Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

邮发代号 80-975

2019 Impact Factor: 2.448

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering  0, Vol. Issue (): 410-416   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-012-0341-4
  RESEARCH ARTICLE 本期目录
Effect of magneto rheological damper on tool vibration during hard turning
Effect of magneto rheological damper on tool vibration during hard turning
P. Sam PAUL1, A. S. VARADARAJAN2()
1. Karunya University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641114, India; 2. Mechanical Department, NSS College of Engineering, Palakkad, Kerala 678008, India
 全文: PDF(198 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Recently, the concept of hard turning has gained considerable attention in metal cutting as it can apparently replace the traditional process cycle of turning, heat treating, and finish grinding for assembly of hard wear resistant steel parts. The present investigation aims at developing a magneto rheological (MR) fluid damper for suppressing tool vibration and promoting better cutting performance during hard turning. The magneto rheological Fluid acts as a viscoelastic spring with non-linear vibration characteristics that are controlled by the composition of the magneto rheological fluid, the shape of the plunger and the electric parameters of the magnetizing field. Cutting experiments were conducted to arrive at a set of electrical, compositional and shape parameters that can suppress tool vibration and promote better cutting performance during turning of AISI 4340 steel of 46 HRC with minimal fluid application using hard metal insert with sculptured rake face. It was observed that the use of MR fluid damper reduces tool vibration and improves the cutting performance effectively. Also commercialization of this idea holds promise to the metal cutting industry.

Key wordstool vibration    magneto rheological damper    hard turning    surface finish    tool wear
收稿日期: 2012-08-23      出版日期: 2012-12-05
Corresponding Author(s): VARADARAJAN A. S.,Email:varadarajan_as@yahoo.co.in   
 引用本文:   
. Effect of magneto rheological damper on tool vibration during hard turning[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 0, (): 410-416.
P. Sam PAUL, A. S. VARADARAJAN. Effect of magneto rheological damper on tool vibration during hard turning. Front Mech Eng, 0, (): 410-416.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/10.1007/s11465-012-0341-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/Y0/V/I/410
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
S1 No.ParametersL1L2L3
1Shape of the plungerConicalCylinderInverted conical
2Viscosity index of the mediumSAE20SAE 30SAE 40
3Particle size45 μm53 μm75 μm
4AC and DC current10 V20 V30 V
Tab.1  
Standard orderFactor
1CurrentPlungerViscosityFerro magnetic particle
1ACI1S1P1M1
2ACI1S2P2M2
3ACI1S3P3M3
4ACI2S1P1M2
5ACI2S2P2M3
6ACI2S3P3M1
7ACI3S1P2M1
8ACI3S2P3M2
9ACI3S3P1M3
10DCI1S1P3M3
11DCI1S2P1M1
12DCI1S3P2M2
13DCI2S1P3M3
14DCI2S2P3M1
15DCI2S3P1M2
16DCI3S1P3M2
17DCI3S2P1M3
18DCI3S3P2M1
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Sl NO.Objective Current Voltage Shape of plunger Viscosity Size of ferro particles
1 To minimize vibration L2(DC) L3(30 V) L1( Conical) L3(40) L3(75)
2 To minimize cutting force L2(DC) L3(30 V) L1(Conical) L3(40) L3(75)
3 To minimize surface roughnessL2(DC) L3(30 V) L1(Conical) L3(40) L3(75)
4To minimize tool wearL2(DC) L3(30 V) L1(Conical) L3(40) L3(75)
Tab.3  
ParametersWith damperWithout damperImprovement
Vibration/mm0.0020.01586.6%
Cutting force/N340.3438.522.4%
Tool wear/mm0.030.0757%
Surface finish/μm0.50.944.4%
Tab.4  
Fig.8  
1 Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Denkena B. Advancing cutting technology. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology , 2003, 52(2): 483–507
2 Alexender R, Varadarajan A S, Philip P K. Hard turning with minimum cutting fluid —A viable green alternative on the shop floor. In: Proceedings of the 18th AIMTDR Conference, India , 1998, 183-187
3 Sam Paul P, Varadarajan A S. A multi-sensor fusion model based on artificial neural network to predict tool wear during hard turning. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture , 2012, 226(5): 853–860
doi: 10.1177/0954405411432381
4 Ghani A K, Choudhury I A, Husni. Husni. Study of tool life, surface roughness and vibration in machining nodular cast iron with ceramic tool. Journal of Materials Processing Technology , 2002, 127(1): 17–22
doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00092-4
5 Arizmendi M, Campa F J, Fernández J, Lópes de Lacalle L N, Gil A, Bilbao E, Veiga F, Lamikiz A. Model for surface topography prediction in peripheral milling considering tool vibration. CIRP Annals -Manufacturing Technology, 2009, 58(1): 93–96
6 Altintas Y. Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations and CNC Design. 1st ed. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000
7 Spencer J B F, Dyke S J, Sain M K, Carlson J D. Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper. Journal of Engineering Mechanics , 1997, 123(2): 230–238
8 Torsten B, von Stryk O. Modelling and simulation of rheological fluid devices, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.59.667
9 Wang M, Fei R Y. Chatter suppression based on nonlinear vibration characteristic of electrorheological fluids. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture , 1999, 39(12): 1925–1934
doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00039-5
10 Carlson J D, Sproston J L. Controllable fluids in 2000—Status of ER and MR fluid technology. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on New Actuator, Bermen , 2000, 126–130
11 Lord Corporation, http://mutualhosting.com/~lordfulfillment/upload/PB7138.pdf
12 Genc S, Phule P P. Rheological properties of magnetorheological fluids. Smart Materials and Structures , 2002, 11(1): 140–146 (S)
doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/11/1/316
13 Mei D Q, Kong T R, Albert J S, Chen Z C. Magnetorheological fluid-controlled boring bar for chatter suppression. Journal of Materials Processing Technolology , 2009, 209(4): 1861–1870
14 Sathianarayanan D, Karunamoorthy L, Srinivasan J, Kandasami G S, Palanikumar K. Chatter suppression in boring operation using magnetorheological fluid damper. Materials and Manufacturing Processes , 2008, 23(4): 329–335
doi: 10.1080/10426910701860897
15 Ginder J M, Davis L C, Elie L D. Rheology of magnetorheological fluids: models and measurements. International Journal of Modern Physics B , 1996, 10(23/24): 3293–3303
doi: 10.1142/S0217979296001744
16 Schwartz M M. Encyclopedia of Smart Materials. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed