The problem related to bearing capacity of footing either on pure soil or on pure rock mass has been investigated over the years. Currently, no study deals with the bearing capacity of strip footing on a cohesive soil layer overlying rock mass. Therefore, by implementing the lower bound finite element limit analysis in conjunction with the second-order cone programming and the power cone programming, the ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing located on a cohesive soil overlying rock mass is determined in this study. By considering the different values of interface adhesion factor (αcr) between the cohesive soil and rock mass, the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing is expressed in terms of influence factor (If) for different values of cohesive soil layer cover ratio (Tcs/B). The failure of cohesive soil is modeled by using Mohr−Coulomb yield criterion, whereas Generalized Hoek−Brown yield criterion is utilized to model the rock mass at failure. The variations ofIf with different magnitudes of αcr are studied by considering the influence of the rock mass strength parameters of beneath rock mass layer. To examine stress distribution at different depths, failure patterns are also plotted.
L Prandtl. The bond strength of plastic building materials and the strength of cutting edges. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1921, 1( 1): 15– 20 https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19210010102(inGerman
2
G G Meyerhof. Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1963, 1( 1): 16– 26 https://doi.org/10.1139/t63-003
3
J B Hansen. A revised and extended formula for bearing capacity. Bulletin of Danish Geotechnical Institute, 1970, 28 : 5– 11
R S Merifield, A V Lyamin, S W Sloan. Limit analysis solutions for the bearing capacity of rock masses using the generalised Hoek–Brown criterion. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2006, 43( 6): 920– 937 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.02.001
6
J Kumar, D Mohapatra. Lower-bound finite elements limit analysis for Hoek−Brown materials using semidefinite programming. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 143( 9): 04017077– https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001296
7
J Kumar, O Rahaman. Lower bound limit analysis using power cone programming for solving stability problems in rock mechanics for generalized Hoek–Brown criterion. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53( 7): 3237– 3252 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02099-y
8
S Das, K Halder, D Chakraborty. Bearing capacity of interfering strip footings on rock mass. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 2021, 1– 13 https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.1903091
9
D V Griffiths. Computation of bearing capacity on layered soils. In: Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference. Edmonton: Balkema, 1982, 163– 170
10
A Florkiewicz. Upper bound to bearing capacity of layered soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989, 26( 4): 730– 736 https://doi.org/10.1139/t89-084
11
H J Burd, S Frydman. Bearing capacity of plane-strain footings on layered soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34( 2): 241– 253 https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-106
12
M Huang, H L Qin. Upper-bound multi-rigid-block solutions for bearing capacity of two-layered soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36( 3): 525– 529 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.10.001
13
M Y Ouahab, A Mabrouki, M Mellas, D Benmeddour. Effect of load eccentricity on the bearing capacity of strip footings on non-homogenous clay overlying bedrock. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2018, 5( 2): 169– 186 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-018-0055-0
14
O Mohr. Circumstances that cause the elastic limit and the breakage of a material. Journal of the German Engineers Association, 1900, 46 : 1572– 1577 (in German)
15
E Hoek, C Carranza-Torres, B Corkum. Hoek−Brown failure criterion—2002 edition. Proceedings of NARMS-Tac, 2002, 1( 1): 267– 273
16
K Halder, D Chakraborty. Effect of interface friction angle between soil and reinforcement on bearing capacity of strip footing placed on reinforced slope. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2019, 19( 5): 06019008– https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001394
17
S W Sloan. Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1988, 12( 1): 61– 77 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610120105
18
A Makrodimopoulos, C M Martin. Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive-frictional materials using second-order cone programming. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 66( 4): 604– 634 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1567
19
MATLAB. Version 8.5. Natick, Massachusetts: MathWorks. 2015
20
MOSEK ApS. Version 9.0. Copenhagen: MOSEK, 2020
21
K Krabbenhøft, A V Lyamin, S W Sloan. Formulation and solution of some plasticity problems as conic programs. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2007, 44( 5): 1533– 1549 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.036
22
C Tang, K K Phoon, K C Toh. Lower-bound limit analysis of seismic passive earth pressure on rigid walls. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2014, 14( 5): 04014022– https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000385
23
H Nguyen-Xuan, T Rabczuk. Adaptive selective ES-FEM limit analysis of cracked plane-strain structures. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2015, 9( 4): 478– 490 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-015-0317-7
24
B Ukritchon, S Keawsawasvong. Lower bound limit analysis of an anisotropic undrained strength criterion using second-order cone programming. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2018, 42( 8): 1016– 1033 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2781
25
K Halder, D Chakraborty. Probabilistic bearing capacity of strip footing on reinforced soil slope. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 116 : 103213– https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103213
26
O Rahaman, J Kumar. Stability analysis of twin horse-shoe shaped tunnels in rock mass. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98 : 103354– https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103354
S Zhou, X Zhuang, H Zhu, T Rabczuk. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96 : 174– 192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.011
29
S Zhou, T Rabczuk, X Zhuang. Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 122 : 31– 49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.012
30
S Zhou, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. Engineering Geology, 2018, 240 : 189– 203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.008
31
X Zhuang, S Zhou, M Sheng, G Li. On the hydraulic fracturing in naturally-layered porous media using the phase field method. Engineering Geology, 2020, 266 : 105306– https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105306
32
S Zhou, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 350 : 169– 198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.001
