Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (6): 1017-1026   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0716-x
  本期目录
A method of determining flame radiation fraction induced by interaction burning of tri-symmetric propane fires in open space based on weighted multi-point source model
Jie JI1(), Junrui DUAN2, Huaxian WAN2
1. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; Institute of Advanced Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230088, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
 全文: PDF(1152 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The interaction of multiple fires may lead to a higher flame height and more intense radiation flux than a single fire, which increases the possibility of flame spread and risks to the surroundings. Experiments were conducted using three burners with identical heat release rates (HRRs) and propane as the fuel at various spacings. The results show that flames change from non-merging to merging as the spacing decreases, which result in a complex evolution of flame height and merging point height. To facilitate the analysis, a novel merging criterion based on the dimensionless spacing S/zc was proposed. For non-merging flames (S/zc >0.368), the flame height is almost identical to a single fire; for merging flames (S/zc ≤0.368), based on the relationship between thermal buoyancy B and thrust P (the pressure difference between the inside and outside of the flame), a quantitative analysis of the flame height, merging point height, and air entrainment was formed, and the calculated merging flame heights show a good agreement with the measured experimental values. Moreover, the multi-point source model was further improved, and radiation fraction of propane was calculated. The data obtained in this study would play an important role in calculating the external radiation of propane fire.

Key wordsflame interaction    air entrainment    flame height    multi-point source model    thermal radiation
收稿日期: 2020-06-09      出版日期: 2023-01-17
Corresponding Author(s): Jie JI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2022, 16(6): 1017-1026.
Jie JI, Junrui DUAN, Huaxian WAN. A method of determining flame radiation fraction induced by interaction burning of tri-symmetric propane fires in open space based on weighted multi-point source model. Front. Energy, 2022, 16(6): 1017-1026.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-020-0716-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2022/V16/I6/1017
Fig.1  
HRR for each fire/kW Spacing/cm
Three fires 10, 20 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60
Three fires 30, 40, 50 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 30, 60
Single fire 10, 20, 30, 40, 50
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Q˙ d* s2
1.03 0.016
2.06 0.018
3.10 0.03
4.13 0.036
5.16 0.036
Tab.2  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
1 J Ji, H X Wan, Z H Gao, et al. Experimental study on flame merging behaviors from two pool fires along the longitudinal centerline of model tunnel with natural ventilation. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 173: 307–318
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.08.020
2 C G Fan, J Ji, Y Z Li, et al. Experimental study of sidewall effect on flame characteristics of heptane pool fires with different aspect ratios and orientations in a channel. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 3121–3129
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.196
3 K He, X Cheng, Y Yao, et al. Characteristics of multiple pool fires in a tunnel with natural ventilation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 369: 261–267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.041
4 C Shi, W Liu, W Hong, et al. A modified thermal radiation model with multiple factors for investigating temperature rise around pool fire. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 379(5): 120801
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120801
5 N A Liu, S Zhang, X Luo, et al. Interaction of two parallel rectangular fires. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(3): 3833–3841
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.158
6 H X Wan, J Ji, K Li, et al. Effect of air entrainment on the height of buoyant turbulent diffusion flames for two fires in open space. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 3003–3010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.078
7 A Putnam, C Speich. A model study of the interaction of multiple turbulent diffusion flames. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1963, 9(1): 867–877
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(63)80093-4
8 P Thomas, R Baldwin, A Heselden. Buoyant diffusion flames: some measurements of air entrainment, heat transfer, and flame merging. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1965, 10(1): 983–996
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(65)80241-7
9 O Sugawa, W Takahashi. Flame height behavior from multi-fire sources. Fire and Materials, 1993, 17(3): 111–117
https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.810170303
10 H X Wan, Z H Gao, J Ji, et al. Experimental study on merging behaviors of two identical buoyant diffusion flames under an unconfined ceiling with varying heights. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(3): 3899–3907
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.154
11 H X Wan, Z H Gao, J Ji, et al. Effects of pool size and spacing on burning rate and flame height of two square heptane pool fires. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 369: 116–124
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.111
12 M A Delichatsios. A correlation for the flame height in” group” fires. Fire Science & Technology, 2007, 26(1): 1–8
https://doi.org/10.3210/fst.26.1
13 Y Fukuda, D Kamikawa, Y Hasemi, et al. Flame characteristics of group fires. Fire Science & Technology, 2004, 23(2): 164–169
https://doi.org/10.3210/fst.23.164
14 W Weng, D Kamikawa, Y Hasemi. Experimental study on merged flame characteristics from multifire sources with wood cribs. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(3): 2597–2606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.112
15 H X Wan, Z H Gao, J Ji, et al. Predicting heat fluxes received by horizontal targets from two buoyant turbulent diffusion flames of propane burning in still air. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 190: 260–269
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.12.003
16 C Z Gong, L Ding, H X Wan, et al. Spatial temperature distribution of rectangular n-heptane pool fires with different aspect ratios and heat fluxes received by adjacent horizontal targets. Fire Safety Journal, 2020, 112: 102959
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102959
17 M Shokri, C Beyler. Radiation from large pool fires. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 1989, 1(4): 141–149
https://doi.org/10.1177/104239158900100404
18 Q Liu, N A Liu, X Huang. Radiative heat transfer from multiple discrete fires. Journal of Fire Sciences, 2017, 35(6): 535–546
https://doi.org/10.1177/0734904117717993
19 G Markstein. Radiative properties of plastics fires. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1979, 17(1): 1053–1062
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(79)80101-0
20 G Bennett. The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering: By P. J. DiNenno, C. L. Beyler, R. L. P. Custer, W. D. Walton and J. M. Watts, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA and Society of Fire Prot, Elsevier, 1990
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(90)85054-7
21 K S Mudan. Thermal radiation hazards from hydrocarbon pool fires. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1984, 10(1): 59–80
https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(84)90119-9
22 W May, W Mcqueen. Radiation from large liquefied natural gas fires. Combustion Science and Technology, 1973, 7(2): 51–56
https://doi.org/10.1080/00102207308952342
23 W G Yan, C J Wang, J. Guo One extended OTSU flame image recognition method using RGBL and stripe segmentation. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 121–126: 2141–2145
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.121-126.2141
24 N Otsu. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1): 62–66
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
25 G Q James. Fundamentals of Fire Phenomena. New York: Springer, 2005
26 Z H Gao, J Ji, H X Wan, K Li, J Sun. An investigation of the detailed flame shape and flame length under the ceiling of a channel. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(3): 2657–2664
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.078
27 J Dupuy, J Marechal, D Morvan. Fires from a cylindrical forest fuel burner: combustion dynamics and flame properties. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 135(1-2): 65–76
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(03)00147-0
28 Y Shintani, T Nagaoka, Y Deguchi, K Ido, K Harada. Simple method to predict downward heat flux from flame to floor. Fire Science & Technology, 2014, 33(1): 17–34
https://doi.org/10.3210/fst.33.17
29 B J Lowesmith, G Hankinson, M Acton, G Chamberlain. An overview of the nature of hydrocarbon jet fire hazards in the oil and gas industry and a simplified approach to assessing the hazards. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2007, 85(3): 207–220
https://doi.org/10.1205/psep06038
30 G H Markstein. Radiative energy transfer from turbulent diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame, 1976, 27: 51–63
https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(76)90005-5
31 G Hankinson, B J Lowesmith. A consideration of methods of determining the radiative characteristics of jet fires. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(3): 1165–1177
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.09.004
32 J Souil, P Joulain, E Gengembre. Experimental and theoretical study of thermal radiation from turbulent diffusion flames to vertical target surfaces. Combustion Science and Technology, 1984, 41(1–2): 69–81
https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208408923823
33 M J Hurley, D T Gottuk, J R Hall, et al. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. New York: Springer, 2015
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed