Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2013, Vol. 7 Issue (1): 24-31   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0190-1
  RESEARCH ARTICLE 本期目录
Slope stability analysis based on a multigrid method using a nonlinear 3D finite element model
Slope stability analysis based on a multigrid method using a nonlinear 3D finite element model
Yaoru LIU1(), Zhu HE1, Bo LI2, Qiang YANG1
1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430010, China
 全文: PDF(308 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The rigid-body limit equilibrium method cannot reflect the actual stress distribution in a rock mass, and the finite-element-based strength reduction method also has some problems with respect to convergence. To address these problems, a multi-grid method was adopted in this study to establish a structural grid for finite element computation and a slip surface grid for computing slope stability safety factors. This method can be used to determine the stability safety factor for any slip surface or slide block through a combination of nonlinear finite element analysis and limit equilibrium analysis. An ideal elastic–plastic incremental analysis method based on the Drucker–Prager yield criterion was adopted in the nonlinear finite element computation. Elasto-plastic computation achieves good convergence for both small load steps and large load steps and can increase computation precision to a certain extent. To increase the scale and accuracy of the computation, TFINE, a finite element parallel computation program, was used to analyze the influence of grid density on the accuracy of the computation results and was then applied to analysis of the stability of the Jinping high slope. A comparison of the results with results obtained using the rigid-body limit equilibrium method showed that the slope stability safety factors determined using finite element analysis were greater than those obtained using the rigid-body limit equilibrium method and were in better agreement with actual values because nonlinear stress adjustment was considered in the calculation.

Key wordsslope    stability    multi-grid method    nonlinear    finite element method
收稿日期: 2012-11-27      出版日期: 2013-03-05
Corresponding Author(s): LIU Yaoru,Email:liuyaoru@tsinghua.edu.cn   
 引用本文:   
. Slope stability analysis based on a multigrid method using a nonlinear 3D finite element model[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 24-31.
Yaoru LIU, Zhu HE, Bo LI, Qiang YANG. Slope stability analysis based on a multigrid method using a nonlinear 3D finite element model. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2013, 7(1): 24-31.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-013-0190-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2013/V7/I1/24
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
block borderareac/MPaf
NNW fracture sets (NW18 SE65)A30.550.68
A20.170.36
fault f42-9 (NE800 SE48)B30.310.5
B20.020.3
IV rock mass (NE10 SE15)A1 and B10.60.7
Lamprophyre vein-0.40.6
fault f5-0.020.3
Tab.1  
excavation processunexcavatedUnexcavated+ earthquakeexcavated to dam rest elevationfully excavatedfully excavated+ earthquake
sliding block 1composite slip forces(× 104 N)1577841017373251140037911247664613691487
composite slip resistance(× 104 N)2134124420845583194530291701663816681903
block safety factor1.352561.1998671.3891261.3638791.218414
sliding block 2composite slip forces(× 104 N)56353276083809402752324892462658163
composite slip resistance(× 104 N)80828537878520674216843284284207735
block safety factor1.4343181.2949981.6740241.7388511.582949
Tab.2  
1 Bishop A W. The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Geotechnique , 1955, 5(1): 7-17
doi: 10.1680/geot.1955.5.1.7
2 Duncan J M, 0. State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1996, 122(7): 577-596
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:7(577)
3 Zuyu C, Xiaogang W, Jian Y, Zhixin J, Yujie W. Rock slope stability analysis: Theory methods and programs. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2005 (in Chinese)
4 Griffiths D V, Lane P A. Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Geotechnique , 1999, 49(3): 387-403
doi: 10.1680/geot.1999.49.3.387
5 Lenchman J B, Griffiths D V. Analysis of the progression of failure of the earth slopes by finite elements. In: Proceedings of Sessions of Geo-Denver 2000-Slope Stability 2000. GSP 101 , 289: 250-265
6 Liu Y R. Yang Q, Zhu L. Abutment stability analysis of arch dam based on 3D nonlinear finite element method. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering , 2008, 27(1): 3222-3228 (in Chinese)
7 Jiang G L, Magnan J P. Stability analysis of embankments: Comparison of limit analysis with methods of slices. Geotechnique , 1997, 47(4): 857-872
doi: 10.1680/geot.1997.47.4.857
8 Dawson E M, Roth W H, Drescher A. Slope stability analysis by strength reduction. Geotechnique , 1999, 49(6): 835-840
doi: 10.1680/geot.1999.49.6.835
9 Zhao S Y, Zheng Y R, Shi W M, Wang J L. Analysis on safety factor of slope by strength reduction FEM. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 2002, 24(3): 343-346 (in Chinese)
10 Yang Q, Zhu L, Xue L J. Application of limit equilibrium method to stability analysis of Jinping high slope based on 3D multi-grid method. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering , 2005, 24(Supp.2): 5313-5318 (in Chinese)
11 Liu Y R, Yang Q, Xue L J, Zhou W Y. Rock Slop Stability Analysis with Nonlinear Finite Element Method. In: Cai M F, Wang J, eds. Boundaries of Rock Mechanics . London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2008, 503-507
12 Hjiaj M, Fortin J, de Saxce G. A complete stress update algorithm for the non-associated Drucker-Prager model including treatment of the apex. International Journal of Engineering Science , 2003, 41(10): 1109-1143
doi: 10.1016/S0020-7225(02)00376-2
13 Yang Q, Yang X J, Chen X. On integration algorithms for perfect plasticity based on Drucker-Prager criterion. Engineering Mechanics , 2005, 22(4): 15-19 , 47 (in Chinese)
14 Yang Q, Chen X, Zhou W Y. A practical 3D elastic-plastic incremental method in FEM based on D-P yield criteria. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 2002, 24(1): 16-20 (in Chinese)
15 Chen X. Yang Q, Huang Y S. Sub-incremental method for perfect elasto-plastic material based on D-P yield criteria. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering , 2002, Suppl 2: 2465-2469 (in Chinese)
16 Yang Q. Chen X, Zhou W Y. Elastic-plastic basis of geotechnical engineering reinforcement analysis. Rock and Soil Mechanics , 2005, 26(4): 553-557 (in Chinese)
17 Schreyer H L, Kulak R F, Kramer J M. Accurate numerical solutions for elastoplastic models. Journals of Pressure Vessel Technology , 1979, 101(2): 226-234
18 Ortiz M, Popov E P. Accuracy and stability of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 1985, 21(9): 1561-1576
19 Liu Y R, Zhou W Y, Yang Q. A distributed memory parallel element-by-element scheme based on Jacobi-conditioned conjugate gradient for 3-D finite element analysis. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design , 2007, 43(6-7): 494-503
doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2006.12.007
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed