Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2020, Vol. 14 Issue (6): 1299-1315   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0712-6
  本期目录
An artificial neural network model on tensile behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag power
Fangyu LIU1, Wenqi DING2,3(), Yafei QIAO2,3(), Linbing WANG1
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering (Tongji University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200092, China
 全文: PDF(4567 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The tensile behavior of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HFRC) is important to the design of HFRC and HFRC structure. This study used an artificial neural network (ANN) model to describe the tensile behavior of HFRC. This ANN model can describe well the tensile stress-strain curve of HFRC with the consideration of 23 features of HFRC. In the model, three methods to process output features (no-processed, mid-processed, and processed) are discussed and the mid-processed method is recommended to achieve a better reproduction of the experimental data. This means the strain should be normalized while the stress doesn’t need normalization. To prepare the database of the model, both many direct tensile test results and the relevant literature data are collected. Moreover, a traditional equation-based model is also established and compared with the ANN model. The results show that the ANN model has a better prediction than the equation-based model in terms of the tensile stress-strain curve, tensile strength, and strain corresponding to tensile strength of HFRC. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of the ANN model is also performed to analyze the contribution of each input feature to the tensile strength and strain corresponding to tensile strength. The mechanical properties of plain concrete make the main contribution to the tensile strength and strain corresponding to tensile strength, while steel fibers tend to make more contributions to these two items than PVA fibers.

Key wordsartificial neural network    hybrid fiber reinforced concrete    tensile behavior    sensitivity analysis    stress-strain curve
收稿日期: 2020-08-04      出版日期: 2021-01-12
Corresponding Author(s): Wenqi DING,Yafei QIAO   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(6): 1299-1315.
Fangyu LIU, Wenqi DING, Yafei QIAO, Linbing WANG. An artificial neural network model on tensile behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag power. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1299-1315.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-020-0712-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2020/V14/I6/1299
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
parts feature
strain strain
steel fiber fiber volume of steel fiber
weight of steel fiber
length of steel fiber
diameter of steel fiber
aspect ratio of steel fiber
reinforcement index of steel fiber
PVA fiber fiber volume of PVA fiber
weight of PVA fiber
length of PVA fiber
diameter of PVA fiber
aspect ratio of PVA fiber
reinforcement index of PVA fiber
mechanical properties of plain concrete elastic modulus of plain concrete
tensile strength of plain concrete
strain corresponding to tensile strength of plain concrete
components of HFRC weight of the cement
weight of fly ash
weight of slag powder
weight of water
weight of coarse aggregate
weight of fine aggregate
water binder ratio
Tab.1  
cementitious material fiber volume (%) fiber length (mm) fiber diameter (mm) Ref.
steel fiber PVA fiber steel fiber PVA fiber steel fiber PVA fiber
cement+fly ash+slag powder
(HFRC)
0.5 0.5 38 12 0.677 0.039 [9]
0.5 1.0
0.5 1.5
1.0 0.5
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.5
1.5 0.5
1.5 1.0
1.5 1.5
cement
(HFRC)
0.8 0.1 35/50 8/12 0.55/0.75 0.04 [10]
0.8 0.2
1.3 0.1
1.3 0.2
cement
(HFRC)
0.05 0.15 38 12 1.10 0.04 [33]
0.1 0.3
0.3 0.6
0.03 0.17
0.06 0.34
0.11 0.69
0.02 0.18
0.04 0.36
0.08 0.72
cement
(HFRC)
0.25 0.07 12/15 30/60 0.5/0.73 0.015 [34]
0.25 0.14
0.51 0.07
0.51 0.14
cement
+GGBS*+silica fume
(HFRC)
0.25 0.25 20 6 0.4 0.12 [35]
0.5 0.25
0.75 0.25
1 0.25
1.25 0.25
0.25 0.25
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
type feature mean median standard deviation
output tensile stress 2.40 2.47 0.97
tensile strength 4.10 4.02 0.20
strain corresponding to tensile strength 0.000253 0.000168 0.000172
input strain 0.002542 0.001309 0.003017
fiber volume of steel fiber 1.04 1.00 0.38
weight of steel fiber 81.84 78.50 29.79
length of steel fiber 39.53 38.00 4.54
diameter of steel fiber 0.68 0.68 0.05
aspect ratio of steel fiber 58.51 56.13 4.13
reinforcement index of steel fiber 0.61 0.56 0.22
fiber volume of PVA fiber 0.81 1.00 0.52
weight of PVA fiber 10.56 13.00 6.81
length of PVA fiber 11.59 12.00 1.21
diameter of PVA fiber 0.04 0.04 0.00
aspect ratio of PVA fiber 295.53 307.69 32.32
reinforcement index of PVA fiber 2.48 3.08 1.64
elastic modulus of plain concrete 35915 35369 1135
tensile strength of plain concrete 3.28 3.41 0.21
strain corresponding to tensile strength of plain concrete 0.000087 0.000088 0.000019
weight of the cement 282 225 98
weight of fly ash 56 75 33
weight of slag powder 56 75 33
weight of water 174 165 16
weight of coarse aggregate 1019 1024 8
weight of fine aggregate 756 785 50
water binder ratio 0.443 0.440 0.004
Tab.3  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
mix ID MAE ????R2
ANN equation ANN equation
no-processed mid-processed processed no-processed mid-processed processed
S0.5P0.5 0.047 0.046 0.075 0.119 0.992 0.994 0.986 0.973
S0.5P1.0 0.045 0.050 0.094 0.199 0.996 0.995 0.977 0.929
S0.5P1.5 0.041 0.045 0.068 0.482 0.996 0.995 0.987 0.561
S1.0P0.5 0.077 0.076 0.109 0.234 0.982 0.984 0.968 0.918
S1.0P1.0 0.048 0.065 0.092 0.485 0.996 0.992 0.983 0.569
S1.0P1.5 0.068 0.059 0.143 0.692 0.989 0.992 0.955 0.350
S1.5P0.5 0.124 0.123 0.239 0.688 0.953 0.964 0.882 0.354
S1.5P1.0 0.048 0.049 0.132 0.571 0.997 0.997 0.977 0.622
S1.5P1.5 0.052 0.032 0.080 1.139 0.997 0.998 0.990 0.139
Tab.4  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
1 C Gong, W Ding, K M Mosalam, S Günay, K Soga. Comparison of the structural behavior of reinforced concrete and steel fiber reinforced concrete tunnel segmental joints. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 68: 38–57
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.010
2 F Stoll, J Saliba L E, Casper E. Experimental study of CFRP-prestressed high-strength concrete bridge beams. Composite Structures, 2000, 49(2): 191–200
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00134-8
3 J Sim, C Park, D Y Moon. Characteristics of basalt fiber as a strengthening material for concrete structures. Composites Part B, Engineering, 2005, 36(6–7): 504–512
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.002
4 L Xu, H Xu, Y Chi, Y Zhang. Experimental study on tensile strength of steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete. Advanced Science Letters, 2011, 4(3): 911–916
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2011.1740
5 D L Nguyen, D J Kim, G S Ryu, K T Koh. Size effect on flexural behavior of ultra-high-performance hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete. Composites Part B, Engineering, 2013, 45(1): 1104–1116
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.012
6 Z Wu, C Shi, W He, D Wang. Static and dynamic compressive properties of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) with hybrid steel fiber reinforcements. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 79: 148–157
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.02.010
7 F Liu, W Ding, Y Qiao. An experimental investigation on the integral waterproofing capacity of polypropylene fiber concrete with fly ash and slag powder. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 212: 675–686
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.027
8 R Mu, C Miao, X Luo, W Sun. Interaction between loading, freeze-thaw cycles, and chloride salt attack of concrete with and without steel fiber reinforcement. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(7): 1061–1066
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00746-9
9 F Liu, W Ding, Y Qiao. Experimental investigation on the tensile behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag powder. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 241: 118000
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118000
10 Y Zhou, Y Xiao, A Gu, G Zhong, S Feng. Orthogonal experimental investigation of steel-PVA fiber-reinforced concrete and its uniaxial constitutive model. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 197: 615–625
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.203
11 F Liu, W Ding, Y Qiao. Experimental investigation on the flexural behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag powder. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 228: 116706
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116706
12 J Lawler, T Wilhelm, D Zampini, S P Shah. Fracture processes of hybrid fiber-reinforced mortar. Materials and Structures, 2003, 36(3): 197–208
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479558
13 J S Lawler, D Zampini, S P Shah. Microfiber and macrofiber hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2005, 17(5): 595–604
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(595)
14 D L Nguyen, G S Ryu, K T Koh, D J Kim. Size and geometry dependent tensile behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014, 58: 279–292
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.072
15 P Pujadas, A Blanco, S Cavalaro, A Aguado. Plastic fibres as the only reinforcement for flat suspended slabs: Experimental investigation and numerical simulation. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 57: 92–104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.082
16 M Hsie, C Tu, P Song. Mechanical properties of polypropylene hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008, 494(1–2): 153–157
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.05.037
17 Y Chi, L Xu, H Yu. Constitutive modeling of steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete using a non-associated plasticity and its numerical implementation. Composite Structures, 2014, 111: 497–509
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.025
18 Y Chi, L Xu, Y Zhang. Experimental study on hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to uniaxial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014, 26(2): 211–218
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000764
19 M Açikgenç, M Ulaş, K E Alyamaç. Using an artificial neural network to predict mix compositions of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2015, 40(2): 407–419
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1549-x
20 H Mashhadban, S S Kutanaei, M A Sayarinejad. Prediction and modeling of mechanical properties in fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete using particle swarm optimization algorithm and artificial neural network. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 119: 277–287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.034
21 K Jiang, Q Han, Y Bai, X Du. Data-driven ultimate conditions prediction and stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Composite Structures, 2020, 242: 112094
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112094
22 K M Hamdia, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. An efficient optimization approach for designing machine learning models based on genetic algorithm. Neural Computing & Applications, 2020 (in press)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05035-x
23 K M Hamdia, T Lahmer, T Nguyen-Thoi, T Rabczuk. Predicting the fracture toughness of PNCs: A stochastic approach based on ANN and ANFIS. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 102: 304–313
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.02.045
24 KM Hamdia, H Ghasemi, X Zhuang, N Alajlan, T Rabczuk. Computational machine learning representation for the flexoelectricity effect in truncated pyramid structures. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 79–87
25 H Guo, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(2): 433–456
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06660
26 C Anitescu, E Atroshchenko, N Alajlan, T Rabczuk. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06641
27 E Samaniego, C Anitescu, S Goswami, V M Nguyen-Thanh, H Guo, K Hamdia, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112790
28 J Pizarroso, J Portela, A Muñoz. NeuralSens: Sensitivity analysis of neural networks. 2020, arXiv preprint arXiv:200211423
29 A Saltelli. Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Analysis, 2002, 22(3): 579–590
https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00040
30 M H Shojaeefard, M Akbari, M Tahani, F Farhani. Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural network outputs in friction stir lap joining of aluminum to brass. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 2013: 574914
31 M Stone. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, 1974, 36(2): 111–133
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
32 V Nair, G E Hinton. Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10). Haifa, 2010, 807–814
33 B Liu. Study on Durability and Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Jinzhou: Liaoning University of Technology, 2019
34 K H Yang. Tests on concrete reinforced with hybrid or monolithic steel and polyvinyl alcohol fibers. ACI Materials Journal, 2011, 108(6): 664–672
35 R Hai, J Liu, M Zhang, L Zhang. Performance of hybrid steel-polyvinyl alcohol fiber reinforced ultra high performance concrete. Concrete (China), 2016, 319: 95–97
36 F Pedregosa, G Varoquaux, A Gramfort, V Michel, B Thirion, O Grisel, M Blondel, P Prettenhofer, R Weiss, V Dubourg, J Vanderplas, A Passos, D Cournapeau, M Brucher, M Perrot, E Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011, 12: 2825–2830
37 A Paszke, S Gross, F Massa, A Lerer, J Bradbury, G Chanan, T Killeen, Z Lin, N Gimelshein, L Antiga, A Desmaison, A Köpf, E Yang, Z DeVito, M Raison, A Tejani, S Chilamkurthy, B Steiner, L Fang, J Bai, S Chintala. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2019, 8026–8037
38 T J F Marian Tietz, N Daniel, B Benjamin. Skorch: A Scikit-Learn Compatible Neural Network Library that Wraps PyTorch. 2017
39 D P Kingma, J Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 2014, arXiv preprint arXiv:14126980
40 C Cortes, V Vapnik. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3): 273–297
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
41 L Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
42 C E Rasmussen. Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning. Springer: Summer School on Machine Learning, 2003, 63–71
43 Chinese Standard. Code for Design of Concrete Structures (GB 50010–2010). Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2010
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed