, 207: 96–106
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.092
21 Y D Kim, C W Yang, B J Kim, et al.. Air-blown gasification of woody biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier. Applied Energy, 2013, 112: 414–420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.072
22 X Y Ma, X Zhao, J Y Gu, et al.. Co-gasification of coal and biomass blends using dolomite and olivine as catalysts. Renewable Energy, 2019, 132: 509–514
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.077
23 J G Meng, X B Wang, Z L Zhao, et al.. Highly abrasion resistant thermally fused olivine as in-situ catalysts for tar reduction in a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 268: 212–220
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.135
24 Z Y Zhang, S S Pang. Experimental investigation of tar formation and producer gas composition in biomass steam gasification in a 100 kW dual fluidised bed gasifier. Renewable Energy, 2019, 132: 416–424
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.144
25 R N State, A Volceanov, P Muley, et al.. A review of catalysts used in microwave assisted pyrolysis and gasification. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 277: 179–194
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.036
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed