Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

邮发代号 80-967

2019 Impact Factor: 3.421

Frontiers of Medicine  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (2): 276-284   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-021-0855-4
  本期目录
Chemotherapy initiation with single-course methotrexate alone or combined with dactinomycin versus multi-course methotrexate for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a multi-centric randomized clinical trial
Lili Chen1, Ling Xi2, Jie Jiang3, Rutie Yin4, Pengpeng Qu5, Xiuqin Li6, Xiaoyun Wan1, Yaxia Chen1, Dongxiao Hu1, Yuyan Mao1, Zimin Pan1, Xiaodong Cheng1, Xinyu Wang1, Qingli Li4, Danhui Weng2, Xi Zhang3, Hong Zhang5, Quanhong Ping5, Xiaomei Liu6, Xing Xie1, Beihua Kong3(), Ding Ma2(), Weiguo Lu1()
1. Department of Gynecological Oncology, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Disease of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610041, China
5. Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin 300052, China
6. Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110021, China
 全文: PDF(564 KB)   HTML
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-course initial regimens in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). In this trial (NCT01823315), 276 patients were analyzed. Patients were allocated to three initiated regimens: single-course methotrexate (MTX), single-course MTX+ dactinomycin (ACTD), and multi-course MTX (control arm). The primary endpoint was the complete remission (CR) rate by initial drug(s). The primary CR rate was 64.4% with multi-course MTX in the control arm. For the single-course MTX arm, the CR rate was 35.8% by one course; it increased to 59.3% after subsequent multi-course MTX, with non-inferiority to the control (difference –5.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) –19.4% to 9.2%, P=0.014). After further treatment with multi-course ACTD, the CR rate (93.3%) was similar to that of the control (95.2%, P=0.577). For the single-course MTX+ACTD arm, the CR rate was 46.7% by one course, which increased to 89.1% after subsequent multi-course, with non-inferiority (difference 24.7%, 95% CI 12.8%–36.6%, P<0.001) to the control. It was similar to the CR rate by MTX and further ACTD in the control arm (89.1% vs. 95.2%, P=0.135). Four patients experienced recurrence, with no death, during the 2-year follow-up. We demonstrated that chemotherapy initiation with single-course MTX may be an alternative regimen for patients with low-risk GTN.

Key wordsgestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN)    methotrexate (MTX)    dactinomycin (ACTD)
收稿日期: 2021-03-02      出版日期: 2022-04-26
Corresponding Author(s): Beihua Kong,Ding Ma,Weiguo Lu   
作者简介:

Peng Lu, Renxing Wang, and Yue Xing contributed equally to this work.

 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Medicine, 2022, 16(2): 276-284.
Lili Chen, Ling Xi, Jie Jiang, Rutie Yin, Pengpeng Qu, Xiuqin Li, Xiaoyun Wan, Yaxia Chen, Dongxiao Hu, Yuyan Mao, Zimin Pan, Xiaodong Cheng, Xinyu Wang, Qingli Li, Danhui Weng, Xi Zhang, Hong Zhang, Quanhong Ping, Xiaomei Liu, Xing Xie, Beihua Kong, Ding Ma, Weiguo Lu. Chemotherapy initiation with single-course methotrexate alone or combined with dactinomycin versus multi-course methotrexate for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a multi-centric randomized clinical trial. Front. Med., 2022, 16(2): 276-284.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/10.1007/s11684-021-0855-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/Y2022/V16/I2/276
Fig.1  
Characteristics Single-course MTX
(n = 96)
Single-course
MTX+ ACTD
(n = 93)
Multi-course
MTX
(n = 94)
Age (median (IQR)) 30 (26, 40) 30 (26, 38) 30 (25,40)
Antecedent
Mole 85 (89%) 81 (87%) 82 (87%)
Abortion 9 (9%) 11 (12%) 10 (11%)
Term delivery 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 2 (2%)
Interval from index pregnancy (month)
<4 74 (77%) 76 (82%) 78 (83%)
≥4 22 (23%) 17 (18%) 16 (17%)
Stage
I 36 (38%) 28 (30%) 36 (38%)
II 4 (4%) 1 (1%) 5 (5%)
III 56 (58%) 64 (69%) 53 (56%)
WHO score
0–2 56 (58%) 59 (63%) 55 (59%)
3–4 25 (26%) 22 (24%) 31 (33%)
5–6 15 (16%) 12 (13%) 8 (9%)
Pre-treatment hCG level (median (IQR)) 1635.1 (302.1, 1140.6) 3785 (1031, 14 585.8) 2592.5 (463, 12 726)
<103 IU/L 42 (43.8%) 22 (23.7%) 32 (34.0%)
≥103,<104 IU/L 29 (30.2%) 42 (45.2%) 36 (38.3%)
≥104 IU/L 25 (26.0%) 29 (31.2%) 26 (27.7%)
Largest tumor size (cm)
<3 72 (75%) 78 (84%) 76 (81%)
≥3 24 (25%) 15 (16%) 18 (19%)
Number of metastases identified
0 66 (69%) 53 (57%) 65 (69%)
1–4 23 (24%) 27 (29%) 21 (22%)
≥5 7 (7%) 13 (14%) 8 (9%)
Surgery during chemotherapy 8 (8%) 4 (4%) 3 (3%)
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Control Arm 1 Arm 2
Median IQR Median IQR P Median IQR P
CR by initial drugsa 3 2−4 1 1−3 0.000 1 1−3 0.002
CR by single drugsa 5 4−6 5 4−6 0.568 NA NA
CR by salvage multi-drugsa 7 7−9b 8 7−11b 0.662 7 4−10b 0.513
Tab.2  
Factors OR 95% CI P value
Pre-treatment hCG level 0.027
<103 IU/L Reference
≥103,<104 IU/L 2.211 0.803-6.085 0.125
≥104 IU/L 3.979 1.236-12.809 0.021
Age 0.546 0.171-1.74 0.306
Largest tumor size, cm 1.756 0.506-6.092 0.375
Interval, months 0.962 0.313-2.963 0.947
Pregnancy before 1.982 0.498-7.882 0.332
Metastasis number 0.844
0 0.942 0.161-5.499 0.947
1–4 0.673 0.103-4.382 0.679
>4 Reference
Tab.3  
Main adverse effects Single-course MTX Single-course MTX+ ACTD Multi-course MTX
G1 G2 G3 G4 Total G1 G2 G3 G4 Total G1 G2 G3 G4 Total
Myelosuppression 19 8 18 6 51 31 13 16 4 64 29 16 19 9 73
Stomatitis 31 12 7 1 51 35 3 5 1 44 25 23 5 8 61
Hepatic/kidney 36 9 7 4 56 35 1 5 0 41 35 14 11 1 61
Alopecia 36 3 12 0 51 45 4 25 0 74 23 10 11 0 44
Tab.4  
1 M Alazzam, J Tidy, BW Hancock, R Osborne, TA Lawrie. First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 7(7): CD007102
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub3 pmid: 22786502
2 TA Lawrie, M Alazzam, J Tidy, BW Hancock, R Osborne. First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (6): CD007102
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub4 pmid: 27281496
3 HYS Ngan, MJ Seckl, RS Berkowitz, Y Xiang, F Golfier, PK Sekharan, JR Lurain, L Massuger. Update on the diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143(Suppl 2): 79–85
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12615 pmid: 30306586
4 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia, version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2020
5 I Maestá, R Nitecki, NS Horowitz, DP Goldstein, M de Freitas Segalla Moreira, KM Elias, RS Berkowitz. Effectiveness and toxicity of first-line methotrexate chemotherapy in low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: The New England Trophoblastic Disease Center experience. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 148(1): 161–167
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.028 pmid: 29092742
6 RJ Osborne, V Filiaci, JC Schink, RS Mannel, A Alvarez Secord, JL Kelley, D Provencher, D Scott Miller, AL Covens, JM Lage. Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(7): 825–831
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386 pmid: 21263100
7 YJ Lee, JY Park, DY Kim, DS Suh, JH Kim, YM Kim, YT Kim, JH Nam. Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate and actinomycin D as first-line single chemotherapy agents in low risk gestational trophoblastic disease. J Gynecol Oncol 2017; 28(2): e8
https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8 pmid: 27819410
8 RA Abrão, JM de Andrade, DG Tiezzi, HR Marana, FJ Candido dos Reis, WS Clagnan. Treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease: comparison of single-agent methotrexate, dactinomycin and combination regimens. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 108(1): 149–153
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.006 pmid: 17931696
9 AA Lertkhachonsuk, N Israngura, S Wilailak, S Tangtrakul. Actinomycin D versus methotrexate-folinic acid as the treatment of stage I, low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19(5): 985–988
https://doi.org/10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a8333d pmid: 19574798
10 F Taylor, T Grew, J Everard, L Ellis, MC Winter, J Tidy, BW Hancock, RE Coleman. The outcome of patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with single agent intramuscular methotrexate and oral folinic acid. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49(15): 3184–3190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.004 pmid: 23870384
11 RS Berkowitz, DP Goldstein, MR Bernstein. Ten year’s experience with methotrexate and folinic acid as primary therapy for gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynecol Oncol 1986; 23(1): 111–118
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(86)90123-X pmid: 3002916
12 JS Berek. Gestational trophoblastic disease. In: Novak’s Gynecology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, 2002. 1369
13 AP Garrett, EO Garner, DP Goldstein, RS Berkowitz. Methotrexate infusion and folinic acid as primary therapy for nonmetastatic and low-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors. 15 years of experience. J Reprod Med 2002; 47(5): 355–362
pmid: 12063874
14 L Eiriksson, T Wells, H Steed, A Schepansky, V Capstick, P Hoskins, J Pike, K Swenerton. Combined methotrexate-dactinomycin: an effective therapy for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 124(3): 553–557
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.036 pmid: 22079360
15 HY Ngan, EI Kohorn, LA Cole, RJ Kurman, SJ Kim, JR Lurain, MJ Seckl, S Sasaki, JT Soper. Trophoblastic disease. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 119(Suppl 2): S130–S136
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60026-5 pmid: 22999504
16 JS Berek. Berek & Novak’s Gynecology. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012
17 KK Chan, Y Huang, KF Tam, KY Tse, HY Ngan. Single-dose methotrexate regimen in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(5): 1282–1286
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.048 pmid: 16723109
18 WB Growdon, AJ Wolfberg, DP Goldstein, CM Feltmate, ME Chinchilla, ES Lieberman, RS Berkowitz. Evaluating methotrexate treatment in patients with low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112(2): 353–357
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.003 pmid: 19059633
19 E Chapman-Davis, AV Hoekstra, AW Rademaker, JC Schink, JR Lurain. Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125(3): 572–575
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.039 pmid: 22449733
20 MM Frijstein, C Lok, NE van Trommel, MJ Ten Kate-Booij, L Massuger, E van Werkhoven, D Short, X Aguiar, RA Fisher, B Kaur, N Sarwar, NJ Sebire, MJ Seckl. Lung metastases in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2020; 127(3): 389–395
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16036 pmid: 31794098
[1] FMD-21009-OF-LWG_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed