1. State Key Lab of Power Systems, International Joint Laboratory on Low Carbon Clean Energy, Innovation, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 2. Renewable Energy Resources Laboratory (RERL) & National Fuel Cell Research Center, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3975, USA
Relatively large measurement uncertainty severely hindered wide application for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), therefore it is of great importance to understand the mechanism of signal uncertainty generation, including initiation and propagation. It has been found that the fluctuation of plasma morphology was the main reason for signal uncertainty. However, it still remains unclear what mechanism leads to laser-induced plasma morphology fluctuation. In the present work, we employed three fast-imaging cameras to capture three successive plasma images from a same laser-induced Titanium alloy plasma, which enables us to understand more clearly of the plasma evolution process especially for the early plasma evolution stage when plasma and surrounding gases interact drastically. Seen from the images, the plasma experienced an increasing morphological fluctuation as delay time increased, transforming from a “stable plasma” before the delay time of 100 ns to a “fluctuating plasma” after the delay time of 300 ns. Notably, the frontier part of plasma showed a significant downward motion from the delay time of 150 ns to 200 ns and crashed with the lower part of the plasma, making the plasma flatter and later even splitting the plasma into two parts, which was considered as a critical process for the transformation of “stable plasma” to “unstable plasma”. By calculating the correlation coefficient of plasma image pairs at successive delay times, it was found that the higher the similarity between two plasma at early stage, the more similar at later stage; this implied that the tiny plasma fluctuation earlier than the critical delay time (150–200 ns) was amplified, causing a large plasma fluctuation at the later stage as well as LIBS measurement uncertainty. The initiation of slight fluctuation was linked with Rayleigh–Taylor Instability (RTI) due to the drastic material interpenetration at the plasma-ambient gas interface at earlier stage (before 50 ns). That is, the uncertainty generation of LIBS was proposed as: plasma morphology fluctuation was inevitably trigged by RTI at the early stage and the tiny fluctuation was amplified by the back pressed downward process of plasma frontier material, leading to severe morphology fluctuation as well as LIBS signal uncertainty.
D. W. Hahn and N. Omenetto, Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), Part I: Review of basic diagnostics and plasma–particle interactions: Still-challenging issues within the analytical plasma community, Appl. Spectrosc. 64(12), 335A (2010) https://doi.org/10.1366/000370210793561691
2
D. W. Hahn and N. Omenetto, Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), Part II: Review of instrumental and methodological approaches to material analysis and applications to different fields, Appl. Spectrosc. 66(4), 347 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1366/11-06574
Z. Wang, T. B. Yuan, Z. Y. Hou, W. D. Zhou, J. D. Lu, H. B. Ding, andX. Y. Zeng, Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in China, Front. Phys. 9, 419 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-013-0410-0
5
J. D. Winefordner, I. B. Gornushkin, T. Correll, E. Gibb, B. W. Smith, and N. Omenetto, Comparing several atomic spectrometric methods to the super stars: Special emphasis on laser induced breakdown spectrometry, LIBS, a future super star, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 19(9), 1061 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1039/b400355c
6
J. M. Mermet, P. Mauchien, and J. L. Lacour, Processing of shot-to-shot raw data to improve precision in laser-induced breakdown spectrometry microprobe, Spectrochim. Acta B At. Spectrosc. 63(10), 999 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2008.06.003
7
Z. Hou, Z. Wang, T. Yuan, J. Liu, Z. Li, and W. Ni, A hybrid quantification model and its application for coal analysis using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 31(3), 722 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1039/C5JA00475F
8
E. Tognoni and G. Cristoforetti, Signal and noise in laser induced breakdown spectroscopy: An introductory review, Opt. Laser Technol. 79, 164 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.12.010
9
X. Zeng, X. Mao, S. S. Mao, J. H. Yoo, R. Greif, and R. E. Russo, Laser–plasma interactions in fused silica cavities, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 816 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1635990
10
J. Yu, Q. Ma, V. Motto-Ros, W. Lei, X. Wang, and X. S. Bai, Generation and expansion of laser-induced plasma as a spectroscopic emission source, Front. Phys. 7(6)649 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-012-0251-2
11
X. Bai, Q. Ma, M. Perrier, V. Motto-Ros, D. Sabourdy, L. Nguyen, A. Jalocha, and J. Yu, Experimental study of laser-induced plasma: Influence of laser fluence and pulse duration, Spectrochim. Acta B At. Spectrosc. 87, 27 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2013.05.019
12
R. Wisbrun, I. Schechter, R. Niessner, H. Schroeder, and K. L. Kompa, Detector for trace elemental analysis of solid environmental samples by laser plasma spectroscopy, Anal. Chem.66(18), 2964 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00090a026
13
Z. Wang, Z. Hou, S. Lui, D. Jiang, J. Liu, and Z. Li, Utilization of moderate cylindrical confinement for precision improvement of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy signal, Opt. Express20(S6), A1011 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.0A1011
14
Z. Hou, Z. Wang, J. Liu, W. Ni, and Z. Li, Signal quality improvement using cylindrical confinement for laser induced breakdown spectroscopy, Opt. Express21(13), 15974 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.015974
15
Y. Fu, Z. Hou, and Z. Wang, Physical insights of cavity confinement enhancing effect in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, Opt. Express24(3), 3055 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.003055
16
V. N. Rai, A. K. Rai, F. Y. Yueh, and J. P. Singh, Optical emission from laser-induced breakdown plasma of solid and liquid samples in the presence of a magnetic field, Appl. Opt. 42(12), 2085 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.002085
17
L. B. Guo, W. Hu, B. Y. Zhang, X. N. He, C. M. Li, Y. S. Zhou, Z. X. Cai, X. Y. Zeng, and Y. F. Lu, Enhancement of optical emission from laser-induced plasmas by combined spatial and magnetic confinement, Opt. Express19(15), 14067 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.014067
18
Z. Wang, Y. Deguchi, R. Liu, A. Ikutomo, Z. Zhang, D. Chong, J. Yan, J. Liu, and F.J. Shiou, Emission characteristics of laser-induced plasma using collinear long and short dual-pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), Appl. Spectrosc. 71, 2187 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702817693239
19
Y. Fu, Z. Hou, T. Li, Z. Li, and Z. Wang, Investigation of intrinsic origins of the signal uncertainty for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, Spectrochim. Acta B At. Spectrosc. 155, 67 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2019.03.007
20
Z. Hou, Z. Wang, J. Liu, W. Ni, and Z. Li, Combination of cylindrical confinement and spark discharge for signal improvement using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy, Opt. Express22(11), 12909 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.012909
21
X. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Fu, Z. Li, J. Liu, and W. Ni, Application of a spectrum standardization method for carbon analysis in coal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), Appl. Spectrosc.68, 955 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1366/13-07345
22
X. Li, Z. Wang, X. Mao, and R. E. Russo, Spatially and temporally resolved spectral emission of laser-induced plasmas confined by cylindrical cavities, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 29(11), 2127 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1039/C4JA00178H
23
H. Yin, Z. Hou, T. Yuan, Z. Wang, W. Ni, and Z. Li, Application of spatial confinement for gas analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy to improve signal stability, J. Anal. At. Spectrom 0(4), 922 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1039/C4JA00437J
24
T. Li, S. Sheta, Z. Hou, J. Dong, and Z. Wang, Impacts of a collection system on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy signal detection, Appl. Opt. 57(21), 6120 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.006120
25
S. B. Wen, X. Mao, R. Greif, and R. E. Russo, Laser ablation induced vapor plume expansion into a background gas (II): Experimental analysis, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 023115 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2431085
26
S. B. Wen, X. Mao, R. Greif, and R. E. Russo, Expansion of the laser ablation vapor plume into a background gas (I): Analysis, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 023114 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2431080
27
C. G. Parigger, C. M. Helstern, B. S. Jordan, D. M. Surmick, and R. Splinter, Laser–plasma spatiotemporal cyanide spectroscopy and applications, Molecules25, 615 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030615
28
C. G. Parigger, D. M. Surmick, and G. Gautam, Self-absorption characteristics of measured laser-induced plasma line shapes, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 810, 012012 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/810/1/012012
29
S. S. Harilal, C. V. Bindhu, M. S. Tillack, F. Najmabadi, and A. C. Gaeris, Internal structure and expansion dynamics of laser ablation plumes into ambient gases, J. Appl. Phys.93, 2380 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1544070
30
S. S. Harilal, G. V. Miloshevsky, P. K. Diwakar, N. L. La-Haye, and A. Hassanein, Experimental and computational study of complex shockwave dynamics in laser ablation plumes in argon atmosphere, Phys. Plasmas. 19, 083504 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4745867
31
V. Y. Baranov, O. N. Derkach, V. G. Grishina, M. F. Kanevskii, and A. Y. Sebrant, Dynamics and stability of an expanding laser-induced plasma in a low-density gas, Phys. Rev. E8(2), 1324 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.48.1324
32
P. S. R. Abhilasha, P. S. R. Prasad, and R. K. Thareja, Laser-produced carbon plasma in an ambient gas, Phys. Rev. E48(4), 2929 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.48.2929
33
A. K. Sharma and R. K. Thareja, Characterization of laser-produced aluminum plasma in ambient atmosphere of nitrogen using fast photography, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4490 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1756199
34
D. W. Koopman, H. J. Siebeneck, and G. Jellison, Turbulent interaction fronts in counterstreaming laser-produced plasma studies, Phys. Fluids22, 526, (1979) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.862619
35
A. Neogi and R. K. Thareja, Laser-produced carbon plasma expanding in vacuum, low pressure ambient gas and nonuniform magnetic field, Phys. Plasmas. 6, 365 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.873290
36
K. Rifai, F. Vidal, and T. W. Johnston, Theoretical investigation of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability in laserproduced plasmas driving into background gases, Phys. Plasmas. 14, 082311 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2766497
L. J Radziemski, Lasers-Induced Plasmas and Applications, Taylor & Francis, 1989
40
T. Lü, Y. Hu, J. Meng, Z. Li, C. Zhang, X. Zhang, and E. Tuyizere, Secondary shock wave: Implication for laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 073101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5030164
41
B. Campanella, S. Legnaioli, S. Pagnotta, F. Poggialini, and V. Palleschi, Shock waves in laser-induced plasmas, Atoms7(2), 57 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms7020057