Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2021, Vol. 15 Issue (3): 576-594   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0728-6
  本期目录
Fatigue shear performance of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (glass-fiber-reinforced polymer+ steel) rebars and stirrups
Peng ZHU1, Jiajing XU2, Wenjun QU1()
1. Department of Structural Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2. School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
 全文: PDF(4288 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Reinforced concrete beams consisting of both steel and glass-fiber-reinforced polymer rebars exhibit excellent strength, serviceability, and durability. However, the fatigue shear performance of such beams is unclear. Therefore, beams with hybrid longitudinal bars and hybrid stirrups were designed, and fatigue shear tests were performed. For specimens that failed by fatigue shear, all the glass-fiber-reinforced polymer stirrups and some steel stirrups fractured at the critical diagonal crack. For the specimen that failed by the static test after 8 million fatigue cycles, the static capacity after fatigue did not significantly decrease compared with the calculated value. The initial fatigue level has a greater influence on the crack development and fatigue life than the fatigue level in the later phase. The fatigue strength of the glass-fiber-reinforced polymer stirrups in the specimens was considerably lower than that of the axial tension tests on the glass-fiber-reinforced polymer bar in air and beam-hinge tests on the glass-fiber-reinforced polymer bar, and the failure modes were different. Glass-fiber-reinforced polymer stirrups were subjected to fatigue tension and shear, and failed owing to shear.

Key wordsfatigue    shear    hybrid stirrups    hybrid reinforcement    fiber-reinforced polymer
收稿日期: 2020-10-29      出版日期: 2021-07-14
Corresponding Author(s): Wenjun QU   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(3): 576-594.
Peng ZHU, Jiajing XU, Wenjun QU. Fatigue shear performance of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (glass-fiber-reinforced polymer+ steel) rebars and stirrups. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 576-594.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-021-0728-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2021/V15/I3/576
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
type Nominal diameter (mm) nominal area (mm2) immersion area (mm2) yield strength (MPa) ultimate strength (MPa) modulus of elasticity (GPa)
steel 7.9 49 448 579 193
13.7 147 520 641 200
21.5 363 423 570 201
GFRP 7.9 49 55 1203 45
24.5 471 503 815 42
Tab.1  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
specimen fatigue phase minimum load Pmin (kN) maximum load Pmax (kN) frequency (Hz)
FS-2.54-0.6 50 (0.12Pu) 250 (0.6Pu) 4
FS-2.54-0.4 before 2 million cycles 34 (0.08Pu) 168 (0.4Pu) 6
2 to 4.5 million cycles 50 (0.12Pu) 250 (0.6Pu)
after 4.5 million cycles 25 (0.06Pu) 250 (0.6Pu)
FS-2.07-0.4 before 4 million cycles 42 (0.08Pu) 208 (0.4Pu) 6
4 to 4.5 million cycles 50 (0.10Pu) 250 (0.48Pu)
after 4.5 million cycles 25 (0.05Pu) 250 (0.48Pu)
Tab.2  
Fig.5  
specimens fracture location
steel stirrups GFRP stirrups longitudinal steel bars longitudinal GFRP bars
FS-2.54-0.6 #9 UB-S #9 U-N
#10 M-S #10 M-N
#9 UB-S #9 U-N
#10 M-S #10 M-N
#11 LB-S #11 LB-N
FS-2.54-0.4 #9 UB-S #9 UB-N
#11 LB-S
#9 UB-S #9 U-N
#10 M-S #10 M-N
#11 LB-S #11 LB-N
location between #10 and #11
FS-2.07-0.4 #9 T
#10 M-S #10 M-N
#11 LB-N
Tab.3  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
beam fatigue phase maximum stress range in GFRP stirrups (MPa) maximum stress range in steel stirrups (MPa) maximum stress range in longitudinal steel bars (MPa) maximum stress range in longitudinal GFRP bars (MPa)
FS-2.54-0.6 1 cycle 11.3 56.9 175.5 54.9
FS-2.54-0.4 1 cycle ?0.5 ?1.4 ?97.9 14.7
2 million cycles 73.0 74.7 220.3 24.7
4.5 million cycles 93.2 55.8 227.5 22.1
FS-2.07-0.4 1 cycle ?3.7 19.7 ?85.0 30.1
4 million cycles 12.7 60.2 118.2 41.8
4.5 million cycles 25.8 79.5 133.9 46.6
Tab.4  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
1 C Arya, F K Ofori-Darko, G Pirathapan. FRP rebars and the elimination of reinforcement corrosion in concrete structures. In: Taerwe L, ed. Proceedings of the Second International RILEM Symposium (FRPRCS-2). London: RILEM, E&FN Spon, 1995, 227–234
2 M A Aiello, L Ombres. Structural performances of concrete beams with hybrid (fiber-reinforced polymer-steel) reinforcements. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2002, 6(2): 133–140
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(133)
3 W J Qu, X L Zhang, H Q Huang. Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2009, 13(5): 350–359
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000035
4 A El Refai, F Abed, A Al-Rahmani. Structural performance and serviceability of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 96: 518–529
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.063
5 J P Newhook. Design of under-reinforced concrete T-sections with GFRP reinforcement. In: Humar J, Razaqpur A G, eds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures. Montreal: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 2000, 153–160
6 D Lau, H J Pam. Experimental study of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(12): 3857–3865
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.028
7 L Pang, W J Qu, P Zhu, J J Xu. Design propositions for hybrid FRP-steel reinforced concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2016, 20(4): 04015086
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000654
8 I F Kara, A F Ashour, M A Köroğlu. Flexural behavior of hybrid FRP/steel reinforced concrete beams. Composite Structures, 2015, 129: 111–121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.073
9 F Bencardino, A Condello, L Ombres. Numerical and analytical modeling of concrete beams with steel, FRP and hybrid FRP-steel reinforcements. Composite Structures, 2016, 140: 53–65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.045
10 P Zhu, J J Xu, W J Qu, H Hao. Experimental study of fatigue flexural performance of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid GFRP and steel bars. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2017, 21(5): 04017036
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000817
11 J J Xu, P Zhu, Z J Ma, W J Qu. Fatigue flexural analysis of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid GFRP and steel bars. Engineering Structures, 2019, 199: 109635
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109635
12 L J Li, B Hou, Z Y Lu, F Liu. Fatigue behaviour of sea sand concrete beams reinforced with basalt fibre-reinforced polymer bars. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 179: 160–171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.218
13 J Zhao, G H Li, Z K Wang, X L Zhao. Fatigue behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass- and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP/CFRP) bars after exposure to elevated temperatures. Composite Structures, 2019, 229: 111427
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111427
14 X L Zhang. Flexural and shear behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (FRP and steel) bars. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2010 (in Chinese)
15 L Pang. Investigation of concrete members reinforced with steel and FRP bars for sectional equal durability. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2016 (in Chinese)
16 J Ruhnau. Influence of repeated loading on the stirrup stress of reinforced concrete beams. ACI Special Publications, 1974, 42(7): 169–181
17 H Okamura, S A Farghaly, T Ueda. Behaviors of reinforced concrete beams with stirrups failing in shear under fatigue loading. In: Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1981, 109–122
18 T Ueda. Behavior in shear of reinforced concrete beams under fatigue loading. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Tokyo: University of Tokyo, 1982
19 K H Kwak, J G Park. Shear-fatigue behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete beams under repeated loading. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2001, 11(3): 301–314
https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.11.3.301
20 S Teng, W Ma, F Wang. Shear strength of concrete deep beams under fatigue loading. ACI Structural Journal, 2000, 97(4): 572–580
21 B Isojeh, M El-Zeghayar, F J Vecchio. High-cycle fatigue life prediction of reinforced concrete deep beams. Engineering Structures, 2017, 150: 12–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.031
22 ACI 440.1R–15. Guide For The Design And Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced With FRP Bars. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2015
23 GB/T 228.1–2010. Metallic Materials-Tensile Testing-Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, 2010
24 GB/T 30022–2013. Test Method For Basic Mechanical Properties Of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bar. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, 2013
25 GB/T 50081–2002. Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2002
26 ACI Committee 318–14. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2014
27 P H Bischoff. Reevaluation of deflection prediction for concrete beams reinforced with steel and fiber reinforced polymer bars. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(5): 752–767
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(752)
28 S H Alsayed, Y A Al-Salloum, T H Almusallam. Performance of glass fiber reinforced plastic bars as a reinforcing material for concrete structures. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2000, 31(6–7): 555–567
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00049-9
29 M M Rafi, A Nadjai, F Ali, D Talamona. Aspects of behaviour of CFRP reinforced concrete beams in bending. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(3): 277–285
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.014
30 J Zhang, H Stang, V C Li. Fatigue life prediction of fiber reinforced concrete under flexural load. International Journal of Fatigue, 1999, 21(10): 1033–1049
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00093-6
31 ACI Committee 215. Considerations for design of concrete structures subjected to fatigue loading. ACI 215R–74 (Revised 1992/ Reapproved 1997). Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 1997
32 P J Heffernan, M A Erki. Fatigue behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced plastic laminates. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2004, 8(2): 132–140
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(132)
33 M Noël, K Soudki. Fatigue behaviour of GFRP reinforcing bars in air and in concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2014, 18(5): 04014006
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000468
34 AASHTO Committee. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2014
35 J M Hanson, C L Hulsbos, D A VanHorn. Fatigue tests of prestressed concrete I-beams. Journal of the Structural Division, 1970, 96(11): 2443–2464
https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002752
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed