Analysis of load and adaptability of disc cutters during shield tunneling in soft–hard varied strata

doi:10.1007/s11709-023-0946-1

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

2023, Vol. 17

Issue (4): 533-545 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0946-1

本期目录

Analysis of load and adaptability of disc cutters during shield tunneling in soft–hard varied strata

Fengwei YANG^1,², Weilin SU^1,³(

), Yi YANG³, Zhiguo CAO^1,²

¹. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China
². Key Laboratory of Water Management and Water Security for Yellow River Basin, Ministry of Water Resources, Zhengzhou 450003, China
³. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

全文: PDF(6048 KB) HTML

Abstract：

The disc cutters of shield machines exhibit unsatisfactory adaptability and performance during the soft–hard varied strata tunneling process. To analyze the rotation state, cutting performance, and adaptability of disc cutters during shield tunneling in soft–hard varied strata, the Holmquist Johnson Cook and Federal Highway Administration constitutive models are introduced to numerically simulate the failure process of materials on the excavation face and to calculate the load of disc cutters. Additionally, the parameters of the models are modified based on laboratory disc cutter excavation test results. The results of numerical calculation can reflect the load level and the behavior of the disc cutters during operation. The tangential loads of the disc cutters during the cutting of four typical soft-strata excavation face models are numerically calculated, thus providing reference values for the starting torque of the disc cutters. A greater penetration is suggested for soft-strata tunneling to allow the disc cutters to rotate smoothly and continuously as well as to guarantee a better cutting effect. The disc cutters in the center of the cutterhead should be specified with a lower starting torque to prevent uneven wear, rotation stagnation, cutterhead clogging, and other adverse phenomena.

Key words： shield tunneling disc cutter load laboratory excavation test numerical calculation soft–hard varied strata

收稿日期: 2022-08-23 出版日期: 2023-06-25

Corresponding Author(s): Weilin SU

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(4): 533-545.
Fengwei YANG, Weilin SU, Yi YANG, Zhiguo CAO. Analysis of load and adaptability of disc cutters during shield tunneling in soft–hard varied strata. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(4): 533-545.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0946-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I4/533

model type	parameter type	parameter assignment	value
HJC model	basic parameters	ρ (kg/m³)	2110
		G (MPa)	$8.75 × 103$
		T (MPa)	1.62
		f_c (MPa)	24.45
	strength parameters	A	0.272
		B	1.50
		N	0.87
		SF_MAX	20
	state equation parameters	p_l (MPa)	$1.78 × 103$
		μ_l	0.16
		p_c (MPa)	8.15
		μ_c	$6.99 × 10 ? 4$
		K₁ (GPa)	9.23
		K₂ (GPa)	141.24
		K₃ (GPa)	136.50
	strain rate effect parameters	C	0.012
	strain rate effect parameters	ESP0	1.0
	damage parameters	D₁	0.04
		D₂	1.0
		EF_MIN	0.01
FHWA model	basic parameters	ρ (kg/m³)	1408.7
		ρ_W (kg/m³)	1.00
		G_s	1.80
	elastic parameters	K (MPa)	11.03
		G (MPa)	5.09
		$D 1$	0
	yield parameters	c (MPa)	2.21 × 10^?2
		$φ$ (° )	24.4
		a	2.37 × 10^?3
	excess pore water pressure parameters	$ω$	0.033
	excess pore water pressure parameters	$D 2$	0
	strain hardening and softening parameters	AN	0
		D_int	5.0 × 10^?5
		$φ m a x$ (° )	40
	strain rate effect parameters	V_n	0
	strain rate effect parameters	γ	0

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

soil type	FHWA model parameter values
soil type	ρ (kg/m³)	K (MPa)	G (MPa)	c (kPa)	$φ$ (° )	$φ m a x$ (° )	AN	D_int	V_n	γ
ordinary soil	1408	9.8	2.3	17.41	25.2	40	0	5.0 × 10^?5	1.1	0.10
hard soil	1514	51.8	22.1	13.35	27.6	42	0	5.0 × 10^?5	1.2	0.10
sandy gravel hard soil	1920	125.4	51.0	25.90	30.7	45	0	5.0 × 10^?5	1.2	0.10
strongly weathered sandy conglomerate	2050	208.5	112.6	42.00	34.7	45	0	5.0 × 10^?5	1.2	0.15

Tab.4

Fig.14

Fig.15

1	S M Liao, F L Peng, S L Shen. Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(4): 421–430 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.001
2	S L Shen, Y S Xu. Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(9): 1378–1392 https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-049
3	D L Jin, D J Yuan, X G Li, H T Zheng. An in-tunnel grouting protection method for excavating twin tunnels beneath an existing tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 27–35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.002
4	D L Jin, D J Yuan, X G Li, H T Zheng. Analysis of the settlement of an existing tunnel induced by shield tunnelling underneath. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 209–220 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.035
5	S Yagiz, H Karahan. Application of various optimization techniques and comparison of their performances for predicting TBM penetration rate in rock mass. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 80: 308–315 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.019
6	F L Min, J R Du, N Zhang, X G Chen, H J Lv, L C Liu, C J Yu. Experimental study on property change of slurry and filter cake of slurry shield under seawater intrusion. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 88: 290–299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.006
7	W ZhuY J QianF L MinL WangC WangC XuJ N Hu. The current status and some problems of slurry shield in China. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(5): 724−735 (in Chinese)
8	W Sun, M L Shi, C Z Zhang, J Zhao, X Song. Dynamic load prediction of tunnel boring machine (TBM) based on heterogeneous in-situ data. Automation in Construction, 2018, 92(8): 23–34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.030
9	Y YangX G Li. Review on the issue of clogging occurred in shield tunnelling. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(S2): 1030−1038 (in Chinese)
10	N C Zhang. Analysis of wear shape of disc-cutter edge of TBM/shield and optimization measures. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(4): 657−665 (in Chinese)
11	W B ZhuS J Ju. Technology for Shield Tunnelling in Mixed Face Ground Condition. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 2006 (in Chinese)
12	D J Ren, S L Shen, A Arulrajah, W C Cheng. Prediction model of TBM disc cutter wear during tunnelling in heterogeneous ground. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(11): 3599–3611 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1549-3
13	D J Ren, S L Shen, A Zhou, J C Chai. Prediction of lateral continuous wear of cutter ring in soft ground with quartz sand. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 103: 86–92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.07.015
14	X G LiX C LiD J Yuan. Application of an interval wear analysis method to cutting tools used in tunnelling shields in soft ground. Wear, 2017, 392–393: 21–28
15	I Evans. The force required to cut coal with blunt wedges. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1965, 2(1): 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(65)90018-5
16	Y Nishimatsu. The mechanics of rock cutting. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1972, 9(2): 261–270 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(72)90027-7
17	H Q Yang, H Wang, X P Zhou. Analysis on the damage behavior of mixed ground during TBM cutting process. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57(Aug): 55–65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.014
18	R A Snowdon, M D Ryley, J Temporal, G I Crabb. The effect of hydraulic stiffness on tunnel boring machine performance. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1983, 20(5): 203–214 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)90001-3
19	H P Sanio. Prediction of the performance of disc cutters in anisotropic rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1985, 22(3): 153–161 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)93229-2
20	J Rostami, L Ozdemir. New model for performance production of hard rock TBMs. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conference. Boston: Energy Data Base, 1993, 793–809
21	J W Cho, S Jeon, H Y Jeong, S H Chang. Evaluation of cutting efficiency during TBM disc cutter excavation within a Korean granitic rock using linear-cutting-machine testing and photogrammetric measurement. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 35: 37–54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.08.006
22	Y C Pan, Q S Liu, J P Liu, X X Peng, X X Kong. Full-scale linear cutting tests in Chongqing sandstone to study the influence of confining stress on rock cutting forces by TBM disc cutter. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(6): 1697–1713 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1412-6
23	Q M GongC T MiaoH S MaX B Zhao. Effect of joint spacing on rock breaking under disc cutter by linear cutting experiments. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(6): 97–105 (in Chinese)
24	E Martin, S Lorenz, R Galler. Tunnel boring machine performance prediction with scaled rock cutting tests. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 70(9): 450–459 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.021
25	F WuL J YinH ZhangQ M Gong. Rock fragmentation mechanism and efficiency under inserted-tooth roller cutter by rotary cutting test. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(10): 150−159 (in Chinese)
26	Q Geng, Z Y Wei, H Meng. An experimental research on the rock cutting process of the gage cutters for rock tunnel boring machine (TBM). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 52: 182–191 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.008
27	Q Geng, Z Y Wei, H Meng, F J Macias. Mechanical performance of TBM cutterhead in mixed rock ground conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 76–84 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.012
28	Q Geng, F He, M X Ma, X H Liu, X B Wang, Z Y Zhang, M Ye. Application of full-scale experimental cutterhead system to study penetration performance of tunnel boring machines (TBMs). Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55(8): 4673–4696 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02886-9
29	H Y LiuS Q KouP A LindqvistC A Tang. Numerical modelling of the heterogeneous rock fracture process using various test techniques. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2007, 40(2): 107−144 (in Chinese)
30	W L SuX G LiY XuD L Jin. Numerical simulation of shield tool cutting concrete based on HJC model. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(6): 1106−1114 (in Chinese)
31	Q TanN E YiY M XiaZ J XuY ZhuJ H Song. Research on rock dynamic fragmentation characteristics by TBM cutters and cutter spacing optimization. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(12): 2453−2464 (in Chinese)
32	H Haeri, M F Marji, K Shahriar. Simulating the effect of disc erosion in TBM disc cutters by a semi-infinite DDM. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2015, 8(6): 3915–3927 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1489-5
33	H Haeri, M F Marji. Simulating the crack propagation and cracks coalescence underneath TBM disc cutters. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9(2): 124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2137-4
34	D J Ren, J S Shen, J C Chai, A Zhou. Analysis of disc cutter failure in shield tunnelling using 3D circular cutting theory. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 90: 23–35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.02.015
35	S Wen, F Wu, S Li, L M Zhang. Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation efficiency of TBM disc cutter under different lateral pressure coefficient and rock strength. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2021, 3(4): 9–19
36	T J Holmquist, G R Johnson. A computational constitutive model for glass subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2011, 78(5): 051003 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004326
37	B A Lewis. Manual for LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147 (No. FHWA-HRT-04-095). 2004
38	J C Simo, J W Ju. Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—I. Formulation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1987, 23(7): 821–840 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(87)90083-7
39	J C Simo, J W Ju. Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—II. Computational aspects. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1987, 23(7): 841–869
40	J W Ju. On energy-based coupled elastoplastic damage theories: Constitutive modeling and computational aspects. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(7): 803–833 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90015-2
41	J W Ju. Energy-based coupled elastoplastic damage models at finite strains. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1989, 115(11): 2507–2525 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:11(2507
42	Y D Murray. Modeling rate effects in rock and concrete. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on the Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures. Washington, D.C., 1997, 65–79
43	50081-2002 GB/T. Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2002 (in Chinese)
44	55-2011 JGJ. Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011 (in Chinese)
45	98-2010 JGJ/T. Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Masonry Mortar. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010 (in Chinese)
46	50123-2019 GB/T. Standard for Soil Test Method. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019 (in Chinese)

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed