Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (10): 1443-1464   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0932-7
  本期目录
Dynamic performance of submerged floating tunnel with different mooring styles subjected to anchor cable failure
Zhiwen WU1(), Chuhan ZHANG1, Liwang MOU1, Guoxiong MEI1(), Ankit GARG2,3
1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2. Department of Civil Engineering, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan
3. Guangdong Engineering Center for Structure Safety and Health Monitoring, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
 全文: PDF(27139 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Submerged floating tunnels (SFTs) are novel structures for transportation across long- and deep-strait regions. Owing to severe wave and current excitation as well as the effects of underwater structures and corrosion, the risk of local anchor cable failure is high, which can result in the progressive failure of the entire structure. In this study, experimental and numerical investigations are conducted to analyze the dynamic behavior of an SFT with different mooring styles under local cable failure. A custom-designed cable failure device and the birth-and-death element method are used to simulate cable failure (i.e., progressive failure) via experiments and numerical simulation, respectively. A physical-scale segmental model of an SFT with different mooring styles under anchor cable failure is developed in this study. A segmental and entire-length mathematical model is developed using the ANSYS program to perform the numerical simulation. The results of the segmental numerical and experimental models indicate good agreement. The dynamic response of an SFT with different mooring styles under cable failure is comprehensively investigated by investigating the effects of key parameters (wave period, buoyant weight ratio, and cable failure mechanism). Moreover, the progressive failure of the SFT under cable failure is investigated via a segment model test and a numerical simulation of its entire length. The present study can serve as a reference for the safer designs of the SFT mooring style.

Key wordsdynamic behaviors    submerged floating tunnel    cable failure    mooring style    progressive failure
收稿日期: 2022-05-17      出版日期: 2024-01-15
Corresponding Author(s): Zhiwen WU,Guoxiong MEI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(10): 1443-1464.
Zhiwen WU, Chuhan ZHANG, Liwang MOU, Guoxiong MEI, Ankit GARG. Dynamic performance of submerged floating tunnel with different mooring styles subjected to anchor cable failure. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(10): 1443-1464.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0932-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I10/1443
componentparameterunitvalue
tunnel tubelengthm1.46
segment lengthm0.6
outer diameterm0.2
elastic modulusGPa2.4
densitykg?m–31.18
BWR1.5
anchor cableselastic modulusGPa206
diameterm0.002
length of incline cablesm1.06
length of vertical cablesm0.75
length of crossover cablesm1.26
pretensionN48.6 (mooring style 1)/44.7 (mooring styles 2 and 3)
Tab.1  
parameterunitvalue
water depthm1.0
wave heightm0.03
wave periods0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7
flow velocitym/s0.1
immersion depthm0.15
Tab.2  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
parametervalue/description
regular wave height (cm)3.0
regular wave period (s)0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7
current velocity (m/s)0.1
wave and current direction (° )0
BWR1.3 : 0.2 : 2.1
cable failure mechanismNo. 5 cable failure; reducing the breaking tensions of all cables to 70 N; triggering No. 5 cable failure at 30 s
Tab.3  
Fig.6  
mooring styletest methodsway (s)heave (s)roll (s)
mooring style 1experimental1.100.251.40
numerical1.150.261.46
mooring style 2experimental0.460.180.45
numerical0.490.180.47
mooring style 3experimental0.450.210.43
numerical0.480.220.46
Tab.4  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
Fig.20  
Fig.21  
Fig.22  
Fig.23  
Fig.24  
Case No.positions of cable failure
119, 20, 21
27, 19, 20
36, 7, 19, 20
Tab.5  
Fig.25  
Fig.26  
1 B Jiang, B Liang, S Wu. Feasibility study on the submerged floating tunnel in Qiongzhou strait, China. Polish Maritime Research, 2018, 25(s2): 4–11
https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0066
2 A Minoretti, X Xiang, I Johansen, M Eidem. The future of the tunnel crossing: The submerged floating tube bridge. Structural Engineering International, 2020, 30(4): 493–497
https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2020.1775165
3 M Dong, G Miao, L Yong, Z Niu, H Pang, C Hou. Effect of escape device for Submerged Floating Tunnel (SFT) on hydrodynamic loads applied to SFT. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(4): 609–616
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60284-9
4 H Zhang, Z Yang, J Li, C Yuan, M Xie, H Yang, H Yin. A global review for the hydrodynamic response investigation method of submerged floating tunnels. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 225: 108825
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108825
5 W Lu, F Ge, X Wu, Y Hong. Nonlinear dynamics of a submerged floating moored structure by incremental harmonic balance method with FFT. Marine Structures, 2013, 31: 63–81
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.01.002
6 S Seo, H Mun, J Lee, J Kim. Simplified analysis for estimation of the behavior of a submerged floating tunnel in waves and experimental verification. Marine Structures, 2015, 44: 142–158
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.09.002
7 D Cantero, A Ronnquist, A Naess. Tension during parametric excitation in submerged vertical taut tethers. Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 65: 279–289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.05.002
8 M Naik, U Zahid, C Dong-Ho. Performance evaluation of submerged floating tunnel subjected to hydrodynamic and seismic excitations. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(11): 1–17
9 G Luo, S Pan, Y Zhang, Y Ren, K Xiong. Displacement response of submerged floating tunnel with flexible boundary under explosion load. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(2): 346–358
https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220950612
10 X Chen, Q Chen, Z Chen, S Cai, X Zhuo, J Lv. Numerical modeling of the interaction between submerged floating tunnel and surface waves. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 220: 108494
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108494
11 J Xie, J Chen. Dynamic response analysis of submerged floating tunnel-canyon water system under earthquakes. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2021, 94: 757–779
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.01.031
12 J Lee, C Jin, M Kim. Dynamic response analysis of submerged floating tunnels by wave and seismic excitations. Ocean Systems Engineering, 2017, 7(1): 1–19
https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2017.7.1.001
13 Y LiuR JinB GengH ZhangC Ren. Influence of anchor cable inclination angle on motion response of submerged floating tunnel with different section. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 35(2): 237−247 (in Chinese)
14 Y Xiang, Z Chen, B Bai, H Lin, Y Yang. Mechanical behaviors and experimental study of submerged floating tunnel subjected to local anchor-cable failure. Engineering Structures, 2020, 212: 110521
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110521
15 Y Zhou, S Chen. Numerical investigation of cable breakage events on long-span cable-stayed bridges under stochastic traffic and wind. Engineering Structures, 2015, 105: 299–315
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.009
16 A Minaei, F Daneshjoo, J Goicolea. Experimental and numerical study on cable breakage equivalent force in cable-stayed structures consisting of low-relaxation seven-wire steel strands. Structures, 2020, 27: 595–606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.028
17 G Wu, W Qiu, T Wu. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the self-anchored suspension bridge subjected to sudden breakage of a hanger. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 97: 701–717
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.028
18 Y Bae, M Kim, H Kim. Performance changes of a floating offshore wind turbine with broken mooring line. Renewable Energy, 2017, 101: 364–375
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.044
19 B Jakobsen. Design of the submerged floating tunnel operating under various conditions. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 4: 71–79
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.08.009
20 Z Wu, D Wang, W Ke, Y Qin, F Lu, M Jiang. Experimental investigation for the dynamic behavior of submerged floating tunnel subjected to the combined action of earthquake, wave and current. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 239(1): 109911
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109911
21 Z Wu, S Yang, L Tang, H Ma, L Mou, Y Xiao. Experimental investigation and analysis for hydrodynamic behaviours and progressive collapse phenomenon of submerged floating tunnel under anchor cables’ breakage. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022, 17(9): 1924–1938
https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2021.1907084
22 Floating Tunnel Structural SubmergedJoint Team of Tackling Technological Problems Design. Submerged Floating Tunnel Engineering and Technology Research Introduction. Beijing: Science Press, 2019 (in Chinese)
23 S Kanie. Feasibility studies on various SFT in Japan and their technological evaluation. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 4: 13–20
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.08.004
24 R Larssen, S Jakobsen. Submerged floating tunnels for crossing of wide and deep fjords. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 4: 171–178
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.08.020
25 Z Yang, B Huang, A Kang, B Zhu, J Han, R Yin, X Li. Experimental study on the solitary wave-current interaction and the combined forces on a vertical cylinder. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 236: 109569
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109569
26 J Chen, J Li, S Sun, Z Su. Experimental and numerical analysis of submerged floating tunnel. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(10): 2949–2957
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1363-0
27 W LinM LiuZ ZhouJ ChenZ YangJ Zhang. Relevant issues about real stiffness of submerged floating tunnel section-model. China Harbour Engineering, 2020, 40(2): 31−37 (in Chinese)
28 J R Morison, J W Johnson, S A Schaaf. The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1950, 2(5): 149–154
https://doi.org/10.2118/950149-G
29 X Wang, Z Chen, Y Yu, H Liu. Numerical and experimental study on loaded suspendome subjected to sudden cable failure. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 137: 358–371
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.06.014
30 C Mozos, A Aparicio. Numerical and experimental study on the interaction cable structure during the failure of a stay in a cable stayed bridge. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(8): 2330–2341
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.006
31 U Starossek. Typology of progressive collapse. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(9): 2302–2307
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.025
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed