Advanced engineering and biomimetic materials for bone repair and regeneration
Advanced engineering and biomimetic materials for bone repair and regeneration
Lei YANG1(), Chao ZHONG2,3()
1. Institute of Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China; 2. Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE), Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, USA; 3. Synthetic Biology Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, USA
Over the past decade, there has been tremendous progress in developing advanced biomaterials for tissue repair and regeneration. This article reviews the frontiers of this field from two closely related areas, new engineering materials for bone substitution and biomimetic mineralization for bone-like nanocomposites. Rather than providing an exhaustive overview of the literature, we focus on several representative directions. We also discuss likely future trends in these areas, including synthetic biology-enabled biomaterials design and multifunctional implant materials for bone repair and regeneration.
Corresponding Author(s):
YANG Lei,Email:yleibrown@gmail.com; ZHONG Chao,Email:zhongc@mit.edu
引用本文:
. Advanced engineering and biomimetic materials for bone repair and regeneration[J]. Frontiers of Materials Science, 2013, 7(4): 313-334.
Lei YANG, Chao ZHONG. Advanced engineering and biomimetic materials for bone repair and regeneration. Front Mater Sci, 2013, 7(4): 313-334.
McGowen J, Raisz L, Noonan A, . Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. United States Department of Health and Human Services , 2004: 69–87
2
Bren L. Joint replacement: an inside look. FDA Consumer , 2004, 38(2): 12–19
3
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. [Internet] Rosemont. IL: AAOS , 2008
4
ATA Global Biomedical Materials Congress. Shanghai: Asia Technology Alliance, 2013
5
Balasundaram G. Nanomaterials for better orthopedics. In: Webster T J, ed. Nanotechnology for the Regeneration of Hard and Soft Tissues . Hackensack, New Jersey; London: World Scientific, 2007, 53–78
6
Krishna B V, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Low stiffness porous Ti structures for load-bearing implants. Acta Biomaterialia , 2007, 3(6): 997–1006
7
He G, Liu P, Tan Q. Porous titanium materials with entangled wire structure for load-bearing biomedical applications. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials , 2012, 5(1): 16–31
8
Kato K, Ochiai S, Yamamoto A, . Novel multilayer Ti foam with cortical bone strength and cytocompatibility. Acta Biomaterialia , 2013, 9(3): 5802–5809
9
Arciniegas M, Aparicio C, Manero J, . Low elastic modulus metals for joint prosthesis: Tantalum and nickel–titanium foams. Journal of the European Ceramic Society , 2007, 27(11): 3391–3398
10
Demetriou M D, Wiest A, Hofmann D C, . Amorphous metals for hard-tissue prosthesis. JOM , 2010, 62(2): 83–91
11
Ashby M, Greer A. Metallic glasses as structural materials. Scripta Materialia , 2006, 54(3): 321–326
12
Hofmann D C, Suh J Y, Wiest A, . Development of tough, low-density titanium-based bulk metallic glass matrix composites with tensile ductility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2008, 105(51): 20136–20140
13
Hofmann D C, Suh J Y, Wiest A, . Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility. Nature , 2008, 451(7182): 1085–1089
14
Hashimoto K. 2002 WR Whitney Award Lecture: In pursuit of new corrosion-resistant alloys. Corrosion , 2002, 58(9): 715–722
15
Chen Q, Liu L, Zhang S M. The potential of Zr-based bulk metallic glasses as biomaterials. Frontiers of Materials Science in China , 2010, 4(1): 34–44
16
Li J, Shi L-L, Zhu Z-D, . Zr61Ti2Cu25Al12 metallic glass for potential use in dental implants: Biocompatibility assessment by in vitro cellular responses. Materials Science and Engineering C , 2013, 33(4): 2113–2121
17
Li H F, Wang Y B, Zheng Y F, . Osteoblast response on Ti- and Zr-based bulk metallic glass surfaces after sand blasting modification. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials , 2012, 100B(7): 1721–1728
18
Yan F, Liu G, Tao N, . Strength and ductility of 316L austenitic stainless steel strengthened by nano-scale twin bundles. Acta Materialia , 2012, 60(3): 1059–1071
19
Ye W, Li Y, Wang F. The improvement of the corrosion resistance of 309 stainless steel in the transpassive region by nano-crystallization. Electrochimica Acta , 2009, 54(4): 1339–1349
20
de Oliveira P T, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials , 2004, 25(3): 403–413
21
Cohen A, Liu-Synder P, Storey D, . Decreased fibroblast and increased osteoblast functions on ionic plasma deposited nanostructured Ti coatings. Nanoscale Research Letters , 2007, 2(8): 385–390
22
Ward B C, Webster T J. The effect of nanotopography on calcium and phosphorus deposition on metallic materials in vitro. Biomaterials , 2006, 27(16): 3064–3074
23
Webster T J, Ejiofor J U. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials , 2004, 25(19): 4731–4739
24
Nakanishi Y, Miura H, Tokunaga K, . Nano-level surface texturing on Co–Cr–Mo alloy inhibits macrophage activation in joint prostheses. The Bone & Joint Journal , 2013, 95-B(Supp 15): 278
25
Huang H H, Pan S J, Lai Y L, . Osteoblast-like cell initial adhesion onto a network-structured titanium oxide layer. Scripta Materialia , 2004, 51(11): 1017–1021
26
Yao C, Perla V, McKenzie J L, . Anodized Ti and Ti6Al4V possessing nanometer surface features enhances osteoblast adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology , 2005, 1(1): 68–73
27
Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, . Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials , 2004, 25(18): 4087–4103
28
Das K, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Surface modifications and cell–materials interactions with anodized Ti. Acta Biomaterialia , 2007, 3(4): 573–585
29
Yao C, Slamovich E B, Webster T J. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nano-rough anodized titanium and CoCrMo. NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show – NSTI Nanotech, Technical Proceedings , 2006, 119–122
30
Popat K C, Eltgroth M, Latempa T J, . Decreased Staphylococcus epidermis adhesion and increased osteoblast functionality on antibiotic-loaded titania nanotubes. Biomaterials , 2007, 28(32): 4880–4888
31
Gruen D M. Nanocrystalline diamond films. Annual Review of Materials Science , 1999, 29(1): 211–259
32
Yang L, Zhang L, Webster T J. Carbon nanostructures for orthopedic medical applications. Nanomedicine , 2011, 6(7): 1231–1244
33
Bajaj P, Akin D, Gupta A, . Ultrananocrystalline diamond film as an optimal cell interface for biomedical applications. Biomedical Microdevices , 2007, 9(6): 787–794
34
Pareta R, Yang L, Kothari A, . Tailoring nanocrystalline diamond coated on titanium for osteoblast adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2010, 95A(1): 129–136
35
Yang L, Sheldon B W, Webster T J. The impact of diamond nanocrystallinity on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials , 2009, 30(20): 3458–3465
36
Yang L, Sheldon B W, Webster T J. Orthopedic nano diamond coatings: control of surface properties and their impact on osteoblast adhesion and proliferation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2009, 91A(2): 548–556
37
Grausova L, Bacakova L, Kromka A, . Nanodiamond as promising material for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology , 2009, 9(6): 3524–3534
38
Yang L, Chinthapenta V, Li Q, . Understanding osteoblast responses to stiff nanotopographies through experiments and computational simulations. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2011, 97A(4): 375–382
39
Rodrigues A A, Baranauskas V, Ceragioli H J, . In vivo preliminary evaluation of bone-microcrystalline and bone-nanocrystalline diamond interfaces. Diamond and Related Materials , 2010, 19(10): 1300–1306
40
Yang L, Li Y W, Sheldon B W, . Altering surface energy of nanocrystalline diamond to control osteoblast responses. Journal of Materials Chemistry , 2012, 22(1): 205–214
41
Klauser F, Hermann M, Steinmuller-Nethl D, . Direct and protein-mediated cell attachment on differently terminated nanocrystalline diamond. Chemical Vapor Deposition , 2010, 16(1–3): 42–49
42
Kromka A, Grausova L, Bacakova L, . Semiconducting to metallic-like boron doping of nanocrystalline diamond films and its effect on osteoblastic cells. Diamond and Related Materials , 2010, 19(2–3): 190–195
43
Kloss F R, Gassner R, Preiner J, . The role of oxygen termination of nanocrystalline diamond on immobilisation of BMP-2 and subsequent bone formation. Biomaterials , 2008, 29(16): 2433–2442
44
Steinmüller-Nethl D, Kloss F R, Najam-Ul-Haq M, . Strong binding of bioactive BMP-2 to nanocrystalline diamond by physisorption. Biomaterials , 2006, 27(26): 4547–4556
45
Jakubowski W, Bartosz G, Niedzielski P, . Nanocrystalline diamond surface is resistant to bacterial colonization. Diamond and Related Materials , 2004, 13(10): 1761–1763
46
Tran P, Webster T J. Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanostructured selenium compacts for anti-cancer orthopedic applications. International Journal of Nanomedicine , 2008, 3(3): 391–396
47
Tran P A, Sarin L, Hurt R H, . Opportunities for nanotechnology-enabled bioactive bone implants. Journal of Materials Chemistry , 2009, 19(18): 2653–2659
48
Navarro-Alarcón M, López-Martínez M C. Essentiality of selenium in the human body: relationship with different diseases. Science of the Total Environment , 2000, 249(1–3): 347–371
49
Kopeikin V V, Valueva S V, Kipper A I, . Synthesis of selenium nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) and morphological characteristics of the related nanocomposites. Polymer Science Series A , 2003, 45(4): 374–379
50
Tran P A, Sarin L, Hurt R H, . Titanium surfaces with adherent selenium nanoclusters as a novel anticancer orthopedic material. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2010, 93(4): 1417–1428
51
Tran P A, Webster T J. Selenium nanoparticles inhibit Staphylococcus aureus growth. International Journal of Nanomedicine , 2011, 6: 1553–1558
52
Wang Q, Webster T J. Nanostructured selenium for preventing biofilm formation on polycarbonate medical devices. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2012, 100A(12): 3205–3210
53
Holinka J, Pilz M, Kubista B, . Effects of selenium coating of orthopaedic implant surfaces on bacterial adherence and osteoblastic cell growth. The Bone & Joint Journal , 2013, 95-B(5): 678–682
54
Sirivisoot S, Yao C, Xiao X, . Developing biosensors for monitoring orthopedic tissue growth. In: Firestone M, Schmidt J, Malmstadt N, eds. MRS Proceedings Volume 950, Symposium D: Biosurfaces and Biointerfaces . Materials Research Society , 2007
55
Sirivisoot S, Webster T J. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes enhance electrochemical properties of titanium to determine in situ bone formation. Nanotechnology , 2008, 19(29): 295101
56
Sirivisoot S, Webster T J. In situ bone growth detection using carbon nanotubes–titanium sensors. BioNanoScience , 2013, 3(2): 184–191
57
Sirivisoot S, Yao C, Xiao X, . Greater osteoblast functions on multiwalled carbon nanotubes grown from anodized nanotubular titanium for orthopedic applications. Nanotechnology , 2007, 18(36): 365102
58
Sirivisoot S, Pareta R, Webster T J. Electrically controlled drug release from nanostructured polypyrrole coated on titanium. Nanotechnology , 2011, 22(8): 085101
59
Song J, Malathong V, Bertozzi C R. Mineralization of synthetic polymer scaffolds: a bottom-up approach for the development of artificial bone. Journal of the American Chemical Society , 2005, 127(10): 3366–3372
60
Gkioni K, Leeuwenburgh S C G, Douglas T E L, . Mineralization of hydrogels for bone regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews , 2010, 16(6): 577–585
61
Huang J, Wong C, George A, . The effect of genetically engineered spider silk-dentin matrix protein 1 chimeric protein on hydroxyapatite nucleation. Biomaterials , 2007, 28(14): 2358–2367
62
Kim H J, Kim U J, Kim H S, . Bone tissue engineering with premineralized silk scaffolds. Bone , 2008, 42(6): 1226–1234
63
Segman-Magidovich S, Grisaru H, Gitli T, . Matrices of acidic β-sheet peptides as templates for calcium phosphate mineralization. Advanced Materials , 2008, 20(11): 2156–2161
64
Gungormus M, Branco M, Fong H, . Self assembled bi-functional peptide hydrogels with biomineralization-directing peptides. Biomaterials , 2010, 31(28): 7266–7274
65
George A, Ravindran S. Protein templates in hard tissue engineering. Nano Today , 2010, 5(4): 254–266
66
Wise E R, Maltsev S, Davies M E, . The organic-mineral interface in bone is predominantly polysaccharide. Chemistry of Materials , 2007, 19(21): 5055–5057
67
Hu Y Y, Rawal A, Schmidt-Rohr K. Strongly bound citrate stabilizes the apatite nanocrystals in bone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2010, 107(52): 22425–22429
68
Mahamid J, Addadi L, Weiner S. Crystallization pathways in bone. Cells, Tissues, Organs , 2011, 194(2–4): 92–97
69
Weiner S, Addadi L. Crystallization pathways in biomineralization. Annual Review of Materials Research , 2011, 41: 21–40
70
Termine J D, Posner A S. Infrared analysis of rat bone: age dependency of amorphous and crystalline mineral fractions. Science , 1966, 153(3743): 1523–1525
71
Mahamid J, Sharir A, Addadi L, . Amorphous calcium phosphate is a major component of the forming fin bones of zebrafish: Indications for an amorphous precursor phase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2008, 105(35): 12748–12753
72
Beniash E, Metzler R A, Lam R S K, . Transient amorphous calcium phosphate in forming enamel. Journal of Structural Biology , 2009, 166(2): 133–143
73
Mahamid J, Aichmayer B, Shimoni E, . Mapping amorphous calcium phosphate transformation into crystalline mineral from the cell to the bone in zebrafish fin rays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2010, 107(14): 6316–6321
74
Olszta M J, Cheng X G, Jee S S, . Bone structure and formation: A new perspective. Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports , 2007, 58(3-5): 77–116
75
Nudelman F, Pieterse K, George A, . The role of collagen in bone apatite formation in the presence of hydroxyapatite nucleation inhibitors. Nature Materials , 2010, 9(12): 1004–1009
76
Salgado A J, Coutinho O P, Reis R L. Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromolecular Bioscience , 2004, 4(8): 743–765
77
Jee S S, Kasinath R K, DiMasi E, . Oriented hydroxyapatite in turkey tendon mineralized via the polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process. CrystEngComm , 2011, 13(6): 2077–2083
78
Liu Y, Kim Y K, Dai L, . Hierarchical and non-hierarchical mineralisation of collagen. Biomaterials , 2011, 32(5): 1291–1300
79
Liu Y, Li N, Qi Y P, . Intrafibrillar collagen mineralization produced by biomimetic hierarchical nanoapatite assembly. Advanced Materials , 2011, 23(8): 975–980
80
Maas M, Guo P, Keeney M, . Preparation of mineralized nanofibers: collagen fibrils containing calcium phosphate. Nano Letters , 2011, 11(3): 1383–1388
81
Wang Y, Aza?s T, Robin M, . The predominant role of collagen in the nucleation, growth, structure and orientation of bone apatite. Nature Materials , 2012, 11(8): 724–733
82
Palmer L C, Newcomb C J, Kaltz S R, . Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chemical Reviews , 2008, 108(11): 4754–4783
83
Palmer L C, Stupp S I. Molecular self-assembly into one-dimensional nanostructures. Accounts of Chemical Research , 2008, 41(12): 1674–1684
84
Hartgerink J D, Beniash E, Stupp S I. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science , 2001, 294(5547): 1684–1688
85
Spoerke E D, Anthony S G, Stupp S I. Enzyme directed templating of artificial bone mineral. Advanced Materials , 2009, 21(4): 425–430
86
Mata A, Geng Y B, Henrikson K J, . Bone regeneration mediated by biomimetic mineralization of a nanofiber matrix. Biomaterials , 2010, 31(23): 6004–6012
87
Boskey A L, Spevak L, Doty S B, . Effects of bone CS-proteoglycans, DS-decorin, and DS-biglycan on hydroxyapatite formation in a gelatin gel. Calcified Tissue International , 1997, 61(4): 298–305
88
Boskey A L, Stiner D, Binderman I, . Effects of proteoglycan modification on mineral formation in a differentiating chick limb-bud mesenchymal cell culture system. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry , 1997, 64(4): 632–643
89
Rees S G, Wassell D T H, Shellis R P, . Effect of serum albumin on glycosaminoglycan inhibition of hydroxyapatite formation. Biomaterials , 2004, 25(6): 971–977
90
Septier D, Hall R C, Lloyd D, . Quantitative immunohistochemical evidence of a functional gradient of chondroitin 4-sulphate/dermatan sulphate, developmentally regulated in the predentine of rat incisor. The Histochemical Journal , 1998, 30(4): 275–284
91
Takagi M, Maeno M, Yamada T, . Nature and distribution of chondroitin sulphate and dermatan sulphate proteoglycans in rabbit alveolar bone. The Histochemical Journal , 1996, 28(5): 341–351
92
Reid D G, Duer M J, Murray R C, . The organic-mineral interface in teeth is like that in bone and dominated by polysaccharides: Universal mediators of normal calcium phosphate biomineralization in vertebrates? Chemistry of Materials , 2008, 20(11): 3549–3550
93
Duer M J, Frisci? T, Proudfoot D, . Mineral surface in calcified plaque is like that of bone: further evidence for regulated mineralization. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology , 2008, 28(11): 2030–2034
94
Duer M J, Frisci? T, Murray R C, . The mineral phase of calcified cartilage: its molecular structure and interface with the organic matrix. Biophysical Journal , 2009, 96(8): 3372–3378
95
Zhong C, Chu C C. Biomimetic mineralization of acid polysaccharide-based hydrogels: towards porous 3-dimensional bone-like biocomposites. Journal of Materials Chemistry , 2012, 22(13): 6080–6087
96
Zhong C, Wu J, Reinhart-King C A, . Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity of photo-crosslinked maleic chitosan–polyethylene glycol diacrylate hybrid hydrogels. Acta Biomaterialia , 2010, 6(10): 3908–3918
97
Li Q, Li M, Zhu P, . In vitro synthesis of bioactive hydroxyapatite using sodium hyaluronate as a template. Journal of Materials Chemistry , 2012, 22(38): 20257–20265
98
Deng Y, Wang H, Zhang L, . In situ synthesis and in vitro biocompatibility of needle-like nano-hydroxyapatite in agar–gelatin co-hydrogel. Materials Letters , 2013, 104: 8–12
99
Posner A S, Beebe R A. The surface chemistry of bone mineral and related calcium phosphates. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism , 1975, 4(3): 267–291
100
Xie B Q, Nancollas G H. How to control the size and morphology of apatite nanocrystals in bone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2010, 107(52): 22369–22370
101
Delgado-López J M, Iafisco M, Rodríguez I, . Crystallization of bioinspired citrate-functionalized nanoapatite with tailored carbonate content. Acta Biomaterialia , 2012, 8(9): 3491–3499
102
Weber W, Fussenegger M. Emerging biomedical applications of synthetic biology. Nature Reviews Genetics , 2012, 13(1): 21–35
