Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (1): 122-137   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0894-1
  本期目录
Structural performance of a façade precast concrete sandwich panel enabled by a bar-type basalt fiber-reinforced polymer connector
Junqi HUANG1,2, Qing JIANG1,2(), Xun CHONG1,2, Xianguo YE1,2, Caihua LIU1
1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2. Anhui Civil Engineering Structures and Materials Laboratory, Hefei 230009, China
 全文: PDF(26138 KB)   HTML
Abstract

In this study, a novel diagonally inserted bar-type basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) connector was proposed, aiming to achieve both construction convenience and partially composite behavior in precast concrete sandwich panels (PCSPs). First, pull-out tests were conducted to evaluate the anchoring performance of the connector in concrete after exposure to different temperatures. Thereafter, direct shear tests were conducted to investigate the shear performance of the connector. After the test on the individual performance of the connector, five façade PCSP specimens with the bar-type BFRP connector were fabricated, and the out-of-plane flexural performance was tested under a uniformly distributed load. The investigating parameters included the panel length, opening condition, and boundary condition. The results obtained in this study primarily indicated that 1) the bar-type BFRP connector can achieve a reliable anchorage system in concrete; 2) the bar-type BFRP connector can offer sufficient stiffness and capacity to achieve a partially composite PCSP; 3) the boundary condition of the panel considerably influenced the out-of-plane flexural performance and composite action of the investigated façade PCSP.

Key wordsprecast concrete sandwich panel    basalt fiber reinforced polymer    pull-out performance    shear performance    out-of-plane flexural performance
收稿日期: 2021-12-31      出版日期: 2023-03-02
Corresponding Author(s): Qing JIANG   
作者简介:

Qingyong Zheng and Ya Gao contributed equally to this work.

 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(1): 122-137.
Junqi HUANG, Qing JIANG, Xun CHONG, Xianguo YE, Caihua LIU. Structural performance of a façade precast concrete sandwich panel enabled by a bar-type basalt fiber-reinforced polymer connector. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(1): 122-137.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-022-0894-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I1/122
Fig.1  
IDdiameter (mm)Er (GPa)fy (MPa)εyfu (MPa)
bar-type BFRP connector8491055
D6 steel rebar62004520.00226600
D10 steel rebar102004550.00228618
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
specimen IDembedded length (mm)temperature (°C)pull-out capacity (kN)
test (individual)test (average)predicted using Eq. (1)test/predicted ratio
ST-B20-142–2018.217.918.30.98
ST-B20-242–2020.1
ST-B20-342–2016.5
ST-B20-442–2016.9
ST-0-142017.316.116.11.00
ST-0-242016.0
ST-0-342015.8
ST-0-442015.4
ST-25-1422514.314.613.41.09
ST-25-2422513.9
ST-25-3422515.7
ST-40-1424013.812.011.71.02
ST-40-2424012.4
ST-40-342409.8
ST-60-142609.08.89.50.93
ST-60-242607.8
ST-60-342609.0
ST-60-442609.5
Tab.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
specimen IDlength (mm)height (mm)thickness (mm)connector spacing (mm)opening numberbottom support numberbottom support spacing (mm)
SP-4980-0-249802930160 (60-50-50)600024350
SP-4980-0-349802930160 (60-50-50)600032175
SP-6280-2-362802930160 (60-50-50)600232780
SP-8020-2-380202930160 (60-50-50)600233675
SP-8020-2-480202930160 (60-50-50)600242400 and 2550
Tab.3  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
specimen IDPcr (kN/m2)Ki (kN/m3)Δtest (mm)Δfully (mm)Δnon (mm)DCAd (%)
SP-4980-0-23.0012500.800.242.8978.87
SP-4980-0-37.0020000.500.091.1561.68
SP-6280-2-33.0027030.370.151.8887.50
SP-8020-2-31.0016390.610.131.6067.41
SP-8020-2-42.0017240.580.111.3863.02
Tab.4  
Fig.10  
1 PCI Committee. PCI Design Handbook. 7th ed. Chicago, IL: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, 2010
2 PCI Committee. State of the art of precast/prestressed concrete sandwich wall panels. PCI Journal, 2011, 56(2): 131–176
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij56.2-06
3 T D Bush, G L Stine. Flexural behavior of composite precast concrete sandwich panels with continuous truss connectors. PCI Journal, 1994, 39(2): 112–121
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011994.112.121
4 O Kinnane, R West, R O Hegarty. Structural shear performance of insulated precast concrete sandwich panels with steel plate connectors. Engineering Structures, 2020, 215: 110691
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110691
5 D C Salmon, M K Tadros, T Culp. A new structurally and thermally efficient precast sandwich panel system. PCI Journal, 1994, 39(4): 90–101
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011994.90.101
6 G Woltman, D Tomlinson, A Fam. Investigation of various GFRP shear connectors for insulated precast concrete sandwich wall panels. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2013, 17(5): 711–721
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000373
7 K B Choi, W C Choi, L Feo, S J Jang, H D Yun. In-plane shear behavior of insulated precast concrete sandwich panels reinforced with corrugated GFRP shear connectors. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 79: 419–429
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.056
8 C P Pantelides, R Surapaneni, L D Reaveley. Structural performance of hybrid GFRP/steel concrete sandwich panels. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2008, 12(5): 570–576
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:5(570
9 A Jawdhari, A Fam, M Kadhim. Thermal bowing of reinforced concrete sandwich panels using time-domain coupled-field finite element analysis. Engineering Structures, 2022, 252: 113592
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113592
10 T G Norris, A Chen. Development of insulated FRP-confined Precast Concrete Sandwich panel with side and top confining plates and dry bond. Composite Structures, 2016, 152: 444–454
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.053
11 A Chen, T G Norris, P M Hopkins, M Yossef. Experimental investigation and finite element analysis of flexural behavior of insulated concrete sandwich panels with FRP plate shear connectors. Engineering Structures, 2015, 98: 95–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.022
12 J Huang, Q Jiang, X Chong, X Ye, D Wang. Experimental study on precast concrete sandwich panel with cross-shaped GFRP connectors. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2020, 72(3): 149–162
https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.18.00258
13 J Q Huang, J G Dai. Direct shear tests of glass fiber reinforced polymer connectors for use in precast concrete sandwich panels. Composite Structures, 2019, 207: 136–147
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.017
14 R Lameiras, J Barros, I B Valente, M Azenha. Development of sandwich panels combining fibre reinforced concrete layers and fibre reinforced polymer connectors. Part I: Conception and pull-out tests. Composite Structures, 2013, 105: 446–459
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.022
15 D Dutta, A Jawdhari, A Fam. A new studded precast concrete sandwich wall with embedded glass-fiber-reinforced polymer channel sections: Part 1, experimental study. PCI Journal, 2020, 65(3): 78–99
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij65.3-04
16 A Jawdhari, A Fam. A new studded precast concrete sandwich wall with embedded glass-fiber-reinforced polymer channel sections: Part 2, finite element analysis and parametric studies. PCI Journal, 2020, 65(4): 51–70
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij65.4-02
17 B A Frankl, G W Lucier, T K Hassan, S H Rizkalla. Behavior of precast, prestressed concrete sandwich wall panels reinforced with CFRP shear grid. PCI Journal, 2011, 56(2): 42–54
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012011.42.54
18 T K Hassan, S H Rizkalla. Analysis and design guidelines of precast, prestressed concrete, composite load-bearing sandwich wall panels reinforced with CFRP grid. PCI Journal, 2010, 55(2): 147–162
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012010.147.162
19 H Kazem, W G Bunn, H M Seliem, S H Rizkalla, H Gleich. Durability and long term behavior of FRP/foam shear transfer mechanism for concrete sandwich panels. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 98: 722–734
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.105
20 J H Kim, Y C You. Composite behavior of a novel insulated concrete sandwich wall panel reinforced with GFRP shear grids: Effects of insulation types. Materials (Basel), 2015, 8(3): 899–913
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8030899
21 I Choi, J H Kim, H R Kim. Composite behavior of insulated concrete sandwich wall panels subjected to wind pressure and suction. Materials (Basel), 2015, 8(3): 1264–1282
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8031264
22 I Choi, J H Kim, Y C You. Effect of cyclic loading on composite behavior of insulated concrete sandwich wall panels with GFRP shear connectors. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2016, 96: 7–19
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.030
23 A Shams, M Horstmann, J Hegger. Experimental investigations on textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) sandwich sections. Composite Structures, 2014, 118: 643–653
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.056
24 R O’Hegarty, R West, A Reilly, O Kinnane. Composite behaviour of fibre-reinforced concrete sandwich panels with FRP shear connectors. Engineering Structures, 2019, 198: 109475
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109475
25 J Q Huang, J G Dai. Flexural performance of precast geopolymer concrete sandwich panel enabled by FRP connector. Composite Structures, 2020, 248: 112563
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112563
26 A Rolland, M Quiertant, A Khadour, S Chataigner, K Benzarti, P Argoul. Experimental investigations on the bond behavior between concrete and FRP reinforcing bars. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 173: 136–148
27 I Yoshitake, H Tsuda, J Itose, N Hisabe. Effect of discrepancy in thermal expansion coefficients of CFRP and steel under cold temperature. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 59: 17–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.051
28 J ZhangZ HuangZ LiP YanP Zhang. Temperature fields of external walls of different thermal insulation placements. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2009, 30(12): 1356−1365 (In Chinese)
29 C Signorini, A Sola, B Malchiodi, A Nobili, A Gatto. Failure mechanism of silica coated polypropylene fibres for Fibre Reinforced Concrete (FRC). Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 236: 117549
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117549
30 Z Zhou, P Qiao. Bond behavior of epoxy-coated rebar in ultra-high performance concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 182: 406–417
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.113
31 I Choi, J H Kim, D W Kim, J S Park. Effects of grid-type shear connector arrangements used for insulated concrete sandwich wall panels with a low aspect ratio. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 46: 103754
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103754
32 H Hou, W Wang, B Qu, C Dai. Testing of insulated sandwich panels with GFRP shear connectors. Engineering Structures, 2020, 209: 109954
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109954
33 H D HibbitB I KarlssonE P Sorensen. ABAQUS User Manual, Version 6.12. Providence, RI: Simulia, 2012
34 318M-05 ACI. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2005
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed