Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (11): 1365-1377   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0882-5
  本期目录
Bridging finite element and deep learning: High-resolution stress distribution prediction in structural components
Hamed BOLANDI1,2(), Xuyang LI1,2, Talal SALEM1, Vishnu Naresh BODDETI2, Nizar LAJNEF1
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
 全文: PDF(21599 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Finite-element analysis (FEA) for structures has been broadly used to conduct stress analysis of various civil and mechanical engineering structures. Conventional methods, such as FEA, provide high fidelity results but require the solution of large linear systems that can be computationally intensive. Instead, Deep Learning (DL) techniques can generate results significantly faster than conventional run-time analysis. This can prove extremely valuable in real-time structural assessment applications. Our proposed method uses deep neural networks in the form of convolutional neural networks (CNN) to bypass the FEA and predict high-resolution stress distributions on loaded steel plates with variable loading and boundary conditions. The CNN was designed and trained to use the geometry, boundary conditions, and load as input to predict the stress contours. The proposed technique’s performance was compared to finite-element simulations using a partial differential equation (PDE) solver. The trained DL model can predict the stress distributions with a mean absolute error of 0.9% and an absolute peak error of 0.46% for the von Mises stress distribution. This study shows the feasibility and potential of using DL techniques to bypass FEA for stress analysis applications.

Key wordsDeep Learning    finite element analysis    stress contours    structural components
收稿日期: 2022-03-15      出版日期: 2023-01-03
Corresponding Author(s): Hamed BOLANDI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(11): 1365-1377.
Hamed BOLANDI, Xuyang LI, Talal SALEM, Vishnu Naresh BODDETI, Nizar LAJNEF. Bridging finite element and deep learning: High-resolution stress distribution prediction in structural components. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(11): 1365-1377.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-022-0882-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2022/V16/I11/1365
Fig.1  
geometryboundary conditionsload positionload angle (° )load magnitude (kN)
pentagonE2E5, E4, E4 E530, 45, 601, 2, 3, 4, 5
pentagonE2 E3E530, 45, 601, 2, 3, 4, 5
pentagonE1 E2E430, 45, 601, 2, 3, 4, 5
pentagonE3E2 E5, E1 E2 E530, 45, 60, 901, 2, 3, 4
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
itemnumber of layersfirst layer (H × W × C)last layer (H × W × C)activarion
Conv7600 × 600 × 1210 × 10 × 1024ReLU
SE-ResNet310 × 10 × 102410 × 10 × 1024Sigmoid-ReLU
Inception310 × 10 × 102410 × 10 × 1024ReLU
EffiientNet110 × 10 × 102410 × 10 × 1024ReLU6
ConvT619 × 19 × 512600 × 600 × 12ReLU
Tab.2  
batch_sizelearning rateweight deacyexpand ratioloss functions
161.00E?051.00E?076MSE-MAE
Tab.3  
Fig.8  
modeldatasetbottleneckMSEMAEMRE (%)PMAE (%)PPAE (%)PAE
model 1classicSE-ResNet0.2158.803.800.900.4630.00
model 2classicInception0.6231.551.540.572.66150.55
model 3classicMobileNet0.3851.992.830.934.36246.50
model 4Fold 1SE-ResNet0.5934.901.800.632.19124.00
model 5Fold 2SE-ResNet0.6425.041.100.450.126.93
model 6Fold 3SE-ResNet0.6132.031.420.570.9352.89
mean of K-fold cross-validation0.6130.651.440.551.0861.27
STD of K-fold cross-validation0.024.140.280.070.8548.15
Tab.4  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
1 Y LeCun, Y Bengio, G E Hinton. Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436–444
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
2 J Schmidhuber. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 2015, 61: 85–117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
3 N Umetani. Exploring generative 3D shapes using autoencoder networks. Pages, 2017, 24: 1–4
https://doi.org/10.1145/3145749.3145758
4 Y YuT HurJ Jung. Deep learning for topology optimization design. 2018, arXiv:1801.05463
5 W Zhang, H Jiang, Z Yang, S Yamakawa, K Shimada, L B Kara. Data-driven upsampling of point clouds. Computer-Aided Design, 2019, 112: 1–13
6 E UluR ZhangM E YumerL B Kara. A data-driven investigation and estimation of optimal topologies under variable loading configurations. In: Computational Modeling of Objects Presented in Images. Fundamentals, Methods, and Applications. Pittsburgh: Springer International Publishing, 2014
7 A G Roy, S Conjeti, S P K Karri, D Sheet, A Katouzian, C Wachinger, N Navab. Relaynet: retinal layer and fluid segmentation of macular optical coherence tomography using fully convolutional networks. Biomedical Optics Express, 2017, 8(8): 3627–3642
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.003627
8 T Arvind. Mohan and Datta V. Gaitonde. A Deep Learning-based approach to reduced order modeling for turbulent flow control using LSTM neural networks. 2018, arXiv:1804.09269
9 A B FarimaniJ GomesV S Pande. Deep learning the physics of transport phenomena. 2017, arXiv:1709.02432
10 B KimV C AzevedoN ThuereyT KimM GrossB Solenthaler. Deep fluids: A generative network for parameterized fluid simulations. Computer Graphics Forum. 2019, 38(2): 59–70
11 G B Goh, N O Hodas, A Vishnu. Deep learning for computational chemistry. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2017, 38(16): 1291–1307
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24764
12 A Mardt, L Pasquali, H Wu, F Noé. VAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02388-1
13 G Montavon, M Rupp, V Gobre, A Vazquez-Mayagoitia, K Hansen, A Tkatchenko, K R Müller, von Lilienfeld O Anatole. Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space. New Journal of Physics, 2013, 15(9): 095003
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095003
14 G A Tribello, M Ceriotti, M Parrinello. A self-learning algorithm for biased molecular dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(41): 17509–17514
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011511107
15 A Mohammadi Bayazidi, G G Wang, H Bolandi, A H Alavi, A H Gandomi. Multigene genetic programming for estimation of elastic modulus of concrete. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 474289
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/474289
16 M Sarveghadi, A H Gandomi, H Bolandi, A H Alavi. Development of prediction models for shear strength of SFRCB using a machine learning approach. Neural Computing & Applications, 2019, 31(7): 2085–2094
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1997
17 S M Mousavi, P Aminian, A H Gandomi, A H Alavi, H Bolandi. A new predictive model for compressive strength of HPC using gene expression programming. Advances in Engineering Software, 2012, 45(1): 105–114
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.09.014
18 H Bolandi, W Banzhaf, N Lajnef, K Barri, A H Alavi. An Intelligent model for the prediction of bond strength of FRP bars in concrete: A soft computing approach. Technologies, 2019, 7(2): 42
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies7020042
19 M J Atalla, D J Inman. On model updating using neural networks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1998, 12(1): 135–161
https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1997.0138
20 R I Levin, N A J Lieven. Dynamic finite element model updating using neural networks. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, 210(5): 593–607
https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.1364
21 Z FanY WuJ LuW Li. Automatic pavement crack detection based on structured prediction with the convolutional neural network. 2018, arXiv:1802.02208
22 C V Dung, L D Anh. Autonomous concrete crack detection using deep fully convolutional neural network. Automation in Construction, 2019, 99: 52–58
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.028
23 N S Gulgec, M Takáč, S N Pakzad. Convolutional neural network approach for robust structural damage detection and localization. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2019, 33(3): 04019005
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000820
24 Y J Cha, W Choi, O Büyüköztürk. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2017, 32(5): 361–378
https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12263
25 A A Javadi, T P Tan, M Zhang. Neural network for constitutive modelling in finite element analysis. Computer Assisted Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, 2003, 10(4): 523–530
26 A Oishi, G Yagawa. Computational mechanics enhanced by deep learning. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 327: 327–351
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.040
27 A Madani, A Bakhaty, J Kim, Y Mubarak, M R Mofrad. Bridging finite element and machine learning modeling: stress prediction of arterial walls in atherosclerosis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2019, 141(8): 084502
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043290
28 L Liang, M Liu, C Martin. A deep learning approach to estimate stress distribution: A fast and accurate surrogate of finite-element analysis. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2018, 15(138): 20170844
29 A L Samuel. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 1959, 3(3): 210–229
https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.33.0210
30 E Alpaydin. Introduction to machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014
31 Y Kim. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. 2014, arXiv:1408.5882
32 A KrizhevskyI SutskeverG E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25. Lake Tahoe: Curran Associates, 2012
33 Y LeCun, L Bottou, Y Bengio, P Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11): 2278–2324
https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791
34 K SimonyanA Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. 2014, arXiv:1409.1556
35 M D ZeilerR Fergus. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. New York: Springer, 2014
36 C SzegedyW LiuY JiaP SermanetS ReedD AnguelovD ErhanV VanhouckeA Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE, 2015
37 K HeX ZhangS RenJ Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Boston: IEEE, 2015
38 W M Jenkins. Neural network-based approximations for structural analysis. In: Developments in Neural Networks and Evolutionary Computing for Civil and Structural Engineering. Cambridge: Civil-Comp Press Edinburgh, 1995
39 Z WaszczyszynL Ziemiański. Neural networks in mechanics of structures and materials—New results and prospects of applications. Computers & Structures, 2001, 79(22−25): 2261−2276
40 A T C Goh, K S Wong, B B Broms. Multivariate modelling of FEM data using neural networks. Computers & Structures, 2001, 79(22−25): 2261–2276
41 N Huber, Ch Tsakmakis. Determination of constitutive properties from spherical indentation data using neural networks. Part II: Plasticity with nonlinear isotropic and kinematic hardening. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1999, 47(7): 1589–1607
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00110-0
42 C Settgast, M Abendroth, M Kuna. Constitutive modeling of plastic deformation behavior of open-cell foam structures using neural networks. Mechanics of Materials, 2019, 131: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.015
43 M AbendrothM Kuna. Determination of deformation and failure properties of ductile materials by means of the small punch test and neural networks. Computational Materials Science, 2003, 28(3–4): 633–644
44 X Wu, J Ghaboussi, J H Jr Garrett. Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage. Computers & Structures, 1992, 42(4): 649–659
https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(92)90132-J
45 C Modarres, N Astorga, E L Droguett, V Meruane. Convolutional neural networks for automated damage recognition and damage type identification. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2018, 25(10): e2230
https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2230
46 C Zang, M Imregun. Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks and measured for data reduced via principal component projection. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2001, 242(5): 813–827
https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3390
47 A KhadilkarJ WangR Rai. Deep learning-based stress prediction for bottom-up sla 3d printing process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 102(5−8): 2555−2569
48 Z Nie, H Jiang, L B Kara. Stress field prediction in cantilevered structures using convolutional neural networks. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2020, 20(1): 011002
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044097
49 H GuoX ZhuangT Rabczuk. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. 2021, arXiv:2102.02617
50 C Anitescu, E Atroshchenko, N Alajlan, T Rabczuk. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second-order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06641
51 E Samaniego, C Anitescu, S Goswami, V M Nguyen-Thanh, H Guo, K Hamdia, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112790
52 X Zhuang, H Guo, N Alajlan, H Zhu, T Rabczuk. Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2021, 87: 104225
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104225
53 H GuoX ZhuangT Rabczuk. Stochastic analysis of heterogeneous porous material with modified neural architecture search (NAS) based physics-informed neural networks using transfer learning. 2020, arXiv:2010.12344
54 H Guo, X Zhuang, P Chen, N Alajlan, T Rabczuk. Analysis of three-dimensional potential problems in non-homogeneous media with physics-informed deep collocation method using material transfer learning and sensitivity analysis. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 1–22
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01633-6
55 S M Zahraei, M Heidarzadeh. Destructive effects of the 2003 bam earthquake on structures. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2007, 8(3): 329–342
56 S M Zahrai, H Bolandi. Towards lateral performance of CBF with unwanted eccentric connection: A finite element modeling approach. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(5): 1421–1428
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0094-1
57 S M Zahrai, H Bolandi. Numerical study on the impact of out-of-plane eccentricity on lateral behavior of concentrically braced frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2019, 19(2): 341–350
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0119-6
58 H Bolandi, S M Zahrai. Influence of in-plane eccentricity in connection of bracing members to columns and beams on the performance of steel frames. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 24(1): 91–102
59 J MasciU MeierD CireşanJ Schmidhuber. Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction. In: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011
60 J HuL ShenG Sun. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City: IEEE, 2018
61 M SandlerA HowardM ZhuA ZhmoginovL C Chen. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City: IEEE, 2018
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed