Improvement of solidification model and analysis of 3D channel blockage with MPS method

doi:10.1007/s11708-021-0754-z

Frontiers in Energy

2021, Vol. 15

Issue (4): 946-958 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0754-z

本期目录

Improvement of solidification model and analysis of 3D channel blockage with MPS method

Reo KAWAKAMI¹(

), Xin LI¹, Guangtao DUAN², Akifumi YAMAJI¹, Isamu SATO³, Tohru SUZUKI³

¹. Cooperative Major in Nuclear Energy, Graduate School and Advanced Science and Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-8555, Japan
². Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
³. Department of Nuclear Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo City University, 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 158-0087, Japan

全文: PDF(2650 KB) HTML

Abstract：

In a severe accident of a nuclear power reactor, coolant channel blockage by solidified molten core debris may significantly influence the core degradations that follow. The moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method is one of the Lagrangian-based particle methods for analyzing incompressible flows. In the study described in this paper, a novel solidification model for analyzing melt flowing channel blockage with the MPS method has been developed, which is suitable to attain a sufficient numerical accuracy with a reasonable calculation cost. The prompt velocity diffusion by viscosity is prioritized over the prompt velocity correction by the pressure term (for assuring incompressibility) within each time step over the “mushy zone” (between the solidus and liquidus temperature) for accurate modeling of solidification before fixing the coordinates of the completely solidified particles. To sustain the numerical accuracy and stability, the corrective matrix and particle shifting techniques have been applied to correct the discretization errors from irregular particle arrangements and to recover the regular particle arrangements, respectively. To validate the newly developed algorithm, 2-D benchmark analyses are conducted for steady-state freezing of the water in a laminar flow between two parallel plates. Furthermore, 3-D channel blockage analyses of a boiling water reactor (BWR) fuel support piece have been performed. The results show that a partial channel blockage develops from the vicinity of the speed limiter, which does not fully develop into a complete channel blockage, but still diverts the incoming melt flow that follows to the orifice region.

Key words： boiling water reactor (BWR) severe accident channel blockage moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method solidification

收稿日期: 2020-11-24 出版日期: 2022-01-04

Corresponding Author(s): Reo KAWAKAMI

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2021, 15(4): 946-958.
Reo KAWAKAMI, Xin LI, Guangtao DUAN, Akifumi YAMAJI, Isamu SATO, Tohru SUZUKI. Improvement of solidification model and analysis of 3D channel blockage with MPS method. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(4): 946-958.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-021-0754-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2021/V15/I4/946

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig.4

Case	A	B	C	D	E	F
Re	700				1200	2300
$u ¯ m o / (m ? s − 1)$	0.02625				0.045	0.08625
$θ W$	2.5	1.1	0.6	0.4	1.1
$T 0 / ° C$	2.0	4.0	4.0	6.0	4.0
$T W / ° C$	–5.0	–4.4	–2.4	–2.4	–4.4

Tab.2

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Tab.3

Tab.4

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

$α$	Threshold parameter
C	Corrective matrix
C_p	Specific heat capacity
CR	Parameter of Ramacciotti model
d	Dimension number
f	Force
g	Gravity
H	Half of the flow channel width
h	Enthalpy
k	Thermal conductivity
l₀	Particle size
L	Row vector
n⁰	Initial particle number density
P	Pressure
Q	Heat source
Re	Reynolds number
r_e	Effective interaction radius
r	Position vector
t	Time
T	Temperature
T₀	Inflow temperature
T_W	Wall temperature
u	Velocity vector
$u ‾ m o$	Inflow rate
w(r)	Weight function
x,y	Position
$γ$	Solid fraction
$θ w$	Dimensionless wall temperature
$λ$	Correction factor
$μ$	Dynamic viscosity
v	Kinematic viscosity
$ρ$	Density
$ϕ$	A scalar quantity
i,j	Particle identification number
I	Liquidus
s	Solidus

1	Y Yu, Y Yang. URANS simulation of the turbulent flow in tight lattice bundle. Frontiers in Energy, 2011, 5(4): 404–411 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-011-0165-7
2	E L Tolman, P Kuan, J M Broughton. TMI-2 accident scenario update. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1988, 108(1–2): 45–54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(88)90055-6
3	R O Gauntt, L L Humphries. Final results of the XR2–1 BWR metallic melt relocation experiment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1997
4	Tokyo Electric Power Company. Evaluation of the situation of cores and containment vessels of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units-1 to 3 and examination into unsolved issues in the accident progression progress. Tokyo Electric Power Company, Report No. 4, 2015
5	Sandia National Laboratories. MELCOR Computer Code Manuals Vol. 2: Reference Manual Version 2.2.9541 2017. SAND2017–0876 O, 2017
6	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency. Benchmark Study of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (BSAF Project) Phase 1 Summary Report. NEA/CSNI/R18, 2015
7	D Luxat. Modular Accident Analysis Program (MAAP)-MELCOR Crosswalk Phase 1 Study. Technical Update, 2014
8	S Koshizuka, Y Oka. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1996, 123(3): 421–434 https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24205
9	R Chen, Y Oka. Numerical analysis of freezing controlled penetration behavior of the molten core debris in an instrument tube with MPS. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2014, 71: 322–332 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.008
10	Y Goto, A Yamaji. Analysis of eutectic and metallic melt flow and blockage in BWR control rod guide tube by MPS method. In: Proceedings of TopSafe 2017, Vienna, Austria, 2017
11	N Takahashi, G Duan, M Furuya, et al.Analysis of hemispherical vessel ablation failure involving natural convection by MPS method with corrective matrix. International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology, 2019, 1: 19–29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jandt.2019.08.001
12	A Yamaji, X Li. Development of MPS method for analyzing melt spreading behavior and MCCI in severe accidents. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2016, 739(1): 012002(in Chinese) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012002
13	G Duan, A Yamaji, S Koshizuka. A novel multiphase MPS algorithm for modeling crust formation by highly viscous fluid for simulating corium spreading. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019, 343: 218–231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.01.005
14	R Xu, P Stansby, D Laurence. Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228(18): 6703–6725 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.032
15	A Khayyer, H Gotoh, Y Shimizu. Comparative study on accuracy and conservation properties of two particle regularization schemes and proposal of an optimized particle shifting scheme in ISPH context. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 332: 236–256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.005
16	G Duan, S Koshizuka, A Yamaji, et al.An accurate and stable multiphase moving particle semi-implicit method based on a corrective matrix for all particle interaction models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2018, 115(10): 1287–1314 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5844
17	Y Kikuchi, Y Shigemasa, A Oe, et al.Steady-state freezing of liquids in laminar flow between two parallel plates. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 1986, 23(11): 979–991 https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1986.9735086
18	R Vacondio, C Altomare, M De Leffe, et al.Grand challenges for smoothed particle hydrodynamics numerical schemes. Computational Particle Mechanics, 2021, 8: 575–588 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-020-00354-1
19	S M Jeong, J W Nam, S C Hwang, et al.Numerical prediction of oil amount leaked from a damaged tank using two-dimensional moving particle simulation method. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 69: 70–78 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.009
20	P N Sun, A Colagrossi, D Le Touzé, et al.Extension of the δ-Plus-SPH model for simulating Vortex-Induced-Vibration problems. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2019, 90: 19–42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.06.004
21	S Koshizuka, K. Shibata MPS-SW-MAIN-Ver.2.0. P 8827–1. 2006
22	B Spindler, J M Veteau. Simulation of spreading with solidification: assessment synthesis of THEMA code. Rapport CEA-R-6053, 2004
23	H Alsmeyer, T Cron, J J Foit, et al.Test report of the Melt Spreasding Tests ECOKATS-V1 and ECOKATS-1. 2004
24	M Ramacciotti, C Journeau, F Sudreau, et al.Viscosity models for corium melts. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2001, 204(1–3): 377–389 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00328-9
25	G Duan, B Chen. Large Eddy Simulation by particle method coupled with Sub-Particle-Scale model and application to mixing layer flow. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015, 39(10–11): 3135–3149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.058
26	P L Kirillov, M I Terentieva, N B Deniskina. Thermophysical Properties of Materials for Nuclear Engineering. 2nd ed. Moscow: IzdAT Publishing House, 2007

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed