Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (6): 781-791   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0862-9
  本期目录
Resistance to acid degradation, sorptivity, and setting time of geopolymer mortars
Osama A MOHAMED(), Rania AL-KHATTAB, Waddah AL-HAWAT
College of Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
 全文: PDF(3302 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Experimental evaluations were conducted to determine the water sorptivity, setting time, and resistance to a highly acidic environment, of mortar with alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GBS) binder and also of combinations of fly ash and GBS binders. Binders were activated using mixtures of NaOH and Na2SiO3 solutions. The molarity of NaOH in the mixtures ranged from 10 mol·L−1 to 16 mol·L−1, and the Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio was varied from 1.5 to 2.5. Mortar samples were produced using three binder combinations: 1) GBS as the only binder; 2) blended binder with a slag-to-fly ash ratio of 3:1; and 3) mixed binder with 1:1 ratio of slag to fly ash. Mortar samples were mixed and cured at (22 ± 2) °C till the day of the test. The impact of activator solution alkalinity, activator ratio Na2SiO3/NaOH, GBS content on the rate of water absorption were evaluated. After 7, 28, and 90 d of immersion in a 10% sulfuric acid solution, the resistance of a geopolymer matrix to degradation was assessed by measuring the change in sample weight. The influence of solution alkalinity and relative fly ash content on setting times was investigated. Alkali-activated mortar with a slag-to-fly ash ratio of 3:1 had the least sorptivity compared to the two other binder combinations, at each curing age, and for mortars made with each of the NaOH alkaline activator concentrations. Mortar sorptivity decreased with age and sodium hydroxide concentrations, suggesting the production of geopolymerization products. No reduction in weight of sample occurred after immersion in the strong acid H2SO4 solution for three months, regardless of binder combination. This was due to the synthesis of hydration and geopolymerization products in the presence of curing water, which outweighed the degradation of the geopolymer matrix caused by sulfuric acid.

Key wordsalkali-activated materials    fly ash    sorptivity    durability of concrete    sodium hydroxide    sodium silicates    reduction in CO2 emissions    sulfuric acid
收稿日期: 2021-12-02      出版日期: 2022-10-20
Corresponding Author(s): Osama A MOHAMED   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(6): 781-791.
Osama A MOHAMED, Rania AL-KHATTAB, Waddah AL-HAWAT. Resistance to acid degradation, sorptivity, and setting time of geopolymer mortars. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 781-791.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-022-0862-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2022/V16/I6/781
item CaO SiO2 Al2O3 SO3 Fe2O3 TiO2 K2O MnO SrO ZrO2 CuO Cr2O3 Y2O3 ZnO
GBS (%) 59.44 25.68 8.12 2.75 1.5 1.05 0.61 0.56 0.13 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01
fly ash (%) 4.29 58.16 24.35 0.07 8.52 2.57 1.53 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.03
Tab.1  
item mix No. NaOH molarity (mol·L−1) SS/SH
G50F50 mixesBinder: 50% slag + 50% fly ash 1 10 1.5
2 10 2
3 10 2.5
4 12 1.5
5 12 2
6 12 2.5
7 14 1.5
8 14 2
9 14 2.5
10 16 1.5
11 16 2
12 16 2.5
G75F25 mixesBinder: 75% slag + 25% fly ash 13 10 1.5
14 10 2
15 10 2.5
16 12 1.5
17 12 2
18 12 2.5
19 14 1.5
20 14 2
21 14 2.5
22 16 1.5
23 16 2
24 16 2.5
G100 mixesBinder: 100% slag 25 10 1.5
26 10 2
27 10 2.5
28 12 1.5
29 12 2
30 12 2.5
31 14 1.5
32 14 2
33 14 2.5
34 16 1.5
35 16 2
36 16 2.5
Tab.2  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
1 O A Mohamed, K L Rens, J J Stalnaker. Factors affecting resistance of concrete to freezing and thawing damage. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2000, 12( 1): 26– 32
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:1(26
2 O Mohamed, M Kewalramani, M Ati, W A Hawat. Application of ANN for prediction of chloride penetration resistance and concrete compressive strength. Materialia, 2021, 17 : 101123
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101123
3 O A Mohamed. Effect of mix constituents and curing conditions on compressive strength of sustainable self-consolidating concrete. Sustainability (Basel), 2019, 11( 7): 2094
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072094
4 F Collins, J Sanjayan. Microcracking and strength development of alkali activated GBS concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2001, 23( 4−5): 345– 352
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00003-8
5 A F Allahverdi, F Škvára. Sulfuric acid attack on hardened paste of geopolymer cements-Part 1. Mechanism of corrosion at relatively high concentrations. Ceramics-Silikáty, 2005, 49( 4): 225– 229
6 M Nedeljković, B Ghiassi, der Laan S van, Z Li, G Ye. Effect of curing conditions on the pore solution and carbonation resistance of alkali-activated fly ash and slag pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 116 : 146– 158
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.011
7 A Mehta, R Siddique, T Ozbakkaloglu, F Uddin Ahmed Shaikh, R Belarbi. Fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace GBS-based alkali-activated concrete: Mechanical, transport and microstructural properties. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 257 : 119548
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119548
8 O A Mohamed. Effect of immersing geopolymer slag−fly ash mortar in sulfuric acid on strength development and stability of mass. Construction & Building Materials, 2022, 341 : 127786
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127786
9 O A Mohamed, R Al Khattab. Fresh properties and sulfuric acid resistance of sustainable mortar using alkali-activated GGBS/FA binder. Polymers, 2022, 14( 3): 591
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030591
10 O A Mohamed, R Al Khattab, W Al Hawat. Effect of relative GGBS/fly contents and alkaline solution concentration on compressive strength development of geopolymer mortars subjected to sulfuric acid. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12( 1): 5634
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09682-z
11 A K Parande, P L Ramsamy, S Ethirajan, C R K Rao, N Palanisamy. Deterioration of reinforced concrete in sewer environments. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer. London: Thomas Telford, 2006, 11– 20
https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.2006.159.1.11
12 T Gutberlet, H Hilbig, R Beddoe. Acid attack on hydrated cement—Effect of mineral acids on the degradation process. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 74 : 35– 43
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.011
13 N Fattuhi, B Hughes. The performance of cement paste and concrete subjected to sulphuric acid attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 1988, 18( 4): 545– 553
https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(88)90047-6
14 J Ren, L Zhang, R San Nicolas. Degradation of alkali-activated slag and fly ash mortars under different aggressive acid conditions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2021, 33( 7): 04021140
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003713
15 W Zhang, X Yao, T Yang, Z Zhang. The degradation mechanisms of alkali-activated FA/GBS blend cements exposed to sulphuric acid. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186 : 1177– 1187
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.050
16 T Bakharev. Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35( 4): 658– 670
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005
17 L Gu, T Bennett, P Visintin. Sulphuric acid exposure of conventional concrete and alkali-activated concrete: Assessment of test methodologies. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 197 : 681– 692
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.166
18 N Lee, H Lee. Influence of the slag content on the chloride and sulfuric acid resistances of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2016, 72 : 168– 179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.004
19 C K Yip, G C Lukey, J L Provis, J S van Deventer. Effect of calcium silicate sources on geopolymerisation. Cement and Concrete Research, 2008, 38( 4): 554– 564
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.001
20 I Ismail, S A Bernal, J L Provis, R San Nicolas, S Hamdan, J S van Deventer. Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace GBS by the incorporation of fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 45 : 125– 135
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.006
21 F N Degirmenci. Effect of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratios on durability of geopolymer mortars containing natural and artificial pozzolans. Ceramics-Silikáty, 2017, 61( 4): 340– 350
https://doi.org/10.13168/cs.2017.0033
22 C Hall. Water sorptivity of mortars and concretes: A review. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1989, 41( 147): 51– 61
https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1989.41.147.51
23 C1585-20 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic Cement Concretes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2020
24 S A Bernal, J L Provis. Durability of alkali-activated materials: Progress and perspectives. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2014, 97( 4): 997– 1008
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12831
25 P Duxson, J L Provis, G C Lukey, S W Mallicoat, W M Kriven, J S van Deventer. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2005, 269( 1−3): 47– 58
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060
26 R Khattab, O A Mohamed, E A Ahmed. Setting time and carbonation resistance of alkali-activated GGBS-fly ash mortar. In: Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET). Dubai: IEEE, 2022, 1– 5
https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9735023
27 O A Mohamed, R Al Khattab, E A Ahmed. Sorptivity of mortar with alkali-activated slag and fly ash binders. Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai: IEEE, 2022, 1– 6
https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734864
28 C267-20 ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2020
29 R Hooton, M Nokken, R Hooton. Dependence of rate of absorption on degree of saturation of concrete. Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 2002, 24( 1): 20– 24
https://doi.org/10.1520/CCA10487J
30 S Samantasinghar, S P Singh. Fresh and hardened properties of fly ash–GBS blended geopolymer paste and mortar. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2019, 13( 1): 47
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0360-1
31 U Rattanasak, P Chindaprasirt. Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 22( 12): 1073– 1078
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.022
32 N Marjanović, M Komljenović, Z Baščarević, V Nikolić, R Petrović. Physical–mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated fly ash–blast furnace GBS blends. Ceramics International, 2015, 41( 1): 1421– 1435
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.075
33 H Z Öz, N Doğan-Sağlamtimur, A Bilgil, A Tamer, K Günaydin. Process development of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars in view of the mechanical characteristics. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14( 11): 2935
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112935
34 J Jang, N Lee, H Lee. Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/GBS pastes with superplasticizers. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 50 : 169– 176
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.048
35 X Gao, Q Yu, H Brouwers. Characterization of alkali activated GBS–fly ash blends containing nano-silica. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 98 : 397– 406
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.086
36 A Dehghani, F Aslani, N Ghaebi Panah. Effects of initial SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio and GBS on fly ash-based ambient cured geopolymer properties. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 293 : 123527
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123527
37 O Mohamed. Durability and compressive strength of high cement replacement ratio self-consolidating concrete. Buildings, 2018, 8( 11): 153
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8110153
38 N Lee, H Lee. Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/GBS concrete manufactured at room temperature. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 47 : 1201– 1209
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.107
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed