Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2016, Vol. 10 Issue (4): 409-419   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0358-6
  本期目录
Torsional behavior of triangular web profile (TRIWP) steel section by experimental study
Fatimah DE’NAN1(),Hazwani HASAN1,Mohd Hanim OSMAN2,Sariffudin SAAD2
1. School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang 14300, Malaysia
2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai Johor 81310, Malaysia
 全文: PDF(3450 KB)   HTML
Abstract

A triangular web profile (TriWP) is a modified section where the flanges are connected to a web plate of triangular profile. This study examined the torsional behavior of TriWP steel sections and compared to that of the flat web (FW) steel sections. Three types of specimen sizes were used: 180 mm × 75 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm, 200 mm × 100 mm × 8 mm × 6 mm, and 200 mm × 100 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm. All the specimens were loaded vertically until the maximum load was achieved and then the load was released. For both types of specimens, it was observed that the torsional rotation for bigger size [200 mm × 100 mm × 8 mm × 6 mm] were smaller than that of smaller size [180 mm × 75 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm] of the specimens. At the maximum torsional loading, the experimental result was compared to the theoretical calculation. The comparison showed that the percentage difference ranged from 1.10% to 16.80%. From the graph of torsional load versus rotational angle, the torsional rotation for all TriWP steel sections were smaller than that of the FW steel section under the same torsional loading i.e., 0.2 kNm and 1 kNm. The range between FW and TriWP were 3.74 to 71.83 at 0.2 kNm while 14.5 to 75.1 at 1.0 kNm. The findings were shown that the TriWP steel sections had better resistance against torsion in comparison to FW steel section.

Key wordscorrugated web    i-beam    non uniform steel section    torsion resistance    torsion angle    triangular web profile steel section
收稿日期: 2015-07-24      出版日期: 2016-11-29
Corresponding Author(s): Fatimah DE’NAN   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(4): 409-419.
Fatimah DE’NAN,Hazwani HASAN,Mohd Hanim OSMAN,Sariffudin SAAD. Torsional behavior of triangular web profile (TRIWP) steel section by experimental study. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 409-419.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-016-0358-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2016/V10/I4/409
Fig.1  
Researchers behavior results
De’nan and Hashim [22] Effect of web corrugation angle on bending performance of TriWP The deflection of 45° and 75° web corrugation angle were the lowest deflection value either in minor or major axis of TriWP.
De’nan and Hashim [22] TriWP subjected to bending The deflection of TriWP was more in major axis (Ix) and less in minor axis (Iy). So, the TriWP steel section had a higher resistance to bending about minor axis than flat web steel section.
De’nan et.al [20] Effect TriWP on the shear behavior TriWP had a higher shear capacity compared to that of normal flat web profile section.
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
beam designated
(B × D × tf × tw)
P
(kN)
T
(kNmm)
?
theory
degree
d
(mm)
?FW
degree
d
(mm)
?TRIWEB
degree
120 × 300 × 11 × 7
120 × 300 × 11 × 5
120 × 300 × 11 × 3
120 × 300 × 9 × 7
120 × 300 × 9 × 3
120 × 300 × 7 × 3
120 × 300 × 7 × 5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
3.24
3.80
4.12
4.96
7.38
14.96
11.41
3.122
3.389
2.785
4.090
4.724
6.238
6.637
1.19
1.29
1.06
1.56
1.80
2.38
2.53
1.932
2.077
2.188
2.768
3.214
4.671
5.021
0.74
0.79
0.84
1.06
1.23
1.78
1.92
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
specimen (mm) section span (mm) H (mm) B (mm) tf
(mm)
tw
(mm)
q
(mm)
TriWP 2c 180 × 75 × 5 × 2 2500 178 75 5 2 45°
TriWP 2d 180 × 75 × 5 × 2 2500 180 75 5 2 45°
FW 2d 180 × 75 × 5 × 2 2500 180 75 5 2
FW 3a 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 8 6
FW 3b 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 8 6
TriWP 3a 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 8 6 45°
TriWP 3b 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 8 6 45°
FW 3c 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 6 5
FW 3d 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 6 5
TriWP 3c 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 6 5 45°
TriWP 3d 200 × 100 × 8 × 6.0 2200 200 100 6 5 45°
Tab.3  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
specimen dimension (mm) specimen
type
torque (kNm)
0.2 kNm 10.0 kNm
?2 (o) average ?2 (o) percentage difference (%) ?2 (o) average ?2 (o) percentage difference (%)
180 × 75 × 5 × 2 FW 2d 34.2 34.2 24.4 - - -
TriWP 2d 18.9 25.85 - -
TriWP 2c 32.8 -
200 × 100 × 8 × 6 FW 3a 3.6 3.55 71.83 22.1 22.05 75.1
FW 3b 3.5 22.0
TriWP 3a 1.0 1.00 5.0 5.50
TriWP 3b 1.0 6.0
200 × 100 × 6 × 5 FW 3c 2.6 2.70 37.4 16.9 16.95 14.5
FW3d 2.8 17.0
TriWP 3c 2.2 2.60 13.0 14.50
TriWP 3d 3.0 16.0
Tab.4  
Fig.14  
specimen dimension (mm) specimen type deflection d (mm) torsional rotation, ? (o) percentage different (%)
average experimental average of theoretical tan ? = d/15
180 × 75 × 5 × 2 FW 2d 11.556 41.20 37.61 8.70
TriWP 2c 9.469 38.55 32.07 16.80
TriWP 2d 9.327
200 × 100 × 8 × 6 FW 3a 11.718 30.50 33.65 9.40
FW 3b 8.406
TriWP 3a 8.974 22.30 24.37 8.50
TriWP 3b 4.827
200 × 100 × 6 × 5 FW 3c 8.185 35.15 34.78 1.10
FW 3d 13.013
TriWP 3c 8.185 32.35 33.7 4.00
TriWP 3d 12.06
Tab.5  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
1 Sabarish J, Biju V. Web Buckling Of Castellated Beams. Department of Civil Engineerin g, College of Engineering Trivandrum, Kerala, India, 2010
2 Trahair N S, Pi Y L. Torsion, bending and buckling of steel beams. Engineering Structures, 1997, 19(5): 372–377
3 Sapountzakis E J, Mokos V G. Non-uniform torsion of bars of variable cross section. Computers & Structures, 2004, 82(9): 703–715
4 Coull A, Tawfik S Y. Analysis of core structures subjected to torsion. Building and Environment, 1981, 16(3): 221–228
5 Billinghurst A, Williams J R L, Chen G, Trahair N S. Inelastic uniform torsion of steel members. Computers & Structures, 1992, 42(6): 887–894
6 Gotluru B P, Schafer B W, Pekoz T. Torsion in thin-walled cold-formed steel beams. Thin-walled Structures, 2000, 37(2): 127–145
7 Eldib M E A. Shear buckling strength and design of curved corrugated steel webs for bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(12): 2129–2139
8 He J, Liu Y, Lin Z, Cheng A, Yoda T. Shear behavior of partially encased composite I-girder with corrugated steel web: Experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 77: 193–209
9 Ding Y, Jiang K, Liu Y. Nonlinear analysis for PC box-girder with corrugated steel webs under pure torsion. Thin-walled Structures, 2012, 51: 167–173
10 Khalid Y A, Chan C L, Sahari B B, Hamouda A M S. Bending behavior of corrugated web beams. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 150(3): 242–254
11 Korrani H R K N. Lateral bracing of I-girder with corrugated webs under uniform bending. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(12): 1502–1509
12 Jamali S. Torsional behavior of trapezoid web profile. Master Thesis, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, 2002
13 Yi J, Gil H, Youn K, Lee H. Interactive shear buckling behavior of trapezoidally corrugated steel webs. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(6): 1659–16669
14 Moon J, Yi J, Choi B H, Lee H. Shear strength and design of trapezoidally corrugated steel webs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(5): 1198–1205
15 Denan F, Osman M H, Saad S. The study of lateral torsional buckling behavior of beam with trapezoid web steel section by experimental and finite element analysis. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Science, 2010, 221(1-2): 107–111
16 He J, Liu Y, Chen A, Yoda T. Mechanical behavior and analysis of composite bridges with corrugated steel webs: State-of-the-art. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2012, 12(3): 321–338
17 Wang Z, Tan L, Wang Q. Fatigue strength evaluation of welded structural details in corrugated steel web girders. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2014, 13(4): 707–721
18 Den’nan F, Hashim N S.Experimental study on bending behavior of triangular web profile steel beam section. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2013, 2(10): 384–390
19 Nethercot D A, Salter P R, Malik A S. Design of members subject to combined bending and torsion, SCI Publication 057, The Steel Construction Research, 1997
20 Denan F, Hashim N S. The effect of web corrugation angle on bending performance of triangular web profile steel beam section. International Journal of Energy Engineering, 2012, 2(1): 1–4
21 De’nan F. Effect of triangular web profile on the shear behaviour of steel I-beam. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 2013, 4(3): 219–222
22 De’nan F, Omar N, Mustapha M.Finite element analysis of torsion behaviour of triangular web profile beam section. In: Proceedings of the PMM Research Colloqium 2012. Politeknik Merlimau, Melaka, January 2012
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed