Electron–positron pair production in a strong asymmetric laser electric field
Obulkasim Oluk1, Bai-Song Xie2(), Muhmmad Ali Bake2, Sayipjamal Dulat1
1. School of Physics Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China 2. College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
By solving the quantum Vlasov equation, electron–positron pair production in a strong electric field with asymmetric laser pulses has been investigated. We consider three different situations of subcycle, cycle and supercycle laser pulses. It is found that in asymmetric laser pulse field, i.e., when the pulse length of one rising or falling side is fixed while the pulse length of the other side is changed, the pair production rate and number density can be significantly modified comparable to symmetric situation. For each case of these three different cycle pulses, when one side pulse length is constant and the other side pulse length becomes shorter, i.e., the whole pulse is compressed, the more pairs can be produced than that in the vice versa case, i.e., the whole pulse is elongated. In compressed pulse case there exists an optimum pulse length ratio of asymmetric pulse lengths which makes the pair number density maximum. Moreover, the created maximum pair number density by subcycle pulse is larger than that by cycle or/and supercycle pulse. In elongated pulse case, however, only for supercycle laser pulse the created pairs is enhanced and there exists also an optimum asymmetric pulse length ratio that maximizes the pair number density. On the other hand, surprisingly, in both cases of subcycle and cycle elongated laser pulses, the pair number density is monotonically decreasing as the asymmetry of pulse increases.
F. Sauter , Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs , Z. Phys. , 1931 , 69 ( 11−12 ): 742 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01339461
2
W. Heisenberg and H. Euler , Folgerungen aus der Diracschen Theorie des Positrons , Z. Phys. , 1936 , 98 ( 11−12 ): 714 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01343663
V. Yanovsky , V. Chvykov , G. Kalinchenko , P. Rousseau , T. Planchon , T. Matsuoka , A. Maksimchuk , J. Nees , G. Cheriaux , G. Mourou , and K. Krushelnick , Ultra-high intensity-300-TW laser at 0.1 Hz repetition rate , Opt. Express , 2008 , 16 ( 3 ): 2109 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.002109
R. Alkofer , M. Hecht , C. Roberts , S. Schmidt , and D. Vinnik , Pair creation and an X-ray free electron laser , Phys. Rev. Lett. , 2001 , 87 ( 19 ): 193902 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.193902
10
C. D. Roberts , S. M. Schmidt , and D. V. Vinnik , Quantum effects with an X-ray free-electron laser , Phys. Rev. Lett. , 2002 , 89 ( 15 ): 153901 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.153901
11
A. Ringwald , Pair production from vacuum at the focus of an X-ray free electron laser , Phys. Lett. B , 2001 , 510 ( 1−4 ): 107
12
D. B. Blaschke , A. Prozorkevich , C. Roberts , S. Schmidt , and S. Smolyansky , Pair production and optical lasers , Phys. Rev. Lett. , 2006 , 96 ( 14 ): 140402 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.140402
13
V. S. Popov , Pair production in a variable external field (Quasiclassical approximation) , Sov. Phys. JETP , 1972 , 34 : 709
14
S. S. Bulanov , Pair production by a circularly polarized electromagnetic wave in a plasma , Phys. Rev. E , 2004 , 69 ( 3 ): 036408 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.036408
15
B. S. Xie , M. Melike , and D. Sayipjamal , Electron–positron pair production in an elliptic polarized time varying field , Chin. Phys. Lett. , 2012 , 29 ( 2 ): 021102 https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/29/2/021102
16
G. Dunne and C. Schubert , Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogenous fields , Phys. Rev. D , 2005 , 72 ( 10 ): 105004 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.105004
17
F. Hebenstreit , R. Alkofer , and H. Gies , Schwinger pair production in space- and time-dependent electric fields: Relating the Wigner formalism to quantum kinetic theory , Phys. Rev. D , 2010 , 82 ( 10 ): 105026 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.105026
18
M. Orthaber , F. Hebenstreit , and R. Alkofer , Momentum spectra for dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production , Phys. Lett. B , 2011 , 698 ( 1 ): 80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.053
19
J. C. R. Bloch , V. Mizerny , A. Prozorkevich , C. Roberts , S. Schmidt , S. Smolyansky , and D. Vinnik , Pair creation: Back reactions and damping , Phys. Rev. D , 1999 , 60 ( 11 ): 116011 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.116011
20
J. C. R. Bloch , C. Roberts , and S. Schmidt , Memory effects and thermodynamics in strong field plasmas , Phys. Rev. D , 2000 , 61 ( 11 ): 117502 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.117502
21
D. V. Vinnik , A. V. Prozorkevich , S. A. Smolyansky , V. D. Toneev , M. B. Hecht , C. D. Roberts , and S. M. Schmidt , Plasma production and thermalisation in a strong field , Eur. Phys. J. C , 2001 , 22 ( 2 ): 341 https://doi.org/10.1007/s100520100787
22
A. Nuriman , B. S. Xie , Z. L. Li , and S. Dulat , Enhanced electron–positron pair creation by dynamically assisted combinational fields , Phys. Lett. B , 2012 , 717 ( 4−5 ): 465 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.09.060
23
B. F. Shen and J. Meyer-ter-Vehn , Pair and γ -photon production from a thin foil confined by two laser pulses , Phys. Rev. E , 2001 , 65 ( 1 ): 016405 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.016405
24
C. P. Ridgers , C. S. Brady , R. Duclous , J. G. Kirk , K. Bennett , T. D. Arber , A. P. L. Robinson , and A. R. Bell , Dense electron–positron plasmas and ultraintense γ rays from laserirradiated solids , Phys. Rev. Lett. , 2012 , 108 ( 16 ): 165006 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.165006