Abstract：The excellent mechanical properties of biocomposites has attracted a lot of research attention, and people have started attempting to fabricate biomimetic staggered composites. In this paper, the relationship between the equivalent coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and the microstructure of a biomimetic staggered composite is investigated. A shear-lag based thermalelastic analytical model is developed and is found to agree well with the finite element simulations. It is found that besides the volume fraction and the material constants of the constituent phases, the aspect ratio of the hard platelet plays an important role in the CTE of biocomposites. Hence, there are additional design parameters in staggered composites that can be used to adjust the CTE, which makes this type of composite promising in thermalelastic loading.
Guo H, Huang Y, Wang C A. Preparation and properties of fibrousmonolithic ceramics by in situ synthesizing. Journal of Materials Science, 1999, 34(10): 2455―2459 doi: 10.1023/A:1004527119256
Jackson A P, Vincent J F V, Turner R M. The mechanical design ofnacre. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 1988, 234(1277): 415―440 doi: 10.1098/rspb.1988.0056
Gao H. Application of fracture mechanics concepts to hierarchicalbiomechanics of bone and bone-like materials. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 138(1―4): 101―137 doi: 10.1007/s10704-006-7156-4
Liu B, Zhang L, Gao H. Poisson ratio can play a crucial rolein mechanical properties of biocomposites. Mechanics of Materials, 2006, 38(12): 1128―1142 doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2006.02.002
Currey J D. Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1977, 196: 443―463 doi: 10.1098/rspb.1977.0050
Chen B, Wu P D, Gao H. A characteristic length for stress transferin the nanostructure of biological composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2009, 69(7―8): 1160―1164 doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.012
Kamat S, Su X, Ballarini R, et al. Structural basis for the fracturetoughness of the shell of the conch Strombusgigas. Nature, 2000, 405(6790): 1036―1040 doi: 10.1038/35016535
Smith B L, Schaffer T E, Viani M, et al. Molecular mechanisticorigin of the toughness of natural adhesive, fibres and composites. Nature, 1999, 399(6738): 761―763 doi: 10.1038/21607
Wang R Z, Suo Z, Evans A G, et al. Deformation mechanisms in nacre. Journal of Materials Research, 2001, 16(9): 2485―2493 doi: 10.1557/JMR.2001.0340
Okumura K, de Gennes P-G. Why is nacre strong? Elastic theory and fracture mechanics for biocompositeswith stratified structures. The EuropeanPhysical Journal E: Soft Matter and Biological Physics, 2001, 4(1): 121―127 doi: 10.1007/s101890170150
J?ger I, Fratzl P. Mineralizedcollagen fibrils: a mechanical model with a staggered arrangementof mineral particles. Biophysical Journal, 2000, 79(4): 1737―1746 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76426-5
Ji B, Gao H. Mechanicalproperties of nanostructure of biological materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2004, 52(9): 1963―1990 doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.006
Nukala P K V V, Simunovic S. Statisticalphysics models for nacre fracture simulation. Physical Review E, 2005, 72(4): 041919 (9 pages)
Katti K S, Katti D R. Why is nacreso tough and strong? Materials Scienceand Engineering C, 2006, 26(8): 1317―1324 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.013
