Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (1): 134-140   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-022-0841-9
  本期目录
Design and analysis of electrothermal metasurfaces
Xiu LIU, Zhuo LI, Zexiao WANG, Hyeong Seok YUN, Sheng SHEN()
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
 全文: PDF(684 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Electrothermal metasurfaces have garnered considerable attention owing to their ability to dynamically control thermal infrared radiation. Although previous studies were mainly focused on metasurfaces with infinite unit cells, in practice, the finite-size effect can be a critical design factor for developing thermal metasurfaces with fast response and broad temperature uniformity. Here, we study the thermal metasurfaces consisting of gold nanorods with a finite array size, which can achieve a resonance close to that of the infinite case with only several periods. More importantly, such a small footprint due to the finite array size yields response time down to a nanosecond level. Furthermore, the number of the unit cells in the direction perpendicular to the axis of nanorods is found to be insensitive to the resonance and response time; thus, providing a tunable aspect ratio that can boost the temperature uniformity in the sub-Kelvin level.

Key wordsmodulated thermal infrared radiation    metasurface    nanosecond response time    sub-Kelvin temperature uniformity    finite size    aspect ratio
收稿日期: 2022-04-02      出版日期: 2023-03-29
Corresponding Author(s): Sheng SHEN   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2023, 17(1): 134-140.
Xiu LIU, Zhuo LI, Zexiao WANG, Hyeong Seok YUN, Sheng SHEN. Design and analysis of electrothermal metasurfaces. Front. Energy, 2023, 17(1): 134-140.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-022-0841-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2023/V17/I1/134
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
YearMechanismMediumWavelengthResponse timeRef
2013EmissivityMEMs6.2 μm30 kHz (33.3 μs)[20]
2017EmissivityMEMs8.9 μm100 kHz (9.1 μs)[37]
2014EmissivityGaAs/AlGaAs9.17 μm600 kHz (1.7 μs)[13]
2018EmissivityInAs7.3 μm4.8 MHz (208.3 ns)[22]
2019EmissivityGaN/AlGaN4 μm50 kHz (20.0 μs)[38]
2013EmissivityGraphene7.8 μm40 MHz (25.0 ns)[39]
2014EmissivityGraphene6.9 μm20 GHz (0.05 ns)[40]
2016EmissivityGraphene8 μm2.6 GHz (0.38 ns)[41]
2018EmissivityGraphene8.5 μm7.2 GHz (0.14 ns)[42]
2021EmissivityGSST1.43 μm500 ms[23]
2021EmissivityGST-326755 nm21 μs[24]
2022EmissivityGST-2251.64 μm200 μs[25]
2019TemperatureHot electrons1.59 μm350 ps[43]
2015TemperatureHeat diffusion4.26 μm, 3.95 μm20 Hz (50 ms)[21]
2018TemperatureHeat diffusion4.2 μm, 7 μm100 kHz (10 μs)[44,45]
2021TemperatureHeat diffusion5.1 μm20 MHz (50 ns)[34]
2022TemperatureHeat diffusion1046 nm600 nsThis study
  
1 B Liu, W Gong, B Yu. et al.. Perfect thermal emission by nanoscale transmission line resonators. Nano Letters, 2017, 17(2): 666–672
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03616
2 J Li, Z Li, S Shen. Degenerate quasi-normal mode theory for near-field radiation between plasmonic structures. Optics Express, 2020, 28(23): 34123–34136
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.405308
3 J Li, Z Li, X Liu. et al.. Active control of thermal emission by graphene-nanowire coupled plasmonic metasurfaces. Physical Review B, 2022, 106: 115416
4 F Lu, B Liu, S Shen. Infrared wavefront control based on graphene metasurfaces. Advanced Optical Materials, 2014, 2(8): 794–799
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201400100
5 J Li, B Liu, S Shen. Graphene surface plasmons mediated thermal radiation. Journal of Optics, 2018, 20(2): 024011
https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/aaa1b7
6 J J Greffet, R Carminati, K Joulain. et al.. Coherent emission of light by thermal sources. Nature, 2002, 416(6876): 61–64
https://doi.org/10.1038/416061a
7 D G BaranovY XiaoI A Nechepurenko, et al.. Nanophotonic engineering of far-field thermal emitters. 2018: arXiv: 1806.03372
8 W Li, S Fan. Nanophotonic control of thermal radiation for energy applications. Optics Express, 2018, 26(12): 15995
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.015995
9 Z Ren, Y Chang, Y Ma. et al.. Leveraging of MEMS technologies for optical metamaterials applications. Advanced Optical Materials, 2020, 8(3): 1900653
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900653
10 Y Li, W Li, T Han. et al.. Transforming heat transfer with thermal metamaterials and devices. Nature Reviews. Materials, 2021, 6(6): 488–507
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00283-2
11 Y Lin, Z Xu. Reconfigurable metamaterials for optoelectronic applications. International Journal of Optomechatronics, 2020, 14(1): 78–93
https://doi.org/10.1080/15599612.2020.1834655
12 D A B Miller, L Zhu, S Fan. Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(17): 4336–4341
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701606114
13 T Inoue, M D Zoysa, T Asano. et al.. Realization of dynamic thermal emission control. Nature Materials, 2014, 13(10): 928–931
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4043
14 V W Brar, M C Sherrott, M S Jang. et al.. Electronic modulation of infrared radiation in graphene plasmonic resonators. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 7032
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8032
15 J H Park, S Han, P Nagpal. et al.. Observation of thermal beaming from tungsten and molybdenum bull’s eyes. ACS Photonics, 2016, 3(3): 494–500
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00022
16 A Lochbaum, Y Fedoryshyn, A Dorodnyy. et al.. On-chip narrowband thermal emitter for mid-IR optical gas sensing. ACS Photonics, 2017, 4(6): 1371–1380
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b01025
17 A Tittl, A K U Michel, M Schäferling. et al.. A switchable mid-infrared plasmonic perfect absorber with multispectral thermal imaging capability. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(31): 4597–4603
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502023
18 A Lenert, D M Bierman, Y Nam. et al.. A nanophotonic solar thermophotovoltaic device. Nature Nanotechnology, 2014, 9(2): 126–130
https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.286
19 D M Bierman, A Lenert, W R Chan. et al.. Enhanced photovoltaic energy conversion using thermally based spectral shaping. Nature Energy, 2016, 1(6): 16068
https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.68
20 X Liu, W J Padilla. Dynamic manipulation of infrared radiation with MEMS metamaterials. Advanced Optical Materials, 2013, 1(8): 559–562
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201300163
21 H T Miyazaki, T Kasaya, H Oosato. et al.. Ultraviolet-nanoimprinted packaged metasurface thermal emitters for infrared CO2 sensing. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2015, 16(3): 035005
https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/035005
22 J Park, J H Kang, X Liu. et al.. Dynamic thermal emission control with InAs-based plasmonic metasurfaces. Science Advances, 2018, 4(12): eaat3163
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat3163
23 Y Zhang, C Fowler, J Liang. et al.. Electrically reconfigurable non-volatile metasurface using low-loss optical phase-change material. Nature Nanotechnology, 2021, 16(6): 661–666
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00881-9
24 Y Wang, P Landreman, D Schoen. et al.. Electrical tuning of phase-change antennas and metasurfaces. Nature Nanotechnology, 2021, 16(6): 667–672
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00882-8
25 S Abdollahramezani, O Hemmatyar, M Taghinejad. et al.. Electrically driven reprogrammable phase-change metasurface reaching 80% efficiency. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 1696
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29374-6
26 J Li, J Wuenschell, Z Li. et al.. Fiber coupled near-field thermoplasmonic emission from gold nanorods at 1100 K. Small. Small, 2021, 17(17): e2007274
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202007274
27 J Li, B Yu, S Shen. Scale law of far-field thermal radiation from plasmonic metasurfaces. Physical Review Letters, 2020, 124(13): 137401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.137401
28 J P Berenger. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 114(2): 185–200
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.1159
29 Z Li, J Li, X Liu. et al.. Wiener chaos expansion method for thermal radiation from inhomogeneous structures. Physical Review. B, 2021, 104(19): 195426
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.195426
30 J Grant, Y Ma, S Saha. et al.. Polarization insensitive, broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber. Optics Letters, 2011, 36(17): 3476–3478
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.003476
31 D Hasan, P Pitchappa, J Wang. et al.. Novel CMOS-compatible Mo–AlN–Mo platform for metamaterial-based mid-IR absorber. ACS Photonics, 2017, 4(2): 302–315
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00672
32 A Lochbaum, A Dorodnyy, U Koch. et al.. Compact mid-infrared gas sensing enabled by an all-metamaterial design. Nano Letters, 2020, 20(6): 4169–4176
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00483
33 D Li, H Zhou, X Hui. et al.. Multifunctional chemical sensing platform based on dual-resonant infrared plasmonic perfect absorber for on-chip detection of poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate). Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2021, 8(20): 2101879
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202101879
34 L Wojszvzyk, A Nguyen, A L Coutrot. et al.. An incandescent metasurface for quasimonochromatic polarized mid-wave infrared emission modulated beyond 10 MHz. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1492
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21752-w
35 Estakhri N Mohammadi, C Argyropoulos, A Alù. Graded metascreens to enable a new degree of nanoscale light management. Philosophical Transactions—Royal Society. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 2015, 373(2049): 20140351
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0351
36 N L Tsitsas, C A Valagiannopoulos. Anomalous reflection of visible light by all-dielectric gradient metasurfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America. B, Optical Physics, 2017, 34(7): D1
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.34.0000D1
37 X Liu, W J Padilla. Reconfigurable room temperature metamaterial infrared emitter. Optica, 2017, 4(4): 430–433
https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000430
38 D D Kang, T Inoue, T Asano. et al.. Electrical modulation of narrowband GaN/AlGaN quantum-well photonic crystal thermal emitters in mid-wavelength infrared. ACS Photonics, 2019, 6(6): 1565–1571
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00440
39 Y Yao, M A Kats, P Genevet. et al.. Broad electrical tuning of graphene-loaded plasmonic antennas. Nano Letters, 2013, 13(3): 1257–1264
https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3047943
40 Y Yao, R Shankar, M A Kats. et al.. Electrically tunable metasurface perfect absorbers for ultrathin mid-infrared optical modulators. Nano Letters, 2014, 14(11): 6526–6532
https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503104n
41 K Fan, J Suen, X Wu. et al.. Graphene metamaterial modulator for free-space thermal radiation. Optics Express, 2016, 24(22): 25189–25201
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025189
42 B Zeng, Z Huang, A Singh. et al.. Hybrid graphene metasurfaces for high-speed mid-infrared light modulation and single-pixel imaging. Light, Science & Applications, 2018, 7(1): 51
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-018-0055-4
43 R J Shiue, Y Gao, C Tan. et al.. Thermal radiation control from hot graphene electrons coupled to a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 109
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08047-3
44 N H Mahlmeister, L M Lawton, I J Luxmoore. et al.. Modulation characteristics of graphene-based thermal emitters. Applied Physics Express, 2016, 9(1): 012105
https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.9.012105
45 C Shi, N H Mahlmeister, I J Luxmoore. et al.. Metamaterial-based graphene thermal emitter. Nano Research, 2018, 11(7): 3567–3573
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1922-7
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed