Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (1): 53-77   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0850-0
  本期目录
Behaviour of self-centring shear walls——A state of the art review
Mehdi JAVADI, Reza HASSANLI(), Md Mizanur RAHMAN, Md Rajibul KARIM
UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5095, Australia
 全文: PDF(14625 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The application of unbonded post-tensioning (PT) in structural walls has led to the development of advanced self-centring (rocking) shear wall systems that has significant advantages, including accelerated construction due to the incorporation of prefabricated elements and segmental construction for different materials (e.g., concrete, masonry, and timber), reduced residual drifts, and little damage upon extreme seismic and wind loads. Concrete, masonry, and timber are often used for the construction of unbonded PT structural wall systems. Despite extensive research since the 1980s, there are no well-established design guidelines available on the shear wall configuration with the required energy dissipation system, joint’s locations and acceptance criteria for shear sliding, confinement, seismic performance factors, PT loss, PT force range and residual drifts of shear walls subjected to lateral loads. In this research a comprehensive state-of-the-art literature review was performed on self-centring shear wall system. An extensive study was carried out to collect a database of 100 concrete, masonry, and self-centring shear wall tests from the literature. The established database was then used to review shear walls’ configurations, material, and components to benchmark requirements applicable for design purposes. The behaviour of concrete, masonry and timber shear walls were compared and critically analysed. The general behaviour, force-displacement performance of the walls, ductility, and seismic response factors, were critically reviewed and analysed for different self-centring wall systems to understand the effect of different parameters including configurations of the walls, material used for construction of the wall (concrete, masonry, timber) and axial stress ratio. The outcome of this research can be used to better understand the behaviour of self-centring wall system in order to develop design guidelines for such walls.

Key wordsself-centring shear walls    rocking walls    energy dissipation    seismic performance factors    PT loss    residual drift
收稿日期: 2021-07-12      出版日期: 2023-03-02
Corresponding Author(s): Reza HASSANLI   
作者简介:

Qingyong Zheng and Ya Gao contributed equally to this work.

 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(1): 53-77.
Mehdi JAVADI, Reza HASSANLI, Md Mizanur RAHMAN, Md Rajibul KARIM. Behaviour of self-centring shear walls——A state of the art review. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(1): 53-77.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-022-0850-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I1/53
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
confinement lengthtested wall reference
0.08lw above wall base[15]
0.25lw on each side of centerline and 0.65lw above wall base[76]
0.09lw on each side of centerline and 0.40lw above wall base[61]
0.08lw on each side of centerline and 0.67lw above wall base[62]
Tab.1  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
referenceductilityT (s)RCdNo. of walls
A, BCDE
Perez et al. [77]11.340.276.374.734.543.332.441
Holden et al. [59]37.270.1410.847.827.485.274.351
Perez et al. [76]23.040.188.606.276.004.303.432
Erkmen and Schultz [17]12.710.123.832.962.862.232.571
Smith and Kurama [60]14.630.093.522.752.662.092.751
Henry [101]29.440.096.404.754.563.343.7432
Smith et al. [75]12.850.113.492.732.642.082.582
Preti and Meda [95]53.650.2728.7320.2319.2513.025.201
Sritharan et al. [1]16.140.206.785.014.813.512.891
Henry et al. [55]18.440.218.065.905.654.063.066
Twigden et al. [62]31.150.138.616.286.014.303.964
Jafari et al. [69]28.510.3117.3712.3511.788.103.5610
average of all tests24.100.189.386.816.524.643.3862
Tab.2  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
Fig.20  
Fig.21  
Fig.22  
Fig.23  
Fig.24  
1 S Sritharan, S Aaleti, R S Henry, K Y Liu, K C Tsai. Precast concrete wall with end columns (PreWEC) for earthquake resistant design. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(12): 2075–2092
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2576
2 A W Wilson, A W Wilson, C J Motter, A R Phillips, J D Dolan. Seismic response of post-tensioned cross-laminated timber rocking wall buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 2020, 146(7): 04020123
3 X Lu, B Yang, B Zhao. Shake-table testing of a self-centering precast reinforced concrete frame with shear walls. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018, 17(2): 221–233
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0436-y
4 X Lu, X Dang, J Qian, Y Zhou, H Jiang. Experimental study of self-centering shear walls with horizontal bottom slits. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(3): 04016183
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001673
5 M J N Priestley, S S Sritharan, J R Conley, S Stefano Pampanin. Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI Journal, 1999, 44(6): 42–67
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67
6 P T Laursen, J M Ingham. Structural testing of single-storey post-tensioned concrete masonry walls. Masonry Society Journal, 2001, 19: 69–82
7 A Yassin, M Ezzeldin, T Steele, L Wiebe. Seismic collapse risk assessment of posttensioned controlled rocking masonry walls. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 2020, 146(5): 04020060
8 C Nylander. Clamps and Chronology. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 1966, 6: 130
9 P RocaP B LourençoA Gaetani. Historic Construction and Conservation: Materials, Systems and Damage. London: Routledge, 2019
10 Loewe M Sanabra, Llovera J Capellà. The four ages of early prestressed concrete structures. PCI Journal, 2014, 59: 93–121
11 S D Nakaki, J F Stanton, S S Sritharan. An overview of the PRESSS five-story precast test building. PCI Journal, 1999, 44(2): 26–39
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011999.26.39
12 M Kyritsis-Spinoulas, Z Vangelatos, P Vassiliou, D Manolakos, M Delagrammatikas, O Papadopoulou. Steel clamps from the Acropolis: some old, some new and some digital. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Corrosion Mitigation and Surface Protection Technologies. Luxor: International Quality, 2016, 11–18
13 G W Housner. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53(2): 403–417
https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0530020403
14 356 FEMA. Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000
15 Y KuramaR SauseS Pessiki. Seismic analysis, behavior, and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Bethlehem: Lehigh University, 1997
16 R L Boroschek, F V Yáñez. Experimental verification of basic analytical assumptions used in the analysis of structural wall buildings. Engineering Structures, 2000, 22(6): 657–669
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00007-3
17 B Erkmen, A E Schultz. Self-centering behavior of unbonded, post-tensioned precast concrete shear walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(7): 1047–1064
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902859136
18 Y C Kurama, S Sritharan, R B Fleischman, J I Restrepo, R S Henry, N M Cleland, S K Ghosh, P Bonelli. Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures: State of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2018, 144(4): 03118001
19 318-14 ACI. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2014
20 ITG-5.1-07 ACI. Acceptance Criteria for Special Unbonded Post-tensioned Precast Structural Walls Based on Validation Testing and Commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2008
21 ITG-5.2-09 ACI. Requirements for Design of Special Unbonded Posttensioned Precast Shear Wall Satisfying ACI ITG-5.1 (ACI ITG-5.2-09) and Commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2009
22 P695 FEMA. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors: US Department of Homeland Security. Redwood City: FEMA, 2009
23 C Loss, T Tannert, S Tesfamariam. State-of-the-art review of displacement-based seismic design of timber buildings. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 191: 481–497
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.205
24 E B Murray. Dry Stacked Surface Bonded Masonry-Structural Testing and Evaluation. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Prove: Brigham Young University, 2007
25 H Sokairge, A Rashad, H Elshafie. Behavior of post-tensioned dry-stack interlocking masonry walls under out of plane loading. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 133: 348–357
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.071
26 R Ambrose, R Hulse, S Mohajery. Cantilevered prestressed diaphragm walling subjected to lateral loading. Brick and Block Masonry (8 th IBMAC) London, Elsevier. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 1988, 2: 583–594
27 W Curtin, J Howard. Lateral loading tests on tall post-tensioned brick diaphragm walls. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 1988, 2: 595–605
28 B Hobbs, Y Daou. Post-tensioned T-section brickwork retaining walls. Brick and Block Masonry(8 th IBMAC) London, Elsevier. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 1988, 2: 665–675
29 K Fisher Bah, P Watt. Structural testing of brick pocket-type retaining walls. In: Proceedings of 10th IB2Mac. Calgary: Masonry Council of Canada, 1994, 441–448
30 A E Schultz, M J Scolforo. Overview of prestressed masonry. Masonry Society Journal, 1991, 10: 6–21
31 S Lissel, E Sayed-Ahmed, N Shrive. Prestressed masonry-the last ten years. In: Proceedings of the 8th North American Masonry Conference. Austin: The Masonry Society, 1999, 599–610
32 J R Bean, A E Schultz. Flexural capacity of post-tensioned masonry walls: Code review and recommended procedure. PTI Journal, 2003, 1: 28–44
33 J R Bean Popehn, A E Schultz, C R Drake. Behavior of slender, posttensioned masonry walls under transverse loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1541–1550
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1541
34 N Ismail, A E Schultz, J M Ingham. Out-of-plane seismic performance of unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted using post-tensioning. In: Proceedings of 15th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference. Florianopolis: The Federal University of Santa Catarina, 2012, 1–12
35 N Ismail, J M Ingham. Time-dependent prestress losses in historic clay brick masonry walls seismically strengthened using unbonded posttensioning. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2013, 25(6): 718–725
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000541
36 J R Bean Popehn, A E Schultz. Influence of imperfections on the out-of-plane flexural strength of post-tensioned masonry walls. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 41: 942–949
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.016
37 M Kohail, H Elshafie, A Rashad, H Okail. Behavior of post-tensioned dry-stack interlocking masonry shear walls under cyclic in-plane loading. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 196: 539–554
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.149
38 G D Wight, J M Ingham, A R Wilton. Innovative seismic design of a post-tensioned concrete masonry house. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2007, 34(11): 1393–1402
https://doi.org/10.1139/L07-104
39 O A RosenboomM J Kowalsky. Reversed in-plane cyclic behavior of posttensioned clay brick masonry wall. Journal of Structural Engineering, 787–798
40 MA ElGawadyD RyuAC Wijeyewickrema. Seismic behavior of unbonded post-tensioned masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Anchorage: Earthquake Engineering research institute, 2014
41 D Ryu, A C Wijeyewickrema, M A ElGawady, M A K M Madurapperuma. Effects of tendon spacing on in-plane behavior of posttensioned masonry walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 140(4): 04013096
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000849
42 R Hassanli, M A ElGawady, J E Mills. Strength and seismic performance factors of posttensioned masonry walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(11): 04015038
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001272
43 D KalliontzisA SchultzS Sritharan. Modelling of a rocking masonry wall with unbonded post-tensioning subjected to shake-table testing. In: Proceedings of the 11th National Conference in earthquake Engineering. Los Angeles: Earthquake Engineering research institute, 2018
44 A Iqbal, M Fragiacomo, S Pampanin, A Buchanan. Seismic resilience of plywood-coupled LVL wall panels. Engineering Structures, 2018, 167: 750–759
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.053
45 D Moroder, T Smith, A Dunbar, S Pampanin, A Buchanan. Seismic testing of post-tensioned Pres-Lam core walls using cross laminated timber. Engineering Structures, 2018, 167: 639–654
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.075
46 F Sarti, A Palermo, S Pampanin, J Berman. Determination of the seismic performance factors for post-tensioned rocking timber wall systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(2): 181–200
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2784
47 T X Ho, T N Dao, S Aaleti, J W van de Lindt, D R Rammer. Hybrid system of unbonded post-tensioned CLT panels and light-frame wood shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(2): 04016171
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001665
48 F Sarti, A Palermo, S Pampanin. Development and testing of an alternative dissipative posttensioned rocking timber wall with boundary columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(4): E4015011
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001390
49 W Y Loo, C Kun, P Quenneville, N Chouw. Experimental testing of a rocking timber shear wall with slip-friction connectors. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43(11): 1621–1639
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2413
50 T SmithS PampaninM FragiacomoA Buchanan. Design and construction of prestressed timber buildings for seismic areas. In: Proceeding of 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering WCTE 2008. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 2008
51 R Sinha, M Lennartsson, B Frostell. Environmental footprint assessment of building structures: A comparative study. Building and Environment, 2016, 104: 162–171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.012
52 D S Pilon, A Palermo, F Sarti, A Salenikovich. Benefits of multiple rocking segments for CLT and LVL Pres-Lam wall systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 117: 234–244
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.026
53 Z Jin, S Pei, H Blomgren, J Powers. Simplified mechanistic model for seismic response prediction of coupled cross-laminated timber rocking walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145: 04018253
54 A IqbalT SmithS PampaninM FragiacomoA PalermoA H Buchanan. Experimental performance and structural analysis of plywood-coupled LVL walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142: 04015123
55 R S Henry, S Sritharan, J M Ingham. Finite element analysis of the PreWEC self-centering concrete wall system. Engineering Structures, 2016, 115: 28–41
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.029
56 T Guo, Z Xu, L Song, L Wang, Z Zhang. Seismic resilience upgrade of RC frame building using self-centering concrete walls with distributed friction devices. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(12): 04017160
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001901
57 A Gu, Y Zhou, Y Xiao, Q Li, G Qu. Experimental study and parameter analysis on the seismic performance of self-centering hybrid reinforced concrete shear walls. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 116: 409–420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.003
58 X Li, G Wu, Y C Kurama, H Cui. Experimental comparisons of repairable precast concrete shear walls with a monolithic cast-in-place wall. Engineering Structures, 2020, 216: 110671
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110671
59 T Holden, J Restrepo, J B Mander. Seismic performance of precast reinforced and prestressed concrete walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(3): 286–296
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286
60 B SmithY Kurama. Seismic behavior of a hybrid precast concrete wall specimen: measured response versus design predictions. In: Proceedings of 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Toronto: Earthquake Engineering research institute, 2010
61 M Nazari, S Sritharan, S Aaleti. Single precast concrete rocking walls as earthquake force-resisting elements. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(5): 753–769
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2829
62 K M Twigden, S Sritharan, R S Henry. Cyclic testing of unbonded post-tensioned concrete wall systems with and without supplemental damping. Engineering Structures, 2017, 140: 406–420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.008
63 B Yang, X Lu. Displacement-based seismic design approach for prestressed precast concrete shear walls and its application. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 22(10): 1836–1860
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309607
64 J B Mander, M J Priestley, R Park. Theoretical stress−strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804–1826
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804
65 M A Masrom, N Hayati. Review on the rocking wall systems as a self-centering mechanism and its interaction with floor diaphragm in precast concrete structures. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2020, 17(6): 1–29
66 B Yang, X Lu. Displacement-based seismic design approach for prestressed precast concrete shear walls and its application. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 22(10): 1836–1860
67 3101 NZS. The Design of Concrete Structures. Wellington: Standards New Zealand, 2006
68 318-R8 ACI. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Michigan: American Concrete Institute, 2008
69 A Jafari, M R Ghasemi, H Akbarzadeh Bengar, B Hassani. Seismic performance and damage incurred by monolithic concrete self-centering rocking walls under the effect of axial stress ratio. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16(2): 831–858
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0227-2
70 W Y Kam, S Pampanin, A Palermo, A J Carr. Self-centering structural systems with combination of hysteretic and viscous energy dissipations. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 39: 1083–1108
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.983
71 B G Morgen, Y C Kurama. Seismic design of friction-damped precast concrete frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1501–1511
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1501
72 R Hassanli, O Youssf, J E Mills, R Karim, T Vincent. Performance of segmental self-centering rubberized concrete columns under different loading directions. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 20: 285–302
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.08.003
73 K M Twigden, R S Henry. Shake table testing of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls with and without additional energy dissipation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 119: 375–389
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.007
74 K Twigden. Dynamic response of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls for seismic resilient structures. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 2016
75 B SmithY KuramaM McGinnis. Hybrid Precast Wall Systems for Seismic Regions. Structural Engineering Research Report NDSE-2012-01. 2012
76 F J Perez, R Sause, S Pessiki. Analytical and experimental lateral load behavior of unbonded posttensioned precast concrete walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1531–1540
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1531
77 F J Perez, R Sause, S Pessiki, L W Lu. Lateral load behavior of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. In: Anson M, Ko J M, Lam E S S, eds. Advances in Building Technology. Oxford: Elsevier, 2002, 423–430
78 B SmithY Kurama. Seismic Design Guidelines for Special Hybrid Precast Concrete Shear Walls. Structural Engineering Research Report NDSE-2012-02. 2012
79 H S Buddika, A C Wijeyewickrema. Seismic shear forces in post-tensioned hybrid precast concrete walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2018, 144(7): 04018086
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002079
80 L J van der Meer, D R W Martens, A T Vermeltfoort. UPT rectangular and flanged shear walls of high-strength CASIEL-TLM masonry: Experimental and numerical push-over analysis. Engineering Structures, 2013, 49: 628–642
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.021
81 R Hassanli, M A ElGawady, J E Mills. Experimental investigation of in-plane cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned masonry walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(5): 04015171
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001450
82 D Kalliontzis, A E Schultz. Improved estimation of the reverse-cyclic behavior of fully-grouted masonry shear walls with unbonded post-tensioning. Engineering Structures, 2017, 145: 83–96
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.011
83 P T Laursen, J M Ingham. Structural testing of large-scale posttensioned concrete masonry walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(10): 1497–1505
84 K Hossain, S Aaleti, T N Dao. Experimental investigation and finite-element modeling of an aluminum energy dissipater for cross-laminated timber walls under reverse cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 2021, 147(4): 04201025
85 D Fitzgerald, T H Miller, A Sinha, J A Nairn. Cross-laminated timber rocking walls with slip-friction connections. Engineering Structures, 2020, 220: 110973
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110973
86 A Hashemi, P Quenneville. Large-scale testing of low damage rocking Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) wall panels with friction dampers. Engineering Structures, 2020, 206: 110166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110166
87 A AmerR SauseJ Ricles. Experimental study on self-centering cross-laminated timber shear wall-floor diaphragm sub-assembly. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 2020
88 C P Lin, R Wiebe, J W Berman. Analytical and numerical study of curved-base rocking walls. Engineering Structures, 2019, 197: 109397
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109397
89 NZS1170.5. Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake actions—New Zealand. Wellington: Standards New Zealand, 2004
90 ATC-19. Structural Response Modification Factors. ATC Report 19. 1995
91 ATC. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. 2 Appendices. Albany: ATC, 1996
92 EC8. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2005
93 440 FEMA. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. Redwood City: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2005
94 G Watanabe, K Kawashima. An evaluation of the displacement amplification factors for seismic design of bridges. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2004, 89–96
95 M Preti, A Meda. RC structural wall with unbonded tendons strengthened with high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials and Structures, 2015, 48(1−2): 249–260
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0180-8
96 P Fajfar. Structural analysis in earthquake engineering—A breakthrough of simplified non-linear methods. In: Proceedings of 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Oxford: Elsevier, 2002
97 369 FEMA. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Commentary. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2001
98 7-16 ASCE. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. Virginia: ASCE Reston, 2017
99 R Hassanli, M A ElGawady, J E Mills. Force–displacement behavior of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls. Engineering Structures, 2016, 106: 495–505
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.035
100 A Jafari, H A Bengar, R Hassanli, M Nazari, R Dugnani. The response of self-centering concrete walls under quasi-static loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19: 2893–2917
101 R S Henry. Self-centering precast concrete walls for buildings in regions with low to high seismicity. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 2011
102 A S ElnashaiL Di Sarno. Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering. New York: Wiley, 2008
103 D Casagrande, S Pacchioli, A Polastri, L Pozza. Influence of the rocking behavior of shearwalls on the fundamental period of CLT structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2021, 50(6): 1734–1754
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3420
104 R I GilbertN C MickleboroughG Ranzi. Design of Prestressed Concrete to AS3600-2009. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2016
105 3600 AS. Concrete Structures. Sydney: Standards Australia, 2018
106 PPT Laursen. Seismic analysis and design of post-tensioned concrete masonry walls. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree Auckland: University of Auckland, 2002
107 O A Rosenboom, M J Kowalsky. Reversed in-plane cyclic behavior of post-tensioned clay brick masonry walls for high performance modular housing. In: Anson M, Ko J M, Lam E S S, eds. Advances in Building Technology. Oxford: Elsevier, 2002, 247–254
108 N Hamid, J B Mander. Lateral seismic performance of multipanel precast hollowcore walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010, 136(7): 795–804
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000183
109 M A Rahman, S Sritharan. An evaluation of force-based design vs. direct displacement-based design of jointed precast post-tensioned wall systems. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 5(2): 285–296
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-006-0620-3
110 G A MacRae, K Kawashima. Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1997, 26(7): 701–716
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199707)26:7<701::AID-EQE671>3.0.CO;2-I
111 B J Smith, Y C Kurama, M J McGinnis. Design and measured behavior of a hybrid precast concrete wall specimen for seismic regions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2011, 137(10): 1052–1062
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000327
112 G D Wight. Seismic performance of a post-tensioned concrete masonry wall system. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: University of Auckland, 2006
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed