Effect of strata restraint on seismic performance of prefabricated sidewall joints in fabricated subway stations

doi:10.1007/s11709-023-0917-6

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

2023, Vol. 17

Issue (5): 763-779 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0917-6

本期目录

Effect of strata restraint on seismic performance of prefabricated sidewall joints in fabricated subway stations

Hua-Fei HE, Zhao-Ping LI(

), Shao-Lin MA, Xiang-Yang CUI

School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

全文: PDF(13712 KB) HTML

Abstract：

A disadvantage of the conventional quasi-static test method is that it does not consider the soil restraint effect. A new method to test the seismic performance of prefabricated specimens for underground assembled structures is proposed, which can realistically reflect the strata restraint effect on the underground structure. Laboratory work combined with finite element (FE) analysis is performed in this study. Three full-scale sidewall specimens with different joint forms are designed and fabricated. Indices related to the seismic performance and damage modes are analyzed comprehensively to reveal the mechanism of the strata restraint effect on the prefabricated sidewall components. Test results show that the strata restraint effect effectively improves the energy dissipation capacity, load-bearing capacity, and the recoverability of the internal deformation of the precast sidewall components. However, the strata restraint effect reduces the ductility of the precast sidewall components and aggravates the shear and bending deformations in the core region of the connection joints. Additionally, the strata restraint effect significantly affects the seismic performance and damage mode of the prefabricated sidewall components. An FE model that can be used to conduct a seismic performance study of prefabricated specimens for underground assembled structures is proposed, and its feasibility is verified via comparison with test data.

Key words： underground structures precast sidewall specimen seismic test method bearing capacity energy dissipation capacity plastic deformation

收稿日期: 2022-07-22 出版日期: 2023-07-14

Corresponding Author(s): Zhao-Ping LI

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(5): 763-779.
Hua-Fei HE, Zhao-Ping LI, Shao-Lin MA, Xiang-Yang CUI. Effect of strata restraint on seismic performance of prefabricated sidewall joints in fabricated subway stations. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 763-779.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0917-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I5/763

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Tab.1

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig.21

Fig.22

Fig.23

Fig.24

Fig.25

Fig.26

Fig.27

Fig.28

Tab.2

Fig.29

Fig.30

Fig.31

Fig.32

Fig.33

1	H DobashiA ShiratoriD MiyamaH NaguraT Miyawaki. Design and construction of enlarging shield tunnel sections of large dimensional shield tunnels for the non-open-cut method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21(3–4): 249
2	Y Koyama. Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18(2–3): 145–159
3	J Liu, W Yu, L Jia, R Zhang, Y Hao, X Du. Effect of cryogenic temperature on static fracture of concrete having different structural sizes: Experimental tests. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2022, 193: 103431 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103431
4	B J He, L Yang, M Ye. Strategies for creating good wind environment around Chinese residences. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2014, 10: 174–183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.08.003
5	A Shahin, S M AbouRizk, Y Mohamed, S Fernando. Simulation modeling of weather-sensitive tunnelling construction activities subject to cold weather. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 41(1): 48–55 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0087
6	X Xu, Z Li, Q Fang, H Zheng. Challenges and countermeasures for using pile-beam-arch approach to enlarge large-diameter shield tunnel to subway station. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103326 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103326
7	L Tao, C Shi, P Ding, S Li, S Wu, Y Bao. A study on bearing characteristic and failure mechanism of thin-walled structure of a prefabricated subway station. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(3): 359–377 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0816-2
8	H He, Z Li. Effect mechanism of connection joints in fabricated station structures. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2021, 11(24): 11927 https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411927
9	P Ding, L Tao, X Yang, J Zhao, C Shi. Three-dimensional dynamic response analysis of a single-ring structure in a prefabricated subway station. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 45: 271–286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.010
10	L Tao, P Ding, C Shi, X Wu, S Wu, S Li. Shaking table test on seismic response characteristics of prefabricated subway station structure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 102994 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.102994
11	L Tao, P Ding, X Yang, P Lin, C Shi, Y Bao, P Wei, J Zhao. Comparative study of the seismic performance of prefabricated and cast-in-place subway station structures by shaking table test. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 105: 103583 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103583
12	H Liu, Q Han, Y Bai, C Xu, X Du. Connection performance of restrained deformed grouted sleeve splice. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2018, 21(3): 488–499 https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217719987
13	H Liu, Q Yan, X Du. Seismic performance comparison between precast beam joints and cast-in-place beam joints. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2017, 20(9): 1299–1314 https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216674952
14	H Liu, C Xu, X Du. Seismic response analysis of assembled monolithic subway station in the transverse direction. Engineering Structures, 2020, 219: 110970 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110970
15	J Liu, X Bao, D Wang, H Tan, S Li. The internal substructure method for seismic wave input in 3D dynamic soil−structure interaction analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 127: 105847 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105847
16	M A Sayed, O Kwon, D Park, Q Van Nguyen. Multi-platform soil−structure interaction simulation of Daikai subway tunnel during the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 125: 105643 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.017
17	S Dashti, Y M A Hashash, K Gillis, M Musgrove, M Walker. Development of dynamic centrifuge models of underground structures near tall buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 86: 89–105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.014
18	J Wang, G Ma, H Zhuang, Y Dou, J Fu. Influence of diaphragm wall on seismic responses of large unequal-span subway station in liquefiable soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 102988 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.018
19	H Zhuang, J Ren, Y Miao, L Jing, E Yao, C Xu. Seismic performance levels of a large underground subway station in different soil foundations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 25(14): 2808–2833 https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1651423
20	H Zhuang, Z Hu, X Wang, G Chen. Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modelling. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13(12): 3645–3668 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9790-6
21	M A Sayed, O Kwon, D Park, Q van Nguyen. Multi-platform soil−structure interaction simulation of Daikai subway tunnel during the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 125: 105643 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.017
22	Q Sun, D Dias, L Ribeiro e Sousa. Soft soil layer-tunnel interaction under seismic loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103329 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103329
23	Y H Deng, S Dashti, A Hushmand, C Davis, B Hushmand. Seismic response of underground reservoir structures in sand: Evaluation of Class-C and C1 numerical simulations using centrifuge experiments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 85: 202–216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.003
24	G Chen, S Chen, X Zuo, X Du, X Qi, Z Wang. Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 76: 13–28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.012
25	D Qiu, J Chen, Q Xu. Comparative numerical analysis on dynamic effects of underground large scale frame structures under seismic waves. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 83: 35–50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.012
26	D Qiu, J Chen, Q Xu. Dynamic responses and damage forms analysis of underground large scale frame structures under oblique SV seismic waves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 117: 216–220 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.032
27	S C Chian, S Madabhushi. Effect of buried depth and diameter on uplift of underground structures in liquefied soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 41: 181–190 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.020
28	W Li, Q Chen. Effect of vertical ground motions and overburden depth on the seismic responses of large underground structures. Engineering Structures, 2020, 205: 110073 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110073
29	GB50909-2014. Code for Seismic Design of Urban Rail Transit Structures. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2014 (in Chinese)
30	K Kawajima. A Seismic Design of Underground Structures. Tokyo: Kajima Institute Publishing Co., Ltd., 1994
31	W Ding, X Chen, Y Jin, Y Qiao. Flexural behavior of segmental joint containing double rows of bolts: Experiment and simulation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 112: 103940 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103940
32	L Zhou, Z Yan, Y Shen, L Guan. Experimental study on effect of ductile-iron panel stiffness on mechanical properties of segmental joints of shield tunnels. Underground Space, 2022, 7(6): 1056 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2022.02.001
33	S Teachavorasinskun, T Chub-uppakarn. Influence of segmental joints on tunnel lining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(4): 490–494 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.02.003
34	Y Jin, W Ding, Z Yan, K Soga, Z Li. Experimental investigation of the nonlinear behavior of segmental joints in a water-conveyance tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 68: 153–166 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.018
35	K Feng, C He, Y Qiu, L Zhang, W Wang, H Xie, Y Zhang, S Cao. Full-scale tests on bending behavior of segmental joints for large underwater shield tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 75: 100–116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.02.008
36	X Liu, Z Dong, Y Bai, Y Zhu. Investigation of the structural effect induced by stagger joints in segmental tunnel linings: First results from full-scale ring tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66: 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.03.008
37	H F He, Z P Li. Seismic response of single-arch large-span fabricated subway station structure. Earthquakes and Structures, 2022, 23: 101–113
38	P Ding, L Tao, X Yang, J Zhao, C Shi. Three-dimensional dynamic response analysis of a single-ring structure in a prefabricated subway station. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 45: 271–286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.010
39	W Li, H Gao, R Xiang, Y Du. Experimental study of seismic performance of precast shear wall with a new bolt-plate connection joint. Structures, 2021, 34: 3818–3833 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.009
40	D V Bompa, A Y Elghazouli. Inelastic cyclic behaviour of RC members incorporating threaded reinforcement couplers. Engineering Structures, 2019, 180: 468–483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.053
41	GB50010-2010. Code for Design of Concrete Structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011 (in Chinese)
42	A Shishegaran, B Karami, T Rabczuk, A Shishegaran, M A Naghsh, M Mohammad Khani. Performance of fixed beam without interacting bars. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 1180–1195 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0661-0
43	J T He, H F Ma, B Y Zhang, H Q Chen. Method and realization of seismic motion input of viscous-spring boundary. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41: 960–969
44	A Shishegaran, M R Ghasemi, H Varaee. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1301–1315 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0552-4
45	A Bigdeli, A Shishegaran, M A Naghsh, B Karami, A Shishegaran, G Alizadeh. Surrogate models for the prediction of damage in reinforced concrete tunnels under internal water pressure. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2021, 22: 632–656

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed