Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

邮发代号 80-975

2019 Impact Factor: 2.448

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering  2023, Vol. 18 Issue (2): 32   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-023-0748-0
  本期目录
Digital twin-assisted gearbox dynamic model updating toward fault diagnosis
Jingyan XIA1, Ruyi HUANG2,3, Yixiao LIAO1, Jipu LI1, Zhuyun CHEN1,3, Weihua LI1,2,3()
1. School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
2. Shien-Ming Wu School of Intelligent Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 511442, China
3. Guangdong Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 510335, China
 全文: PDF(4576 KB)   HTML
Abstract

One of the core challenges of intelligent fault diagnosis is that the diagnosis model requires numerous labeled training datasets to achieve satisfactory performance. Generating training data using a virtual model is a potential solution for addressing such a problem, and the construction of a high-fidelity virtual model is fundamental and critical for data generation. In this study, a digital twin-assisted dynamic model updating method for fault diagnosis is thus proposed to improve the fidelity and reliability of a virtual model, which can enhance the generated data quality. First, a virtual model is established to mirror the vibration response of a physical entity using a dynamic modeling method. Second, the modeling method is validated through a frequency analysis of the generated signal. Then, based on the signal similarity indicator, a physical–virtual signal interaction method is proposed to dynamically update the virtual model in which parameter sensitivity analysis, surrogate technique, and optimization algorithm are applied to increase the efficiency during the model updating. Finally, the proposed method is successfully applied to the dynamic model updating of a single-stage helical gearbox; the virtual data generated by this model can be used for gear fault diagnosis.

Key wordsdigital twin    gearbox    model construction    model updating    physical–virtual interaction
收稿日期: 2022-10-20      出版日期: 2023-07-11
Corresponding Author(s): Weihua LI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 18(2): 32.
Jingyan XIA, Ruyi HUANG, Yixiao LIAO, Jipu LI, Zhuyun CHEN, Weihua LI. Digital twin-assisted gearbox dynamic model updating toward fault diagnosis. Front. Mech. Eng., 2023, 18(2): 32.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/10.1007/s11465-023-0748-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/Y2023/V18/I2/32
Fig.1  
ParameterValue
Tooth number of driving/driven gears32/44
Helix angle of driving/driven gears13°/?13°
Tooth width35 mm
Normal module3.5 mm
Normal pressure angle20°
Density7800 kg/m3
Elastic modulus210 GPa
Poisson’s ratio0.29
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
ParameterValue
Static friction coefficient Csf0.1
Static transonic speed Vst1 mm/s
Dynamic friction coefficient Cdf0.08
Dynamic transonic speed Vdt10 mm/s
Contact stiffness K8.6 × 105 N·s/m3/2
Force exponent eF2.0
Damping coefficient CD86 N·s/mm
Penetration depth DP0.1 mm
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
ParameterRange
Contact stiffness K[4.3 × 105, 12.9 × 105] N/mm3/2
Damping coefficient CD[86, 860] N·s/mm
Force exponent eF[1.5, 2.5]
Penetration depth DP[0.05, 0.15] mm
Elastic modulus of gears E[179, 242] GPa
Gear density ρ[6600, 9000] kg/m3
Tab.3  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Value typeContact stiffnessK/(N·mm?3/2)Damping coefficient CD/(N·s·mm?1)Force exponent eFCosine similarity
Initial value8.60 × 105862.000.689
Updated value6.44 × 1053032.270.752
Tab.4  
ConditionExperimentRFCD model
Speed/(r?min?1)Load/(N?m)Revolute joint/((° )?s?1)Torque applied force/(N?m)
Condition 1100650603550
Condition 2100575602775
Condition 310031006021100
Base condition10001506000150
Tab.5  
Fig.11  
ConditionMeshing frequency or its harmonics/HzVirtual main frequency components/Hz
Condition 1536.5/1073.0/1609.5537.2/1073.0/1610.0
Condition 2536.0/1072.0/1608.0536.1/1072.0/1608.0
Condition 3534.9/1069.9/1604.8535.6/ 1071.0/1606.0
Base condition533.3/1066.7/1600.0533.9/1067.0/1601.0
Tab.6  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Abbreviations
FAFirefly algorithm
FEMFinite element method
FFTFast Fourier transform
LHSLatin hypercube sampling
LPMLumped parameter method
LSMLeast squares method
PHMPrognostics and health management
PRSMPolynomial response surface model
RFCDRigid–flexible coupling dynamic
RFCMRigid–flexible coupling method
RSMResponse surface methodology
Variables
aiAmplitude of the exciting force
aˉiAmplitude of the vibration response
CdfDynamic friction coefficient
CDDamping coefficient
CsfStatic friction coefficient
DPPenetration depth
eFForce exponent
EElastic modulus of gears
f(t)Excitation force
f(t1,t2,t3)Cosine similarity between virtual and experimental signals
fn1, fn2Rotation frequencies of input and output gears, respectively
fzMesh frequency
ggth iteration
h(t)Transfer function of the gearbox
kNumber of sensitive model parameters
KContact stiffness
LNumber of sample points
MNumber of mode order
nNumber of parameters
pModel parameters in the dynamic model
pLLower bound of the model parameters
psSensitive model parameters
psLLower bound of the sensitive model parameters
psUUpper bound of the sensitive model parameters
pUUpper bound of the model parameters
r1, r2Equivalent radius
rijDistance between fireflies i and j
R2Coefficient of determination
R(p)Difference between the generated and physical signals
t1Normalized contact stiffness
t2Normalized contact damping coefficient
t3Normalized force exponent
VdtDynamic transonic speed
VstStatic transonic speed
XVariable matrix of sampling points
XePhysical signal in the time domain
XgGenerated signal in the time domain
yˉMean value of the simulation response
yiResult of sample point i based on the complex simulation model
y~iResult of sample point i based on the constructed surrogate model
y(t)Vibration response
YResponse vector of sampling points
z1Tooth number of the driving gear
z2Tooth number of the driven gear
αRandom parameter that controls movement randomization
βUnknown coefficient vector
β0Attractiveness factor
εError vector
γBrightness absorption coefficient
ν1, ν2Poisson’s ratios of the gears
θ1Phase of the exciting force
θˉiPhase of the vibration response
ρDensity of gears
?Random vector (k-dimensional)
  
1 X F Chen , S B Wang , B J Qiao , Q Chen . Basic research on machinery fault diagnostics: past, present, and future trends. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(2): 264–291
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0472-3
2 V Singh , P Gangsar , R Porwal , A Atulkar . Artificial intelligence application in fault diagnostics of rotating industrial machines: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2023, 34(3): 931–960
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01861-5
3 S Rajabi , M Saman Azari , S Santini , F Flammini . Fault diagnosis in industrial rotating equipment based on permutation entropy, signal processing and multi-output neuro-fuzzy classifier. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 206: 117754
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117754
4 L F Zhang , F B Zhang , Z Y Qin , Q K Han , T Y Wang , F L Chu . Piezoelectric energy harvester for rolling bearings with capability of self-powered condition monitoring. Energy, 2022, 238: 121770
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121770
5 B Maschler , M Weyrich . Deep transfer learning for industrial automation: a review and discussion of new techniques for data-driven machine learning. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 2021, 15(2): 65–75
https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2020.3034884
6 X Li , H D Shao , S L Lu , J W Xiang , B P Cai . Highly efficient fault diagnosis of rotating machinery under time-varying speeds using LSISMM and small infrared thermal images. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(12): 7328–7340
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3151185
7 G Cirrincione , R R Kumar , A Mohammadi , S H Kia , P Barbiero , J Ferretti . Shallow versus deep neural networks in gear fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2020, 35(3): 1338–1347
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2020.2978155
8 W H Li , R Y Huang , J P Li , Y X Liao , Z Y Chen , G L He , R Q Yan , K Gryllias . A perspective survey on deep transfer learning for fault diagnosis in industrial scenarios: theories, applications and challenges. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 167: 108487
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108487
9 X Zhang , T Huang , B Wu , Y M Hu , S Huang , Q Zhou , X Zhang . Multi-model ensemble deep learning method for intelligent fault diagnosis with high-dimensional samples. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 16(2): 340–352
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0629-3
10 X Li , H D Shao , H K Jiang , J W Xiang . Modified gaussian convolutional deep belief network and infrared thermal imaging for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotor-bearing system under time-varying speeds. Structural Health Monitoring, 2022, 21(2): 339–353
https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921721998957
11 S Schwendemann , Z Amjad , A Sikora . Bearing fault diagnosis with intermediate domain based layered maximum mean discrepancy: a new transfer learning approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 105: 104415
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104415
12 Y G Lei , B Yang , X W Jiang , F Jia , N P Li , A K Nandi . Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: a review and roadmap. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 138: 106587
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587
13 Y X Liao , R Y Huang , J P Li , Z Y Chen , W H Li . Deep semisupervised domain generalization network for rotary machinery fault diagnosis under variable speed. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 69(10): 8064–8075
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.2992829
14 N Sawalhi , R B Randall . Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part I. The combined gear bearing dynamic model and the simulation of localised bearing faults. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2008, 22(8): 1924–1951
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.12.001
15 N Sawalhi , R B Randall . Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part II: simulation of the vibrations produced by extended bearing faults. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2008, 22(8): 1952–1966
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.12.002
16 L Bachar , I Dadon , R Klein , J Bortman . The effects of the operating conditions and tooth fault on gear vibration signature. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 154: 107508
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107508
17 X Y Liu , H Z Huang , J W Xiang . A personalized diagnosis method to detect faults in gears using numerical simulation and extreme learning machine. Knowledge-based Systems, 2020, 195: 105653
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105653
18 G L He , K Ding , X M Wu , X Q Yang . Dynamics modeling and vibration modulation signal analysis of wind turbine planetary gearbox with a floating sun gear. Renewable Energy, 2019, 139: 718–729
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.123
19 C Mishra , A K Samantaray , G Chakraborty . Ball bearing defect models: a study of simulated and experimental fault signatures. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 400: 86–112
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.04.010
20 J Liu , R K Pang , S Z Ding , X B Li . Vibration analysis of a planetary gear with the flexible ring and planet bearing fault. Measurement, 2020, 165: 108100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108100
21 C S Song , C C Zhu , H J Liu , G X Ni . Dynamic analysis and experimental study of a marine gearbox with crossed beveloid gears. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2015, 92: 17–28
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.05.001
22 B El Yousfi , A Soualhi , K Medjaher , F Guillet . Electromechanical modeling of a motor–gearbox system for local gear tooth faults detection. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 166: 108435
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108435
23 F Tao , Q L Qi . Make more digital twins. Nature, 2019, 573(7775): 490–491
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02849-1
24 M Grieves . Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence Through Virtual Factory Replication. White Paper, 2014, 1: 1–7
25 C Semeraro , M Lezoche , H Panetto , M Dassisti . Digital twin paradigm: a systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 2021, 130: 103469
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469
26 A Rasheed , O San , T Kvamsdal . Digital twin: values, challenges, and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 21980–22012
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143
27 B D Deebak , F Al-Turjman . Digital-twin assisted: fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning for machining tool condition. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2022, 37(12): 10289–10316
https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22493
28 M H Farhat , X Chiementin , F Chaari , F Bolaers , M Haddar . Digital twin-driven machine learning: ball bearings fault severity classification. Measurement Science & Technology, 2021, 32(4): 044006
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/abd280
29 H H Hosamo , P R Svennevig , K Svidt , D Han , H K Nielsen . A digital twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. Energy and Building, 2022, 261: 111988
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111988
30 Y C Wang , F Tao , M Zhang , L H Wang , Y Zuo . Digital twin enhanced fault prediction for the autoclave with insufficient data. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 60: 350–359
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.05.015
31 K Feng , J C Ji , Y C Zhang , Q Ni , Z Liu , M Beer . Digital twin-driven intelligent assessment of gear surface degradation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 186: 109896
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109896
32 Y X Lou , A Kumar , J W Xiang . Machinery fault diagnosis based on domain adaptation to bridge the gap between simulation and measured signals. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2022, 71: 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3180416
33 F K Moghadam , A R Nejad . Online condition monitoring of floating wind turbines drivetrain by means of digital twin. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 162: 108087
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108087
34 Y Z Li , K Ding , G L He , H B Lin . Vibration mechanisms of spur gear pair in healthy and fault states. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 81: 183–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.03.014
35 A I Khuri , S Mukhopadhyay . Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics, 2010, 2(2): 128–149
https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.73
36 R B Ma , L H Dong , H D Wang , S Y Chen , Z G Xing . Response surface regression analysis on FeCrBSi particle in-flight properties by plasma spray. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 11(3): 250–257
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-016-0401-2
37 F Bertocci , A Fort , V Vignoli , L Shahin , M Mugnaini , R Berni . Assessment and optimization for novel gas materials through the evaluation of mixed response surface models. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2015, 64(4): 1084–1092
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2014.2364106
38 P X Yi , L J Dong , T L Shi . Multi-objective genetic algorithms based structural optimization and experimental investigation of the planet carrier in wind turbine gearbox. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 9(4): 354–367
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0319-5
39 R Sheikholeslami , S Razavi . Progressive latin hypercube sampling: an efficient approach for robust sampling-based analysis of environmental models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2017, 93: 109–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.010
40 R Y Huang , J P Li , Y X Liao , J B Chen , Z Wang , W H Li . Deep adversarial capsule network for compound fault diagnosis of machinery toward multidomain generalization task. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 70: 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3042300
41 H R Cao , H D Shao , X Zhong , Q W Deng , X K Yang , J P Xuan . Unsupervised domain-share CNN for machine fault transfer diagnosis from steady speeds to time-varying speeds. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 62: 186–198
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.016
42 X S Yang. Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In: Watanabe O, Zeugmann T, eds. Stochastic Algorithms: Foundations and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2009, 169–178
43 V Kumar , D Kumar . A systematic review on firefly algorithm: past, present, and future. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2021, 28(4): 3269–3291
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09498-y
44 Y Tian , T L Shi , Q Xia . A parametric level set method for the optimization of composite structures with curvilinear fibers. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 388: 114236
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114236
45 V Mokarram , M R Banan . A new PSO-based algorithm for multi-objective optimization with continuous and discrete design variables. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57(2): 509–533
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1764-7
46 M F Wang , M Ceccarelli , G Carbone . A feasibility study on the design and walking operation of a biped locomotor via dynamic simulation. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 11(2): 144–158
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-016-0391-0
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed