Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (5): 862-875   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-022-0839-3
  本期目录
Optimal design analysis of a tubular heat exchanger network with extended surfaces using multi-objective constructal optimization
Hassan HAJABDOLLAHI, Mohammad SHAFIEY DEHAJ(), Babak MASOUMPOUR, Mohammad ATAEIZADEH
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan 7718897111, Iran
 全文: PDF(3796 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The present work aims to investigate the influence of extended surfaces (fins) on the multi-objective optimization of a tubular heat exchanger network (THEN). An increase in the heat transfer area using various extended surfaces (fins) to enhance the performance of the heat exchanger was used while considering the effectiveness and total heat transfer area as two objective functions. In addition to the simulation of simple fins, a new set of fins, called constructal fins, was designed based on the constructal theory. Tubular heat exchanger network design parameters were chosen as optimization variables, and optimization results were achieved in such a way as to enhance the effectiveness and decrease the total heat transfer area. The results show the importance of constructal fins in improving the objective functions of heat exchangers. For instance, the simple fins case enhances the effectiveness by up to 5.3% compared to that without fins (usual heat exchanger) while using constructal fins, in addition to the 7% increment of effectiveness, reduces the total heat transfer area by 9.47%. In order to optimize the heat exchanger, the heat transfer rate and cold fluid temperature must increase, and at the same time, the hot exiting fluid temperature should decrease at the same constant total heat transfer area, which is higher in the constructal fins case. Finally, optimized design variables were studied for different cases, and the effects of various fins were reported.

Key wordsconstructal theory    extended surface    effectiveness    total heat transfer area    multi-objective optimization
收稿日期: 2021-04-11      出版日期: 2022-11-28
Corresponding Author(s): Mohammad SHAFIEY DEHAJ   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2022, 16(5): 862-875.
Hassan HAJABDOLLAHI, Mohammad SHAFIEY DEHAJ, Babak MASOUMPOUR, Mohammad ATAEIZADEH. Optimal design analysis of a tubular heat exchanger network with extended surfaces using multi-objective constructal optimization. Front. Energy, 2022, 16(5): 862-875.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-022-0839-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2022/V16/I5/862
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Decision variableLower boundUpper bound
Tube arrangement/(° )30°–45°–90°
Tube inner diameter/mm4.925.2
Tube pitch ratio1.22
Tube length in each pass/m0.58
Tube number1200
Fin number160
Number of heat exchanger15
Fin first part length/m0.0050.01
Fin second part length/m0.0050.01
Fin thickness in the first part/m0.0010.002
Fin thickness in the second part/m0.00050.002
Tab.1  
1–78–1314–1920–2627–3233–38
(0.194, 1/4)(0.206, 1/4)(0.214, 1/4)(0.277, 3/8)(0.305, 3/8)(0.319, 3/8)
(0.331, 3/8)(0.370, 1/2)(0.402, 1/2)(0.430, 1/2)(0.444, 1/2)(0.407, 5/8)
(0.435, 5/8)(0.481, 5/8)(0.495, 5/8)(0.509, 5/8)(0.527, 5/8)(0.541, 5/8)
(0.555, 5/8)(0.482, 3/4)(0.510, 3/4)(0.532, 3/4)(0.560, 3/4)(0.584, 3/4)
(0.606, 3/4)(0.620, 3/4)(0.643, 3/4)(0.352, 3/4)(0.680, 3/4)(0.607, 7/8)
(0.635, 7/8)(0.657, 7/8)(0.685, 7/8)(0.709, 7/8)(0.745, 7/8)(0.777, 7/8)
(0.805, 7/8)(0.67, 1)
Tab.2  
Fig.3  
ParameterPresent codeRef. [1]Difference/%
ht1526015685.9–2.715
hs216.624223–2.860
Uo110.372108.61.632
ft0.00460.00460
fs0.09020.1011–10.781
ηF0.6950.6821.906
ηo0.7030.7154–1.746
Tab.3  
ParameterValue
Tube diameter (inner,external)/mm10–12
Tube number28
Tube length in each pass/mm600
Shell diameter (inner,outer)/mm110–118
Tab.4  
Fig.4  
Without fin Simple fin Constructal fin
EffectivenessTotal heat transfer areaEffectivenessTotal heat transfer areaEffectivenessTotal heat transfer area
0.56138.79670.59119.15460.60077.9631
Tab.5  
Simple fin Constructal fin
EffectivenessTotal heat transfer areaEffectivenessTotal heat transfer area
5.309–4.06867.01949.4763
Tab.6  
Design parameterWithout finSimple finConstructal fin
Tube arrangement/(° )304545
Tube inner diameter/mm5.48.311.18
Tube pitch ratio1.21.20661.4024
Tube length in each pass/m0.64330.50930.5461
Tube number533010
Number of heat exchanger555
Fin number12
Fin first part length/m0.0070.0051
Fin second part length/m0.0052
Fin thickness in the first part/m0.00180.002
Fin thickness in the second part/m0.0019
Cold side pressure drop/kPa25.468.4818.18
Hot side pressure drop/kPa87.0495.6690.43
Tab.7  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Atot Total heat transfer area/m2
AcCross sectional area of inlet flow to annulus space side/m2
A1First part heat transfer area/m2
A2Second part heat transfer area/m2
cpSpecific heat/(J·kg–1·K–1)
CLTube layout constant
CTPConstant for number of tube pass
diInner diameter of tube/m
doOuter diameter of tube/m
DeEquivalent diameter/m
DhHydraulic diameter/m
DsShell diameter/m
fFanning friction factor
hConvection heat transfer coefficient/(W·m–2·K–1)
KeExit pressure loss coefficient
KcEntrance pressure loss factor
L1Fin first part length/m
L2Fin second part length/m
NtTube number
NHEHeat exchanger number
NTUNumber of transfer units
LMTDLogarithmic mean temperature difference
NuNusselt number
NpNumber of tube pass
PrPrandtl number
ptTube pitch/m
QmaxMaximum heat transfer rate/kW
ReReynolds number
RFouling resistance/(K·m2·W–1)
t1Fin thickness in the first part/m
t2Fin thickness in the second part/m
UoOverall heat transfer coefficient/(W·m–2 ·K–1)
vFluid flow velocity/(m·s–1)
μViscosity/(kg·m–1·s–1)
?PtotalTotal pressure drop/kPa
ρDensity/(kg·m–3)
εEffectiveness
σPorosity/(gr·cm–3)
Subscripts
cCold side
hHot side
FFin
iInner
oOuter
sShell
tTube
wWall
totTotal
  
1 S Kakaç, H Liu, A Pramuanjaroenkij. Heat Exchangers: Selection, Rating, and Thermal Design. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2012, 123–143
2 R K Shah, D P Sekulic. Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2003, 67–68
3 J R Thome. Heat transfer augmentation of shell-and-tube heat exchangers for the chemical processing industry. Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 1997, 4(2): 147–161
https://doi.org/10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.v4.i2.70
4 J R Thome. A review on shell-and-tube heat exchangers for the chemical processing industry: heat transfer augmentation. Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 2017, 24(1–6): 427–442
5 S SanayeH Hajabdollahi. Multi-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(14–15): 1937–1945
6 R Khosravi, A Khosravi, S Nahavandi. et al.. Effectiveness of evolutionary algorithms for optimization of heat exchangers. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 281–288
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.039
7 H Hajabdollahi, P Ahmadi, I Dincer. Thermoeconomic optimization of a shell and tube condenser using both genetic algorithm and particle swarm. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2011, 34(4): 1066–1076
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2011.02.014
8 H Hajabdollahi. Investigating the effect of non-similar fins in thermoeconomic optimization of plate fin heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 82: 152–161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.077
9 P Ahmadi, H Hajabdollahi, I Dincer. Cost and entropy generation minimization of a cross-flow plate fin heat exchanger using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2011, 133(2): 021801
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002599
10 H Hajabdollahi, P Ahmadi, I Dincer. Multi-objective optimization of plain fin-and-tube heat exchanger using evolutionary algorithm. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2011, 25(3): 424–431
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.49976
11 A H Alinia Kashani, A Maddahi, H Hajabdollahi. Thermal-economic optimization of an air-cooled heat exchanger unit. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 54(1): 43–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.01.014
12 H Hajabdollahi, M Shafiey Dehaj. Rotary regenerator: Constructal thermoeconomic optimization. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2020, 113: 231–240
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2020.08.020
13 S Sanaye, H Hajabdollahi. Multi-objective optimization of rotary regenerator using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2009, 48(10): 1967–1977
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.02.008
14 H Hajabdollahi, M Ataeizadeh, B Masoumpour. et al.. Comparison of the effect of various nanoparticle shapes on optimal design of plate heat exchanger. Heat Transfer Research, 2021, 52(3): 29–47
https://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.2021036994
15 T L Bergman, F P Incropera, A S Lavine. et al.. Introduction to Heat Transfer. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2011, 232–238
16 A Bejan. Shape and Structure, From Engineering to Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 49–65
17 A Bejan, S Lorente. Constructal theory of generation of configuration in nature and engineering. Journal of Applied Physics, 2006, 100(4): 041301
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2221896
18 A BejanS Lorente. Design with Constructal Theory. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2008
19 A Bejan, S Lorente. Constructal law of design and evolution: physics, biology, technology, and society. Journal of Applied Physics, 2013, 113(15): 151301
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4798429
20 P Mardanpour. Freedom and evolution: hierarchy in nature, society, and science. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(10): 4612
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059779
21 A Bejan. Discipline in thermodynamics. Energies, 2020, 13(10): 2487
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102487
22 A Bejan, G Tsatsaronis. Purpose in thermodynamics. Energies, 2021, 14(2): 408
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020408
23 X Guo, G Cheng. Recent development in structural design and optimization. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2010, 26(6): 807–823
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-010-0395-7
24 R Hosseinnezhad, O A Akbari, H Hassanzadeh Afrouzi. et al.. Numerical study of turbulent nanofluid heat transfer in a tubular heat exchanger with twin twisted-tape inserts. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2018, 132(1): 741–759
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6900-5
25 H Hajabdollahi, B Masoumpour, M Ataeizadeh. Thermoeconomic analysis and multiobjective optimization of tubular heat exchanger network using different shapes of nanoparticles. Heat Transfer, 2021, 50(1): 56–80
https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.21955
26 G K Poongavanam, V Ramalingam. Effect of shot peening on enhancing the heat transfer performance of a tubular heat exchanger. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2019, 139: 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.01.024
27 S Skullong, P Promvonge, N Jayranaiwachira. et al.. Experimental and numerical heat transfer investigation in a tubular heat exchanger with delta-wing tape inserts. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2016, 109: 164–177
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2016.09.005
28 W Chingtuaythong, P Promvonge, C Thianpong. et al.. Heat transfer characterization in a tubular heat exchanger with V-shaped rings. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 110: 1164–1171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.020
29 H M Sadeghi, M Babayan, A Chamkha. Investigation of using multi-layer PCMs in the tubular heat exchanger with periodic heat transfer boundary condition. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 147: 118970
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118970
30 S Tamna, Y Kaewkohkiat, S Skullong. et al.. Heat transfer enhancement in tubular heat exchanger with double V-ribbed twisted-tapes. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2016, 7: 14–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2016.01.002
31 F Kerche, M Weterings, M Beyrer. The effect of temperature and shear upon technological properties of whey protein concentrate: Aggregation in a tubular heat exchanger. International Dairy Journal, 2016, 60: 32–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.02.032
32 A Sadeghianjahromi, S Kheradmand, H Nemati. et al.. Optimization of the louver fin-and-tube heat exchangers—a parametric approach. Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 2020, 27(4): 289–312
https://doi.org/10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.2020033527
33 A Muley, R M Manglik. Enhanced heat transfer characteristics of single-phase flows in a plate heat exchanger with mixed chevron plates. Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 1997, 4(3): 187–201
https://doi.org/10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.v4.i3.30
34 A MuleyR M Manglik. A review on enhanced heat transfer characteristics of single-phase flows in a plate heat exchanger. Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 2017, 24(1–6): 443–458
35 R Beigzadeh, S Eiamsa-Ard. Genetic algorithm multiobjective optimization of a thermal system with three heat transfer enhancement characteristics. Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 2020, 27(2): 123–141
https://doi.org/10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.2020032595
36 A V Azad, M Amidpour. Economic optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger based on constructal theory. Energy, 2011, 36(2): 1087–1096
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.041
37 J Lee, Y Kim, S Lorente. et al.. Constructal design of a comb-like channel network for self-healing and self-cooling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 66: 898–905
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.07.070
38 J P Meyer, O T Olakoyejo, T Bello-Ochende. Constructal optimisation of conjugate triangular cooling channels with internal heat generation. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 39(8): 1093–1100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.07.008
39 A M Hafizan, S R Wan Alwi, Z A Manan. et al.. Optimal heat exchanger network synthesis with operability and safety considerations. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2016, 18(8): 2381–2400
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1222-z
40 J Yang, S R Oh, W Liu. Optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchangers using a general design approach motivated by constructal theory. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 77: 1144–1154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.06.046
41 E Norouzi, M Amidpour. Optimal thermodynamic and economic volume of a heat recovery steam generator by constructal design. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 39(8): 1286–1292
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.06.021
42 M Mirzaei, H Hajabdollahi, H Fadakar. Multi-objective optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchanger by constructal theory. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 125: 9–19
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.137
43 A Yang, L Chen, Z Xie. et al.. Constructal heat transfer rate maximization for cylindrical pin-fin heat sinks. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 108: 427–435
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.150
44 L Chen, H Feng, Z Xie. et al.. Progress of constructal theory in China over the past decade. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 130: 393–419
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.064
45 L Chen, A Yang, H Feng. et al.. Constructal design progress for eight types of heat sinks. Science China, Technological Sciences, 2020, 63(6): 879–911
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1469-1
46 H Feng, L Chen, Z Wu. et al.. Constructal design of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger for organic fluid evaporation process. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 131: 750–756
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.105
47 H Feng, L Chen, S Xia. Constructal design for disc-shaped heat exchanger with maximum thermal efficiency. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 130: 740–746
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.003
48 C Tang, L Chen, H Feng. et al.. Four-objective optimizations for an improved irreversible closed modified simple brayton cycle. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021, 23(3): 282
https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030282
49 L Zhang, L Chen, S Xia. et al.. Multi-objective optimization for helium-heated reverse water gas shift reactor by using NSGA-II. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 148: 119025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119025
50 L Chen, C Tang, H Feng. et al.. Power, efficiency, power density and ecological function optimization for an irreversible modified closed variable-temperature reservoir regenerative Brayton cycle with one isothermal heating process. Energies, 2020, 13(19): 5133
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195133
51 Z Wu, H Feng, L Chen. et al.. Performance optimization of a condenser in ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) system based on constructal theory and a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 22(6): 641
https://doi.org/10.3390/e22060641
52 M Sun, S Xia, L Chen. et al.. Minimum entropy generation rate and maximum yield optimization of sulfuric acid decomposition process using NSGA-II. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 22(10): 1065
https://doi.org/10.3390/e22101065
53 S Shi, Y Ge, L Chen. et al.. Four-objective optimization of irreversible atkinson cycle based on NSGA-II. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 22(10): 1150
https://doi.org/10.3390/e22101150
54 C Chen, J You, H Feng. et al.. A multi-objective study on the constructal design of non-uniform heat generating disc cooled by radial- and dendritic-pattern cooling channels. Science China, Technological Sciences, 2021, 64(4): 729–744
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1697-7
55 L Chen, H Feng, Z Xie. et al.. Thermal efficiency maximization for H- and X-shaped heat exchangers based on constructal theory. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 91: 456–462
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.029
56 Z Wu, H Feng, L Chen. et al.. Pumping power minimization of an evaporator in ocean thermal energy conversion system based on constructal theory. Energy, 2019, 181: 974–984
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.216
57 Z Xie, H Feng, L Chen. et al.. Constructal design for supercharged boiler evaporator. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 138: 571–579
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.04.078
58 H Feng, C Cai, L Chen. et al.. Constructal design of a shell-and-tube condenser with ammonia-water working fluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 118: 104867
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104867
59 H Feng, Z Xie, L Chen. et al.. Constructal design for supercharged boiler superheater. Energy, 2020, 191: 116484
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116484
60 W Tang, H Feng, L Chen. et al.. Constructal design for a boiler economizer. Energy, 2021, 223: 120013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120013
61 A Ganjehkaviri, M N Mohd Jaafar. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization of flat plate solar collector using constructal theory. Energy, 2020, 194: 116846
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116846
62 H Hajabdollahi. Multi-objective optimization of plate fin heat exchanger using constructal theory. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 108: 104283
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104283
63 A Bejan, S Gucluer. Morphing the design to go with the times. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 120: 104837
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104837
64 A Ramiar, S A Manavi, B Yousefi-Lafouraki. et al.. Thermal performance optimization of a sinusoidal wavy channel with different phase shifts using artificial bee colony algorithm. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40(6): 327
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1254-x
65 E Y Gürbüz, A Sözen, H İ Variyenli. et al.. A comparative study on utilizing hybrid-type nanofluid in plate heat exchangers with different number of plates. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 524
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02601-1
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed