Variable eccentric distance-based tool path generation for orthogonal turn-milling

doi:10.1007/s11465-015-0361-y

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

2015, Vol. 10

Issue (4): 352-366 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-015-0361-y

本期目录

Variable eccentric distance-based tool path generation for orthogonal turn-milling

Fangyu PENG^1,^*(

),Wei WANG²,Rong YAN²,Xianyin DUAN²,Bin LI²

1. State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2. National Numerical Control System Engineering Research Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

全文: PDF(2068 KB) HTML

Abstract：

This study proposes an algorithm for maximizing strip width in orthogonal turn-milling based on variable eccentric distance. The machining error model is first established based on the local cutting profile at the contact line. The influencing factors of the strip width are then investigated to analyze their features and determine an optimizing strategy. The optimized model for maximum machining strip width is formulated by adopting a variable eccentric distance. Hausdorff distance and Fréchet distance are introduced in this study to implement the constraint function of the machining error in the optimized model. The computing procedure is subsequently provided. Simulations and experiments have been conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Key words： orthogonal turn-milling variable eccentric distance local cutting profile machining strip-width maximization

收稿日期: 2015-09-11 出版日期: 2015-12-03

Corresponding Author(s): Fangyu PENG

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 10(4): 352-366.
Fangyu PENG,Wei WANG,Rong YAN,Xianyin DUAN,Bin LI. Variable eccentric distance-based tool path generation for orthogonal turn-milling. Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, 10(4): 352-366.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/10.1007/s11465-015-0361-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/Y2015/V10/I4/352

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.1

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Tab.2

Fig.18

1	Schulz H, Spur G. High speed turn-milling—A new precision manufacturing technology for the machining of rotationally symmetrical workpieces. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 1990, 39(1): 107–109 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61013-0
2	Choudhury S K, Bajpai J B. Investigation in orthogonal turn-milling towards better surface finish. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 170(3): 487–493 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.12.010
3	Karadkar R B, Pande S S. Feature based automatic CNC code generation for prismatic parts. Computers in Industry, 1996, 28(2): 137–150 https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3615(95)00071-2
4	Waiyagan K, Bohez E L J. Intelligent feature based process planning for five-axis mill-turn parts. Computers in Industry, 2009, 60(5): 296–316 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.009
5	Jiang Z, Jia C. Vector modeling of turn-milling motion. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2003, 39(04): 15–18 https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2003.04.015
6	Xia J, Ge Q. An exact representation of effective cutting shapes of 5-axis CNC machining using rational Bezier and B-spline tool motions. In: Proceedings of 2001 ICRE, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Seoul, IEEE, 2001, 342–347 https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2001.932575
7	Kikkawa K, Nakamura K, Mizugaki Y. An approach of estimating machining error by heuristic geometrical rule in 5-axis ball-nosed end milling. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st century: LEM21. 2003, 415–420
8	Li C, Mann S, Bedi S. Error measurements for flank milling. Computer Aided Design, 2005, 37(14): 1459–1468 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2005.02.014
9	Chiou C J, Lee Y S. Swept surface determination for five-axis numerical control machining. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2002, 42(14): 1497–1507 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00110-4
10	Weinert K, Du S, Damm P, Swept volume generation for the simulation of machining processes. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2004, 44(6): 617–628 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.12.003
11	Gong H, Cao L, Liu J. Second-order approximation of tool envelope surface for 5-axis machining with single point contact. Computer Aided Design, 2008, 40(5): 604–615 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2008.02.003
12	Zhu L, Ding H, Xiong Y. Third-order point contact approach for five-axis sculptured surface machining using non-ball-end tools (I): Third-order approximation of tool envelope surface. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(7): 1904–1912 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-3185-3
13	Sarma R. Flat-ended tool swept sections for five-axis NC machining of sculptured surfaces. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2000, 122(1): 158–165 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.538914
14	Ni Y, Ma D, Zhang H, . Optimal orientation control for torus tool 5-axis sculptured surface NC machining. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2001, 37(02): 87–91 https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2001.02.087
15	Warkentin A, Ismail F, Bedi S. Multi-point tool positioning strategy for 5-axis machining of sculptured surfaces. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 2000, 17(1): 83–100 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8396(99)00040-0
16	Yoon J, Pottmann H, Lee Y. Locally optimal cutting positions for 5-axis sculptured surface machining. Computer Aided Design, 2003, 35(1): 69–81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00176-2
17	Fan J, Ball A. Quadric method for cutter orientation in five-axis sculptured surface machining. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2008, 48(7−8): 788–801 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.12.004
18	Xu R, Chen Z, Chen W, . Dual drive curve tool path planning method for 5-axis NC machining of sculptured surfaces. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2010, 23(4): 486–494 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(09)60245-4
19	Sun Y, Guo D, Jia Z, . Iso-parametric tool path generation from triangular meshes for free-form surface machining. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 28(7−8): 721–726 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2437-4
20	Zhu L, Ding H, Xiong Y. Third-order point contact approach for five-axis sculptured surface machining using non-ball-end tools (II): Tool positioning strategy. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(8): 2190–2197 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-3184-4
21	Lee Y, Chiou C. Unfolded projection approach to machining non-coaxial parts on mill-turn machines. Computers in Industry, 1999, 39(2): 147–173 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(98)00140-7
22	Rao A, Sarma R. On local gouging in five-axis sculptured surface machining using flat-end tools. Computer Aided Design, 2000, 32(7): 409–420 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(99)00105-0
23	Zhu L, Zheng G, Ding H. Formulating the swept envelope of rotary cutter undergoing general spatial motion for multi-axis NC machining. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2009, 49(2): 199–202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.004
24	Chiou J C J, Lee Y S. Optimal tool orientation for five-axis tool-end machining by swept envelope approach. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2005, 127(4): 810–818
25	Floriani L D. Shape Analysis and Structuring. Berlin: Springer, 2008
26	Chen X, Ma W, Xu G, . Computing the Hausdorff distance between two B-spline curves. Computer Aided Design, 2010, 42(12): 1197–1206 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.06.009
27	Buchin K, Buchin M, Wenk C. Computing the Fréchet distance between simple polygons. Computational Geometry, 2008, 41(1-2): 2–20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2007.08.003

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed