Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2018, Vol. 12 Issue (3): 300-317   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0449-7
  本期目录
Experimental study of wind loads on gable roofs of low-rise buildings with overhangs
Peng HUANG, Ling TAO, Ming GU(), Yong QUAN
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
 全文: PDF(4513 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Gable roofs with overhangs (eaves) are the common constructions of low-rise buildings on the southeastern coast of China, and they were vulnerable to typhoons from experience. The wind pressure distributions on gable roofs of low-rise buildings are investigated by a series of wind tunnel tests which consist of 99 test cases with various roof pitches, height-depth ratios and width-depth ratios. The block pressure coefficients and worst negative (block) pressure coefficients on different roof regions of low-rise buildings are proposed for the main structure and building envelope, respectively. The effects of roof pitch, height-depth ratio, and width-depth ratio on the pressure coefficients of each region are analyzed in detail. In addition, the pressure coefficients on the roofs for the main structure and building envelope are fitted according to roof pitch, height-depth ratio and width-depth ratio of the low-rise building. Meanwhile, the rationality of the fitting formulas is verified by comparing the fitting results with the codes of different countries. Lastly, the block pressure coefficients and worst negative pressure coefficients are recommended to guide the design of low-rise buildings in typhoon area and act as references for the future’s modification of wind load codes.

Key wordslow-rise building    gable roof    wind loads    wind tunnel test    block pressure coefficient    load code
收稿日期: 2016-09-22      出版日期: 2018-05-22
Corresponding Author(s): Ming GU   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12(3): 300-317.
Peng HUANG, Ling TAO, Ming GU, Yong QUAN. Experimental study of wind loads on gable roofs of low-rise buildings with overhangs. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 300-317.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-018-0449-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2018/V12/I3/300
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
cases pitch
b
mean roof
height
H (m)
depth
D (m)
width
B (m)
height of building eave
H0 (m)
horizontal length of overhang
De (m)
comments
1–9 0.0° 6.6, 9.6, 12.6 12.0 7.2, 14.4, 21.6 6.6, 9.6, 12.6 0.60 with overhangs
10–18 4.8°
19–27 9.5°
28–36 14.0° 7.35, 10.35, 13.35
37–45 18.4° 7.6, 10.6, 13.6
46–54 21.8° 7.8, 10.8, 13.8
55–63 26.6° 8.1, 11.1, 14.1
64–72 30° 8.33, 11.33, 14.33
73–81 35° 8.7, 11.7, 14.7 0.57
82–90 45° 9.6, 12.6, 15.6 0.40
91–99 60° 11.8, 15.8, 18.8 0.23
Tab.1  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
coefficients Ou Ru Rl Ra Rb Rc
correlation coefficient 0.97 0.98 0.73 0.88 0.85 0.86
quality coefficient (%) 6.8 3.0 8.3 3.2 8.9 5.6
Tab.2  
Fig.9  
coefficient Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6
correlation coefficient 0.72 0.86 0.89 0.93 0.92 0.86
quality coefficient (%) 7.5 11.1 13.6 8.0 10.0 8.7
Tab.3  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Roof pitch b (°) <10 14 18.4 21.8 26.6 30 35 45 60
Ou -2.0 -1.8 -1.6 -1.4 -1.1 -0.9 -0.6 -0.2 0.1
Tab.4  
Roof area   Roof pitch b (°) H/D>1 H/D≤1
Ru (windward roof) Positive b≤30 -
b=35 0.1
b=45 0.3
b=60 0.5
Negative b<10 Similar to Ra, Rb, Rc *
b=14 -0.8 -0.7
b=18.4 -0.6 -0.5
b=21.8 -0.5 -0.4
b=26.6 -0.4 -0.3
b=30 -0.3 -0.25
b=35 -0.2 -0.15
    b>35 -
Tab.5  
Rl β<10 β= 14 β=18.4 18.4<β≤30 β=35 β≥45
B/D>1 Similar to Ra, Rb, Rc * −0.7 −0.8 −0.9 −0.8 −0.75
B/D≤1 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7
Tab.6  
item value
Ra H/B>1 ?0.9
H/B≤1 ?0.8
Rb H/B>1 ?0.7
H/B≤1 ?0.5
Rc H/B>1 ?0.6
H/B≤1 ?0.5
Tab.7  
Roof pitch Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6
b≤5 -2.6 -3.4 -3.0 -5.2 -3.8 -5.5
b=10 -2.6 -3.4 -3.0 -5.2 -4.6 -5.5
b=20 -2.6 -3.4 -4.1 -4.4 -6.2 -5.5
b=25 -2.6 -3.2 -3.8 -4.0 -5.8 -5.5
b=30 -2.6 -2.8 -3.4 -3.5 -5.3 -5.1
b=35 -2.6 -2.6 -3.0 -3.5 -4.8 -4.8
b≥45 -2.6 -2.6 -3.0 -3.5 -3.8 -4.0
Tab.8  
1 Cao S Y, Ge Y J, Tamura Y. Wind damage in China caused by Typhoon Rananim. Proceedings of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, Seoul, Korea, 2005
2 Stathopoulos T. Turbulent wind action on low-rise buildings. Dissertation for PhD degree. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 1979
3 Holmes J D. Wind pressures on tropical housing. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1994, 53(1–2): 105–123
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90021-3
4 Meecham D, Surry D, Davenport A G. The magnitude and distribution of wind-induced pressures on hip and gable roofs. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1991, 38(2–3): 257–272
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(91)90046-Y
5 Xu Y L, Reardon G F. Variations of wind pressure on hip roofs with roof pitch. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998, 73(3): 267–284
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00291-2
6 Uematsu Y, Isyumov N. Wind pressures acting on low-rise buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 82(1–3): 1–25
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00036-7
7 Gavanski E, Kordi B, Kopp G A, Vickery P J. Wind loads on roof sheathing of houses. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2013, 114: 106–121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.011
8 Huang P, Gu M, Jia C G, Quan D L. Field measurement of wind effects of roof accessory structures on gable-roofed low-rise building. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2013, 731572
9 Gerhardt H J, Kramer C. Effects of building geometry on roof wind loading. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1992, 43(1–3): 1765–1773
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90589-3
10 Krishna P. Wind loads on low rise buildings—A review. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 54–55: 383–396
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00055-I
11 Ginger J D, Holmes J D. Wind loads on long, low-rise buildings. Proceedings of the 5th Asia Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, 2001, 529–532
12 Kanda M, Maruta E. Characteristics of fluctuating wind pressure on long low-rise buildings with gable roofs. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 50: 173–182
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90072-V
13 Ginger J D, Holmes J D. Effect of building length on wind loads on low-rise buildings with a steep roof pitch. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(11): 1377–1400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.08.003
14 Ho T C E, Surry D, Morrish D, Kopp G A. The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 1. Archiving format and basic aerodynamic data. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2005, 93(1): 1–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.006
15 Robertson A P. Effect of eaves detail on wind pressures over an industrial building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1991, 38(2–3): 325–333
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(91)90051-W
16 Stathopoulos T, Luchian H. Wind-induced forces on eaves of low buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1994, 52: 249–261
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90051-5
17 Savory D J. Digital terrain classification via scale-sensitive edge detection: hillslope characterization for soil-landscape analysis. University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1992
18 Ahmad S, Kumar K. Wind pressures on low-rise hip roof buildings. Wind and Structures, 2002, 5(6): 493–514
https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2002.5.6.493
19 Huang P, Peng X L, Gu M. Aerodynamic devices to mitigate rooftop suctions on a gable roof building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014a, 135: 90–104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.10.015
20 Huang P, Tao L, Gu M, Quan Y. Wind effects of architectural details on gable-roofed low-rise buildings in southeastern coast of China. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2014b, 17(11): 1551–1565
https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.11.1551
21 Architectural Institute of Japan. Recommendations for loads on buildings, Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan
22 ASCE/SEI 7. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, USA, 2010
23 AS/NZS 1170.2, 2002. Structural design actions, Part 2: Wind actions. Australian/New Zealand Standard, 2004
24 International Standard. Bases for design of structures, loads, forces and other actions. Wind actions on structures, ISO 4354:2009, Technical Committee ISO/TC98, Subcommittee SC3, Switzerland, 2009
25 National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Load Code for the Design of Building Structures GB50009-2012 (English Edition). Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2012
26 Wang Y. Codification of wind pressure coefficients on claddings/components of low-rise buildings. Dissertation for Master degree. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2011
27 Lawson T V. The design of cladding. Building and Environment, 1976, 11(1): 37–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(76)90017-2
28 Lawson T V. Wind Effects on Buildings: Design Applications. Barking: Applied Science Publishers, 1980
29 Holmes J D. Equivalent time averaging in wind engineering. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1997, 72: 411–419
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00266-3
30 Uematsu Y, Isyumov N. Peak gust pressures acting on the roof and wall edges of a low-rise building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998, 77–78: 217–231
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00145-7
31 Sadek F, Simiu E. Peak non-Gaussian wind effects for database-assisted low-rise building design. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2002, 128: 530–539
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(530)
32 St. Pierre L M, Kopp G A, Surry D, Ho T C E. The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 2. Comparison of data with wind load provisions. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2005, 93(1): 31–59
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.007
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed