Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

邮发代号 80-967

2019 Impact Factor: 3.421

Frontiers of Medicine  2021, Vol. 15 Issue (5): 767-775   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0785-6
  本期目录
Acupuncture is ineffective for chronic low back pain? A critical analysis and rethinking
Xuqiang Wei1, Baoyan Liu1,2()
1. College of Acupuncture and Orthopedic, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China
2. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
 全文: PDF(128 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Acupuncture is a promising treatment for relieving pain and improving lower back function in clinical practice. However, evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) remains controversial. Most RCTs conclude that acupuncture procedures for chronic low back pain (CLBP) had no significant difference in efficacy and belonged to placebo. We carefully reviewed and analyzed the methodology and implementation of sham acupuncture in RCTs. Controversial evidence of acupuncture for CLBP is only a microcosm of the evaluation methodological limitation of acupuncture. Inappropriate selection of sham acupuncture controls, rigorous RCT research models, and incorrect interpretation of results may contribute to negative evidence. Evaluating and disregarding the holistic efficacy of acupuncture with an explanatory RCT model based on evaluation drugs may be unwise. Moreover, sham acupuncture is often proven to be non-inert, unreasonable, and with low fidelity. Pitfalls of the explanatory RCT model and sham acupuncture design should be avoided. Establishing a new evaluation system that is in line with the clinical characteristics of acupuncture and obtaining high-quality evidence are difficult but promising tasks.

Key wordschronic low back pain    sham acupuncture    acupuncture    methodology    therapeutic evaluation
收稿日期: 2019-12-03      出版日期: 2021-11-01
Corresponding Author(s): Baoyan Liu   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Medicine, 2021, 15(5): 767-775.
Xuqiang Wei, Baoyan Liu. Acupuncture is ineffective for chronic low back pain? A critical analysis and rethinking. Front. Med., 2021, 15(5): 767-775.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/10.1007/s11684-020-0785-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/Y2021/V15/I5/767
Domains Experimental group Control group Underlying hypothesis of acupuncture effect
Location Acupoint Non-acupoint Acupoint specific
Meridian Non-meridian Meridian specific
Stimulation De Qi sensation Non-De Qi sensation Perception specific
Manual operation Physical stimulation (electricity, magnet, laser, or visually virtual) Stimulation specific (different parameter specific)
Deep insert Shallow insertion Needing depth specific
Needling Standard procedure Non-standard procedure Procedure specific
Penetration Penetration skin Non-penetration skin Penetration specific
Tab.1  
Domains Acupuncture characteristics RCT model Flaws or traps in acupuncture RCTs
Intervention principle Individual and integration concept Homogenization and standardization Regression from optimal to average
Intervention attributes Integration of specific and non-specific factors The intervention itself is the only specific factor The non-specific factors of acupuncture were dissected
Population Wide crowd Fixed population Draws conclusions from limited population
Blind method Operated by an acupuncturist without blinding Strictly double blind or triple blind The blind method has poor implement ability and low reliability
Control Sham acupuncture or minimal acupuncture Blank control or inert treatment Control styles are “non-inert”
Acupuncture regimen Flexible Stationary Ignores the correspondence between treatment and disease change
Treatment Dynamic adjustment Stable Loss of acupuncture characteristics and flexibility
Effect composition Multiple (acupoint, stimulus, operation, environment, and psychology and expectation) Monotonous (needling or electric stimulus) Acupuncture properties are split
Diagnosis and treatment sequence Traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis: synchronous or dynamic changes Biomedical diagnosis: diagnosis is fixed and made prior to treatment Violates the concept of acupuncture treatment
Evaluation indicators Subjective and objective indicators Objective biological indicators Ignores the patient’s subjective perception of treatment
Settings Real-world Ideal-world Poor extrapolation
Tab.2  
Elements Efficacy Effectiveness Implementation
Hypothesis Acupuncture is invalid Acupuncture is not as effective Reproducibility and extensibility of the acupuncture program are poor
Object Strictly limited participants Limited participants Participants, implementation environment, and strategies
Intervention program Single fixed acupuncture program Single or multiple dynamic acupuncture programs Acupuncture education and training (skills, knowledge, and others); single or multiple dynamic acupuncture programs
Control selection Placebo or blank control Positive control or standard treatment or waitlist Health strategy or policy
Outcomes Disease-related indicators Health-related indicators a Implementation-related indicators and Health-related indicators
Research purpose Verification of the acupuncture effect Comparison of the acupuncture effectiveness or program optimization Reproducibility and extension of effective acupuncture programs
Validity Internal≥external External≥internal Focus on applicability and fidelity
Model examples Explanatory RCTs b CERs, Pragmatic RCTs, and others Implementation research design, hybrid design, and others.
Tab.3  
1 J Hartvigsen, MJ Hancock, A Kongsted, Q Louw, ML Ferreira, S Genevay, D Hoy, J Karppinen, G Pransky, J Sieper, RJ Smeets, M Underwood, Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018; 391(10137): 2356–2367
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X pmid: 29573870
2 GBD 2017 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392(10159): 1859–1922
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3 pmid: 30415748
3 LD Salzberg, EG Manusov. Management options for patients with chronic back pain without an etiology. Health Serv Insights 2013; 6: 33–38
https://doi.org/10.4137/HSI.S10469 pmid: 25114558
4 R Buchbinder, M van Tulder, B Öberg, LM Costa, A Woolf, M Schoene, P Croft, R Buchbinder, J Hartvigsen, D Cherkin, NE Foster, CG Maher, M Underwood, M van Tulder, JR Anema, R Chou, SP Cohen, L Menezes Costa, P Croft, M Ferreira, PH Ferreira, JM Fritz, S Genevay, DP Gross, MJ Hancock, D Hoy, J Karppinen, BW Koes, A Kongsted, Q Louw, B Öberg, WC Peul, G Pransky, M Schoene, J Sieper, RJ Smeets, JA Turner, A Woolf. Low back pain: a call for action. Lancet 2018; 391(10137): 2384–2388
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30488-4 pmid: 29573871
5 NE Foster, JR Anema, D Cherkin, R Chou, SP Cohen, DP Gross, PH Ferreira, JM Fritz, BW Koes, W Peul, JA Turner, CG Maher; Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet 2018; 391(10137): 2368–2383
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6 pmid: 29573872
6 CB Oliveira, CG Maher, RZ Pinto, AC Traeger, CC Lin, JF Chenot, M van Tulder, BW Koes. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J 2018; 27(11): 2791–2803
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2 pmid: 29971708
7 A Qaseem, TJ Wilt, RM McLean, MA; Forciea Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166(7): 514–530
https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2367 pmid: 28192789
8 J Weiß, S Quante, F Xue, R Muche, M Reuss-Borst. Effectiveness and acceptance of acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med 2013; 19(12): 935–941
https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2012.0338 pmid: 23738680
9 A Plunkett, T Beltran, C Haley, C Kurihara, A McCoart, L Chen, I Wilkinson, SP Cohen. Acupuncture for the treatment of chronic pain in the military population: factors associated with treatment outcomes. Clin J Pain 2017; 33(10): 939–943
https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000518 pmid: 28872474
10 H Wang, G Yang, S Wang, X Zheng, W Zhang, Y Li. The most commonly treated acupuncture indications in the United States: a cross-sectional study. Am J Chin Med 2018; 46(7): 1387–1419
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X18500738 pmid: 30298749
11 AJ Vickers, EA Vertosick, G Lewith, H MacPherson, NE Foster, KJ Sherman, D Irnich, CM Witt, K; Linde Acupuncture Trialists’ Collaboration. Acupuncture for chronic pain: update of an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Pain 2018; 19(5): 455–474
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.005 pmid: 29198932
12 AC Skelly, R Chou, JR Dettori, JA Turner, JL Friedly, SD Rundell, R Fu, ED Brodt, N Wasson, C Winter, AJR Ferguson. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Noninvasive nonpharmacological treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2018
13 YJ Cho, YK Song, YY Cha, BC Shin, IH Shin, HJ Park, HS Lee, KW Kim, JH Cho, WS Chung, JH Lee, MY Song. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a multicenter, randomized, patient-assessor blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. Spine 2013; 38(7): 549–557
https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318275e601 pmid: 23026870
14 FL Bishop, L Yardley, P Prescott, C Cooper, P Little, GT Lewith. Psychological covariates of longitudinal changes in back-related disability in patients undergoing acupuncture. Clin J Pain 2015; 31(3): 254–264
https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000108 pmid: 24901897
15 National Guideline Centre (UK). Low Back Pain and Sciatica in Over 16s: Assessment and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK), 2016
16 M Xu, S Yan, X Yin, X Li, S Gao, R Han, L Wei, W Luo, G Lei. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain in long-term follow-up: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials. Am J Chin Med 2013; 41(1): 1–19
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X13500018 pmid: 23336503
17 J Wise. NICE recommends exercise and not acupuncture for low back pain. BMJ 2016; 352: i1765
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1765 pmid: 27025659
18 J Van Zundert, G Hans, S van Kuijk, K Van Boxem, K Vissers. Low back pain. Lancet 2018; 392(10164): 2548–2549
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33124-6 pmid: 30563636
19 E Leibing, U Leonhardt, G Köster, A Goerlitz, JA Rosenfeldt, R Hilgers, G Ramadori. Acupuncture treatment of chronic low-back pain—a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 9-month follow-up. Pain 2002; 96(1–2): 189–196
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00444-4 pmid: 11932074
20 AR White, J Filshie, TM, Cummings International Acupuncture Research Forum. Clinical trials of acupuncture: consensus recommendations for optimal treatment, sham controls and blinding. Complement Ther Med 2001; 9(4): 237–245
https://doi.org/10.1054/ctim.2001.0489 pmid: 12184353
21 BM Berman S Birch, CM Cassidy, J Ezzo, JS Han, LX Lao, T Oleson, B Pomeranz, C Shang, G Stux, C Takeshige. Clinical Acupuncture: Scientific Basis. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2001
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56732-2
22 S Birch. Clinical research on acupuncture. Part 2. Controlled clinical trials, an overview of their methods. J Altern Complement Med 2004; 10(3): 481–498
https://doi.org/10.1089/1075553041323911 pmid: 15253852
23 C Paterson, N Britten. Acupuncture as a complex intervention: a holistic model. J Altern Complement Med 2004; 10(5): 791–801
https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2004.10.791 pmid: 15650468
24 X Wei, B Liu, L He, X Yang, J Zhou, H Zhao, J Liu. Acupuncture therapy for chronic low back pain: protocol of a prospective, multi-center, registry study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20(1): 488
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2894-4 pmid: 31656194
25 C Paterson, P Dieppe. Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture. BMJ 2005; 330(7501): 1202–1205
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1202
26 RE Sherman, SA Anderson, GJ Dal Pan, GW Gray, T Gross, NL Hunter, L LaVange, D Marinac-Dabic, PW Marks, MA Robb , J Shuren, R Temple, J Woodcock, LQ Yue, RM Califf. Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med 2016; 375(23): 2293–2297
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1609216
27 E Ernst. Acupuncture—a critical analysis. J Intern Med 2006; 259(2): 125–137
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01584.x pmid: 16420542
28 AC Gaw, LW Chang, L-C Shaw. Efficacy of acupuncture on osteoarthritic pain. A controlled, double-blind study. N Engl J Med 1975; 293(8): 375–378
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197508212930803 pmid: 1097921
29 K Streitberger, J Kleinhenz. Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research. Lancet 1998; 352(9125): 364–365
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10471-8 pmid: 9717924
30 P White, G Lewith, V Hopwood, P Prescott. The placebo needle, is it a valid and convincing placebo for use in acupuncture trials? A randomised, single-blind, cross-over pilot trial. Pain 2003; 106(3): 401–409
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.013 pmid: 14659523
31 C Younbyoung, K Yunju, C Ilhwan, L Sabina, L Sangjae, L Hyejung. A comparison study of acupuncture sensation scale between real acupuncture and sham needle. Korean J Acupunct 2006; 23(4): 85–99
32 M Haake, HH Müller, C Schade-Brittinger, HD Basler, H Schäfer, C Maier, HG Endres, HJ Trampisch, A Molsberger. German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(17): 1892–1898
https://doi.org/10.1001/Archinte.167.17.1892 pmid: 17893311
33 A Benham, G Phillips, MI Johnson. An experimental study on the self-report of acupuncture needle sensation during deep needling with bi-directional rotation. Acupunct Med 2010; 28(1): 16–20
https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.2009.001651 pmid: 20351371
34 Y Choi, S Cho, J Lee, W Moon, D Yoo. P02.116. The relationship between deqi and the effect of acupuncture. BMC Complement Altern Med 2012; 12(S1): P172
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-S1-P172
35 KT Hall, J Loscalzo, T Kaptchuk. Pharmacogenomics and the placebo response. ACS Chem Neurosci 2018; 9(4): 633–635
https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00078 pmid: 29498823
36 GT Lewith, PJ White, TJ Kaptchuk. Developing a research strategy for acupuncture. Clin J Pain 2006; 22(7): 632–638
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ajp.0000210908.42299.1a pmid: 16926579
37 E Manheimer. Selecting a control for in vitro fertilization and acupuncture randomized controlled trials (RCTs): how sham controls may unnecessarily complicate the RCT evidence base. Fertil Steril 2011; 95(8): 2456–2461
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.040 pmid: 21570069
38 ZJ Zhang, XM Wang, GM McAlonan. Neural acupuncture unit: a new concept for interpreting effects and mechanisms of acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012; 2012: 429412
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/429412 pmid: 22474503
39 KT Hall, J Loscalzo, TJ Kaptchuk. Genetics and the placebo effect: the placebome. Trends Mol Med 2015; 21(5): 285–294
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2015.02.009 pmid: 25883069
40 Z Liu, Y Liu, H Xu, L He, Y Chen, L Fu, N Li, Y Lu, T Su, J Sun, J Wang, Z Yue, W Zhang, J Zhao, Z Zhou, J Wu, K Zhou, Y Ai, J Zhou, R Pang, Y Wang, Z Qin, S Yan, H Li, L Luo, B Liu. Effect of electroacupuncture on urinary leakage among women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 317(24): 2493–2501
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7220 pmid: 28655016
41 X Zhang, Y Wang, Z Wang, C Wang, W Ding, Z Liu. A randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of electroacupuncture versus medium-frequency electrotherapy for discogenic sciatica. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2017; 2017: 9502718
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9502718 pmid: 28491116
42 ZX Chen, Y Li, XG Zhang, S Chen, WT Yang, XW Zheng, GQ Zheng. Sham electroacupuncture methods in randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 40837
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40837 pmid: 28106094
43 TH Kim, JW Kang, MS Lee. What is lost in the acupuncture trial when using a sham intervention? Acupunct Med 2017; 35(5): 384–386
https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2016-011333 pmid: 28456756
44 T Lundeberg, I Lund, A Sing, J Näslund. Is placebo acupuncture what it is intended to be? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011; 2011: 932407
45 L Vase, S Baram, N Takakura, H Yajima, M Takayama, TJ Kaptchuk, S Schou, TS Jensen, R Zachariae, P Svensson. Specifying the nonspecific components of acupuncture analgesia. Pain 2013; 154(9): 1659–1667
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.008 pmid: 23707680
46 QL Yuan, P Wang, L Liu, F Sun, YS Cai, WT Wu, ML Ye, JT Ma, BB Xu, YG Zhang. Acupuncture for musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of sham-controlled randomized clinical trials. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 30675
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30675 pmid: 27471137
47 I Lund, J Näslund, T Lundeberg. Minimal acupuncture is not a valid placebo control in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: a physiologist’s perspective. Chin Med 2009; 4(2): 1
https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-4-1 pmid: 19183454
48 I Ford, J Norrie. Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(5): 454–463
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1510059 pmid: 27518663
49 H MacPherson, DG Altman, R Hammerschlag, L Youping, W Taixiang, A White, D; Moher STRICTA Revision Group. Revised Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Med 2010; 7(6): e1000261
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261 pmid: 20543992
50 RE Glasgow, E Lichtenstein, AC Marcus. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 2003; 93(8): 1261–1267
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261 pmid: 12893608
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed