Application of a weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics multi-phase model to non-cohesive embankment breaching due to flow overtopping

doi:10.1007/s11709-017-0432-8

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

2018, Vol. 12

Issue (3): 412-424 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0432-8

本期目录

Application of a weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics multi-phase model to non-cohesive embankment breaching due to flow overtopping

Rasoul MEMARZADEH(

), Gholamabbas BARANI, Mahnaz GHAEINI-HESSAROEYEH

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

全文: PDF(2479 KB) HTML

Abstract：

The subject of present study is the application of mesh free Lagrangian two-dimensional non-cohesive sediment transport model applied to a two-phase ﬂow over an initially trapezoidal-shaped sediment embankment. The governing equations of the present model are the Navier-Stocks equations solved using Weakly Compressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (WCSPH) method. To simulate the movement of sediment particles, the model considers a powerful two-part technique; when the sediment phase has rigid behavior, only the force term due to shear stress in the Navier-Stokes equations is used for simulation of sediment particles’ movement. Otherwise, all the Navier-Stokes force terms are used for transport simulation of sediment particles. In the present model, the interactions between different phases are calculated automatically, even with considerable difference between the density and viscosity of phases. Validation of the model is performed using simulation of available laboratory experiments, and the comparison between computational results and experimental data shows that the model generally predicts well the flow propagation over movable beds, the induced sediment transport and bed changes, and temporal evolution of embankment breaching.

Key words： WCSPH method non-cohesive sediment transport rheological model two-part technique two-phase dam break

收稿日期: 2017-01-03 出版日期: 2018-05-22

Corresponding Author(s): Rasoul MEMARZADEH

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12(3): 412-424.
Rasoul MEMARZADEH, Gholamabbas BARANI, Mahnaz GHAEINI-HESSAROEYEH. Application of a weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics multi-phase model to non-cohesive embankment breaching due to flow overtopping. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 412-424.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-017-0432-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2018/V12/I3/412

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.1

Fig.8

Fig.9

1	Basco D R, Shin C S. A one-dimensional numerical model for storm-breaching of barrier islands. Journal of Coastal Research, 1999, 15(1): 241–260
2	Tingsanchali T, Chinnarasri C. Numerical modeling of dam failure due to flow overtopping. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2001, 46(1): 113–130 https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660109492804
3	Wang Z, Bowles D S. Three-dimensional non-cohesive earthen dam breach model. Part 1: theory and methodology. Advances in Water Resources, 2006, 29(10): 1528–1545 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.009
4	Faeh R. Numerical modeling of breach erosion of river embankments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 133(9): 1000–1009 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:9(1000)
5	Pontillo M, Schmocker L, Greco M, Hager W H. 1D numerical evaluation of dike erosion due to overtopping. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2010, 48(5): 573–582 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.507005
6	Volz C, Rousselot P, Vetsch D, Faeh R. Numerical modelling of non-cohesive embankment breach with the dual-mesh approach. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2012, 50(6): 587–598 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.732970
7	Wu W, Marsooli R, He Z. Depth-averaged two-dimensional model of unsteady flow and sediment transport due to noncohesive embankment break/breaching. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2012, 138(6): 503–516 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000546
8	Kuiry S N, Ding Y, Wang S S Y. Numerical simulations of morphological changes in barrier islands induced by storm surges and waves using a supercritical flow model. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(1): 57–68 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0235-0
9	Lucy L B. A numerical approach to the testing of the ﬁssion hypothesis. Astronomical Journal, 1977, 82(12): 1013–1024 https://doi.org/10.1086/112164
10	Monaghan J J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1992, 30(1): 543–574 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551
11	Altomare C, Crespo A J C, Domínguez J M, Gómez-Gesteira M, Suzuki T, Verwaest T. Applicability of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for estimation of sea wave impact on coastal structures. Coastal Engineering, 2015, 96: 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.11.001
12	Husain S M, Muhammed J R, Karunarathna H U, Reeve D E. Investigation of pressure variations over stepped spillways using smooth particle hydrodynamics. Advances in Water Resources, 2014, 66: 52–69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.11.013
13	Ataie-Ashtiani B, Shobeyri G. Numerical simulation of landslide impulsive waves by incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2008, 56(2): 209–232 https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1526
14	Capone T, Panizzo A, Monaghan J J. SPH modelling of water waves generated by submarine landslides. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2010, 48(sup1): 80–84 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.9641248
15	Memarzadeh R, Hejazi K. ISPH numerical modeling of nonlinear wave run-up on steep slopes. Journal of the Persian Gulf (Marine Science), 2012, 3(10): 17–26
16	Vacondio R, Rogers B D, Stansby P K, Mignosa P. Shallow water SPH for flooding with dynamic particle coalescing and splitting. Advances in Water Resources, 2013, 58: 10–23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.04.007
17	Bui H H, Fukagawa R. An improved SPH method for saturated soils and its application to investigate the mechanisms of embankment failure: Case of hydrostatic pore-water pressure. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2013, 37(1): 31–50 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1084
18	Hosseini S M, Manzari M T, Hannani S K. A fully explicit three-step SPH algorithm for simulation of non-Newtonian ﬂuid ﬂow. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 2007, 17(7): 715–735 https://doi.org/10.1108/09615530710777976
19	Manenti S, Sibilla S, Gallati M, Agate G, Guandalini R. SPH simulation of sediment flushing induced by a rapid water flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2012, 138(3): 272–284 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000516
20	Razavitoosi S L, Ayyoubzadeh S A, Valizadeh A. Two-phase SPH modelling of waves caused by dam break over a movable bed. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2014, 29(3): 344–356 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(14)60049-4
21	Ran Q, Tong J, Shao S, Fu X, Xu Y. Incompressible SPH scour model for movable bed dam break flows. Advances in Water Resources, 2015, 82: 39–50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.04.009
22	Memarzadeh R, Barani G, Ghaeini-Hessaroeyeh M. Numerical modeling of sediment transport based on unsteady and steady flows by incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, (in press)
23	Asadi Kalameh H, Karamali A, Anitescu C, Rabczuk T. High velocity impact of metal sphere on thin metallic plate using smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2012, 6(2): 101–110
24	Shao S, Lo E. Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non Newtonian ﬂows with a free surface. Advances in Water Resources, 2003, 26(7): 787–800 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(03)00030-7
25	Ata R, Soulaimani A. A stabilized SPH method for inviscid shallow water flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2005, 47(2): 139–159 https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.801
26	Crespo A J C, Gómez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple R A. Modeling dam break behavior over a wet bed by a SPH technique. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134(6): 313–320
27	Lee E S, Moulinec C, Xu R, Violeau D, Laurence D, Stansby P. Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(18): 8417–8436 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.06.005
28	Khayyer A, Gotoh H. On particle-based simulation of a dam break over a wet bed. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2010, 48(2): 238–249 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221681003726361
29	Ferrari A, Fraccarollo L, Dumbser M, Toro E F, Armanini A. Three-dimensional flow evolution after a dam break. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 663: 456–477 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112010003599
30	Chang T J, Kao H M, Chang K H, Hsu M H. Numerical simulation of shallow-water dam break flows in open channels using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2011, 408(1-2): 78–90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.023
31	Shakibaeinia A, Jin Y C. A weakly compressible MPS method for modeling of open-boundary free-surface ﬂow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2010, 63(10): 1208–1232
32	Fourtakas G, Rogers B D. Modelling multi-phase liquid-sediment scour and resuspension induced by rapid flows using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) accelerated with a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU). Advances in Water Resources, 2016, 92: 186–199 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.04.009
33	Jánosi I M, Jan D, Szabó K G, Tél T. Turbulent drag reduction in dam-break ﬂows. Experiments in Fluids, 2004, 37(2): 219–229 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0804-4
34	Schmocker L, Hager W H. Modelling dike breaching due to overtopping. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2009, 47(5): 585–597 https://doi.org/10.3826/jhr.2009.3586
35	Lo E Y M, Gotoh H, Shao S D. Simulation of near-shore solitary wave mechanics by an incompressible SPH method. Applied Ocean Research, 2002, 24(5): 275–286 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1187(03)00002-6
36	Rabczuk T, Belytschko T, Xiao S P. Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 193(12-14): 1035–1063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.005
37	Chen C L, Ling C H. Granular-flow rheology: role of shear-rate number in transition regime. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1996, 122(5): 469–480 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:5(469)
38	Ken-Ichi K. A plasticity theory for the kinematics of ideal granular materials. International Journal of Engineering Science, 1982, 20(1): 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(82)90066-0
39	Monaghan J J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 110(2): 399–406 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.1034
40	Shakibaeinia A, Jin Y C. A mesh-free particle model for simulation of mobile-bed dam break. Advances in Water Resources, 2011, 34(6): 794–807 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.04.011
41	Coleman S E, Andrews D P, Webby M G. Overtopping breaching of noncohesive homogeneous embankments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, 128(9): 829–838 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:9(829)

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed