Abstract：The automobile product development (PD) design space continually increases in size and complexity. In this dynamic environment, firms must identify competitive strategies that maintain or increase financial return. Firms can compete on several factors including price/cost, time-to-market, or differentiation (e.g., function or quality). Here, we envision that differentiation through expertise in integration can be a successful strategy in the automotive industry. Expertise in integration requires attention to knowledge management, which is crucial for competitive advantage [Drucker P. The Atlantic Monthly, 1994, 274(5): 53–80]. A key component of the PD process is the acquisition of data about customers’ responses to vehicle performance and the rapid use of that information in the development of new products. The paper proposes a system for collecting near real-time data about responses to vehicle performance and its integration with recent developments in design and analysis. The proposed system would collect customer psychophysical response data, correlate it with vehicle parameter response data, and apply this information with feasible design automation to provide reduced cycle time, improved quality, and greater customer satisfaction. The paper discusses some relevant technological and legal constraints and concludes that such a system is feasible, can provide a near-term competitive advantage, and in the long-term, in some form, will be necessary for success.
Drucker P. Theage of social transformation. The AtlanticMonthly, 1994, 274(5): 53–80
Darlington M J, Culley S J. Current research in the engineeringdesign requirement. Proc Instn Mech Engrs.Engineering Manufacture, 2002, 216: 375–388
Pearlson K E, Saunders K S. Managing and Using InformationSystems: A Strategic Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2004
Laube Zammuto. Business Driven Information Technology: Answers to 100 Critical Questionsfor Every Manager. Stanford Business Books, 2003.
Caproni P J. Management Skills for Everyday Life. 2nd ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005
Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1980
Michelena N, Kim H M, Papalambros P. A system partitioning and optimization approach to targetcascading. In: Proceedings of the 12thInternational Conference on Engineering Design. Germany, 1999, 2: 1109–1112
Michelena N, Papalambros P. A hypergraph framework foroptimal model-based decomposition of design problems. Computational Optimization and Applications, 1997, 8(2): 173–196 doi: 10.1023/A:1008673321406
Cooper A B, Georgiopoulos P, Kim H M, Papalambros P Y. Analytical target setting: an enterprise context in optimal productdesign. Transactions of ASME: Journal ofMechanical Design, 2006, 128(1): 4–13 doi: 10.1115/1.2125972
Greig J A. Form vs. Function: A systems approach to achieving harmony. SAE paper, 1999, 266
Brewin B. WirelessLANs envisioned for ‘drive-by’ downloads. Computerworld, 2002, 12(36): 12
Buchholz K. Insidenorth American vehicles. Automotive EngineeringInternational, 2002, 5(110): 51–58
Baroody R, Al-Holou N, Hariri S. Development of car intranet infrastructure. SAE paper, 2002, 38
Jost K. Sensingthe possibilities. Automotive EngineeringInternational, 2002, 5(110): 92–98
Singh S. Well,software will drive the future cars. EconomicTimes of India, 2006, 14
Babala M, Kempen G, Zatyko P. Trade-offs for vehicle stability control sensor sets. SAE paper, 2002, 1587
Whale G R. Traction tech: next-generation StabiliTrak for ‘03 GMs’. Truck Trends, 2002, 54–55
Costlow T. Sensinga change. Automotive Engineering International, 2006, 114(4): 48–53
Ranky P G. Advanced digital automobile sensor applications. Sensor Review, 2002, 2(22): 213–217 doi: 10.1108/02602280210433043
Anon. Advances in automotive materials. In: Advanced Materials and Processes. 2002, 21–26
Choi S B. Performance comparison of vehicle suspensions featuring two differentelectrorheological shock absorbers. ProcInstn Mech Engrs, Part D: Automobile Engineering, 2003, 217: 999–1010 doi: 10.1243/095440703770383893
Murphy T. Newwheels: super cars on the cheap. Ward’sAutoWorld, 2003, 42–43
Lee J Y, Kauh S K, Ha K P. Development of a disc-type torque meter for an automatictransmission vehicle. Proc Instn Mech Engrs,Part D: Automobile Engineering, 2005, 219: 1443–1449 doi: 10.1243/095440705X35107
Yamaguchi J. Drivetrainadvances. Automotive Engineering International, 2006, 114(4): 78–86
Hrovat D. Surveyof advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications. Automatica, 1997, 10 (33): 1781–1817 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00101-5
Kiencke U, Nielsen L. Automotive Control Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000
Lycan W G. Consciousness. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1987
Sellars W. TheRole of the Imagination in Kant's Theory of Experience. In Categories: A Colloquium (PennsylvaniaState University), Johnstone H W,Jr, ed, 1978
Hsiao S W, Wang H P. Applying the semantic transformationmethod to product form design. Design Studies, 1998, (19): 309–330 doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00009-X
Vergeest J S M, Egmond van R, Dumitrescu R. Correlating Shape Parameters to Customer Preference. Horvath I, Li P, Vergeest J S M, eds. Proc of the TMCE 2002. Wuhan: HUST Press, 2002, 331–338
Giannini F, Monti M M. An innovative approach tothe aesthetic design. In: Proceedings ofCommon Ground—The Design Research Society Conference 2002. London, 2002 (http://www.fiores.com/FIORES2/publication/AnInnovativeApproachToTheAestheticDesign.pdf)
Lian L L, Chen Y H, Yang Z Y. Haptic rendering: an approach to tactile property perceptionin early product design. Proc IMECHE PartB: J of Engineering Manufacture, 2005, B(12): 891–902
Sass L. Materializingdesign: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design. Design Studies, 2005, 27(3): 325–355 doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.11.009
Vidal R, Mulet E. Thinking about computer systemsto support design synthesis. Communicationsof the ACM, 2006, 49(4): 100–104 doi: 10.1145/1121949.1121955
Wang C B, Chen Y J, Chen Y M, Chu H C. Developmentof technology for customer requirement-based reference design retrieval. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2006, 22: 33–46 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2005.02.002
Buchholz K. Gettingvalidation. Automotive Engineering International, 2006, 114(4): 147–149
Ulrich K. Therole of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 1995, 24(3): 419–440 doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3
Meyer M H, Lehnerd A P. The Power of Product Platforms:Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York: The Free Press, 1997
Ulrich K, Eppinger S. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill, 2000
Siddique Z, Rosen D W, Wang N. On the applicability of product variety design conceptsto automotive platform commonality. ProcDETC98: 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 1998, 98-DETC/DTM-561
Davenport. The ComingCommoditization of Processes. Harvard BusinessReview, 2005
Gourville J. Eagerbuyers and stony sellers: understanding the psychology of new productadoption. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84(6)
Arnold V. Behavioralresearch opportunities: Understanding the impact of enterprise systems. International Journal of Accounting InformationSystems, 2006, 7: 7–17 doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2006.02.001
Dowlatshahi S. Therole of product safety and liability in concurrent engineering. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2001, 41: 187–209 doi: 10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00054-7
Mallor J P, Barnes A J, Bowers T, Phillips M J, Langvardt A W. Business Law and the RegulatoryEnvironment, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001
Barabasi A L. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What ItMeans. New York: Plume, 2003
Kalay Y E. The impact of information technology on design methods, products,and practices. Design Studies, 2005, 27(3): 357–380 doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.11.001
Csikszentmihalyi. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper, 1997
