Laboratory and field evaluation of asphalt pavement surface friction resistance
Zhong WU1(), Chris ABADIE2
1. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, 4101 Gourrier Avenue, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA 2. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 5080 Florida Blvd, Baton Rouge, LA 70806, USA
Pavement surface friction is a significant factor for driving safety and plays a critical role in reducing wet-pavement crashes. However, the current asphalt mixture design procedure does not directly consider friction as a requirement. The objective of this study was to develop a surface friction prediction model that can be used during a wearing course mixture design. To achieve the objective, an experimental study was conducted on the frictional characteristics of typical wearing course mixtures in Louisiana. Twelve wearing course mixtures including dense-graded and open-graded mixes with different combinations of aggregate sources were evaluated in laboratory using an accelerated polishing and testing procedure considering both micro- and macro texture properties. In addition, the surface frictional properties of asphalt mixtures were measured on twenty-two selected asphalt pavement sections using different in situ devices including Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT), Circular Texture Meter (CTM), and Lock-Wheel Skid Trailer (LWST). The results have led to develop a procedure for predicting pavement end-of-life skid resistance based on the aggregate blend polish stone value, gradation parameters, and traffic, which is suited in checking whether the selected aggregates in a wearing course mix design would meet field friction requirements under a certain design traffic polishing.
Blincoe L J, Miller T R, Zaloshnja E, Lawrence B A. The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010. Report No. DOT HS 812 013.Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2014
2
Kuemmel D A, Sontag R C, Crovetti J A, Becker Y, Jaeckel J R, Satanovsky A. Noise and Texture on PCC Pavements. Final report multi state study. Report Number WI/SPR-08-99, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Kinsman Blvd., Madison, WI, 2000
3
Noyce D A, Bahia H U, Yambό J M, Kim G. Incorporating Road Safety into Pavement Management: Maximizing Asphalt Pavement Surface Friction for Road Safety Improvements. Draft Literature Review and State Surveys, Midwest regional University Transportation Center, Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Laboratory. Apr. 29, 2005
4
Masad E, Rezaei A, Chowdhury A, Harris P. Predicting Asphalt Mixture Skid Resistance Based on Aggregate Characteristics. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas, 77843, 2009
5
Hall J W, Smith K L, Titus-Glover L, Wambold J C, Yager T J, Rado Z. Guide for Pavement Friction. NCHRP Project 1-43. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2009
6
Dewey G R, Robords A C, Armour B T, Muethel R. Aggregate Wear and Pavement Friction. Presented at 80th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2001
7
Hogervorst D. Some properties of crushed stone for road surfaces. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 1974, 10(1): 59–64 (Springer) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02634635
8
Rose J G, Gallaway B M. Macrotexture Measurement and Related Skid Resistance at Speeds from 20 to 60 Miles per Hour. Transportation Research Record 341, Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1970
9
Ashby J T. Blended Aggregate Study. LTRC final report 145, Baton Rouge, 1980
10
Bloem D L. Skid-Resistance: The Role of Aggregates and Other Factors. National Sand and Gravel Association Circular 109, Silver Spring, MD, 1971
11
Wu Z, King B. Developments of Surface Friction Guidelines for DOTD FHWA/La.011/485. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, 2012
12
Vollor T W, Hanson D I. Development of Laboratory Procedure for Measuring Friction of HMA Mixtures-Phase 1. NCAT Report 06-06, National Center of Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, AL, 2006
13
Wambold J C, Antle C E, Henry J J, Rado Z. PIARC (Permanent International Association of Road Congress) Report. International PIARC Experiment to Compare and Harmonize Texture and Skid Resistance Measurement, C-1 PIARC Technical Committee on Surface Characteristics, France, 1995
14
Masad E, Rezaei A, Chowdhury A, Harris P. Field Evaluation of Asphalt Mixture Skid Resistance and Its Relationship to Aggregate Characteristics. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843, 2010