Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (5): 664-677   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0787-3
  本期目录
Combustion and emissions of RP-3 jet fuel and diesel fuel in a single-cylinder diesel engine
Tongbin ZHAO, Zhe REN, Kai YANG, Tao SUN, Lei SHI(), Zhen HUANG, Dong HAN()
Key Laboratory for Power Machinery and Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
 全文: PDF(4776 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The combustion characteristics and emission behaviors of RP-3 jet fuel were studied and compared to commercial diesel fuel in a single-cylinder compression ignition (CI) engine. Engine operational parameters, including engine load (0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 MPa indicating the mean effective pressure (IMEP)), the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rate (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%), and the fuel injection timing (−20, −15, −10, and −5 ° crank angle (CA) after top dead center (ATDC)) were adjusted to evaluate the engine performances of RP-3 jet fuel under changed operation conditions. In comparison to diesel fuel, RP-3 jet fuel shows a retarded heat release and lagged combustion phase, which is more obvious under heavy EGR rate conditions. In addition, the higher premixed combustion fraction of RP-3 jet fuel leads to a higher first-stage heat release peak than diesel fuel under all testing conditions. As a result, RP-3 jet fuel features a longer ignition delay (ID) time, a shorter combustion duration (CD), and an earlier CA50 than diesel fuel. The experimental results manifest that RP-3 jet fuel has a slightly lower indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) compared to diesel fuel, but the ITE difference becomes less noticeable under large EGR rate conditions. Compared with diesel fuel, the nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions of RP-3 jet fuel are higher while its soot emissions are lower. The NOx emissions of RP-3 can be effectively reduced with the increased EGR rate and delayed injection timing.

Key wordsRP-3 jet fuel    diesel    engine    combustion    emissions
收稿日期: 2021-04-14      出版日期: 2023-11-09
Corresponding Author(s): Lei SHI,Dong HAN   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2023, 17(5): 664-677.
Tongbin ZHAO, Zhe REN, Kai YANG, Tao SUN, Lei SHI, Zhen HUANG, Dong HAN. Combustion and emissions of RP-3 jet fuel and diesel fuel in a single-cylinder diesel engine. Front. Energy, 2023, 17(5): 664-677.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-021-0787-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2023/V17/I5/664
Composition/(mass fraction, %) Jet-A JP-5 JP-8 RP-3
Alkane 19 13.35 21.86 25.1
Iso-alkane 31.34 18.92 33.11 42.7
Cyclo-alkane 28.42 47.37 26.38 17.8
Aromatics 21.24 20.36 18.65 14.4
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Engine specifications Value or type
Stroke number 4
Compression ratio 17: 1
Bore×stroke/(mm×mm) 126×155
Displacement/L 1.933
Connecting rod length/mm 310
Valve number 4
Max. injection pressure/MPa 160
Combustion chamber ω-type
Tab.2  
Testing instruments Type
Dynamometer GW63
Cylinder pressure transducer AVL12QP
Fuel consumption meter FC2210
Charge amplifier Kistler5007
Data acquisition card NI9411
Soot analysis meter PPS-M
NOx analysis meter Uninox24V
Tab.3  
Properties Diesel RP-3
Density at 20°C/(kg·m−3) 840 790
CNa 53.0 45.1
Lower heat valueb/(MJ·kg−1) 42.8 43.1
Heat of vaporization at 25°C/(kJ·kg−1) 270c 291d
Surface tensionc at 20°C/(10−3 N·m−1) 27.5 23.6
Dynamic viscosityd at 20°C/(mPa·s) 3.47 1.01
Tab.4  
Parameters Value or type
Speed/(r·min−1) 1100
IMEP/MPa 0.6, 0.7, 0.8
Injection pressure/MPa 80
Injection strategy Single injection
Injection time/(°CA ATDC) −20, −15, −10, −5
EGR rate/% 0, 10, 20, 30
Coolant temperature/°C 80±2
Test fuels RP-3 jet fuel, diesel fuel
Tab.5  
Parameters Uncertainty/%
Engine speed ±0.1
Pressure ±0.1
Fuel flow meter ±1???
EGR ±1???
PM ±0.1
NOx ±1???
Tab.6  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
1 S S Hoseini, M A Sobati. Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine operating on different water in diesel emulsion fuels: optimization using response surface methodology (RSM). Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(4): 636–657
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0646-7
2 H Wei, J Yu, L Zhou. Improvement of engine performance with high compression ratio based on knock suppression using Miller cycle with boost pressure and split injection. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(4): 691–706
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0621-3
3 X Liang, J Zhang, Z Li, et al. Effects of fuel combination and IVO timing on combustion and emissions of a dual-fuel HCCI combustion engine. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(4): 778–789
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0698-8
4 Z Zheng, L Yue, H Liu, et al. Effect of two-stage injection on combustion and emissions under high EGR rate on a diesel engine by fueling blends of diesel/gasoline, diesel/n-butanol, diesel/gasoline/n-butanol and pure diesel. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 90: 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.011
5 H Liu, P Zhang, X Liu, et al. Laser diagnostics and chemical kinetic analysis of PAHs and soot in co-flow partially premixed flames using diesel surrogate and oxygenated additives of n-butanol and DMF. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 188: 129–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.025
6 H Chen, B Xie, J Ma, et al. NOx emission of biodiesel compared to diesel: higher or lower. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 137: 584–593
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.022
7 H Chen, X Su, J Li, X Zhong. Effects of gasoline and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers blending in diesel on the combustion and emission of a common rail diesel engine. Energy, 2019, 171: 981–999
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.089
8 P Dagaut, M Cathonnet. The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: a review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(1): 48–92
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2005.10.003
9 Y Lu, J Pan, B Fan, et al. Research on the application of aviation kerosene in a direct injection rotary engine–Part 1: fundamental spray characteristics and optimized injection strategies. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 195: 519–532
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.042
10 Y Lu, J Pan, B Fan, et al. Research on the application of aviation kerosene in a direct injection rotary engine–Part 2: spray combustion characteristics and combustion process under optimized injection strategies. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 203: 112217
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112217
11 J N Bowden, S R Westbrook, M E LePera. Jet kerosene fuels for military diesel application. Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 1989, 4: 810–832
12 J Lee, C Bae. Application of JP-8 in a heavy duty diesel engine. Fuel, 2011, 90(5): 1762–1770
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.032
13 Z Shi, C F Lee, H Wu, et al. Optical diagnostics of low-temperature ignition and combustion characteristics of diesel/kerosene blends under cold-start conditions. Applied Energy, 2019, 251: 113307
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113307
14 K Lin Tay, W Yu, F Zhao, et al. From fundamental study to practical application of kerosene in compression ignition engines: an experimental and modeling review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2020, 234(2–3): 303–333
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407019841218
15 K R Patil, S S Thipse. Experimental investigation of CI engine combustion, performance and emissions in DEE-kerosene-diesel blends of high DEE concentration. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 396–408
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.10.022
16 H Bayındır, M Zerrakki Işık, H Aydın. Evaluation of combustion, performance and emission indicators of canola oil-kerosene blends in a power generator diesel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 114: 234–244
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.184
17 G Chen, J N Gamble, D W McAndrew, et al. Analytical and experimental investigation of medium-speed diesel engine using a kerosene fuel. In: Proceedings of ASME 2006 Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference, Aachen, Germany, 2008
18 K L Tay, W Yang, F Zhao, et al. A numerical study on the effects of boot injection rate-shapes on the combustion and emissions of a kerosene-diesel fueled direct injection compression ignition engine. Fuel, 2017, 203: 430–444
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.142
19 K L Tay, W Yang, F Zhao, et al. Numerical investigation on the combined effects of varying piston bowl geometries and ramp injection rate-shapes on the combustion characteristics of a kerosene-diesel fueled direct injection compression ignition engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 136: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.079
20 W Yu, Y Zong, Q Lin, et al. Experimental study on engine combustion and particle size distributions fueled with Jet A-1. Fuel, 2020, 263: 116747
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116747
21 Y Duan, D Han, P Li, et al. Experimental study on injection and macroscopic spray characteristics of ethyl oleate, jet fuel, and their blend on a diesel engine common rail system. Atomization and Sprays, 2015, 25(9): 777–793
https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2015011145
22 Y Park, C Bae, C Mounaïm-Rousselle, et al. Application of jet propellant-8 to premixed charge ignition combustion in a single-cylinder diesel engine. International Journal of Engine Research, 2015, 16(1): 92–103
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087414561275
23 W Yu, W Yang, K Tay, et al. Macroscopic spray characteristics of kerosene and diesel based on two different piezoelectric and solenoid injectors. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016, 76: 12–23
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.03.008
24 W Jing, W L Roberts, T Fang. Spray combustion of Jet-A and diesel fuels in a constant volume combustion chamber. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 525–540
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.10.010
25 S N Volgin, I V Belov, N M Likhterova, et al. Feasibility study for using jet fuel in diesel engines. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, 2019, 55(3): 243–258
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-019-01027-3
26 J Lee, H Oh, C Bae. Combustion process of JP-8 and fossil diesel fuel in a heavy duty diesel engine using two-color thermometry. Fuel, 2012, 102: 264–273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.029
27 H Lee. Biodiesel, HSD, and JP-8 combustion process and emission characteristics in a dual-stage fuel injection condition. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 2014, 3(4): 209–216
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20140304.15
28 J Lee, J Lee, S Chu, et al. Emission reduction potential in a light-duty diesel engine fueled by JP-8. Energy, 2015, 89: 92–99
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.060
29 H Lee, Y Jeong. Diesel (ULSD, LSD, and HSD), biodiesel, kerosene, and military jet propellants (JP-5 and JP-8) applications and their combustion visualization in a single cylinder diesel engine. Naval Engineers Journal, 2016, 128(4): 97–106
30 A Uyumaz, H Solmaz, E Yılmaz, et al. Experimental examination of the effects of military aviation fuel JP-8 and biodiesel fuel blends on the engine performance, exhaust emissions and combustion in a direct injection engine. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 128: 158–165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.013
31 G Labeckas, S Slavinskas, V Vilutiene. Combustion, performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine operating on Jet fuel treated with cetane improver. In: Engineering for Rural Development International Scientific Conference, Jelgava, Latvia, 2013
32 G Chiatti, O Chiavola, F Palmieri. Impact on combustion and emissions of jet fuel as additive in diesel engine fueled with blends of petrol diesel, renewable diesel and waste cooking oil biodiesel. Energies, 2019, 12(13): 2488
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132488
33 L Chen, S Ding, H Liu, et al. Comparative study of combustion and emissions of kerosene (RP-3), kerosene-pentanol blends and diesel in a compression ignition engine. Applied Energy, 2017, 203: 91–100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.036
34 L Chen, M Raza, J Xiao. Combustion analysis of an aviation compression ignition engine burning pentanol-kerosene blends under different injection timings. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(9): 9429–9437
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00813
35 D Kang, D Kim, V Kalaskar, et al. Experimental characterization of jet fuels under engine relevant conditions–Part 1: effect of chemical composition on autoignition of conventional and alternative jet fuels. Fuel, 2019, 239: 1388–1404
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.005
36 Z Wu, Y Mao, M Raza, et al. Surrogate fuels for RP-3 kerosene formulated by emulating molecular structures, functional groups, physical and chemical properties. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 208: 388–401
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.07.024
37 ASTM International. ASTM D7668–14 standard test method for determination of derived cetane number (DCN) of diesel fuel oils–ignition delay and combustion delay using a constant volume combustion chamber method. 2014, available at the website of astm.org
38 Y Zhao, X He, M Li, et al. Ignition, efficiency and emissions of RP-3 kerosene in a three-staged multi-injection combustor. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021, 213: 106635
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106635
39 B H John. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018
40 D Han, J Zhai, Z Huang. Autoignition of n-hexane, cyclohexane, and methylcyclohexane in a constant volume combustion chamber. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(4): 3576–3583
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00003
41 Y Duan, W Liu, Z Huang, et al. An experimental study on spray auto-ignition of RP-3 jet fuel and its surrogates. Frontiers in Energy, 2021, 15(2): 396–404
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0715-y
42 J Wang, M An, B Yin, et al. Combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with diesel–rocket propellant-3 wide distillation blended fuels. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2020, 146(4): 04020025
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000679
43 Z Ren, W Liu, Z Huang, et al. Spray auto-ignition behaviors of diesel and jet fuel at reduced oxygen environments. Combustion Science and Technology, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2020.1774567
44 H Liu, S Ma, Z Zhang, et al. Study of the control strategies on soot reduction under early-injection conditions on a diesel engine. Fuel, 2015, 139: 472–481
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.011
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed