Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China  2011, Vol. 5 Issue (2): 225-238   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0108-8
  RESEARCH ARTICLE 本期目录
Experimental study of two saturated natural soils and their saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained stress paths
Experimental study of two saturated natural soils and their saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained stress paths
Mingjing JIANG1(), Haijun HU1, Jianbing PENG2, Serge LEROUEIL3
1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. School of Geological Engineering and Surveying, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Laval University, Quebec G1K 7P4, Canada
 全文: PDF(1258 KB)   HTML
Abstract

In this paper, an experimental investigation is conducted to study the mechanical behavior of saturated natural loess, saturated natural filling in ground fissure and their corresponding saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained triaxial stress tests, namely, conventional triaxial compression test (CTC), triaxial compression test (TC) and reduced triaxial compression test (RTC). The test results show that stress-strain relation, i.e. strain-softening or strain-hardening, is remarkably influenced by the structure, void ratio, stress path and confining pressure. Natural structure, high void ratio, TC stress path, RTC stress path and low confining pressures are favorable factors leading to strain-softening. Excess pore pressure during shearing is significantly affected by stress path. The tested soils are different from loose sand on character of strain-softening and are different from common clay on excess pore water pressure behavior. The critical states in p′– q space in CTC, TC and RTC tests almost lie on one line, which indicates that the critical state is independent of the above stress paths. As for remoulded loess or remoulded filling, the critical state line (CSL) and isotropic consolidation line (ICL) in e-log p′ space are almost straight, while for natural loess or natural filling, in e-log p′ space there is a turning point on the CSL, which is similar to the ICL.

Key wordsstress paths    static liquefaction    natural soil    remoulded soil    loess    structure    total strength indices    excess pore pressure
收稿日期: 2011-03-03      出版日期: 2011-06-05
Corresponding Author(s): JIANG Mingjing,Email:mingjing.jiang@tongji.edu.cn   
 引用本文:   
. Experimental study of two saturated natural soils and their saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained stress paths[J]. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2): 225-238.
Mingjing JIANG, Haijun HU, Jianbing PENG, Serge LEROUEIL. Experimental study of two saturated natural soils and their saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained stress paths. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(2): 225-238.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-011-0108-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2011/V5/I2/225
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
propertyloessfilling
natural moisture content, %16.915.0
natural density, g/cm31.521.73
void ratio1.070.80
grain size distribution
sand>0.05mm, %12.19.5
silt 0.05~0.005mm, %83.184.1
clay<0.005mm, %4.86.4
atterberge limits
wl, %3331.3
wp, %18.914.6
Ip14.116.7
Tab.1  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
samplesload grades/kPa
saturated natural loess15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 95, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1600,3200
saturated natural filling15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 95, 110, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200
saturated remoulded loess15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 100, 130, 150, 180, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1600, 3200
saturated remoulded filling15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 95, 110, 150, 200, 400, 600, 1600, 2400, 3200
Tab.2  
test typessaturated natural loesssaturated natural fillingsaturated remoulded loesssaturated remoulded filling
conventional triaxial compression testCTC50kPaCTC100kPaCTC50kPaCTC100kPa
CTC200kPaCTC200kPaCTC200kPaCTC200kPa
CTC400kPa
CTC600kPaCTC600kPaCTC600kPaCTC600kPa
triaxial compression testTC50kPaTC100kPaTC50kPaTC100kPa
TC200kPaTC200kPaTC200kPaTC200kPa
TC600kPaTC600kPaTC600kPaTC600kPa
reduced triaxial compression testRTC50kPaRTC100kPaRTC50kPaRTC100kPa
RTC200kPaRTC200kPaRTC200kPaRTC200kPa
RTC600kPaRTC600kPaRTC600kPaRTC600kPa
Tab.3  
Fig.7  
samplesconsolidation yield stress/kPa
saturated natural loess79
saturated natural filling315
saturated remoulded loess29
saturated remoulded filling53
Tab.4  
soil typessaturated natural loesssaturated natural fillingsaturated remoulded loesssaturated remoulded filling
compression coefficient α1-2/MPa-11.110.170.820.55
compression index cc0.340.250.280.17
gradient of K0 compression line λ0.1520.1130.1250.073
gradient of isotropic consolidation line λ*0.1990.0880.1320.072
Tab.5  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
samplesstrain-hardeningstrain-softening
saturated natural loessCTC600kPaCTC50kPa, CTC200kPa,
TC400ka, TC50kPa, TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC50kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
saturated natural fillingCTC50kPa, CTC200kPa, CTC600ka, TC50kPa,TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC50kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
saturated remoulded loessCTC600kPaCTC100kPa, CTC200kPa
TC100kPa, TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC100kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
saturated remoulded fillingCTC100kPa, CTC200kPa, CTC600ka,
TC100kPa, TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC100kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
Tab.6  
Fig.15  
consolidated stress/kPasaturated natural loesssaturated natural fillingsaturated remoulded loess
CTCTCRTCCTCTCRTCCTCTCRTC
5027.8420.5440.7221.138.1215.0422.09
20013.2518.9021.1013.3720.4222.605.5511.15
60020.157.157.3711.472.3814.88
Tab.7  
samplesc'/kPa?'/(°)
saturated natural loess6.430.8
saturated remoulded loess1.434.3
saturated natural filling3.134.2
saturated remoulded filling2.633.5
Tab.8  
samplesc/kPa?/(°)
CTC8.714.9
TC5.116.8
RTC6.626.8
Tab.9  
test typesaAf
CTC100kPa0.770.26
CTC200kPa1.320.44
CTC600kPa1.390.46
TC100kPa1.340.45
TC200kPa1.540.51
TC600kPa1.640.55
RTC100kPa1.640.55
RTC200kPa1.540.51
RTC600kPa1.790.60
Tab.10  
samples?cu/(°)
TC18.9
RTC34.8
Tab.11  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
1 Castro G. Liquefaction of sands. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Cambridge: Harvard University, 1969
2 Poulos S J. The steady state of deformation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1981, 107(5): 553–562
3 Poulos S J, Castro G, France J W. Liquefaction evaluation procedure. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1985, 111(6): 772–792
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:6(772)
4 Ishihara K. Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes: thirty-third rankine lecture. Geotechnique , 1993, 43(3): 351–415
doi: 10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351
5 Yamamuro J A, Lade P V. Steady state concepts and static liquefaction of silty sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 1998, 124(9): 868–877
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(868)
6 Chang Y S, Wang X D, Zai J M, Xu J L. Stress path tests of cohesive soil. Journal of Nanjing University of technology , 2005, 27(5): 36–44 (in Chinese)
7 Zeng L L, Chen X P. Analysis of mechanical characteristics of soft soil under different stress paths. Rock and Soil Mechanics , 2009, 30(5): 1264–1270 (in Chinese)
8 Liu Z D, Xing Y C. A new method for determining the parameters of cap-model. Water Resources & Water Engineering , 1993, 4(4): 1–8 (in Chinese)
9 Yang P. Influence of stress path on deformation and strength characteristics of saturated intact loess. Dissertation for the Master Degree , Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2007 (in Chinese)
10 Yang Z M, Zhao C G, Wang L M, Rao W G. Liquefaction behaviros and steady state strength of saturated loess. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering , 2007, 35(12): 83–86 (in Chinese)
11 Zhang D X, Wang G H, Luo C Y, Chen J, Zhou Y X. A rapid loess flow slide triggered by irrigation in China. Landslides , 2009, 6(1): 55–60
doi: 10.1007/s10346-008-0135-2
12 Zhou Y X, Zhang D X, Zhou X D. Undrained consolidation triaxial test for flow sliding mechanism of loess landslides. Journal of Engineering Geology , 2010, 18(1): 72–77 (in Chinese)
13 Zhou Y X, Zhang D X, Luo C Y, Chen J.Experimental research on steady strength of saturated loess. Rock and Soil Mechanics , 2010, 31(5): 1486–1490,1496 (in Chinese)
14 Leroueil S, Vaughan P R. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Geotechnique , 1990, 40(3): 467–488
doi: 10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.467
15 Diaz-Rodriguez J A, Leroueil S, Aleman J D. Yielding of mexico city clay and other natural clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1992, 118(7): 981–995
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:7(981)
16 Malandraki V, Toll D G. Triaxial tests on weakly bonded soil with changes in stress path. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 2001, 127(3): 282–291
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:3(282)
17 Yin J, Hong Z S, Gao Y F. Yielding characteristics of natural soft Lianyungang clay. Journal of Southeast University , 2009, 39(5): 1059–1064 (Natural Science Edition)
18 Liu M F, Yao Y P, Kong D Q. The experimental study of saturated structural K0 consolidated loess. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology , 2008, 40(2): 238–248 (Natural Science Edition)
19 Lamber T W. Stress path method. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations , 1967, 93(6): 309–331
20 Lamber T W, Marr W A. Stress path method: second edition. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1979, 105(6): 727–738
21 Ng C W W. Stress paths in relation to deep excavations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 1999, 125(5): 357–363
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:5(357)
22 Cai M. Influence of stress path on tunnel excavation response – Numerical tool selection and modeling strategy. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology , 2008, 23(6): 618–628
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2007.11.005
23 Weng M C, Jeng F S, Hsieh Y M, Huang T H. A simple model for stress-induced anisotropic softening of weak sandstones. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences , 2008, 45(2): 155–166
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.04.004
24 Chen C N, Tseng C T. 2D tunneling chart from redistributed 3D principal stress path. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology , 2010, 25(4): 305–314
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2010.01.003
25 Bilotta E, Stallebrass S E. Prediction of stresses and strains around model tunnels with adjacent embedded walls in overconsolidated clay. Computers and Geotechnics , 2009, 36(6): 1049–1057
doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.03.015
26 Dai F C, Lee C F, Wang S J, Feng Y Y. Stress–strain behavior of a loosely compacted volcanic-derived soil and its significance to rainfall-induced fill slope failures. Engineering Geology , 1999, 53(3-4): 359–370
doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00016-2
27 Zhou B C. Influence of stress path on effective shear strength parameters of reshaped clay. Journal of Huazhong University of Science & Technology , 2007, 35(12): 83–86 (Nature Science Edition)
28 Gibbs H J, Holland W Y. Petrographic and engineering properties of loess. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation. Engineering Monograph , 1960, 28: 1–37
29 Bishop A W, Wesley L. A hydraulic triaxial apparatus for controlled stress path testing. Geotechnique , 1975, 25(4): 657–670
doi: 10.1680/geot.1975.25.4.657
30 Menzies B K. A computer controlled hydraulic triaxial testing system. In: Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock, ASTM STP 977 Philadelphia , 1988, 82–94
31 Casagrande A. Determination of the pre-consolidation load and its practical significance. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1936, 60–64
32 Chandler R J. Clay sediments in depositional Basins: the geotechnical cycle. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology , 2000, 33(1): 7–39
doi: 10.1144/qjegh.33.1.7
33 Jiang M J, Yu H S, Leroueil S. A simple and efficient approach to capturing bonding effect in natural sands by discrete element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 2007, 69(6): 1158–1193
doi: 10.1002/nme.1804
34 Roscoe K H, Schofield A N, Thurairajah A. Yield of clays in states wetter than critical. Geotechnique , 1963, 13(3): 211–240
doi: 10.1680/geot.1963.13.3.211
35 Bishop A W. Progressive failure-with special reference to the mechanism causing it. In: Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference, Norway , 1967, 142–150
36 Pan X Q, Pan L, Luo S H. Influence of stress path on ?cu of normally-consolidated saturated clay. Dam Observation and Geotechnical Tests , 1997, 21(4): 25–30 (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed