Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2018, Vol. 12 Issue (3): 425-437   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0427-5
  本期目录
Proposal of a probabilistic assessment of structural collapse concomitantly subject to earthquake and gas explosion
Gholamreza ABDOLLAHZADEH(), Hadi FAGHIHMALEKI
Department of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Shariati Av., Babol, Mazandaran, Iran
 全文: PDF(908 KB)   HTML
Abstract

In recent decades, many public buildings, located in seismic-prone residential areas, had to grapple with abnormal loads against which the structures were unguarded. In this piece of research, an ordinary three dimensional reinforced concrete building is selected as case study. The building is located in an earthquake-prone region; however, it is designed according to seismic building codes. Yet, it is not shielded against abnormal loads, such as blasts. It is assumed that the building suffers a blast load, due to mechanical/thermal installation failure during or after intense seismic oscillations. These two critical incidents are regarded codependent and compatible. So the researchers developed scenarios and tried to assess different probabilities for each scenario and carried out an analysis to ensure if progressive collapse had set in or not. In the first step, two analysis models were used for each scenario; a non-linear dynamic time history analysis and a blast local dynamic analysis. In the second step, having the structural destructions of the first step in view, a pushdown analysis was carried out to determine the severity of progressive collapse and assess building robustness. Finally, the annual probability of structural collapse under simultaneous earthquake and blast loads was estimated and offered.

Key wordsgas blast    pushdown analysis    progressive collapse    annual probability of structural collapse    3D model of structure
收稿日期: 2017-01-04      出版日期: 2018-05-22
Corresponding Author(s): Gholamreza ABDOLLAHZADEH   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12(3): 425-437.
Gholamreza ABDOLLAHZADEH, Hadi FAGHIHMALEKI. Proposal of a probabilistic assessment of structural collapse concomitantly subject to earthquake and gas explosion. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 425-437.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-017-0427-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2018/V12/I3/425
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
No.EQ. namestationpeak ground acceleration (PGA) (g)peak ground velocity (PGV) (cm/s)peak ground displacemen (PGD) (cm)start time1) (s)end time2) (s)difference (s)3)
A1Kocaeli, TurkeyAtakoy0.16416.211.5911.7424.1912.45
A2NorthridgeBeverly Hills0.6174.88.570.502.011.51
A3TabasBoshrooyeh0.10713.710.501.043.082.04
A4Loma PrietaHalls Valley0.13415.43.302.418.886.47
A5LandersMorongo Valley0.18816.69.453.5115.8912.38
A6Cape MendocinoRio Dell Overpass0.38543.922.030.431.441.01
A7Imperial ValleyChihuahua0.27024.99.080.655.074.42
Tab.1  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
1 Rong H C, Li B. Probabilistic response evaluation for RC flexural members subjected to blast loadings. Structural Safety, 2007, 29(2): 146–163
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.03.004
2 Stewart M G, Netherton M D. Security risks and probabilistic risk assessment of glazing subject to explosive blast loading. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008, 93(4): 627–638
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.007
3 Cizelj L, Leskovar M, Čepin M, Mavko B. A method for rapid vulnerability assessment of structures loaded by outside blasts. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2009, 239(9): 1641–1646
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.07.004
4 Shi Y, Li Z X, Hao H. A new method for progressive collapse analysis of RC frames under blast loading. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(6): 1691–1703
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.017
5 Cullis I G, Schofield J, Whitby A. Assessment of blast loading effects—Types of explosion and loading effects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2010, 87(9): 493–503
6 Fu F. Dynamic response and robustness of tall buildings under blast loading. Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 80: 299–307
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.10.001
7 Parisi F, Augenti N. Influence of seismic design criteria on blast resistance of RC framed buildings: A case study. Engineering Structures, 2012, 44: 78–93
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.046
8 Asprone D, Jalayer F, Prota A, Manfredi G. Proposal of a probabilistic model for multi-hazard risk assessment of structures in seismic zones subjected to blast for the limit state of collapse. Structural Safety, 2010, 32(1): 25–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.002
9 Ellingwood B R. Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse. Perform Construct Facil, 2006, 20(4): 315–323
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(315)
10 Talebi H, Silani M, Rabczuk T. Concurrent multiscale modelling of three dimensional crack and dislocation propagation. Advances in Engineering Software, 2015, 80: 82–92
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.016
11 Talebi H, Silani M, Bordas S, Kerfriden P, Rabczuk T. A computational library for multiscale modelling of material failure. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(5): 1047–1071
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0948-2
12 Talebi H, Silani M, Bordas S P A, Kerfriden P, Rabczuk T. Molecular dynamics/XFEM coupling by a three-dimensional extended bridging domain with applications to dynamic brittle fracture. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 2013, 11(6): 527–541
https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2013005838
13 Ghorashi S, Valizadeh N, Mohammadi S, Rabczuk T. T-spline based XIGA for fracture analysis of orthotropic media. Computers & Structures, 2015, 147: 138–146
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.09.017
14 Areias P M A, Rabczuk T, Camanho P P. Finite strain fracture of 2D problems with injected anisotropic softening elements. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 72: 50–63
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.06.006
15 Dobashi R, Kawamura S, Kuwana K, Nakayama Y. Consequence analysis of blast wave from accidental gas explosions. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2): 2295–2301
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.059
16 Rabczuk T, Areias P M A, Belytschko T. A meshfree thin shell method for nonlinear dynamic fracture. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 72(5): 524–548
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2013
17 Lea C J, Ledin H S. A Review of the State-of-the-Art in Gas Explosion Modelling. Harpur Hill, Buxton: Health and Safety Laboratory, Fire and Explosion Group, 2002
18 Areias P, Rabczuk T, Dias-da-Costa D. Element-wise fracture algorithm based on rotation of edges. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 110: 113–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.06.006
19 Middha P, Hansen O R, Storvik I E. Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(6): 1034–1038
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.07.020
20 Bradley D, Mitcheson A. Mathematical solutions for explosions in spherical vessels. Combustion and Flame, 1976, 26: 201–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(76)90072-9
21 Dobashi R. Experimental study on gas explosion behavior in enclosure. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1997, 10(2): 83–89
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(96)00050-2
22 Zalosh R G. Explosion Protection, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Chapter 3‒16, 1995
23 Zhuang X, Zhu H, Augarde C. An improved meshless Shepard and least square method possessing the delta property and requiring no singular weight function. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(2): 343–357
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0912-1
24 Amiri F, Milan D, Shen Y, Rabczuk T, Arroyo M. Phase-field modeling of fracture in linear thin shells, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 69, 102–109
25 Alashker Y, Li H, El-Tawil S. Approximations in progressive collapse modeling. Structure Engineering, 2011, 137(9): 914–924
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000452
26 Areias P, Rabczuk T. Finite strain fracture of plates and shells with configurational forces and edge rotation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2013, 94(12): 1099–1122
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4477
27 Amiri F, Anitescu C, Arroyo M, Bordas S, Rabczuk T. XLME interpolants, a seamless bridge between XFEM and enriched meshless methods. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(1): 45–57
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0891-2
28 Cai Y, Zhuang X, Zhu H. A generalized and efficient method for finite cover generation in the numerical manifold method. International Journal of Computational Methods, 2013, 10(5): 1350028
https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987621350028X
29 Tsai M H, Lin B H. Investigation of progressive collapse resistance and inelastic response for an earthquake-resistant RC building subjected to column failure. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(12): 3619–3628
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.031
30 Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically non-linear three-dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.019
31 Zhuang X, Augarde C E, Mathisen K M. Fracture modeling using meshless methods and level sets in 3D: Framework and modeling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 92(11): 969–998
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4365
32 General Services Administration (GSA). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects GSA. 2003
33 US Department of Defence. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, Unified Facilities Criteria, UFC 4-023-03. 2009
34 Federal Emergency Management Agency. Guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 273, NEHRP. 1997
35 Comité Européen de Normalisation. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Eurocode 8. 2005
36 Next Generation Attenuation (NGA). Project strong motion database. 2005
37 Seismosoft Company. Seismosignal earthquake engineering software solutions, Version 5.1.0. 2012
38 Trifunac M D, Brady A G. A study on duration of strong earthquake ground motio. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1975, 65: 581–626
39 Ruth P, Marchand K A, Williamson E B. Static equivalency in progressive collapse alternate path analysis: Reducing conservatism while retaining structural integrity. Perform Construct Facil, 2006, 20(4): 349–364
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(349)
40 SAP. 2000. Structural analysis program. Version 18. California: Computers and Structures, Inc. 2015
41 Zhuang X, Huang R, Zhu H, Askes H, Mathisen K. A new and simple locking-free triangular thick plate element using independent shear degrees of freedom. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2013, 75: 1–7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2013.06.005
42 Zhuang X, Augarde C, Mathisen K. Fracture modelling using meshless methods and level sets in 3D: Framework and modelling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 92(11): 969–998
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4365
43 Abdollahzadeh G R, Faghihmaleki H. A method to evaluate the risk-based robustness index in blast-influenced structures. Earthquakes and Structures, 2017, 12(1): 47–54
https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.047
44 Abdollahzadeh G R, Faghihmaleki H. Seismic-explosion risk-based robustness index of structures. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1056789516651919
45 Faghihmaleki H, Najafi E K, Aini A H. Seismic rehabilitation effect in a steel moment frame subjected to tow critical loads. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 2017, 8(1): 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-09-2015-0034
46 Abdollahzadeh G R, Faghihmaleki H. Effect of seismic improvement techniques on a structure in seismic-explosive probabilistic two-hazard risk. International Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 7(3): 314–331
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2016.077726
47 Faghihmaleki H, Nejati F, Roshan A M, Motlagh Y B. An evaluation of multi-hazard risk subjected to blast and earthquake loads in RC moment frame with shear wall. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2017, 12(3): 636–647
48 Khaloo A, Nozhati S, Masoomi H, Faghihmaleki H. Influence of earthquake record truncation on fragility curves of RC frames with different damage indices. Journal of Building Engineering, 2016, 7: 23–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.05.003
49 Abdollahzadeh G R, Faghihmaleki H, Esmaili H. Comparing hysteretic energy and inter-story drift in steel frames with V-shaped brace under near and far fault earthquakes. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.09.015
50 Building and housing research center. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, 4th revision, Standard No. 2800. 2013
51 Asprone D, Jalayer F, Prota A, Manfredi G. Probabilistic assessment of blast-induced progressive collapse in a seismic retrofitted RC structure. In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, 2008
52 Statistical Institute of Pooyesh. The major damages in the building structures due to a strong earthquake. Report No. 93-411. 2012 (Persian)
53 Continuation of assistance to the DPC for the completion and management of the seismic hazard map provided by ordinance PCM 3274 and planning for future developments. Project INGV-DPC. S1. 2007
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed