Reduced-order modeling and vibration transfer analysis of a fluid-delivering branch pipeline that consider fluid–solid interactions

doi:10.1007/s11465-024-0781-7

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

2024, Vol. 19

Issue (2): 10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-024-0781-7

本期目录

Reduced-order modeling and vibration transfer analysis of a fluid-delivering branch pipeline that consider fluid–solid interactions

Wenhao JI^1,², Hongwei MA^1,², Wei SUN^1,²(

), Yinhang CAO³

¹. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
². Key Laboratory of Vibration and Control of Aero-Propulsion Systems (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
³. College of Power and Energy Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

全文: PDF(12593 KB) HTML

Abstract：

The efficient dynamic modeling and vibration transfer analysis of a fluid-delivering branch pipeline (FDBP) are essential for analyzing vibration coupling effects and implementing vibration reduction optimization. Therefore, this study proposes a reduced-order dynamic modeling method suitable for FDBPs and then analyzes the vibration transfer characteristics. For the modeling method, the finite element method and absorbing transfer matrix method (ATMM) are integrated, considering the fluid–structure coupling effect and fluid disturbances. The dual-domain dynamic substructure method is developed to perform the reduced-order modeling of FDBP, and ATMM is adopted to reduce the matrix order when solving fluid disturbances. Furthermore, the modeling method is validated by experiments on an H-shaped branch pipeline. Finally, transient and steady-state vibration transfer analyses of FDBP are performed, and the effects of branch locations on natural characteristics and vibration transfer behavior are analyzed. Results show that transient vibration transfer represents the transfer and conversion of the kinematic, strain, and damping energies, while steady-state vibration transfer characteristics are related to the vibration mode. In addition, multiple-order mode exchanges are triggered when branch locations vary in frequency-shift regions, and the mode-exchange regions are also the transformation ones for vibration transfer patterns.

Key words： fluid-delivering branch pipeline vibration transfer analysis reduced-order modeling fluid–solid interactions finite element method absorbing transfer matrix method

收稿日期: 2023-11-01 出版日期: 2024-06-05

Corresponding Author(s): Wei SUN

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 19(2): 10.
Wenhao JI, Hongwei MA, Wei SUN, Yinhang CAO. Reduced-order modeling and vibration transfer analysis of a fluid-delivering branch pipeline that consider fluid–solid interactions. Front. Mech. Eng., 2024, 19(2): 10.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/10.1007/s11465-024-0781-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/Y2024/V19/I2/10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Domain	Density/(kg·m⁻³)	Elastic modulus/Pa	Poisson’s ratio	Velocity/(m·s⁻¹)	Pressure/Pa
Solid	$7800$	$2.04 × 1011$	0.285	?	?
Fluid (air)	$1.293$	?	?	0	0
Fluid (water)	$1000$	?	?	0	0

Tab.1

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.2

Fig.8

Fluid medium	Stress response at point S1			Stress response at point S2
Fluid medium	$σ t$ /MPa	$σ s$ /MPa	$e σ = σ t − σ s σ t × 100 %$	$σ t$ /MPa	$σ s$ /MPa	$e σ = σ t − σ s σ t × 100 %$
Air	69.24	63.26	8.64	70.11	67.08	4.32
Water	64.32	63.55	1.20	76.12	68.52	9.98

Tab.3

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig.21

Abbreviations
ATMM	Absorbing transfer matrix method
CR	Change rate
DOF	Degree of freedom
FDBP	Fluid-delivering branch pipeline
FEM	Finite element method
FVAP	Fluid velocity and pressure
ROM	Reduced-order modeling
SAM	Semi-analytical method
SIM	Structural intensity method
TMM	Transfer matrix method
Variables
A_f	Area of the fluid
$A ⌢$	Transfer matrix between the master and slave branches
b	Number of boundary DOFs
C_r, c	Damping matrices of the structure and fluid, respectively
f_x, f_y, f_z	External forces at a position in the x, y, and z directions, respectively
f	Natural frequency
G_c, G	Constraint matrix and transformation matrix, respectively
$i ~$	Number of internal DOFs
I_i(t)	Structural intensity response
$K p s$ , $k$ , $K c$ , K	Stiffness matrices of the pipeline, fluid, coupling element, and pipeline system, respectively
$K^$	Reduced stiffness matrix
M(n − 1)	General transfer matrices used in TMM
$M p s$ , $m$ , $M$	Mass matrices of the pipeline, fluid, and pipeline system, respectively
m_x, m_y, m_z	External moments at a position in the x, y, and z directions, respectively
$M^$	Reduced mass matrix
P_f	Fluid pressure
$Q^$	Reduced external force
$Q^(L, s)$	Transfer matrix used in TMM
$R^(L, s)$	External excitation vector used in TMM
$\| u ˙ ¯ \|$	Amplitudes of the velocity responses
$u ˙$ , $v ˙$ , $w ˙$	Velocity responses at a position in the x, y, and z directions, respectively
u_n	Node displacement response
$u ˙ ~$ , $σ ~$	Steady-state velocity and stress
V_f	Fluid velocity
$W ˙ k$ , $W ˙ s$ , $W ˙ d$	CRs of kinetic, strain, and damping energies, respectively
x	Reduced DOFs
$y (z^, t)$	Time-domain state vectors
$Θ ~ s$ , $Γ^s$ , $Ψ^s$ , $D^s$	Coefficient matrices used in TMM
$ϕ ˙ x$ , $ϕ ˙ y$ , $ϕ ˙ z$	Angular velocity responses at a position in the x, y, and z directions, respectively
$Φ^$	Frequency-domain state vectors
$\| σ ¯ \|$	Amplitudes of stress responses
σ	Stress response
ψ, γ	Phase angles of stress and velocity responses, respectively
ω	Angular frequency
Ξ	State matrix of the branch
ξ₁, ξ₂	First- and second-order damping ratios, respectively

1	M S Myeong, Y J Kim, P J Budden. Plastic limit loads for cracked large bore branch junction. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2011, 78(11): 2298–2309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.05.003
2	J Y Zheng, Y Zhang, D S Hou, Y K Qin, W C Guo, C Zhang, J F Shi. A review of nondestructive examination technology for polyethylene pipe in nuclear power plant. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(4): 535–545 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0515-9
3	K Miyoshi, Y Utanohara, M Kamaya. Penetration flow into a branch pipe causing thermal fatigue at a mixing tee. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2020, 360: 110496 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110496
4	M P Païdoussis. Pipes conveying fluid: a fertile dynamics problem. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2022, 114: 103664 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103664
5	H T Sui, W T Niu. Branch-pipe-routing approach for ships using improved genetic algorithm. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 11(3): 316–323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-016-0384-z
6	S W Kim, B G Jeon, D G Hahm, M K Kim. Failure criteria evaluation of steel pipe elbows in nuclear power plant piping systems using cumulative damage models. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 182: 110250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110250
7	H X Yuan, J P Yu, D Jia, Q Liu, H Ma. Group-based multiple pipe routing method for aero-engine focusing on parallel layout. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 16(4): 798–813 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0645-3
8	B Li, L Qiang, T Lu, X Geng, M H Li. A stoneley wave method to detect interlaminar damage of metal layer composite pipe. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 10(1): 89–94 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-015-0323-4
9	F Z Xuan, P N Li, S T Tu. Limit load analysis for the piping branch junctions under in-plane moment. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2006, 48(4): 460–467 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.07.013
10	J L Huang, J H Xiang, X Y Chu, W J Sun, R L Liu, W S Ling, W Zhou, S L Tao. Thermal performance of flexible branch heat pipe. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 186: 116532 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116532
11	C Walker, A Manera, B Niceno, M Simiano, H M Prasser. Steady-state RANS-simulations of the mixing in a T-junction. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2010, 240(9): 2107–2115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.05.056
12	J Pérez-García, E Sanmiguel-Rojas, J Hernández-Grau, A Viedma. Numerical and experimental investigations on internal compressible flow at T-type junctions. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2006, 31(1): 61–74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2006.02.001
13	A S Tijsseling, A E Vardy. Fluid–structure interaction and transient cavitation tests in a T-piece pipe. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2005, 20(6): 753–762 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.01.003
14	A E Vardy, D Fan, A S Tijsseling. Fluid–structure interaction in a T-piece pipe. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1996, 10(7): 763–786 https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1996.0052
15	A S TijsselingP Vaugrante. FSI in L-shaped and T-shaped pipe systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Meeting of the IAHR Work Group on the Behaviour of Hydraulic Machinery under Steady Oscillatory Conditions. Trondheim: IAHR, 2001
16	Y Z Xu, D N Johnston, Z X Jiao, A R Plummer. Frequency modelling and solution of fluid–structure interaction in complex pipelines. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2014, 333(10): 2800–2822 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.12.023
17	G M Liu, S J Li, Y H Li, H Chen. Vibration analysis of pipelines with arbitrary branches by absorbing transfer matrix method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013, 332(24): 6519–6536 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.06.019
18	W H Ji, W Sun, D X Du, Y H Cao. Dynamic modeling and stress response solution for liquid-filled pipe system considering both fluid velocity and pressure fluctuations. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 188: 110831 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.110831
19	M Boiangiu, V Ceausu, C D Untaroiu. A transfer matrix method for free vibration analysis of Euler-Bernoulli beams with variable cross section. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2016, 22(11): 2591–2602 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314550699
20	H W Ma, W Sun, W H Ji, X F Liu, H H Liu, D X Du. Nonlinear vibration analysis of Z-shaped pipes with CLD considering amplitude-dependent characteristics of clamps. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2024, 262: 108739 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108739
21	H W Ma, W Sun, W H Ji, Y Zhang, X F Liu, H H Liu. Dynamic modeling and vibration analysis of planar pipeline with partial constrained layer damping treatment: theoretical and experimental studies. Composite Structures, 2023, 323: 117476 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117476
22	A R Askarian, M R Permoon, M Zahedi, M Shakouri. Stability analysis of viscoelastic pipes conveying fluid with different boundary conditions described by fractional Zener model. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2022, 103: 750–763 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.11.013
23	A R Askarian, M R Permoon, M Shakouri. Vibration analysis of pipes conveying fluid resting on a fractional Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic foundation with general boundary conditions. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020, 179: 105702 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105702
24	T C Deng, H Ding, L Q Chen. Critical velocity and supercritical natural frequencies of fluid-conveying pipes with retaining clips. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2022, 222: 107254 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107254
25	B Dou, H Ding, X Y Mao, H R Feng, L Q Chen. Modeling and parametric studies of retaining clips on pipes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 186: 109912 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109912
26	Y X Zhen, Y F Gong, Y Tang. Nonlinear vibration analysis of a supercritical fluid-conveying pipe made of functionally graded material with initial curvature. Composite Structures, 2021, 268: 113980 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113980
27	M Kheiri. Nonlinear dynamics of imperfectly-supported pipes conveying fluid. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2020, 93: 102850 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102850
28	Y Zhang, W Sun, H W Ma, W H Ji, H Ma. Semi-analytical modeling and vibration analysis for U-shaped, Z-shaped and regular spatial pipelines supported by multiple clamps. European Journal of Mechanics—A/Solids, 2023, 97: 104797 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104797
29	M Kheiri, M P Païdoussis, Pozo G C Del, M Amabili. Dynamics of a pipe conveying fluid flexibly restrained at the ends. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 49: 360–385 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.11.023
30	Y Gao, W Sun. Inverse identification of the mechanical parameters of a pipeline hoop and analysis of the effect of preload. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 14(3): 358–368 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0539-9
31	W H JiW SunH W MaY ZhangD Wang. A high-precision super element used for the parametric finite element modeling and vibration reduction optimization of the pipeline system. Journal of Vibration Engineering and Technologies, 2024, 12: 1177–1193
32	P X Gao, Y L Zhang, X F Liu, T Yu, J Wang. Vibration analysis of aero parallel-pipeline systems based on a novel reduced order modeling method. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, 34(8): 3137–3146 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0705-3
33	W H Ji, W Sun, D H Wang, Z H Liu. Optimization of aero-engine pipeline for avoiding vibration based on length adjustment of straight-line segment. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 17(1): 11 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0667-x
34	M Maess, L Gaul. Substructuring and model reduction of pipe components interacting with acoustic fluids. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(1): 45–64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.02.008
35	J Herrmann, M Maess, L Gaul. Substructuring including interface reduction for the efficient vibro-acoustic simulation of fluid-filled piping systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2010, 24(1): 153–163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.05.003
36	R K Krishna, J Kochupillai. A new formulation for fluid–structure interaction in pipes conveying fluids using Mindlin shell element and 3-D acoustic fluid element. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2020, 42(7): 388 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02477-1
37	Y L Zhang, D G Gorman, J M Reese. A finite element method for modelling the vibration of initially tensioned thin-walled orthotropic cylindrical tubes conveying fluid. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2001, 245(1): 93–112 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3554
38	R Schardt. Generalized beam theory—an adequate method for coupled stability problems. Thin-Walled Structures, 1994, 19(2–4): 161–180 https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(94)90027-2
39	L P Duan, J C Zhao, S Liu. A b-splines based nonlinear GBT formulation for elastoplastic analysis of prismatic thin-walled members. Engineering Structures, 2016, 110: 325–346 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.042
40	W H Duan, C G Koh. Axisymmetric transverse vibrations of circular cylindrical shells with variable thickness. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 317(3–5): 1035–1041 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.069
41	M P Païdoussis. Dynamic of cylindrical structures in axial flow: a review. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2021, 107: 103374 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103374
42	J N Hong, J W Kim, D Y Lee, J M Lee, Y J Kim. Very low-cycle fatigue failure behaviours of pipe elbows under displacement-controlled cyclic loading. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 193: 111261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111261
43	K Antoniou, A G Stamou, S A Karamanos, C Palagas, A Tazedakis, E Dourdounis. Finite element modeling of the JCO-E line pipe fabrication process; material properties and collapse pressure prediction. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 192: 111120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111120
44	A S Tijsseling, A E Vardy, D Fan. Fluid-structure interaction and cavitation in a single-elbow pipe system. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1996, 10(4): 395–420 https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1996.0025
45	D M Andrade, F B de Freitas Rachid, A S Tijsseling. A new model for fluid transients in piping systems taking into account the fluid–structure interaction. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2022, 114: 103720 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103720
46	M P Norton, M K Bull. Mechanisms of the generation of external acoustic radiation from pipes due to internal flow disturbances. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1984, 94(1): 105–146 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(84)80008-5
47	R S Langley. Analysis of power flow in beams and frameworks using the direct-dynamic stiffness method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1990, 136(3): 439–452 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(90)90455-9
48	Y P Xiong, J T Xing, W G Price. Power flow analysis of complex coupled systems by progressive approaches. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2001, 239(2): 275–295 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3159
49	B R Mace, P J Shorter. Energy flow models from finite element analysis. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 233(3): 369–389 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2812
50	Z H Wang, J T Xing, W G Price. Power flow analysis of indeterminate rod/beam systems using a substructure method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 249(1): 3–22 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3645
51	C D Zhu, J Yang, C Rudd. Vibration transmission and power flow of laminated composite plates with inerter-based suppression configurations. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021, 190: 106012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106012
52	X M Guo, H Ge, C L Xiao, H Ma, W Sun, H Li. Vibration transmission characteristics analysis of the parallel fluid-conveying pipes system: numerical and experimental studies. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 177: 109180 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109180
53	W H Ji, W Sun, D X Du, Y H Cao. Dynamics modeling and vibration transmission visualization of fluid-conveying series pipe system based on FEM-TMM. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 280: 114693 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114693
54	W H Ji, W Sun, Y Zhang, D Wang, B Wang. Parametric model order reduction and vibration analysis of pipeline system based on adaptive dynamic substructure method. Structures, 2023, 50: 689–706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.062
55	J Zeng, C G Zhao, H Ma, X L Cui, W Sun, Z Luo. Dynamic response characteristics of the shaft-blisk-casing system with blade-tip rubbing fault. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 125: 105406 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105406
56	Y F Huangfu, J Zeng, H Ma, X J Dong, H Z Han, Z F Zhao. A flexible-helical-geared rotor dynamic model based on hybrid beam-shell elements. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2021, 511: 116361 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116361
57	J G Yue, A Fafitis, J Qian, T Lei. Application of 1D/3D finite elements coupling for structural nonlinear analysis. Journal of Central South University, 2011, 18(3): 889–897 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-011-0778-3
58	K W Shim, D J Monaghan, C G Armstrong. Mixed dimensional coupling in finite element stress analysis. Engineering with Computers, 2002, 18(3): 241–252 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003660200021
59	G M Liu, Y H Li. Vibration analysis of liquid-filled pipelines with elastic constraints. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2011, 330(13): 3166–3181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.01.022
60	S J Li, G M Liu, W T Kong. Vibration analysis of pipes conveying fluid by transfer matrix method. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014, 266: 78–88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.10.028
61	S Adhikari. An iterative approach for nonproportionally damped systems. Mechanics Research Communications, 2011, 38(3): 226–230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.02.009
62	F E Udwadia, R S Esfandiari. Nonclassically damped dynamic systems: an iterative approach. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1990, 57(2): 423–433 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2892007
63	O C Zienkiewicz, J Z Zhu. The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: the recovery technique. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1992, 33(7): 1331–1364 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620330702
64	Z M Zhang, A Naga. A new finite element gradient recovery method: superconvergence property. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2005, 26(4): 1192–1213 https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827503402837
65	Y Q Ma, Q J Zhao, K Zhang, M Xu, W Zhao. Analysis of instantaneous vibrational energy flow for an aero-engine dual-rotor–support–casing coupling system. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2020, 142(5): 051011 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046418
66	Y Q Ma, Q J Zhao, K Zhang, M Xu, W Zhao. Effects of mount positions on vibrational energy flow transmission characteristics in aero-engine casing structures. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 2020, 39(2): 313–326 https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348419845506
67	W H Ji, W Sun, H W Ma, J X Li. Dynamic modeling and analysis of fluid-delivering cracked pipeline considering breathing effect. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2024, 264: 108805 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108805
68	F S Egner, L Sangiuliano, R F Boukadia, S van Ophem, W Desmet, E Deckers. Polynomial filters for camera-based structural intensity analysis on curved plates. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 193: 110245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110245

[1]

FME-24001-OF-JW_suppl_1

Download

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed