Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2021, Vol. 15 Issue (4): 1016-1024   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0751-7
  本期目录
Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing resting on clay soil mixed with tire-derived aggregates
Ali AREFNIA1,2, Ali DEHGHANBANADAKI3(), Khairul Anuar KASSIM1
1. Department of Geotechnics & Transportation, School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia
2. Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3. Department of Civil Engineering, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran
 全文: PDF(6670 KB)   HTML
Abstract

This study investigated the use of recycled tire-derived aggregate (TDA) mixed with kaolin as a method of increasing the ultimate bearing capacity ( UBC) of a strip footing. Thirteen 1g physical modeling tests were prepared in a rigid box of 0.6 m × 0.9 m in plan and 0.6 m in height. During sample preparation, 0%, 20%, 40%, or 60% (by weight) of powdery, shredded, small-sized granular (G 1–4 mm) or large-sized granular (G 5–8 mm) TDA was mixed with the kaolin. A strip footing was then placed on the stabilized kaolin and was caused to fail under stress-controlled conditions to determine the UBC. A rigorous 3D finite element analysis was developed in Optum G-3 to determine the UBC values based on the experimental test results. The experimental results showed that, except for the 20% powdery TDA, the TDA showed an increase in the UBC of the strip footing. When kaolin mixed with 20% G (5–8 mm), the UBC showed a threefold increase over that for the unreinforced case. The test with 20% G (1–4 mm) recorded the highest subgrade modulus. It was observed that the UBC calculated using finite element modeling overestimated the experimental UBC by an average of 9%.

Key wordskaolin    physical modeling tests    stabilization    numerical modeling
收稿日期: 2021-04-08      出版日期: 2021-09-29
Corresponding Author(s): Ali DEHGHANBANADAKI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(4): 1016-1024.
Ali AREFNIA, Ali DEHGHANBANADAKI, Khairul Anuar KASSIM. Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing resting on clay soil mixed with tire-derived aggregates. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 1016-1024.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-021-0751-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2021/V15/I4/1016
USCS moisture content (%) 24 mesh per cm of residue (%) specific gravity ( G s) LL (%) PL (%) PI (%)
MH 4.5 16 2.67 57.39 35.06 22.33
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
1 K Halder, D Chakraborty. Probabilistic bearing capacity of strip footing on reinforced anisotropic soil slope. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2020, 23( 1): 15– 30
2 EuroSoilStab. Design Guide Soft Soil Stabilisation. Berkshire: IHS BRE Press, 2002
3 A S A Rashid, A R Bunawan, K N M Said. The deep mixing method: bearing capacity studies. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2017, 35( 4): 1271– 1298
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0196-x
4 A Dehghanbanadaki, K Ahmad, N Ali. Influence of natural fillers on shear strength of cement treated peat. Gradevinar, 2013, 65( 7): 633– 640
https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.814.2013
5 A Dehghanbanadaki, K Ahmad, N Ali. Experimental investigations on ultimate bearing capacity of peat stabilized by a group of soil-cement column: Acomparative study. Acta Geotechnica, 2016, 11( 2): 295– 307
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0328-x
6 CDIT (Coastal Development Institute of Technology). The Deep Mixing Method—Principle, Design and Construction. Florida: CRC Press, 2002
7 B Li, Y Chi, L Xu, Y Shi, C Li. Experimental investigation on the flexural behavior of steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 191 : 80– 94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.202
8 A Shishegaran, F Daneshpajoh, H Taghavizade, S Mirvalad. Developing conductive concrete containing wire rope and steel powder wastes for route deicing. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 232 : 117184–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117184
9 H Zhong, E W Poon, K Chen, M Zhang. Engineering properties of crumb rubber alkali-activated mortar reinforced with recycled steel fibers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 238 : 117950–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117950
10 S T Amiri, A Dehghanbanadaki, R Nazir, S Motamedi. Unit composite friction coefficient of model pile floated in kaolin clay reinforced by recycled crushed glass under uplift loading. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 22 : 100313–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100313
11 A AlKhatib, M Maslehuddin, S U Al-Dulaijan. Development of high performance concrete using industrial waste materials and nano-silica. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2020, 9( 3): 6696– 6711
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.067
12 K Sharma, A Kumar. Utilization of industrial waste based geopolymers as a soil stabilizer—A review. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2020, 5( 3): 1– 20
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00350-7
13 H Djadouni, H Trouzine, A Gomes Correia, T F S Miranda. 2D numerical analysis of a cantilever retaining wall backfilled with sand–tire chips mixtures. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2021, 25( 6): 1119– 1135
14 CWA 14243. Post-consumer Tyre Materials and Applications. CEN, 2002
15 H Hazarika, S M K Pasha, I Ishibashi, N Yoshimoto, T Kinoshita, S Endo, A K Karmokar, T Hitosugi. Tire-chip reinforced foundation as liquefaction countermeasure for residential buildings. Soil and Foundation, 2020, 60( 2): 315– 326
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.12.013
16 M Tajabadipour, M Dehghani, B Kalantari, S H Lajevardi. Laboratory pullout investigation for evaluate feasibility use of scrap tire as reinforcement element in mechanically stabilized earth walls. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 237 : 117726–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117726
17 A Mahgoub, H El Naggar. Shallow foundations on lightweight TDA backfill: Field tests and 3D numerical modelling. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 126 : 103761–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103761
18 B J Khan, I Ahmad, H Nasir, A Abdullah, Q K Gohar. Shear strength and pull-out response of tire shred-sand mixture reinforced with deformed steel bars. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020 : 1– 15
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5185093
19 M Koohmishi, A Azarhoosh. Degradation of crumb rubber modified railway ballast under impact loading considering aggregate gradation and rubber size. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2021, 58( 3): 1– 13
20 Z Yang, Z Yue, B Tai. Investigation of the deformation and strength properties of fouled graded macadam materials in heavy-haul railway subgrade beds. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 273 : 121778–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121778
21 I S Ahn, L Cheng. Seismic analysis of semi-gravity RC cantilever retaining wall with TDA backfill. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 11( 4): 455– 469
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0392-z
22 A Anastasiadis, K Senetakis, K Pitilakis. Small-strain shear modulus and damping ratio of sand-rubber and gravel-rubber mixtures. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2012, 30( 2): 363– 382
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9473-2
23 S Rios, M Kowalska, A V da Fonseca. Cyclic and dynamic behavior of sand-rubber and clay-rubber mixtures. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2021, 39( 5): 1– 19
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01704-3
24 S B Reddy, A M Krishna, K R Reddy. Sustainable utilization of scrap tire derived geomaterials for geotechnical applications. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 48( 2): 251– 266
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0273-3
25 M Ghazavi, M A Sakhi. Influence of optimized tire shreds on shear strength parameters of sand. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2005, 5( 1): 58– 65
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:1(58)
26 M N Sheikh, M S Mashiri, J S Vinod, H H Tsang. Shear and Compressibility behaviour of sand–tire crumb mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2013, 25( 10): 1366– 1374
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000696
27 I Ghaaowd, J S McCartney, S S Thielmann, M J Sanders, P J Fox. Shearing behavior of tire-derived aggregate with large particle size. I: Internal and concrete interface direct shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2017, 143( 10): 04017078–
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001775
28 Y Yi, C Kang, A Bayat. Predicting one-dimensional compression of tire derived aggregate using a simple method. Soil and Foundation, 2019, 59( 5): 1292– 1301
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.05.010
29 M Bekhiti, H Trouzine, M Rabehi. Influence of waste tire rubber fibers on swelling behavior, unconfined compressive strength and ductility of cement stabilized bentonite clay soil. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 208 : 304– 313
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.011
30 G Gill, R K Mittal, R Dandautiya. Pressure settlement behaviour of strip footing resting on unreinforced and tire chips reinforced copper slag. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 25( 1): 92– 106
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0606-0
31 S Bandyopadhyay, A Sengupta, G R Reddy. Performance of sand and shredded rubber tire mixture as a natural base isolator for earthquake protection. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2015, 14( 4): 683– 693
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0053-y
32 N Hataf, M M Rahimi. Experimental investigation of bearing capacity of sand reinforced with randomly distributed tire shreds. Construction & Building Materials, 2006, 20( 10): 910– 916
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.019
33 R K Mittal, G Gill. Pressure settlement behaviour of strip footing resting on tire-chip reinforced sand. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 14( 2): 162– 168
https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1408195
34 A Shishegaran, M R Khalili, B Karami, T Rabczuk, A Shishegaran. Computational predictions for estimating the maximum deflection of reinforced concrete panels subjected to the blast load. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 139 : 103527–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103527
35 A Shishegaran, B Karami, T Rabczuk, A Shishegaran, M A Naghsh, M M Khani. Performance of fixed beam without interacting bars. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14( 5): 1180– 1195
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0661-0
36 A Shishegaran, H Varaee, T Rabczuk, G Shishegaran. High correlated variables creator machine: Prediction of the compressive strength of concrete. Computers & Structures, 2021, 247 : 106479–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106479
37 A Shishegaran, M Saeedi, S Mirvalad, A H Korayem. The mechanical strength of the artificial stones, containing the travertine wastes and sand. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021, 11 : 1688– 1709
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.013
38 M A Naghsh, A Shishegaran, B Karami, T Rabczuk, A Shishegaran, H Taghavizadeh, M Moradi. An innovative model for predicting the displacement and rotation of column-tree moment connection under fire. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15( 1): 1– 19
39 A Shishegaran, M R Ghasemi, H Varaee. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13( 6): 1301– 1315
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0552-4
40 M S Es-Haghi, A Shishegaran, T Rabczuk. Evaluation of a novel Asymmetric Genetic Algorithm to optimize the structural design of 3D regular and irregular steel frames. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14( 5): 1110– 1130
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0643-2
41 B Mortazavi, E V Podryabinkin, S Roche, T Rabczuk, X Zhuang, A V Shapeev. Machine-learning interatomic potentials enable first-principles multiscale modeling of lattice thermal conductivity in graphene/borophene heterostructures. Materials Horizons, 2020, 7( 9): 2359– 2367
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MH00787K
42 H Ren, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A higher order nonlocal operator method for solving partial differential equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 367 : 113132–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113132
43 H L Ren, X Y Zhuang, C Anitescu, T Rabczuk. An explicit phase field method for brittle dynamic fracture. Computers & Structures, 2019, 217 : 45– 56
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.005
44 Potts D M, Zdravković L, Addenbrooke T I, Higgins K G, Kovačević N. Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering: Application (Vol. 2). London: Thomas Telford, 2001
45 A Dehghanbanadaki, S Motamedi, K Ahmad. FE-based modelling of stabilized fibrous peat by end-bearing cement deep mixing columns. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2020, 20( 1): 75– 86
46 M Majumder, D Chakraborty. Bearing and uplift capacities of under-reamed piles in soft clay underlaid by stiff clay using lower-bound finite element limit analysis. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15( 2): 1– 15
47 A Arefnia, E Momeni, D J Armaghni, K A Kassim, K Ahmad. Effect of tire derived aggregate on maximum Dry density of Kaolin. Jurnal Teknologi, 2013, 66( 1): 19– 23
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.1704
48 A Arefnia, A Dehghanbanadaki, K A Kassim, K Ahmad. Stabilization of backfill using TDA material under a footing close to retaining wall. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2020, 22( 3): 197– 206
49 L Prandtl. On the penetration resistance of plastic building materials and the strength of cutting edges. Journal for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1921, 1( 1): 15– 20
https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19210010102
50 BS 1377–1. Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes Part 1: General Requirements and Sample Preparation. London: British Standards Institute, 1990
51 M K Jafari, A Shafiee. Mechanical behavior of compacted composite clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2004, 41( 6): 1152– 1167
https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-062
52 K Terzaghi. Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction. Geotechnique, 1955, 5( 4): 297– 326
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1955.5.4.297
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed