Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Physics

ISSN 2095-0462

ISSN 2095-0470(Online)

CN 11-5994/O4

邮发代号 80-965

2019 Impact Factor: 2.502

Frontiers of Physics  2024, Vol. 19 Issue (4): 42500   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-023-1353-8
  本期目录
Advances in the kinetics of heat and mass transfer in near-continuous complex flows
Aiguo Xu1,2,3(), Dejia Zhang1,4,5, Yanbiao Gan6
1. National Key Laboratory of Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, P. O. Box 8009-26, Beijing 100088, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
3. HEDPS, Center for Applied Physics and Technology, and College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
4. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
5. National Key Laboratory of Shock Wave and Detonation Physics, Mianyang 621999, China
6. Hebei Key Laboratory of Trans-Media Aerial Underwater Vehicle, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Langfang 065000, China
 全文: PDF(27331 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The study of macro continuous flow has a long history. Simultaneously, the exploration of heat and mass transfer in small systems with a particle number of several hundred or less has gained significant interest in the fields of statistical physics and nonlinear science. However, due to absence of suitable methods, the understanding of mesoscale behavior situated between the aforementioned two scenarios, which challenges the physical function of traditional continuous fluid theory and exceeds the simulation capability of microscopic molecular dynamics method, remains considerably deficient. This greatly restricts the evaluation of effects of mesoscale behavior and impedes the development of corresponding regulation techniques. To access the mesoscale behaviors, there are two ways: from large to small and from small to large. Given the necessity to interface with the prevailing macroscopic continuous modeling currently used in the mechanical engineering community, our study of mesoscale behavior begins from the side closer to the macroscopic continuum, that is from large to small. Focusing on some fundamental challenges encountered in modeling and analysis of near-continuous flows, we review the research progress of discrete Boltzmann method (DBM). The ideas and schemes of DBM in coarse-grained modeling and complex physical field analysis are introduced. The relationships, particularly the differences, between DBM and traditional fluid modeling as well as other kinetic methods are discussed. After verification and validation of the method, some applied researches including the development of various physical functions associated with discrete and non-equilibrium effects are illustrated. Future directions of DBM related studies are indicated.

Key wordsnear-continuous flow    non-equilibrium    kinetics    discrete Boltzmann method    complex physical field analysis
收稿日期: 2023-11-10      出版日期: 2024-02-29
Corresponding Author(s): Aiguo Xu   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Physics, 2024, 19(4): 42500.
Aiguo Xu, Dejia Zhang, Yanbiao Gan. Advances in the kinetics of heat and mass transfer in near-continuous complex flows. Front. Phys. , 2024, 19(4): 42500.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fop/CN/10.1007/s11467-023-1353-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fop/CN/Y2024/V19/I4/42500
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Year Schemes for detecting and describing discrete/TNE behavior and effects
Before 2012 There was no significant difference in physical function between the two types of LBMs.
2012 Proposed to use non-conserved moments of ff( 0) to detect and describe discrete/TNE states and effects, which is the starting point of current DBM method [73].
2015 Proposed to use the non-conserved moments of ff( 0) as bases to open phase space, and use the distance from a state point to the origin to define the TNE strength of one perspective. This is the starting point of the phase space description method in DBM [74].
2018 Proposed to use the distance between two points in the phase space to describe the difference between two discrete/TNE states, and use the mean distance between two points in a given time interval to describe the difference of two kinetic processes [75].
2021 Extended the phase space method to describe any set of system features [76].
2022 Proposed the concept of non-equilibrium strength vector, each of whose components is one TNE strength of a perspective, to multi-perspective cross-locate the non-equilibrium strength of complex flow [61, 77].
Tab.1  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
Fig.20  
Fig.21  
Fig.22  
Fig.23  
Fig.24  
Fig.25  
Fig.26  
Fig.27  
Fig.28  
Fig.29  
Fig.30  
Fig.31  
Fig.32  
Fig.33  
Fig.34  
Fig.35  
Fig.36  
Fig.37  
Fig.38  
Fig.39  
Fig.40  
Fig.41  
Fig.42  
Fig.43  
Fig.44  
Fig.45  
Fig.46  
Fig.47  
Fig.48  
Fig.49  
Fig.50  
Fig.51  
1 S. Tsien H.. Superaerodynamics, mechanics of rarefied gases. J. Aeronaut. Sci., 1946, 13(12): 653
https://doi.org/10.2514/8.11476
2 Thomson W.. Hydrokinetic solutions and observations. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci., 1871, 42(281): 362
https://doi.org/10.1080/14786447108640585
3 L. F. Helmholtz H.. On discontinuous movements of fluids. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1868, 36: 337
4 Rayleigh R., Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s1‒14, pp 170–177 (1882)
5 I. Taylor G.. The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes (I). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1950, 201(1065): 192
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1950.0052
6 D. Richtmyer R.. Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 1960, 13(2): 297
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160130207
7 E. Meshkov E.. Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave. Fluid Dyn., 1972, 4(5): 101
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015969
8 X. Liu Y., F. Wang L., G. Zhao K., Y. Li Z., F. Wu J., H. Ye W., J. Li Y.. Thin-shell effects on nonlinear bubble evolution in the ablative Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2022, 29(8): 082102
9 X. Liu Y., Chen Z., F. Wang L., Y. Li Z., F. Wu J., H. Ye W., J. Li Y.. Dynamic of shock–bubble interactions and nonlinear evolution of ablative hydrodynamic instabilities initialed by capsule interior isolated defects. Phys. Plasmas, 2023, 30(4): 042302
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0137856
10 Lan K.. Dream fusion in octahedral spherical hohlraum. Matter Radiat. Extrem., 2022, 7(5): 055701
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103362
11 H. Chen Y., C. Li Z., Cao H., Q. Pan K., W. Li S., F. Xie X., Deng B., Q. Wang Q., R. Cao Z., F. Hou L., S. Che X., Yang P., J. Li Y., A. He X., Xu T., G. Liu Y., L. Li Y., M. Liu X., J. Zhang H., Zhang W., L. Jiang B., Xie J., Zhou W., X. Huang X., Y. Huo W., L. Ren G., Li K., D. Hang X., Li S., L. Zhai C., Liu J., Y. Zou S., K. Ding Y., Lan K.. Determination of laser entrance hole size for ignition-scale octahedral spherical hohlraums. Matter Radiat. Extrem., 2022, 7(6): 065901
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102447
12 Lan K., Dong Y., Wu J., Li Z., Chen Y., Cao H., Hao L., Li S., Ren G., Jiang W., Yin C., Sun C., Chen Z., Huang T., Xie X., Li S., Miao W., Hu X., Tang Q., Song Z., Chen J., Xiao Y., Che X., Deng B., Wang Q., Deng K., Cao Z., Peng X., Liu X., He X., Yan J., Pu Y., Tu S., Yuan Y., Yu B., Wang F., Yang J., Jiang S., Gao L., Xie J., Zhang W., Liu Y., Zhang Z., Zhang H., He Z., Du K., Wang L., Chen X., Zhou W., Huang X., Guo H., Zheng K., Zhu Q., Zheng W., Y. Huo W., Hang X., Li K., Zhai C., Xie H., Li L., Liu J., Ding Y., Zhang W.. First inertial confinement fusion implosion experiment in octahedral spherical Hohlraum. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2021, 127(24): 245001
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.245001
13 M. Qiao X., Lan K.. Novel target designs to mitigate hydrodynamic instabilities growth in inertial confinement fusion. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2021, 126(18): 185001
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.185001
14 B. Gan Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., J. Li Y.. Lattice Boltzmann study on Kelvin–Helmholtz instability: Roles of velocity and density gradients. Phys. Rev. E, 2011, 83(5): 056704
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.056704
15 D. Lin C., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., H. Luo K., J. Li Y.. Discrete Boltzmann modeling of Rayleigh–Taylor instability in two-component compressible flows. Phys. Rev. E, 2017, 96(5): 053305
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.053305
16 Chen F., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G.. Collaboration and competition between Richtmyer–Meshkov instability and Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids, 2018, 30(10): 102105
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049869
17 Chen F., G. Xu A., D. Zhang Y., B. Gan Y., B. Liu B., Wang S.. Effects of the initial perturbations on the Rayleigh–Taylor–Kelvin–Helmholtz instability system. Front. Phys., 2022, 17(3): 33505
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-021-1145-y
18 Chen L., L. Lai H., D. Lin C., M. Li D.. Specific heat ratio effects of compressible Rayleigh–Taylor instability studied by discrete Boltzmann method. Front. Phys., 2021, 16(5): 52500
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-021-1096-3
19 Zhang G., G. Xu A., J. Zhang D., J. Li Y., L. Lai H., M. Hu X.. Delineation of the flow and mixing induced by Rayleigh–Taylor instability through tracers. Phys. Fluids, 2021, 33(7): 076105
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0051154
20 F. Li Y., L. Lai H., D. Lin C., M. Li D.. Influence of the tangential velocity on the compressible Kelvin–Helmholtz instability with non-equilibrium effects. Front. Phys., 2022, 17(6): 63500
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-022-1200-3
21 Lai H., Lin C., Gan Y., Li D., Chen L.. The influences of acceleration on compressible Rayleigh–Taylor instability with non-equilibrium effects. Comput. Fluids, 2023, 266(15): 106037
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.106037
22 D. Lin C., H. Luo K., B. Gan Y., P. Liu Z.. Kinetic simulation of nonequilibrium Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Commum. Theor. Phys., 2019, 71(1): 132
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/1/132
23 D. Lin C., H. Luo K., G. Xu A., B. Gan Y., L. Lai H.. Multiple-relaxation-time discrete Boltzmann modeling of multicomponent mixture with non-equilibrium effects. Phys. Rev. E, 2021, 103(1): 013305
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.013305
24 B. Gan Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., D. Lin C., L. Lai H., P. Liu Z.. Nonequilibrium and morphological characterizations of Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in compressible flows. Front. Phys., 2019, 14(4): 43602
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-019-0885-4
25 F. Chen W.W. Zhao W., Moment Equations and Numerical Methods for Rarefied Gas Flows, Beijing: Science Press, 2017 (in Chinese)
26 H. Li Z., P. Peng A., X. Zhang H., G. Deng X.. Numerical study on the gas-kinetic high-order schemes for solving Boltzmann model equation. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 2011, 54(9): 1687
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-011-4440-8
27 Karniadaskis G.Beskok A.Aluru N., Microflows and Nanoflows: Fundamentals and Simulation, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2005
28 Keerthi A., K. Geim A., Janardanan A., P. Rooney A., Esfandiar A., Hu S., A. Dar S., V. Grigorieva I., J. Haigh S., C. Wang F., Radha B.. Ballistic molecular transport through two-dimensional channels. Nature, 2018, 558(7710): 420
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0203-2
29 López Quesada G., Tatsios G., Valougeorgis D., Rojas-Cárdenas M., Baldas L., Barrot C., Colin S.. Design guidelines for thermally driven micropumps of different architectures based on target applications via kinetic modeling and simulations. Micromachines (Basel), 2019, 10(4): 249
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10040249
30 Kavokine N., R. Netz R., Bocquet L.. Fluids at the nanoscale: From continuum to subcontinuum transport. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2021, 53(1): 377
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-071320-095958
31 Jiang X., A. Siamas G., Jagus K., G. Karayiannis T.. Physical modelling and advanced simulations of gas–liquid two-phase jet flows in atomization and sprays. Prog. Eenerg. combust., 2010, 36(2): 131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.002
32 C. Ding J., Si T., J. Chen M., G. Zhai Z., Y. Lu X., S. Luo X.. On the interaction of a planar shock with a three-dimensional light gas cylinder. J. Fluid Mech., 2017, 828: 289
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.528
33 Liang Y., G. Zhai Z., S. Luo X.. Interaction of strong converging shock wave with SF6 gas bubble. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 2018, 61(6): 064711
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-017-9151-6
34 C. Ding J., Liang Y., J. Chen M., G. Zhai Z., Si T., S. Luo X.. Interaction of planar shock wave with three-dimensional heavy cylindrical bubble. Phys. Fluids, 2018, 30(10): 106109
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5050091
35 S. Luo X., Li M., C. Ding J., G. Zhai Z., Si T.. Nonlinear behaviour of convergent Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech., 2019, 877: 130
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.610
36 D. Zhang Y., G. Xu A., J. Qiu J., T. Wei H., H. Wei Z.. Kinetic modeling of multiphase flow based on simplified Enskog equation. Front. Phys., 2020, 15(6): 62503
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-020-1014-0
37 L. Jiang Z.H. Teng H., Gaseous Detonation Physics and Its Universal Framework Theory, Singapore: Springer, 2022
38 P. Wang J.B. Yao S., Principle and Technology of Continuous Detonation Engine, Beijing: Science Press, 2018 (in Chinese)
39 Xiao J., Liu P., X. Wang C., W. Yang G.. External field-assisted laser ablation in liquid: An efficient strategy for nanocrystal synthesis and nanostructure assembly. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2017, 87: 140
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.02.004
40 G. Rinderknecht H., A. Amendt P., C. Wilks S., Collins G.. Kinetic physics in ICF: Present understanding and future directions. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 2018, 60(6): 064001
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aab79f
41 Vidal F., P. Matte J., Casanova M., Larroche O.. Ion kinetic simulations of the formation and propagation of a planar collisional shock wave in a plasma. Phys. Fluids B Plasma Phys., 1993, 5(9): 3182
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.860654
42 Bond D., Wheatley V., Samtaney R., I. Pullin D.. Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of a thermal interface in a two-fluid plasma. J. Fluid Mech., 2017, 833: 332
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.693
43 H. Song J.G. Xu A.Miao L.Chen F.P. Liu Z. F. Wang L.F. Wang N.Hou X., Plasma kinetics: Discrete Boltzmann modelling and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability, Phys. Fluids 36, 016107(2023)
44 L. Yao P., B. Cai H., X. Yan X., S. Zhang W., Du B., M. Tian J., H. Zhang E., W. Wang X., P. Zhu S.. Kinetic study of transverse electron-scale interface instability in relativistic shear flows. Matter Radiat. Extrem., 2020, 5(5): 054403
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0017962
45 B. Cai H., X. Yan X., L. Yao P., P. Zhu S.. Hybrid fluid–particle modeling of shock-driven hydrodynamic instabilities in a plasma. Matter Radiat. Extrem., 2021, 6(3): 035901
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0042973
46 K. Agarwal R., Y. Yun K., Balakrishnan R.. Beyond Navier–Stokes: Burnett equations for flows in the continuum-transition regime. Phys. Fluids, 2001, 13(10): 3061
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1397256
47 K. Kundu P.M. Cohen I.Dowling D., Fluid Mechanics, 4th Ed., Ch. 13, pp 537–601, Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press, 2008
48 J. Zhou H., Zhang Y., C. Ouyang Z.. Bending and base-stacking interactions in double-stranded DNA. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 82(22): 4560
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4560
49 Y. Zhang X., Boccaletti S., G. Guan S., H. Liu Z.. Explosive synchronization in adaptive and multilayer networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 114(3): 038701
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.038701
50 H. Tang G., Bi C., Zhao Y., Q. Tao W.. Thermal transport in nano-porous insulation of aerogel: Factors, models and outlook. Energy, 2015, 90: 701
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.109
51 C. Zong Z., C. Deng S., J. Qin Y., Wan X., H. Zhan J., K. Ma D., Yang N.. Enhancing the interfacial thermal conductance of Si/PVDF by strengthening atomic couplings. Nanoscale, 2023, 15(40): 16472
https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR03706A
52 N. Yang L., S. Yang B., W. Li B.. Enhancing interfacial thermal conductance of an amorphous interface by optimizing the interfacial mass distribution. Phys. Rev. B, 2023, 108(16): 165303
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.165303
53 Zhao H.. Identifying diffusion processes in one-dimensional lattices in thermal equilibrium. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96(14): 140602
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.140602
54 Li Y., Y. Shen X., H. Wu Z., Y. Huang J., X. Chen Y., S. Ni Y., P. Huang J.. Temperature-dependent transformation thermotics: From switchable thermal cloaks to macroscopic thermal diodes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 115(19): 195503
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.195503
55 Wang Z., C. Fu W., Zhang Y., Zhao H.. Wave-turbulence origin of the instability of anderson localization against many-body interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020, 124(18): 186401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.186401
56 B. Li N., Ren J., Wang L., Zhang G., Hänggi P., W. Li B.. Phononics: Manipulating heat flow with electronic analogs and beyond. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2012, 84(3): 1045
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1045
57 Wang L., H. He D., B. Hu B.. Heat conduction in a three-dimensional momentum-conserving anharmonic lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2010, 105(16): 160601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.160601
58 Zhao L., L. Wang C., Liu J., H. Wen B., S. Tu Y., W. Wang Z., P. Fang H.. Reversible state transition in nanoconfined aqueous solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, 112(7): 078301
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.078301
59 Maasilta I., J. Minnich A.. Heat under the microscope. Phys. Today, 2014, 67(8): 27
https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.2479
60 G. Chen S., Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Beijing: Science Press, 2010 (in Chinese)
61 G. Xu A.D. Zhang Y., Complex Media Kinetics, Beijing: Science Press, 2022 (in Chinese)
62 H. Li J.Wei G.Wang W.Yang N.H. Liu X. M. Wang L.F. He X.W. Wang X.W. Wang J.Kwauk M., From Multiscale Modeling to Meso-Science: A Chemical Engineering Perspective, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013
63 L. Huang W., H. Li J., P. Edwards P.. Mesoscience: exploring the common principle at mesoscales. Natl. Sci. Rev., 2018, 5(3): 321
https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx083
64 D. Zhang Y., Wu X., B. Nie B., G. Xu A., Chen F., Wei R.. Lagrangian steady-state discrete Boltzmann model for non-equilibrium flows at micro–nanoscale. Phys. Fluids, 2023, 35(9): 092008
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0166488
65 B. Gan Y., G. Xu A., L. Lai H., Li W., L. Sun G., Succi S.. Discrete Boltzmann multi-scale modelling of non-equilibrium multiphase flows. J. Fluid Mech., 2022, 951: A8
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.844
66 L. Tien C.. Molecular and microscale transport phenomena: A report on the 2nd US Japan Joint Seminar, Santa Barbara, California, 7−10 August, 1996. Microscale Thermophys. Eng., 1997, 1(1): 71
https://doi.org/10.1080/108939597200458
67 M. McCoy B., Advanced Statistical Mechanics, Oxford: Oxford university press, 2010
68 D. Lee T., N. Yang C.. Statistical theory of equations of state and phase transitions. II. Lattice gas and Ising model. Phys. Rev., 1952, 87(3): 410
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.87.410
69 Succi S., The Lattice Boltzmann Equation: For Fluid Dynamics and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001
70 L. He Y.Wang Y.Li Q., Lattice Boltzmann Method: Theory and Applications, Beijing: Science Press, 2009 (in Chinese)
71 L. Guo Z.Shu C., Lattice Boltzmann Method and its Applications in Engineering, Beijing: World Scientific Publishing, 2013
72 B. Huang H.C. Sukop M.Y. Lu X., Multiphase Lattice Boltzmann Methods: Theory and Application, John Wiley & Sons, 2015
73 G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., B. Gan Y., Chen F., J. Yu X.. Lattice Boltzmann modeling and simulation of compressible flows. Front. Phys., 2012, 7(5): 582
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-012-0269-5
74 G. Xu A., D. Lin C., C. Zhang G., J. Li Y.. Multiple relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann kinetic model for combustion. Phys. Rev. E, 2015, 91(4): 043306
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.043306
75 G. Xu A.C. Zhang G.D. Zhang Y.B. Gan Y., Discrete Boltzmann modeling of nonequilibrium effects in multiphase flow, Presentation at the 31st International Symposium on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, see also FLOWS: Physics & Beyond, 1001 (2018)
76 G. Xu A.H. Song J.Chen F.Xie K.J. Ying Y., Modeling and analysis methods for complex fields based on phase space, Chinese Journal of Computational Physics 38(6), 631 (2021) (in Chinese)
77 J. Zhang D., G. Xu A., D. Zhang Y., B. Gan Y., J. Li Y.. Discrete Boltzmann modeling of high-speed compressible flows with various depths of non-equilibrium. Phys. Fluids, 2022, 34(8): 086104
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0100873
78 D. Zhang Y., Modeling and research of non-equilibrium flows and multi-phase flows: Based on discrete Boltzmann method, Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2019 (in Chinese)
79 B. Gan Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., D. Zhang Y., Succi S.. Discrete Boltzmann trans-scale modeling of highspeed compressible flows. Phys. Rev. E, 2018, 97(5): 053312
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.053312
80 Wu L., M. Reese J., H. Zhang Y.. Solving the Boltzmann equation deterministically by the fast spectral method: Application to gas microflows. J. Fluid Mech., 2014, 746: 53
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.79
81 Yan B., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., J. Ying Y., Li H.. Lattice Boltzmann model for combustion and detonation. Front. Phys., 2013, 8: 94
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-013-0286-z
82 D. Lin C., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., J. Li Y.. Double distribution-function discrete Boltzmann model for combustion. Combust. Flame, 2016, 164: 137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.11.010
83 D. Lin C., H. Luo K.. Mesoscopic simulation of nonequilibrium detonation with discrete Boltzmann method. Combust. Flame, 2018, 198: 356
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.09.027
84 D. Lin C., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., J. Li Y.. Polar coordinate lattice Boltzmann kinetic modeling of detonation phenomena. Commum. Theor. Phys., 2014, 62(5): 737
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/62/5/18
85 D. Lin C.H. Luo K.L. Fei L.Succi S., A multicomponent discrete Boltzmann model for nonequilibrium reactive fows, Commum. Theor. Phys. 7(1), 14580 (2017)
86 D. Lin C.H. Luo K., MRT discrete Boltzmann method for compressible exothermic reactive flows, Comput. Fluids 166, 176 (2018)
87 D. Lin C., H. Luo K.. Discrete Boltzmann modeling of unsteady reactive flows with nonequilibrium effects. Phys. Rev. E, 2019, 99(1): 012142
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.012142
88 D. Lin C., H. Luo K.. Kinetic simulation of unsteady detonation with thermodynamic nonequilibrium effects. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, 2020, 56(4): 435
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508220040073
89 D. Lin C., L. Su X., D. Zhang Y.. Hydrodynamic and thermodynamic nonequilibrium effects around shock waves: Based on a discrete Boltzmann method. Entropy (Basel), 2020, 22(12): 1397
https://doi.org/10.3390/e22121397
90 D. Zhang Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., M. Zhu C., D. Lin C.. Kinetic modeling of detonation and effects of negative temperature coefficient. Combust. Flame, 2016, 173: 483
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.04.003
91 M. Shan Y., G. Xu A., D. Zhang Y., F. Wang L., Chen F.. Discrete Boltzmann modeling of detonation: Based on the Shakhov model. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2023, 237(11): 2517
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062221096254
92 D. Zhang Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., H. Chen Z.. Discrete Boltzmann method with Maxwell-type boundary condition for slip flow. Commum. Theor. Phys., 2018, 69(1): 77
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/69/1/77
93 D. Zhang Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., H. Chen Z., Wang P.. Discrete Boltzmann method for non-equilibrium flows: Based on Shakhov model. Comput. Phys. Commun., 2019, 238: 50
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.018
94 Zhang Y., Xu A., Chen F., Lin C., H. Wei Z.. Non-equilibrium characteristics of mass and heat transfers in the slip flow. AIP Adv., 2022, 12(3): 035347
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086400
95 Sone Y., Molecular Gas Dynamics: Theory, Techniques, and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
96 Onishi Y., A rarefied gas flow over a flat wall, Bull. Univ. Osaka Prefect. Ser. A Eng. Nat. Sci. 22(2), 91 (1974)
97 S. Chen X., Dohm V., Schultka N.. Order-parameter distribution function of finite O(n) symmetric systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77(17): 3641
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3641
98 J. Wagner A., M. Yeomans J.. Breakdown of scale invariance in the coarsening of phase-separating binary fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1998, 80(7): 1429
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1429
99 R. Swift M., R. Osborn W., M. Yeomans J.. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of nonideal fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1995, 75(5): 830
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.830
100 M. Shan Y., G. Xu A., F. Wang L., D. Zhang Y.. Nonequilibrium kinetics effects in Richtmyer–Meshkov instability and reshock processes. Commum. Theor. Phys., 2023, 75(11): 115601
https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/acf305
101 Latini M., Schilling O., S. Don W.. High-resolution simulations and modeling of reshocked single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability: Comparison to experimental data and to amplitude growth model predictions. Phys. Fluids, 2007, 19(2): 024104
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2472508
102 D. Collins B.W. Jacobs J., PLIF flow visualization and measurements of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of an air/SF6 interface, J. Fluid Mech. 464, 113 (2002)
103 J. Zhang D., G. Xu A., H. Song J., B. Gan Y., D. Zhang Y., J. Li Y.. Specific-heat ratio effects on the interaction between shock wave and heavy-cylindrical bubble: Based on discrete Boltzmann method. Comput. Fluids, 2023, 265: 106021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.106021
104 S. Jiang G.L. Wu C., A high-order WENO finite difference scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 150(2), 561 (1999)
105 H. Song J.G. Xu A.Miao L.G. Liao Y.W. Liang F. Tian F.Q. Nie M.F. Wang N., Entropy increase characteristics of shock wave/plate laminar boundary layer interaction, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 44(21), 528520 (2023) (in Chinese)
106 F. Liao S., B. Zhang W., Chen H., Y. Zou L., H. Liu J., X. Zheng X.. Atwood number effects on the instability of a uniform interface driven by a perturbed shock wave. Phys. Rev. E, 2019, 99(1): 013103
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.013103
107 Y. Zou L., Al-Marouf M., Cheng W., Samtaney R., C. Ding J., S. Luo X.. Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of an unperturbed interface subjected to a diffracted convergent shock. J. Fluid Mech., 2019, 879: 448
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.694
108 Y. Zou L., Wu Q., Z. Li X.. Research progress of general Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron., 2020, 50: 104702
109 M. Shan Y.G. Xu A.D. Zhang Y.F. Wang L. Wall-heating phenomena in shock wave physics: Physical or artificial? (in preparation)
110 J. Zhang D., G. Xu A., B. Gan Y., D. Zhang Y., H. Song J., J. Li Y.. Viscous effects on morphological and thermodynamic non-equilibrium characterizations of shock-bubble interaction. Phys. Fluids, 2023, 35(10): 106113
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0172345
111 B. Gan Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., Succi S.. Discrete Boltzmann modeling of multiphase flows: Hydrodynamic and thermodynamic non-equilibrium effects. Soft Matter, 2015, 11(26): 5336
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM01125F
112 D. Zhang Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., B. Gan Y., H. Chen Z., Succi S.. Entropy production in thermal phase separation: A kinetic-theory approach. Soft Matter, 2019, 15(10): 2245
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM02637H
113 L. Sun G., B. Gan Y., G. Xu A., D. Zhang Y., F. Shi Q.. Thermodynamic nonequilibrium effects in bubble coalescence: A discrete Boltzmann study. Phys. Rev. E, 2022, 106(3): 035101
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.035101
114 L. Sun G.B. Gan Y.G. Xu A.F. Shi Q., Droplet coalescence kinetics: Thermodynamic nonequilibrium effects and entropy production mechanism, arXiv: 2311.06546 (2023), Phys. Fluids (2024) (in press)
115 Chen J., G. Xu A., W. Chen D., D. Zhang Y., H. Chen Z.. Discrete Boltzmann modeling of Rayleigh–Taylor instability: Effects of interfacial tension, viscosity, and heat conductivity. Phys. Rev. E, 2022, 106(1): 015102
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.015102
116 Q. Jia Y.G. Xu A.F. Wang L.W. Chen D., Study on Rayleigh−Taylor instability under variable acceleration: Based on discrete Boltzmann method, Beijing: Symposium on Interfacial Instability and Multi-media Turbulence, 2023 (in Chinese)
117 Chen J.G. Xu A.W. Chen D.D. Zhang Y.H. Chen Z., Kinetics of RT instability in van der Waals fluid: The influence of compressibility (in preparation)
118 Chen F., G. Xu A., D. Zhang Y., K. Zeng Q.. Morphological and non-equilibrium analysis of coupled Rayleigh–Taylor–Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Phys. Fluids, 2020, 32(10): 104111
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023364
119 P. Liu Z., H. Song J., G. Xu A., D. Zhang Y., Xie K.. Discrete Boltzmann modeling of plasma shock wave. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2023, 237(11): 2532
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062221075943
120 H. Song J.Miao L.G. Xu A.Chen F.Li L. Hou X., Plasma kinetics: Transport and mixing characteristics induced by Kelvin–Helmholtz instability (in preparation)
121 D. Lin C., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., J. Li Y., Succi S.. Polar-coordinate lattice Boltzmann modeling of compressible flows. Phys. Rev. E, 2014, 89(1): 013307
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.013307
122 D. Zhang Y., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., H. Chen Z., Wang P.. Discrete ellipsoidal statistical BGK model and Burnett equations. Front. Phys., 2018, 13(3): 135101
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-018-0749-3
123 L. Su X., D. Lin C.. Nonequilibrium effects of reactive flow based on gas kinetic theory. Commum. Theor. Phys., 2022, 74(3): 035604
https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/ac53a0
124 L. Su X., D. Lin C.. Unsteady detonation with thermodynamic nonequilibrium effect based on the kinetic theory. Commum. Theor. Phys., 2023, 75(7): 075601
https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/acd6dd
125 L. Lai H., Modeling and Simulation of Compressible Rayleigh-Taylor Instability by Discrete Boltzmann, Post-doctoral research report of Beijing Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, 2015 (in Chinese)
126 L. Lai H., G. Xu A., C. Zhang G., B. Gan Y., J. Ying Y., Succi S.. Nonequilibrium thermohydrodynamic effects on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in compressible flows. Phys. Rev. E, 2016, 94(2): 023106
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.023106
127 G. Chen A., Study of shock detachment distance in rarefied flow field, Hefei: The 2nd National Conference on Shock Wave and Shock Tube, 2022 (in Chinese)
128 M. Bao W., Future aerospace technology development and aerodynamics challenges, Tianjin: The 2nd Aerodynamics Congress, 2023 (in Chinese)
129 S. Zhu G., Several encountered aerodynamic problems and progress in hypersonic flight, Tianjin: The 2nd Aerodynamics Congress, 2023 (in Chinese)
130 C. Ai B., Research on some problems of aerodynamics of space vehicle, Tianjin: The 2nd Aerodynamics Congress, 2023 (in Chinese)
131 G. Chen A.Wang J.H. Li Z.Q. Li Z.Tian Y. Y. Long Z., Velocity measurement investigation of rarefied flow field by pulse electron beam fluorescence technique, Phys. Gases 6(5), 67 (2021) (in Chinese)
132 Chen W.Y. Hu H.Wang L., Characterization method and measurement technique of thermodynamic non-equilibrium characteristics of high enthalpy flow field, Dalian: The 17th National Conference on Physics and Mechanics, 2023 (in Chinese)
133 M. Danehy P., Molecular based hypersonic nonequilibrium flow optical diagnosis (in Chinese, translated by Qifeng Chen) (to be published)
134 M. Danehy P.F. Bathel B.T. Johansen C.., et al.. Molecular Based Hypersonic Non-Equilibrium Flow Optical Diagnosis, AIAA Progress Series, 2013
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed