Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (5): 686-703   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0937-2
  本期目录
Performance evaluation of low-rise infilled reinforced concrete frames designed by considering local effects on column shear demand
Jarun SRECHAI1, Wongsa WARARUKSAJJA2(), Sutat LEELATAVIWAT3, Suchart LIMKATANYU4
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Burapha University, Chon Buri 20131, Thailand
2. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani 12110, Thailand
3. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
4. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla 90110, Thailand
 全文: PDF(14536 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The interactions between reinforced concrete (RC) frames and infill walls play an important role in the seismic response of frames, particularly for low-rise frames. Infill walls can increase the overall lateral strength and stiffness of the frame owing to their high strength and stiffness. However, local wall-frame interactions can also lead to increased shear demand in the columns owing to the compressive diagonal strut force from the infill wall, which can result in failure or in serious situations, collapse. In this study, the effectiveness of a design strategy to consider the complex infill wall interaction was investigated. The approach was used to design example RC frames with infill walls in locations with different seismicity levels in Thailand. The performance of these frames was assessed using nonlinear static, and dynamic analyses. The performance of the frames and the failure modes were compared with those of frames designed without considering the infill wall or the local interactions. It was found that even though the overall responses of the buildings designed with and without consideration of the local interaction of the infill walls were similar in terms the overall lateral strength, the failure modes were different. The proposed method can eliminate the column shear failure from the building. Finally, the merits and limitations of this approach are discussed and summarized.

Key wordsreinforced concrete frames    infill wall    seismic design method    shear failure    wall-frame interaction
收稿日期: 2022-02-26      出版日期: 2023-07-14
Corresponding Author(s): Wongsa WARARUKSAJJA   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(5): 686-703.
Jarun SRECHAI, Wongsa WARARUKSAJJA, Sutat LEELATAVIWAT, Suchart LIMKATANYU. Performance evaluation of low-rise infilled reinforced concrete frames designed by considering local effects on column shear demand. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 686-703.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0937-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I5/686
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
building column story
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
B1 C1 1.25 1.26 1.27 1.29
C2 1.03 1.07 1.14 1.23
C3 1.07 1.09 1.14 1.24
C4 0.75 0.77 0.94 1.13
B2 C1 1.10 1.09 1.10 1.12
C2 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.08
C3 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.09
C4 0.75 0.84 0.95 1.10
Tab.1  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
material parameter value
infill struts w (mm) 255
tw (mm) 100
ψf m (MPa) 14.63
fr (MPa) 1.46
εm 0.0025
εu 0.0060
concrete E (GPa) 20.75
fc (MPa) 19.50
ft (MPa) 0.00
εcm 0.003
reinforcement bar Es (GPa) 200
fy (MPa) 579
St 0.02
R0 18.00
R1 0.97
R2 0.20
A1 0.10
A2 6.00
A3 0.10
A4 6.00
fi (MPa) 0.00
εf 0.20
Tab.2  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
Fig.20  
Fig.21  
1 H Sezen, A S Whittaker, K J Elwood, K M Mosalam. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25(1): 103–114
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9
2 M Ferraioli, A Lavino. Irregularity effects of masonry infills on nonlinear seismic behaviour of RC buildings. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020: 4086320
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4086320
3 B S Smith. Lateral stiffness of infilled frames. Journal of the Structural Division, 1962, 88(6): 183–199
https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0000849
4 T PaulayM J N Priestly. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. New York: Wiley, 1992
5 A Saneinejad, B Hobbs. Inelastic design of infilled frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1995, 121(4): 634–650
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:4(634
6 M N Fardis, T B Panagiotakos. Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings. Part II: Infilled structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1997, 1(3): 475–503
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962375
7 P G Asteris. Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(8): 1071–1079
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1071
8 V Bertero, S Brokken. Infills in seismic resistant building. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1983, 109(6): 1337–1361
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:6(1337
9 G Blasi, D Perrone, M A Aiello. Fragility functions and floor spectra of RC masonry infilled frames: Influence of mechanical properties of masonry infills. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16(12): 6105–6130
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0435-4
10 P G Asteris, C C Repapis, L Cavaleri, V Sarhosis, A Athanasopoulou. On the fundamental period of infilled RC frame buildings. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2015, 54(6): 1175–1200
https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1175
11 H Burton, G Deierlein. Simulation of seismic collapse in nonductile reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infills. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 140(8): A4014016
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000921
12 A B Mehrabi, P B Shing, M P Schuller, J L Noland. Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1996, 122(3): 228–237
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228
13 G Al-Chaar, M Issa, S Sweeney. Behavior of masonry-infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(8): 1055–1063
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1055
14 J Srechai, P Lukkunaprasit. An innovative scheme for retrofitting masonry-infilled non-ductile reinforced concrete frames. The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, 2013, 6(4): 277–289
https://doi.org/10.1080/19373260.2013.821716
15 S Niyompanitpattana, P Warnitchai. Effects of masonry infill walls with openings on seismic behaviour of long-span GLD RC frames. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2017, 69(21): 1082–1102
https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.17.00008
16 Q Su, G Cai, H Cai. Seismic behaviour of full-scale hollow bricks-infilled RC frames under cyclic loads. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15(7): 2981–3012
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0074-6
17 T Suzuki, H Choi, Y Sanada, Y Nakano, K Matsukawa, D Paul, P Gülkan, B Binici. Experimental evaluation of the in-plane behaviour of masonry wall infilled RC frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15(10): 4245–4267
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0139-1
18 H Alwashali, D Sen, K Jin, M Maeda. Experimental investigation of influences of several parameters on seismic capacity of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame. Engineering Structures, 2019, 189: 11–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.020
19 W Wararuksajja, J Srechai, S Leelataviwat. Seismic design of RC moment-resisting frames with concrete block infill walls considering local infill-frame interactions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18(14): 6445–6474
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00942-9
20 A Stavridis, P B Shing. Finite-element modeling of nonlinear behavior of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010, 136(3): 285–296
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.116
21 I KoutromanosA StavridisP B Shing K Willam. Numerical modeling of masonry-infilled RC frames subjected to seismic loads. Computers & Structures, 2011, 89(11−12): 1026−1037
22 R R Milanesi, P Morandi, G Magenes. Local effects on RC frames induced by AAC masonry infills through FEM simulation of in-plane tests. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16(9): 4053–4080
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0353-5
23 L Cavaleri, F Di Trapani. Prediction of the additional shear action on frame members due to infills. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13(5): 1425–1454
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9668-z
24 J Srechai, S Leelataviwat, A Wongkaew, P Lukkunaprasit. Experimental and analytical evaluation of a low-cost seismic retrofitting method for masonry-infilled non-ductile RC frames. Earthquakes and Structures, 2017, 12(6): 699–712
25 S H Basha, H B Kaushik. A novel macromodel for prediction of shear failure in columns of masonry infilled RC frames under earthquake loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17(4): 2219–2244
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00537-5
26 H Huang, H V Burton. A database of test results from steel and reinforced concrete infilled frame experiments. Earthquake Spectra, 2020, 36(3): 1525–1548
https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899950
27 H B Kaushik, D C Rai, S K Jain. Code approaches to seismic design of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames: A state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra, 2006, 22(4): 961–983
https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2360907
28 W W El-Dakhakhni, M Elgaaly, A A Hamid. Three-strut model for concrete masonry-infilled steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(2): 177–185
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177
29 F J Crisafulli, A J Carr. Proposed macro-model for the analysis of infilled frame structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 40(2): 69–77
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.40.2.69-77
30 P G Asteris, S T Antoniou, D S Sophianopoulos, C Z Chrysostomou. Mathematical macromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2011, 137(12): 1508–1517
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000384
31 T Nicola, C Leandro, C Guido, S Enrico. Masonry infilled frame structures: State-of-the-art review of numerical modelling. Earthquakes and Structures, 2015, 8(1): 225–251
https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.225
32 J Srechai, S Leelataviwat, W Wararuksajja, S Limkatanyu. Multi-strut and empirical formula-based macro modeling for masonry infilled RC frames. Engineering Structures, 2022, 266: 114559
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114559
33 P K Dhir, E Tubaldi, H Ahmadi, J Gough. Numerical modelling of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills and rubber joints. Engineering Structures, 2021, 246: 112833
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112833
34 Committee for Standardization (CEN) European. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, EN 1998-1, Eurocode 8. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2004
35 Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) American. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-17. Reston, VA: ASCE, 2017
36 W Wararuksajja, J Srechai, S Leelataviwat, T Sungkamongkol, S Limkatanyu. Seismic design method for preventing column shear failure in reinforced concrete frames with infill walls. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44: 102963
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102963
37 B S SmithA Coull. Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design. New York: Wiley, 1991
38 Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Federal. Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings: Basic Procedures Manual, FEMA 306. Washington, D.C.: FEMA, 1999
39 C J Tucker. Prediction the in-plane capacity of masonry infilled frames, in Faculty of the Graduate School. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Cookeville, TN: Tennessee Technological University, 2007, 270
40 A Stavridis. Analytical and Experimental Study of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frames Infilled with Masonry Walls. La Jolla, CA: University of California San Diego, 2009, 417
41 Standard Joint Committee (MSJC) Masonry. Building Code Requirements and Specification for Masonry Structures, TMS 402-11. Longmont, CO: MSJC, 2011
42 M Moretti, T Tassios. Behaviour of short columns subjected to cyclic shear displacements: Experimental results. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(8): 2018–2029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.001
43 Y A LiS J Hwang. Shear behavior prediction of non-ductile reinforced concrete members in earthquake. In: Hsu T T C, ed. Concrete Structures in Earthquake. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, 17–27
44 Y A Li, S J Hwang. Prediction of lateral load displacement curves for reinforced concrete short columns failed in shear. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(2): 04016164
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001656
45 Concrete Institute (ACI) American. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318/318R-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI, 2014
46 Civil engineering software for structural assessment SeismoStruct:retrofitting structural. Pavia: SeismoSoft–Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions. 2020
47 S Sattar, A B Liel. Seismic performance of nonductile reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls—I: Development of a strut model enhanced by finite element models. Earthquake Spectra, 2016, 32(2): 795–818
https://doi.org/10.1193/90914eqs139m
48 N Mohammad Noh, L Liberatore, F Mollaioli, S Tesfamariam. Modelling of masonry infilled RC frames subjected to cyclic loads: State of the art review and modelling with OpenSees. Engineering Structures, 2017, 150: 599–621
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.002
49 F di Trapani, G Bertagnoli, M F Ferrotto, D Gino. Empirical equations for the direct definition of stress−strain laws for fiber-section-based macromodeling of infilled frames. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 144(11): 04018101
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001532
50 W Wararuksajja. Seismic behavior and design of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames with concrete block infill walls considering infill-frame interactions. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Bangkok: King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 2020, 2020
51 A K Chopra, R K Goel, C Chintanapakdee. Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthquake Spectra, 2004, 20(3): 757–778
https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1775237
52 S Antoniou, R Pinho. Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 8(4): 497–522
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350498
53 M Ferraioli, A Lavino, A Mandara. An adaptive capacity spectrum method for estimating seismic response of steel moment-resisting frames. Ingegneria Sismica, 2016, 1(2): 47–60
54 M Ferraioli. Multi-mode pushover procedure for deformation demand estimates of steel moment-resisting frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2017, 17(2): 653–676
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-6022-8
55 of Public Works Department& Country Planning (DPT) Town. Companion Standard for Seismic Design of Building Structures in Thailand, DPT 1301-54. Bangkok: DPT, 2011 (in Thai)
56 of Public Works Department& Country Planning (DPT) Town. Standard for Seismic Design of Building Structures in Thailand, DPT 1301-52. Bangkok: DPT, 2009 (in Thai)
[1] FSC-22937-OF-JS_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed