Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2019, Vol. 13 Issue (5): 1171-1182   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0544-4
  本期目录
Neural network control for earthquake structural vibration reduction using MRD
Khaled ZIZOUNI1(), Leyla FALI2, Younes SADEK2, Ismail Khalil BOUSSERHANE1,3
1. ArcihPEL Laboratory, University TAHRI Mohammed, Bechar, PB 417, Algeria
2. FIMAS Laboratory, University TAHRI Mohammed, Bechar, PB 417, Algeria
3. Laboratory of Smart-Grid and Renewable Energies, University TAHRI Mohammed, Bechar, PB 417, Algeria
 全文: PDF(2117 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Structural safety of building particularly that are intended for exposure to strong earthquake loads are designed and equipped with high technologies of control to ensure as possible as its protection against this brutal load. One of these technologies used in the protection of structures is the semi-active control using a Magneto Rheological Damper device. But this device need an adequate controller with a robust algorithm of current or tension adjustment to operate which is further discussed in the following of this paper. In this study, a neural network controller is proposed to control the MR damper to eliminate vibrations of 3-story scaled structure exposed to Tōhoku 2011 and Boumerdès 2003 earthquakes. The proposed controller is derived from a linear quadratic controller designed to control an MR damper installed in the first floor of the structure. Equipped with a feedback law the proposed control is coupled to a clipped optimal algorithm to adapt the current tension required to the MR damper adjustment. To evaluate the performance control of the proposed design controller, two numerical simulations of the controlled structure and uncontrolled structure are illustrated and compared.

Key wordsMR damper    semi-active control    earthquake vibration    neural network    linear quadratic control
收稿日期: 2018-06-14      出版日期: 2019-09-11
Corresponding Author(s): Khaled ZIZOUNI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(5): 1171-1182.
Khaled ZIZOUNI, Leyla FALI, Younes SADEK, Ismail Khalil BOUSSERHANE. Neural network control for earthquake structural vibration reduction using MRD. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1171-1182.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-019-0544-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2019/V13/I5/1171
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
item peak displacements (mm)
under 2011 Tōhoku earthquake under 2003 Boumerdès earthquake
1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor 1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor
uncontrolled 1.597 2.476 2.934 0.623 0.943 1.138
controlled 0.444 0.799 0.967 0.186 0.308 0.482
reduction 72.20% 67.73% 67.14% 70.14% 67.33% 57.64%
Tab.1  
1 T Cherkaoui, F Medina, D Hatzfeld. The Agadir earthquake of February 29, 1960, examination of some of the parameters. Monografia of Instituto Geografico Nacional, 1991, 8: 133–148
2 I G Buckle. Passive control of structures for seismic loads. In: Proceeding of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, 2000
3 C Riascos, J M Casas, P Thomson. Semi-active tuned liquid column damper implementation with real-time hybrid simulations. In: Proceeding SPIE, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems. Nevada, 2016, 1–9
4 N R Fisco, H Adeli. Smart structures: Part I-Active and semi-active control. Scientia Iranica, 2011, 18(3): 275–284
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.034
5 S J Dyke, B F Spencer, M K Sain, J D Carlson. Experimental verification of semi-active structural control strategies using acceleration feedback. In: Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control. Chiba, 1996, 3: 291–296
6 J T P Yao. Concept of structural control. Journal of the Structural Division, 1972, 98(7): 1567–1574
7 S G Luca, F Chira, V O Rosca. Passive, active and semi-active control systems in civil engineering. Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Jassy, Constructions. Architecture Section, 2005, 3–4: 23–31
8 D Cancellara, M Pasquino. A new passive seismic control device for protection of structures under anomalous seismic events. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 82: 651–656
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.82.651
9 G L C M Abreu, V Lopes Jr, M J Brennan. Robust control of a two-floors building model using active mass driver. In: Proceeding of ISMA2010 Including USD2010, 2012, 215–226
10 M Abdel-Rohman. Optimal design of active TMD for buildings control. Building and Environment, 1984, 19(3): 191–195
https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(84)90026-X
11 M Battaini, F Casciati, L Faravelli. Fuzzy control of structural vibration: An active mass system driven by a fuzzy controller. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27(11): 1267–1276
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(1998110)27:11<1267::AID-EQE782>3.0.CO;2-D
12 S J Dyke, B F Spencer. A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference, Intelligent Information Systems. The Bahamas, 1997
13 J D Carlson. What makes a good MR fluid? Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2002, 13(7–8): 431–435
https://doi.org/10.1106/104538902028221
14 F Oliveira, M A Botto, P Morais, A Suleman. Semi-active structural vibration control of base-isolated buildings using magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 2017, 37(3): 565–576
15 O Yoshida, S J Dyke, L M Giacosa, K Z Truman. Experimental verification of torsional response control of asymmetric buildings using MR dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2003, 32(13): 2085–2105
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.316
16 F Casciati, J Rodellar, U Yildirim. Active and semi-active control of structures –– theory and applications: A review of recent advances. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2012, 23(11): 1181–1195
https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X12445029
17 K M Hamdia, M Silani, X Zhuang, P He, T Rabczuk. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 215–227
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-017-0210-6
18 K M Hamdia, T Lahmer, T Nguyen-Thoi, T Rabczuk. Predicting the fracture toughness of PNCs: A stochastic approach based on ANN and ANFIS. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 102: 304–313
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.02.045
19 T Pajchrowski, K Zawirski. Application of artificial neural network to robust speed control of servodrive. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2007, 54(1): 200–207
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2006.888782
20 S Maiti, V Verma, C Chakraborty, Y Hori. An adaptive speed sensorless induction motor drive with artificial neural network for stability enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2012, 8(4): 757–766
https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2012.2210229
21 K Zizouni, I K Bousserhane, A Hamouine, L M R Fali. Damper-LQR control for earthquake vibration mitigation. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 2017, 8(11): 201–207
22 X Liu, Y Wu, Y Zhang, S Xiao. A control method to make LQR robust: A planes cluster approaching mode. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2014, 12(2): 302–308
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-012-0435-0
23 A Montazeri, J Poshtan, A Choobdar. Performance and robust stability trade-off in minimax LQG control of vibrations in flexible structures. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(10): 2407–2413
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.011
24 V A Neelakantan, G N Washington. Vibration control of structural systems using MR dampers and a ‘Modified’ sliding mode control technique. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2008, 19(2): 211–224
https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06074509
25 M Aldawod, B Samali, F Naghdy, K C S Kwok. Active control of along wind response of tall building using a fuzzy controller. Engineering Structures, 2001, 23(11): 1512–1522
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00037-2
26 A H Heidari, S Etedali, M R Javaheri-Tafti. A hybrid LQR-PID control design for seismic control of buildings equipped with ATMD. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 44–57
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0382-6
27 K C Schurter, P N Roschke. Neuro-Fuzzy control of structures using magnetorheological dampers. In: Proceedings of the American control conference. Arlington, Virginia, 2001, 1097–1102
28 L M Jansen, S J Dyke. Semi-active control strategies for MR dampers: A comparative study. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126(8): 795–803
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:8(795)
29 D A Pohoryles, P Duffour. Adaptive control of structures under dynamic excitation using magnetorheological dampers: An improved clipped-optimal control algorithm. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2015, 21(13): 2569–2582
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546313510543
30 E C Bingham. An investigation of the laws of plastic flow. U.S. Bureau of Standards Bulletin, 1916, 13(2): 309–353
https://doi.org/10.6028/bulletin.304
31 D R Gamota, F E Filisko. Dynamic mechanical studies of electrorheological materials: Moderate frequencies. Journal of Rheology (New York, N.Y.), 1991, 35(3): 399–425
https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550221
32 M Ismail, F Ikhouane, J Rodellar. The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2009, 16(2): 161–188
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-009-9031-8
33 B F Spencer Jr, S J Dyke, M K Sain, J D Carlson. Phenomenological model for Magneto-Rheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1997, 123(3): 230–238
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)
34 D S Naidu. Optimal Control Systems. Special Indian ed. FL: CRC Press, 2002
35 X Liu, Y Wu, Y Zhang, S Xiao. A control method to make LQR robust: A planes cluster approaching mode. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2014, 12(2): 302–308
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-012-0435-0
36 S Barnett, C Storey. Some results on the sensitivity and synthesis of asymptotically stable linear and non-linear systems. Automatica, 1968, 4(4): 187–194
https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(68)90013-7
37 P Lancaster, L Rodman. Algebraic Riccati Equations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
38 N Vu-Bac, T Lahmer, X Zhuang, T Nguyen-Thoi, T Rabczuk. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.06.005
39 X Cui, K G Shin. Direct control and coordination using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(3): 686–697
https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256542
40 A H Rabiee, A H D Markazi. Semi-active adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control of buildings under earthquake excitations. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering. Barcelona, Spain, 2017
41 S J Dyke, B F Spencer Jr, M K Sain, J D Carlson. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Materials and Structures, 1996, 5(5): 565–575
https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed